GENEALOGY COLLECTION
'rilE CLAN DOIsALD.
THE CLAN DONALD
BV THE
Rev. a. MACDONALD,
MINISTER UH klLLEAUiVAA.
AND THE
Rev. a. MACDONALD,
MINISTER OF KILTAULITY.
V
VOL L
The sovereignty of the Gael to the Clan Cholla,
It is right to proclaim it."
Entienuss :
THE NORTHERN COUNTIES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Ltd.
1896.
1470839
TO
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
THE LADY MACDONALD,
WIFE OF RONALD ARCHIBALD, LORD MACDONALD,
HEIR MALE OF JOHN MACDOIfALD OF ISLA,
EABL OP ROSS AND LORD OF THE ISLES, THIRTY-FIRST IN DESCENT FROM
SOMERLED,
KING OF THE ISLES AND LORD OF ARGYLL,
THIS FIRST VOLUME OF
THE CLAN DONALD
IS WITH MUCH RESPECT
DEDICATED
BY HER LADYSHIP'S CLANSMEN,
THE AUTHORS.
PREFACE.
This is the first of* three volumes of the Clan
Donald History, undertaken at the request of
the Clan Donald Society. The large variety of
authorities to be consulted, illustrative matter
recently come to hand, and an Appendix more
voluminous than was at first anticipated, these,
along with other unexpected causes, have com-
pelled the postponement of its publication beyond
the date at which it was first expected to
appear. It is hoped that, notwithstanding inevi-
table faults and failings, the manner in which
the work has so far been executed may prove
satisfactory to our Clan Donald readers, and that,
entenng as it does to a large extent upon the
domain of Scottish History, it may also prove
acceptable to the public at large. That such
a work should have been mooted at this time of
day may appear superfluous to those who believe
that the subject has already been treated exhaus-
tively throughout its wide extent. Such an
assumption is very wide of the mark. The late
Dr Skene, even in his earlier and less mature work
on " The Highlanders of Scotland," in which he
has occasion to refer at considerable lenc^th to
Vlll. PREFACE.
" Siol Chuinu," did not profess to write the history
of the Clan Donald ; and Mr Donald Gregory —
than whom no more painstaking, thorough, or con-
scientious student of Scottish history ever lived —
wrote of this Clan only so far as to illustrate the
general history of the Highlands up to 1625. Mr
Charles Fraser-Mackintosh, in his erudite researches
regarding "The Last Macdonalds of Isla," i.e., of
Dunnyveg, has only touched upon a part of the
stirring annals of that House. Mr Alexander
Mackenzie, M.J. I., is doubtless responsible for a
compilation entitled " The History of the Mac-
donalds and Lords of the Isles," drawn principally
from the pages of Skene, Gregory, the Clanranald
Book of 1819, Wood's Douglas's Peerage, and other
writers. It is clear, however, that a production
of this nature, based upon second-hand materials
rather than upon primary sources of historical
study, cannot, upon the most charitable view, be
regarded as a serious contribution to the literature
of the subject. Even as a compilation it is
defective in scope. Many Macdonald families
whose position was outstanding, and whose annals
abounded in most stirring events — such as Dunny-
veg, Antrim, Ardnamurchan, Largie, and others-
have been passed over with a mere reference in this
"History of the Macdonalds and Lords of the Isles."
The period embraced in this volume extends from
the twelfth down to the middle of the sixteenth
century, the purpose being to trace the history of
PREFACE. IX.
the Lordship of the Isles not only to the fall of
the House of Isla in 1493, but also to record the
successive attempts made to restore it down to the
last move by Sir James Macdonald in 1545-6. While
wiiting the earlier chapters we felt embarrassed by
our remoteness from the or'reat libraries of the South,
and consequently this part of the volume may have
to some extent suffered as regards thoroughness of
research. With respect to the bulk of the volume
these difficulties have been overcome. Through the
great kindness of Miss Yule, of Tarradale House, the
rich resources of the London Library were placed at
our disposal, while through the unwearied co-operation
of an accomplished Clanswoman, Miss Macdonell of
Keppoch, we have obtained many valuable extracts
from the Library of the British Museum. We also
spent much time among the various libraries of the
" Modern Athens," and obtained from a number of
sources information both interesting and fresh. To
Mr Morrison of the Public Library, Mr Clark of
tlie Advocates' Library, Dr Joseph Anderson of
the Society of Antiquaries Library, and to Mr
Maitland-Thomson of the Historical Department
of the Register House, we tender our sincerest
thanks for the facilities so kindly and courteously
afforded. The valuable private library of Beaufort
Castle, Inverness-shire, was with great kindness
opened up to us by Lord Lovat. Its varied
collection of club publications and other historical
works have proved of immense assistance, and we
X. PREFACE.
beg to record our deep sense of his lordship's
courtesy and consideration.
In the course of our researches we have consulted
at first hand such repositories of historical lore as
the Annals of the Four Masters, The Annals of
Ulster, The Annals of Loch Ce, Hugh Macdonald's
MS., the Macdonald MS. of 1700, The Chronicle
of Man, Anecdotes of Olave the Black, The
Chartulary of Paisley, Haco's Expedition, Acts of
the Scottish Parliament, Rymer's Foedera, Ayloffe's
Calendar of Ancient Charters, Potuli Scoti?e,
Patent Roll, Anderson's Historical Documents of
Scotland, Robertson's Index of Charters, Register
of the Great Seal, Exchequer Rolls, Chamberlain
Rolls, Acts of the Lords of Council, Registei'
of the Privy Seal, Documents in State Paper Office,
with many other historical works written on the
Highlands of Scotland.
Mrs Ramsay of Kildalton very kindly lent us a
copy of " The Book of Islay," printed for private
circulation only, and containing much material for
our work, available mostly for the period embraced
in our second volume.
To the heads of the great Families of the Isles
who so readily responded to our request for help
we owe a deep debt of gratitude. Lord Macdonald
and the Chief of Clanranald, who have placed at
our disposal a mass of most valuable papers, have
conferred a very great obligation not only upon
us but through us upon the Clan in general, and
PREFACE. XI.
no effort will be spared to turn these documents —
relating to the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth
centuries — to the very best account. Lord Antrim's
courteous response to our enquiries as to historical
documents connected with his Family calls for our
warmest thanks.
Colonel Macdonald of Glenaladale and iEneas R.
Macdonald, Esq. of Morar, in proof of the great
interest they take in our work, have kindly furnished
us with historical documents of considerable interest
and value. We record with sincere thanks the
interest displayed in our work by our friend and
countryman, Alexander Macdonald, Esq. of Bal-
ranald and Edenwood, head of the Clann Domhnuill
Herraich, who with his wonted kindness has furnished
us with valuable genealogical notes connected w^ith
the ancient family of which he is the representative.
We beg also to acknowledge our obligations to
Captain Allan Macdonald of Waternish, head of the
house of Balfinlay, for the warm interest he has
manifested in us and in our work, as well as for
interesting historical materials available for our
second volume. We desire to record with most
grateful recollections the aid and co-operation
rendered us by one of the warmest- hearted of
Clansmen and best of Highlanders, Alexander
Macdonald, Esq. of Treaslan, Portree. For various
contributions towards this and the succeeding
volumes we have to acknowledge our indebtedness
to that genial and enthusiastic Clansman, Dr
Xll. PREFACE.
Keith Norman Macdonald of Ediiibane Hospital,
Skye, the Orpheus of the Clan, whose volumes on
the music and song of the Gael are the delight of
all Highlanders.
Among others who have assisted us during the
progress of this volume special reference is due to
Charles Fraser-Mackintosh, Esq. of Drummond,
lately M.P. for Inverness-shire, whose services,
whether in the field of literature or politics, deserve
the everlasting gratitude of every Highlander. We
desire also to record our obligation to Dr C. R,
Macdonald, County Medical Officer, Ayr, who
kindly placed at our disposal papers left by his
cultured father, the late Hugh Macdonald, Esq.,
Grandtully, whose memory as an indefatigable
collector and writer of Clan Donald lore deserves
honourable mention in any record of the Clan
Cholla. We are much indebted to the kindness
of a cultured young gentleman, D. Murray Rose,
Esq., for many valuable suggestions as to sources
of information, and for other assistance. Special
acknowledgment is likewise due to Ranald W.
Macdonald, Esq., of H.M. Customs, one of the
secretaries of the Glasgow Macdonald Society, and
John Macdonald, Esq., Newton-on-Ayr, formerly
one of the secretaries of the Glasgow Macdonald
Society, for help often asked and as often generously
and ungrudgingly given. We have further to
express our sense of the kindly help rendered us by
Andrew Ross, Esq., S.S.C., Marchmont Herald, Edin-
PREFACE. XI 11.
burgh, and W. R. Macdonald, Esq., of the Scottish
MetropoHtan Life Assurance Company, Edinburgh.
Last, but not least, we would record our gratitude
to the venerable Miss L. C E,. Macdonell, Mavis
Bank, Rothesay, daughter of that prince of High-
landers, the late Colonel Alexander Ranaldson
Macdonell of Glengarry.
We trust that the illustrations, most of which are
entirely new, will enhance the value of the volame
and its interest to the Clan. In connection with
these we have again to ex]:)ress our indebtedness to
Miss Josephine M. Macdonell of Keppoch, who has
contributed several animated battle scenes, and whose
cordial assistance has ever been ungrudgingly
bestowed. In conclusion, we must in justice
express our obligations to the manager of the
Northern Counties Printing and Publishing Com-
pany, Limited (Mr Livingston), whose valuable
advice and unfailing urbanity have made the passage
of this volume through the press most pleasant to
remember.
July 7, 1896.
co:n'te:n^ts.
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTORY.
Page.
Difficulties of the Subject. — Primitive Populations. — Picts and Dalriads. —
Union of Dalriada and Pictavia. — The Norse Occupation. — Kingdom
of Man and the Isles. — Traces of the Norseman. — Tlie Gall-Gael . 1
CHAPTER II.
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD.
Rise of the Kingdom of Alban. — Rise and Growth of English Influence. —
Feudal Scotland. — Origin of the Clan Donald. — Theories on the
Subject. — The Dalriadic Origin. — Genealogj' of the Clan down to
Somerled ............ 18
CHAPTER III.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE.— 1100-1164.
Gilledomnan. — Gillebride na h-uaimh. — His attempt to recover the Family
Inheritance. — His Failure. — Rise of Somerled. — Early Life. — Gaelic
Rising. — The Maclnneses. — Somerled's Leadership and Strategy. —
Regulus of Argyll. — Olave the Red.— Marriage with Ragahildis. —
Accession of Godred. — Rebellion in Man. — Battle off Isla. — Division
of Isles. — Conquest of Man. — Malcolm Macbeth. — Somerled's Treaty
with Malcolm IV. — Somerled's Invasion of Scotland.— His Death,
Character, and Position ......... 36
CHAPTER IV.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED.— 1164-1266.
The Sons of Somerled. — Di\'ision of Patrimony. — Strife between Reginald
and Angus. — Death of Angus. — Reginald Succeeds to his Estates. —
Character of Reginald. — Question of Seniority. — Descendants of
XVI. CONTENTS.
Paoe.
Dugald Mac Somerled. — The Sons of Reginald. — Descent of King
Alexander upon Argyll in 1221-2. — Descent in 1249. — Position of
Ewiu of Lorn. — Donald of Isla. — Angus Mor. — Scottish Aggi'cssion
in Isles. — Roderick of Bute. — Haco's Expedition — Battle of Largs. —
Cession of Isles. — Position of the Island Lords . . . . .56
• CHAPTER V.
BRUCE AXD THE CLAN CHOLLA.— 1284-1329.
Death of Alexander III. and subsequent Anarch}-. — Angus Mor's Relation
to Scottish Parties. — Convention of Estates Settling Crown. — Angus
Mor favours the Bruce Interest — Death of Angus Mor. — Division of
Territories. — Alexander of Isla Suj^ports England. — Defeat by Bruce,
Caiitivity, and Death. —Angus Og joins Bruce. — Bannockburn. —
Death of Angus Og 80
CHAPTER VI.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA.- 1330-1386.
John of Isla. — His rehition to .Scottish Pai-ties. — Treaty with Balliol. —
Forfeiture. — Foifciture of Reginald Macruaii. — Pardon fnd Rein.state-
ment. — Assassination of Reginald Macruari. — John aud the Lands of
Garmoran, &c. John at the Battle of Poictiers. —His Captivity. —
Ransom. — Connection with the Nati nal Party.- Second Marriage.—
Constable of Edinburgh ' Castle. — High Steward of Scotland. —
Rebellion.— Treaty of Inverness. — Lordship of the Isles. — John's
Eminence.- Death. — Controversial Questions. — The Two Marriages . 103
CHART El! VII.
DONALD OF HARLAW.
The Succession of Donald to the Lfn-dship of the Isles. — Reginald and the
Crown Charter of 1373. — The jiosition of Godfrey. — John Mor
Tainistear and Alasdair Carrach. — Donald's policy. — Celtic supremacy.
— Alliance with England. — Richard II. at Finlaggan in Isla. —
Rebellion of Alasdair Carrach. — The Marldom of Ross. — The Lord
of the Isles inva<les the Earldom. — Defeat of .\ngus Dubh Mackay at
Dingwall. — Donald takes possession of Inverness. — March to Aber-
deen.— The Battle of Harlaw. — Defeat of Mar and his Lowlanders. —
Donald retires to the Isles. — The Regent Albany with an army
invades Ross, and takes po.ssessiou of the Earldom. — Albany's
Campaigns in Argyle. — John of Fordoun's Treaty of Poi-tgilp. —
The Rebellion of John Mor. — Character and Death of the Hero of
Harlaw 130
CONTENTS. XVll.
CHAPTER VTII.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS.— 1425-1449.
Page.
Alexander's Accession to the Lordship. — James I. returns. — Earldom of
Ross in the Crown. — James I. ^^sits Inverness. — Convention. — State
of Highlands. — Murder of John Mor. — Dispute about Garmoran. —
Murder of Alexander MacGorrie. — Imprisonment of Lord of Isles. —
His Liberation. — His Revolt. — Surrender at Holyrood. — Captivity in
Tantallon. — Inverlochy. —Release of Alexander. — Murder of James I.
— Alexander receives the Earldom. — Appointed Justiciar. — Favours
to Mackintosh. — Death of Alexander. — His Character . . . 169
♦ CHAPTER IX.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS.
John de lie, Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles.— The Earl a Minor when
he succeeded. — Minority of James II. — League between the Earls of
Ross, Crawford, and Douglas. — The Earl of Ross in Rebellion. —
Murder of the Earl of Douglas. — The Earl of Ross and his Ross-shire
Neighbours. — Raids on Orkney by the Islemen. — Meeting of Douglas
and Macdonald at Dunstaffuage. — Invasion of the King's Lands by
Donald Balloch. — Raid of Lismore. —Discomfiture of Bishop Lauder.
— The Lady of the Isles Escapes from the Highlands. — John receives
favours from the King. — He is appointed one of the Wardens of the
Marches.— The Earl of Ross at the Siege of Roxburgh. — Treaty of
Ardthornish ........... 200
CHAPTER X.
DECLINE AND FALL OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA.— 1462-1498.
Events following Ardthornish Treaty. — Its Discovery. — Cause of Dis-
covery.— Indictment. — Summons. — Forfeiture. — Expeditions against
John. — He Submits. — Resignation. — Partial Re-instatement and New
Honour.— Charter of 1476.— Sentiment in Isles.— Angus Og.— His
Attitude. — Rebellion in Knapdale. — Invasion of Ross. — Feud with
Mackenzie. — Lagabraad. — Bloody Bay. — Abduction of Donald Dubh.
—Raid of Athole.— The Probable Facts. — Angus' Reconciliation to
his Father.— Assassination of Angus Og. — Alexander of Lochalsh. —
Invasion of Ross.— Battle of Park.— John's Final Forfeiture and
Death 241
XVllL CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XI.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV.— 1493-1519.
Page.
State of the Highland.^ after the Forfeiture of the Lord of the Isles. —
James IV. visits the Highlands, and holds Court at Dunstaffnage. —
Several Highland Chiefs submit to the King. — The King at Tarbert
in Kintyre. — Left Garrisons at Tarbert and Dunaverty. — Revolt of
the Clan Iain Mhoir. — The King at Mingarry receives Submission of
many of the Highland Chiefs. — Legislation for the Isles. — Rebellion
of Alexander of Lochalsh, — The King grants Charters at his new
Castle of Kilkerran, in Kintyre. — The King revokes Charters
formerly granted by him to the Highland Chiefs. — Rebellion of
Donald Dubh. — Legislation for the Highlands. — Appointment of
Sheriffs. — The position of the different Branches of the Clan Donald.
— The Highlanders at Flodden. — First Rebellion of Sir Donald of
Lochalsh. — Second Rebellion of Sir Donald of Lochalsh. — His Death. 283
CHAPTER XII.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V.— 1519-1545.
Rise of the House of Argyle. — Bonds of Maurent to Clan Donald. —
Escape of James V., and change of Policy. — Troubles in the North
and South Isles. — Donald Gruamach. — Alexander of Dunnyveg. —
Feud of Clan Iain Mhoir with Argyle. — The Clan Maclean unite
with Clan Iain Mhoir against Argyle. — Argyle Invades Maclean
Territory. — Cawdor's Proposals for Pacifying Isles. — Mission of
Robert Hart. — Mission of Argyle and Murray. — The King takes the
Isles in hand. — Alexander of Dunnyveg Submits. — Argyle's Dis-
appointment. — Alexander of Dunny veg's Indictment. — Argyle's
Disgrace. — Rebellion of Donald Gorme of Sleat. — Siege of Elian -
donan. — Death of Donald Gorme. — Royal Progi'ess through Isles. —
Captivity of Chiefs. — Death of James V. — Escape of Donald Dubh. —
Scottish Parties. — Liberation of Chiefs. — Donald Dubh Invades
Argyle and Lochaber. — Correspondence with Henry VIII. — Proclam-
ation against Rebels. — Donald Dubh and Earl of Lennox. — Failure of
Rebellion. — Death of Donald Dubh. — Pretensions of James of Dunny-
veg to the Lordship. — Abdication of Claims ..... 327
CHAPTER XIII.
SOCIAL HISTORY.
Structure of Celtic Society. — The Council of St Finlaggan. — Accounts of
Proclamation of Lords of the Isles. — An Independent Mortuath. —
Tametry. —The Toshach. — The Judge.— Officials. — Relation to the
CONTENTS, XIX.
Page.
Land. — The Tribe Lands. — Demesne and Church Lands. — Law of
Gavel. — The Nubility and Commonalty. — Mackintosh Charter. —
Herezeld Blodwite. — Ward and Relief. — Marriage Law. — Hand-
fasting.— State and Wealth of Highland Princes .... 391
CHAPTER XIV.
THE CHURCH AND EDUCATION.
The Celtic Church. — Its Character. — Its Decay, — Rise of Latin Church. —
Diocese of Isles. — Somerled in Man. — S. Machutus. — Saddell. — Its
Foundation and Endowment. — Tayinloan. — Abbey of lona Built and
Religious Orders Established by Reginald. — Connection with
Paisley. —The Good John and his Wife as Church Patrons. — Oransay
Priory. — Trinity Chapel, Carinish. — Grimsay Oratory. — Sons of
John of Isla and the Church. — Howmore.— Earls of Ross. —
Education,— Art 446
APPENDICES.
Charter by Reginald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Paisley Abbey . .485
Charter by Donald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Paisley Abbey . . . 486
Charter by Angus Macdonald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Paisley Abbey . 487
Confirmation of the Gift of the Church of St. Kiaran, in Kintyre, by
Angus Macdonald of Islay, Lord of the Isles, to Paisley Abbey . . 487
Gift of the Church of St. Kiaran 1:>}' Alexander of Isla, Lord of the Isles,
to Paisley Abbey 488
Safe Conduct to Angus Macdonald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, and Alexander,
his son ... 489
Agreement by Angus Macdonald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, and Alexander,
his son, to keep the peace within the Isles ...... 489
Summons to John Balliol from Edward I., concerning Alexander of Isla,
Lord of the Isles, and Juliana, his wife ...... 490
Appointment of Alexander of Isla, Lord of the Isles, as Bailie of Kintyre,
by Edward 1 491
Grant by Edward I, to Alexander of Isla, Lord of the Isles . . . 491
Commission by Edward I. to Alexander of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to arrest
the rebels of Argyle and Ross 492
Statement by Alexander of Isla, Lord of the Isles, in which he vindicates
his conduct ........... 492
Letter from Angus Og of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Edward I. . . . 494
Charter Ijy Robert I. to Roderick, the son of Allan ..... 495
Confirmation by Edward 111. of Charter by Edward Balliol to Jolui of
Isla, Lord of the Isles 496
Safe Conduct for John of the Isles by Edward III 4J>7
XX. CONTENTS.
Paoe.
Safe Conduct for John of the Isles by Edward III 497
Commission to the Earl of SaU.-sbury to treat with John of Isla, Lord of
the Isles 498
Letter from Edward III. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles . . , 499
Charter by David 11. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 500
Safe Conduct for John of Isla, Lord of the Isles, prisoner in Wales . . 501
Confirmation by David II. of Charter to John of Isla, Lord of the Islee . 501
Charter by Robert II. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 501
Death of Ranald Macruari 502
Confirmation of Charter by John of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Reginald.
his sou, by Robert II. 502
Charter of Robert II. of the Lands of Colousay to John of Islay, Lord of
the Isles 503
Charter of Robert II. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles, of the Lands of
Lochaber ............ 504
Charter of David II. to John of Isla, and Margaret, his wife, of the Lands
of Buchanan 504
Safe Conduct for Donald, son of John of Isla, Lord of the Isles, student
at Oxford ..... ....... 505
Safe Conduct for Hugh of the Isles 505
Commission to the Bishop of the Isles to treat with the sons of John of
Isla, Lord of the Isles ......... 505
Charter by Godfrey Macdouald, Lord of Uist, to the Monastery of St
John's, Inchafiray £06
Charter by Donald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Lachlau Maclean of Dowart 507
Safe Conduct for John Mor Tanisteir, and Donald, his brother . . 508
Aneut Treating with Donald of the Isles 509
Latin Poem on Somerled, King of the Isles, and Lord of Argyle . . 509
Lines on Somerled 511
Charter by Donald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Angus Mackay of Strath-
naver, and Neil, his son . . . . . . . . .512
Anent Treating with Donald of the Isles ....... 513
Gaelic Charter by Macdonald to Brian Vicar Mackay .... 513
Anent Treating with Donald of the Isles ....... 515
Incitement to Battle addressed to Macdouald of the Isles and his Army at
Harlaw by MacVuirich . . . . . . . . ,516
Charter by Donald of Isla, Lord of the Isles, to Maclean .... 525
The Genealogy of Siol Chuinn from Conn to Somerled .... 525
Charter by Alexa^ler of Isla, Earl of Ross, and Lord of the Isles, to
Alexander M'CuUoch 527
Charter of Confirmation from Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross, and Lord of
the Isles, to Sir Walter of Innes, Lord of that Ilk .... 528
Charter by Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross, and Lord of the Isles, to
Hugh Rose of Kih-avock 529
Charter of Badenoch, &c., by the Earl of Ross 530
Precept of Sasine in favour of William, Thane of Cawdor, by Alexander,
Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles 531
Charter by Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross, in favour oi Alexander, Earl
of Huntly 532
Charter by Alexander of Isla, Earl of Roes, to Mackintosh . . , 533
CONTEN'fS. Xxl.
Page.
Confirmation by James II. of Charter bji- the Earl of Ro.ss to John
Ski'imgeom-e ........... 534
Charter of the Bailliary of Lochaber by Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross, to
Malcolm Mackintosh 535
Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles, to the Master
of Sutherland ........... 535
Grant of Kilkerran Church to Paisley Abbey, by John of Isla, Earl of
Ross and Lord of the Isles ......... 536
The Clan Macinnes , 537
Precept of Sasine in favour of William, Thane of Cawdor, by John of Isla,
Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles ....... 537
Precept by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, in favour of Thomas of Dingwall . 538
Precept of Sasine in favour of John Munro of Fowlis by John of Isia, Earl
of Ross and Lord of the Isles . . . . . . . .539
Charter to Donald Coi-batt by John of Isla, Earl of Ross .... 539
Confirmation by James III. of Charter to Thomas, younger of Dingwall,
by John of Isla, Earl of Ross 541
Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to the Abbey of Fearn . . . 541
Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to his brother, Celestine . . . 543
Confirmation by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, of the lands of Innermerky to
William of Cawdor . ......... 545
Charter of John of Isla, Earl of Ross ....... 545
Confirmation by James III. of Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to
Thomas Cuming 546
Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to John Davidson .... 546
Deed by Donald Balloch Macdonald 548
Armorial Bearings of the Lords of the Isles ..,,,. 548
Commission to the Earl of Lennox to carry through the forfeiture of the
Earl of Ross 550
Articles of Agreement between James III. and John of Isla, Lord of the
Isles 553
Charter by James III. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 564
Charter by James III. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 556
Confirmation by James III. of Charter by Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross,
to Walter Ogilvy 557
Confirmation by James III. of Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to
John Davidson ........... 557
Charter by James III. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 559
Charter by James III. to John of Isla, Lord of the Isles .... 560
Confirmation by James III. of Charter by John of Isla, Lord of the Isles,
to Alexander Lesly . . . . . . . . .561
Confirmation by James III. of Charter by John of Isla, Lord of the Isles,
to John Davidson .......... 562
Confirmation by James IV. of Cliarter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to
the Captain of Clan Chattan ........ 562
Confirmation by James IV. of Charter by John of Isla, Earl of Ross, to
JIughof Sleat 563
Confirmation by James IV. of Charter by Alexander of Isla, Lord of the
Isles, to Macueill of Barra 563
XXll.
CONTENTS.
Page.
Confirmation b}- James IV. of Charters l>y the Lords of the Isles to the
Abbey of Saddell .564
Confirmation by James IV. of Charter by Roderick, the son of Reginald . 565
Confirmation by James IV. of a Charter of John, Lord of the Isles, of the
I'atronage of Kilberry Church 565
Charter of Modification to the Bishop of Lismore 565
Poem on the Lords of the Isles, hy O'Heiuia ...... 566
Poem on the Macdonalds, by Gillecallum Mac-an-Ollaimh. . . . 566
Poem on John of Isla, Lord of the Isles 567
Poem on Angus Og Macdonald, by John of Knoydart .... 568
Poem on John, Lord of the Isles, and Angus, his son, by Gillecallum
Mac-an-Ollaimh ........... 509
1700 MS. on the Marriage of John of Isla 570
1700 MS. on the Marriage of Angus Og 570
ILLUSTRATIOI^S, &c.
Page.
Gaelic Charter by Donald, Lord of the Isles, 1408 1
Dun Aonghais, North Uist 16
Dun Torquil, North Uist 16
Ruins of Saddell Monastery, the Burial-place of Somerled ... 54
Seal of Reginald, son of Somerled ........ 64
Kilkerran Loch, Kintyre ......... 65
Fac-simile of Letter of Angus Og, Lord of the Isles, to Edward I., 1301 . 80
Fac-simile of Letter by Angus Mor and Alexander, Lords of the Isles,
to Edward 1 82
Seal of Alexander, Lord of the Isles, and Fac-simile of Superscription . 88
Saddell Castle 92
Angus Og at Bannockburn, 1314 96
Finlaggan Castle 101
Tombstone of Angus Og of Islay, and Seal of Angus Mor . , .102
Aros Castle, Mull 104
Ruins of Borve Castle, Benbecula . . . , . . . .117
Ruined Keep of Ardthornish Castle .*...., 126
Castle Tirrim 128
Shield of the Lord of the Isles . . . . ' . . .136
Battle of Harlaw, 1411 160
Battle of Inverlochy, 1431 184
Inverlochy Castle 192
Sigillum Alexaudri de Yle, Domini Insularum et Rossie .... 199
Armorial Bearings of the Lord of the Isles ...... 208 '""^
Fac-simile of Writ appointing English Commissioners to treat with John,
Earl of Ross, at Ardthornish, Rotuli Scotia?, 1461 .... 233
Armorial Bearings of the Lord of the Isles ...... 272 ^
Fac-simile of Signatures of John Carswell and Archibald Macgillivray . 336
Fac-simile of Donald Dubh's Letter to Henry VIIL, 1545 . . .344
Ruins of Knock Castle, Sleat ......... 352
Signatures to Agreement between Henry VIIL and Deputies of Donald
Dubh 382
Fac-simile of Signatures of the Island Barons to the Commission from
the Lord of the Isles of Scotland to treat with the King of England 384
Part of the Ruins of Saddell Monastery 459
Abbey Church, loua 464
Ruins of Oronsay Priory .......... 470
Ruins of St Mary's and St Columba's Churches, Howmore, South Uist . 472
^Yindow of St Columba's Church, Morveru 476
Celtic Cross at Morvern 477
Ruins of Trinity Temple, Carinish, North Uist 480
Charter by John, Lord of the Isles, 1476 . . . beginning of Appendices
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
Macdonald of the Isles, The Right Hon. The Lady, Armadale
Castle, Skye.
Atholl, His Grace The Duke of, Blair Castle, Blair-Atholl.
D'Oyley, The Most Hon. The Marchioness {nee Macdonald), Paris
(3 copies).
Antrim, The Right Hon. The Earl of, Glenarm Castle, Co. Antrim.
Lovat, The Right Hon. The Lord, Beaufort Castle, Inverness-shire.
Macdonald, The Hon. Hugh J. (heir to the British Barony of
Macdonald of EarnsclifFe), Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Macdonald of Clanranald, Admiral Sir Reginald, 1a Ovington
Square, London (3 copies).
Aylmer Morley, Mrs, Whiterdine, Founhope, Herefordshire.
Bain, James, Esq., chief librarian, Public Library, Toronto.
Barret, F. T., Esq., Mitchell Library, Glasgow.
Barron, James, Esq., Courier Ofhce, Inverness.
Bethell, W., Esq., Rise Park, Hull.
Blair, Sheriff, Ardross Terrace, Inverness.
Buchanan, A. W., Esq., Polmont.
Cameron, Donald, Esq., Lochgorm, Inverness.
Cameron, Diuican, Esq., Fettes, Muir of Ord.
Cazenove, C. D., Esq., bookseller, London.
Clark, Colonel, of Ballindoun, Ballindoun House, Beauly.
Clark, G. T., Esq., London.
Cooke, Mrs, Raeburn, Boscombe, Bournemouth.
Cunninghame, John, Esq. of Balgownie, Culross.
Darroch, Duncan, Esq. of Torridon.
Dow, The Rev. John, Manse of Knockbain, Munlochy.
Drayton, Mrs, Gobborn Park, Lanes.
Ellice, C. H., Esq., Brompton, London.
Fletcher, J. Douglas, Esq. of Rosehaugh.
Gibson, The Rev. John Mackenzie, 22 Regent Terrace, Edinburgh.
Hay, Colin, Esq., Ardbeg, Islay.
Henderson, George, Esq., Ph.D., 192 Morningside Road, Edinburgh.
Macalister, Major C. B., of Gleubarr, Kintyre.
XXV]. LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
Macallister, James, Esq., wine merchant, Ballymeua, Ireland.
MacConnell, Wm., Esq., Knockdolian, Colraonell, Ayrshire.
M'Crindle, John, Esq , Aiichinlee, Ayr.
Macdonald, Alexander, Esq. of Balranald and Edenwood, Spring-
field, Fife.
Macdonald, The Rev. Alex., Napanse, Ontario, Canada.
Macdonald, A., Esq., Commercial Bank House, Thurso.
Macdonald, A. W., Esq., Invernevis, Fort- William.
Macdonald, Andrew, Esq., solicitor, Inverness. . .
Macdonald, A. R., Esq., Ord, Isleornsay, Skye.
Macdonald, Captain Allan, of Waternish, Fasach Hoiise, Portree
(2 copies).
Macdonald, Allan, Esq., LL.D., Gleuarm, Co. Antrim.
Macdonald, Andrew H., Esq., of Calrossie, Rogart Manse.
Macdonald, Angus, Esq., Cunainbmitag, Benbecnla.
Macdonald, Colonel, of Treaslan, Portree, Skye.
Macdonald, Charles, Esq., 247 Fifth Avenue, New York.
Macdonald, Charles, Esq., 17 Oswald Street, Glasgow.
Macdonald, Dr C. R., 7 Wellington Square, Ayr.
Macdonald, Charles D., Esq., Rosario, Argentine Repnblic.
Macdonald, The Rev. (John, Rogart Manse, Sutherlandshirc.
Macdonald, The Rev. Donald, minister of N. Uist, Lochmaddy.
Macdonald, The Rev. D. J., Killean Alanse, Muasdale, Kintyre.
Macdonald, Donald, Esq. of Ramnierscales, Locherbie.
Macdonald, D. T., Esq., Calmult, Michigan, U.S.A.
Macdonald, Duncan, Esq., 2 Heriot Row, Edinburgh.
Macdonald, E., Esq., 39 Donegal Place, Belfast.
Macdonald, The Rev. Finlay R., The Manse, Coupar-Angus.
Macdonald, Henry M., Esq., 34 Broad Street, New York City, U.S.A.
Macdonald, H. A., Esq., 370 Great Western Road, Glasgow.
Macdonald, Harry, Esq., Viewfield, Portree.
Macdonald, H. L., Esq. of Dunach, Dunach House, Oban.
Macdonald, The Rev. Fred. Charles, M.A., vicar of St Hilda's,
Sunderland.
Macdonald, James, Esq., W.S., Edinburgh.
Macdonald, James, Esq., Moss Cottage, Benbecula.
Macdonald, J. J., Esq., 42 York Place, Edin})urgh.
Macdonald, John, Esq., Keppoch, Roy-Bridge.
Macdonald, J. M., Esq., Harley Street, London.
Macdonald, Colonel John A., of Glcnaladale, Glenfinan.
Macdonald, Dr Keith Norman, Gesto Hospital, Skye.
Macdonald, The Rev. Mosse, M.A., St Aidau's College, Birkenhead.
LIST OF SXJBSCRIBEES. XXVll.
Macdonald, Peter, Esq., Carlton Place, Glasgow.
Macdonald, Admiral Robertson, Edinburgh.
Macdonald, R. M. Livingstone, Esq., Flodigarry, Skye.
Macdonald, Ronald Mosse, Esq., The Homestead, Datchet.
Macdonald, The Rev. R., minister of South Uist, Lochboisdale.
Macdonald, Roderick, Esq., 17 Oswald Street, Glasgow.
Macdonald, Stuart Hugh, Esq., The Homestead, Datchet.
Macdonald, T., Esq., H.M.B.'s Supreme Court, Shanghai, China.
Macdonald, The Rev. Thomas Mosse, M.A., Canon of Lincoln and
Rector of Kersal.
Macdonald, W. R., Esq., 1 Forres Street, Edinburgh.
Macdonald, The Hon. W. J., Armadale House, Vancouver, British
Columbia.
Macdonald, Wm. M., 2nd Batt. Q.O. Cameron Highlanders.
Macdonald, Miss, Barnfield Hill, Southampton.
Macdonald, Miss Jone, of Milland Place, Sussex.
Macdonell, Dr. D., 17 Crumlea Road, Belfast.
Macdonnell, Hercules H. G., Esq., Barrister, 4 Roby Place,
Kingstown, Ireland.
Macdonnell, James, Esq. of Kilsharvan and Murlough, Ireland.
Macdonnell, Colonel John, of Kilmore, County Antrim.
Macdonnell, The Very Rev. J. Cotter, D.D., Misterton Rectory,
Lutterworth.
Macdonell, Miss L. C. R., of Glengarry, Mavis Bank, Rothesay.
Macdonell, Mrs, of Keppoch, 86 Cambridge Street, Eccleston
Square, London.
MacDougall, E. A., Esq., 14 High Street, Eccleston Square,
London, S.W.
MacDowall, The Rev. James, The Manse, Rosemarkie.
Macgregor, D. R., Esq., Melbourne, Victoria.
Maclnnes, Lt.-Colonel John, Glendaruel, Argyleshire.
Mackay, Eneas, Esq., Stirling.
Mackay, John, Esq., C.E., Hereford (2 copies).
Mackay, Wm., Esq., solicitor, Inverness.
Mackenzie, Colonel Burton, of Kilcoy, Kilcoy Castle, Muir of Ord.
Mackenzie, H. H., Esq., Balelone, Lochmaddy.
Mackenzie, The Rev. K. A., LL.D., Manse of Kingussie.
Mackenzie, Thomas, Esq., Daluaine.
Mackenzie, W. Dalziel, Esq. of Farr, Inverness-shire.
Mackintosh, Charles Eraser, Esq. of Drummond.
Maclean, Alex. Scott, Esq., Greenock.
Maclean, Charles, Esq., Milton, South Uist, Lochboisdale.
XXVlll. LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
MacLaverty, Grteme A., Esq. of Chanting Hall, Hamilton.
Macleay, Murdo, Esq., Broom Cottage, Ullapool.
Macleod, Colonel John X., of Kintarbert and Saddell, Saddell
Castle, Campbeltown.
Macleod, Norman, Esq., Gaelic bookseller, The Momid, Edinburgh.
Macrae, The Rev. Alex., Emmanuel School, Wandsworth Common,
London, S.W.
Macrae, The Rev. G. W. B., Manse of Cross, Stornoway.
Macrae, John, Esq., late of Langash, North Uist.
Macquarrie, The Rev. A. J., Manse of Ferintosh.
Martin, Adam W., Esq., Knock, Belfast.
Martin, Major Martin, R.E., Howwood, Renfrewshire.
Mainwaring, Charles, Esq., Feugh Cottage, Banchory, Aberdeen.
Millar, Miss J. Macdonald, Courthill, Hermitage Gardens, Edin-
burgh.
Moreton, Lt. -Colonel A. H. Macdonald, Benbridge, Isle of Wight.
Morrison, Dr Alex. C, Lochside Cottage, Larkhall.
Noble, John, Esq., Inverness (9 copies).
Pearson, Dr Archd., 4 Middleton Terrace, Ibrox, Glasgow.
Pender-Smith, Dr J., Dingwall.
Perrins, Mrs Dyson, Davenham, Malvern.
Pryor, Mrs, Armadale, Cecil Road, Boscombe, Bournemouth.
Rankin, The Rev. E. A., B.D., Kilmorack Manse, Beauly,
Rawlins, The Rev. J. Arthur, M.A., St. Andrew's Vicarage,
Willesden, London.
Roberts, Mrs Vernon, D\inloskin, Kersal, Manchester.
Ryan, Mrs James, Glenomera, Cejdon.
Sinclair, The Ven. Wm. Macdonald, Archdeacon of London, The
Chapter House, St. Paul's, London.
Sykes, Harold P., Esq., 2nd Dragoon Giiards.
Tolmie, The Rev. A. M. C, M.A., The Manse, Campbeltown.
Yule, Miss A. F., Tarradale House, Muir of Ord.
THE CLAN DONALD.
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTORY.
Difficulties of the Subject. — Primitive Populations. — Picts and
Dalriads. — Union of Dalriada and Pictavia. — The Norse
Occupation. — Kingdom of Man and the Isles. — Traces of the
Norseman. — The Gall-Gael.
The descent and early history of the Clan Donald,
like those of the other Highland clans, are involved
in much obscurity. From the materials at the
disposal of the historian, it is difficult, if not impos-
sible, to weave anything like a clear, reliable, or
consistent narrative. Fact and fiction are so often,
mixed up together, and tradition so frequently con-
flicts with what is regarded as authentic history,
that the task of the historian sometimes assumes
great, perhaps unmanageable, proportions. The
Clan Donald, however, occupy so conspicuous and
important a position in the annals of the country,
that any attempt to throw further light upon its
rise and history may be regarded as worthy of
commendation, even should it meet with but partial
success.
The origin of this Clan is bound up wiiii some of
the most important questions of Scottish ethnology.
In order, therefore, to lead up to a more or less
clear conception of the subject, it seems desirable
I
2 THE CLAN DONALD.
that we should have recourse to the scanty materials
available for the construction of a history of the
early inhabitants of the country. The history
of Great Britain, so far as it has been written,
commences with the Koman occupation, about the
middle of the first century. But archaeologists,
going back into the dim and hoary past, have found
vestiges of a race that occupied the land at a period
long prior to recorded time. Traces have been dis-
covered of a prehistoric non-Aryan race, resembling
the Iberians and the Aquitani, a race short statured,
long skulled, dark haired, and dark complexion ed ;
that lived in caves, and buried their dead in caves
and chambered tombs ; the representatives of the
Stone Age, whose polished stone weapons of various
kinds are the treasure and delight of the antiquary.
They were probably the same race as the ancient
tin miners of Cornwall, to whom Herodotus makes
reference, and who, from their practice of carrying
bags as receptacles for the metal, are supposed to
have been the Ji7'-holg of Irish mythology. To. them
also do we owe the so-called Druidical circles ;
barrows, and other stone remains which are found
scattered over European lands ; silent witnesses of
the oldest phase of religious culture of which our
Western lands bear any trace.
Long before the historical period a new wave, a
Celtic Aryan race, Gaidhels or Goidels, visited our
island, and pushed the aboriginal race into the more
distant and inaccessible mountainous regions to the
north and west. They spoke a language which is
in our day represented by the Manx Gaelic and the
Gaelic of Scotland and Ireland. These in their turn
were followed and ])ressed northwards and west-
ward by another Celtic Aryan race, the Britons or
INTRODUCTORY. 3
Brythons, whose language now survives only in
Wales. The Gaidhels were probably bronze users,
while the Brythonic invaders — as a later wave —
were versed in the use of iron tools and weapons.
When the Romans came to Britain the country
was more or less divided among the fore-mentioned
races, and this continued very much the case until
the close of the Koman occupation in 410 a.d.
Confining our attention to Scotland, we find that
Roman historians make mention of two nations
occupying that land in the second century, whom
they denominate the Caledonii and the Meatae.
These names in the course of time disappear, and
are succeeded by the Picti and Attacotti. Such a
variety of names is perplexing to the historian,
but, notwithstanding much ingenuity displayed by
various writers, there is every reason to believe that
they are all applicable to the one Goedelic race,
which, as already stated, followed the pre-historic
race as the predominant occupiers of the North of
Scotland. These people, properly designated as the
Alban Gael, though territorially divided into two
or more provinces, and speaking probably slightly
different dialects of the same tongue, were yet in all
racial characteristics one. The best authorities are
agreed that they were homogeneous with the
Cruithne of Ireland, where, as in Scotland, they
succeeded the Firbolg, and that their language,
around which such fierce controversy has been
waged, was an archaic type of our modern Scottish
Gaelic. The date of their advent to Scotland is of
course a question of great obscurity, though in all
probability it must have been some time between
500 and 300 B.C. During a period of nearly 400
years this brave race baffled in many a red field the
4 THE CLAN DONALD.
mighty legionaries of Eome, and though time and
again they were driven, by the force of numbers
and superior disciphne, to their native fastnesses,
they remained unconquered.
For 200 years after the evacuation of Britain by
the Romans, the history of Scotland is almost a
blank, and when, in the beginning of the seventh
century, the light of history again dawns upon us,
we find four distinct peoples occupying as many
different districts of our present Scotland. The
Picts or Alban Gael have to all appearance absorbed
and assimilated, or at any rate converted to their
own speech and social customs, the non- Aryan
people they found in the land, and are now the
predominating race. The Britons occupy the
region of Strathclyde, while two new races, the
Angles and the Dalriadic Scots, have made settle-
ments ^f their own. The Alban Gael occupied
the country north of the Firth of Forth ; the
Britons the region of Strathclyde, and thence
south to Cumberland ; the Angles that fi'om
the Forth to the Humber ; and the Scots of Dalriada
the country afterwards known as Oirirghaidheal,
Islay, a part of Mull and some of the lesser Southern
Isles. ^ These four races are on the whole the
materials out of which the modern Scottish nation
has been formed, and it is clear that even the
Lowland Scot has in him as much of the Celt
as of the Teuton. As regards the Iberian or
pre-historic i)opulation, it is probable that the type,
though absorbed as to language and social life
into the larger and more })owerful organism of
the Celt, yet in its physical characteristics still
survives in the small, dark -haired, black-eyed
^ Vide Map of Four Kingdoms in Skene's Celtic Scotland.
INTRODUCTORY. 5
natives of parts of the north-west of Scotland, as
it is also to be found in Wales, as well as in Ireland
west of the Shannon. Every nation is more or less
a blend of several nationalities ; but nowhere is this
more marked than in the Scottish Highlands, where
there seems to be more of an admixture of races
than in any country in Europe of the same size.
As already indicated, the Picts or Alban Gael
occupied by far the greater portion of the country.
To the north of the Firth of Forth they were
divided into the Northern and Southern Picts ; the
former holding the country north of the Grampians,
and the latter inhabiting the region from that
mountain range south to the Firth of Forth. Not
only so, but in the counties of Wigtown and Kirk-
cudbright there was a settlement of what were
called the Niduarian Picts, and in the debateable
region south of the Firth of Forth they had settle-
ments in the neighbourhood of Edinburgh, and have
left traces of their presence in the name of the
Pentland Hills.
The founders of the Scottish kingdom of Dalriada
were also an offshoot of the Goedelic branch of the
Celtic tree. Both in Scotland and Ireland they are
found appearing at a period subsequent to the
Cruithne. The kingdoms of the Picts and of the
Scots seem, in fact, to have been two collateral
Gaelic nationalities, with well-defined dynasties and
territories, embracing regions in both lands. Most
writers are agreed that the colony of Irish Scots
settled permanently in Argyll about the beginning
of the sixth century. That for several centuries
prior to that date there had been Irish immigrations
to the Scottish coast on a greater or lesser scale
seems highly probable. Indeed, when we bear in
6 THE CLAN DONALD.
mind the nearness of Kintyre to the North of
Ireland, intercourse must have been frequent in very
early times. During the Koman occupation mention
is frequently made by historians of the wandering
Irish, who, like the Scandinavians of later days,
infested the coastlands of Scotland, and at times
carried their predatory incursions into the heart of
the country. Irish historians have sometimes proved
imaginatis^e guides in threading the mazes of these
early centuries. Yet there is nothing inherently
improbable in the statement that the first Dalriadic
settlers were brought over to Scotland in the middle
of the third century by Cairbre Riada ; meaning the
Ruadh or red-haired, after whom a territory in the
North of Ireland, the Houtes and Glens, derives its
name.^ The centre of these early settlements was
Kintyre, whose ancient name of Dalruadhain was a
form of the Irish Dalriada. The theory that the
King of the Alban Gaels or Picts, finding his
kingdom harassed by the Britons of Strath clyde on
the one hand, and the Angles on the other, invited
the Dalriads to Argyll, seems, all things considered,
a highly probable one. They were not destined,
however, to keep the peace long with any of the
neighbouring nationalities, and their future relations
with the Alban Gael is a long story of strife and
bloodshed.
When we come to the middle of the fifth century
we stand upon firmer historical ground. About that
time, perhaps a little later. Ere, King of Dalriada,
died, leaving three sons, Fergus, Lorn, and Angus.
A dispute arose as to the succession, when, according
to the Celtic law of Tanistry, Olchu, their father's
brother, assumed the sceptre, to the exclusion of
' According to the Anuals of the Four Masters, in 506 a.d.
INTRODUCTORY. 7.
Fergus, the eldest son. Thereupon Fergus, with
his two brothers, crossed the Irish Channel, after
obtaining the blessing of St Patrick,^ and landed on
the coast of Argyll, with, it is said, only one hundred
and fifty followers. From this period onwards the
history of Argyll becomes the history of the Scots
Dalriads, and from the fact that we find no record
of opposition to their settlement, we may infer that
the inhabitants must have been largely recruited
from the same Irish stock in former times. The
three brothers divided the country into three
districts ; Lorn occupying the district which
bears his name, as well as the greater portion of
Argyll, while Angus acquired the lands of Islay and
Jura, and Fergus, the eldest, possessed Kin tyre,
and on the death of Lorn succeeded him in his exten-
sive dominions. All three were dependent upon the
Irish kingdom of Dalriada. This subjection to the
parent stock continued for more than sixty years,
and until the time of Aidan, when finally, by the
intervention of St Columba, it was agreed at the
great Council of Drumceat to free the Scots Dalriads
from paying the customary tribute, thus making
them an independent nation. It was stipulated
that in the time of war the Scots Dalriads must
assist their Irish allies. Aidan thus became the first
King of Dalriada, and held Court at Dunadd, which
became the capital of the new kingdom, none of his
predecessors having attained a higher dignity than
that of Toiseach, or chief ruler of a tribe.
After the period at which we have now arrived,
it is unnecessary to follow in detail, at anyrate at
this stage of our work, the fortunes or the genea-
logies of the Dalriad,ic kings or their relations to
^ Albauic Duau,
8 THE CLAN DONALD.
other Scottish iiationahties. Durii-kg the period
leadint,'- up to the coiisohdatioii of Scottish Dalriada,
as Avell as for some time thereafter, there were the
usual internal broils ; Kintyre against Lorn, and
both, singly or together, against the Britons of
Strathclyde. Much of the civil discord sprang from
the operation of the Celtic law of succes&ion, in
which direct hereditary descent often conflicted with
the will and interests of the tribe. In time the
descendants of Angus dropped out of sight, and his
family became extinct in the male line, but his
grand-daughter having married the grandson of
Fergus Mor, his possessions were added to those of
the reigning house of Dalriada.
The light of Scottish history waxes very dim
during the sixth, seventh, and eighth centuries, but
it seems to fail us altogether in the ninth, when
there is in truth a darkness that can be felt. It
would appear, however, that up to the year 733 a.d.
there was no serious collision between the Dalriads
and their neighbours the Alban Gael. But in that
year we find it recorded in the Annals of Ulster
that Angus Mac Fergus, the King of the Alban
Gael, invaded the territory of the Dalriads with a
powerful army, and, after a series of sanguinary
combats, defeated them. He subdued them finally
in the year 741, and added Dalriada as a province
to his kingdom. The Annals of Ulster of that year
record " the downfall of the Dalriads by Angus Mac
Fergus." This Angus Mac Fergus was the greatest
of all the kings of the Alban Gael, if the Irish
Annals are to be relied on, and it was he who laid
the foundation of the future kingdom of present
Scotland.
INtRODUCTOHY. 9
From the year 741 a.d., when Dalriada became
a province of the Northern Kingdom, to the year
843, Scottish history is intensely obscure. We are
not disposed to adopt either of the extreme views
that have been advanced by writers as to the
circumstances leading to the elevation of Kenneth
MacAlpin in that year to the throne of a united
realm. On the one hand the older view, that his
accession was the result of conquest, in the course
of which the Pictish race was annihilated by the
Dalriadic Scots, is an absurd and thrice-exploded
historical fiction. The paternity of this view is
undoubtedly to be traced to the monkish writers of
St Andrews, who inserted it in their Register of
that See in the year 1251, or 400 years after the
pretended event. John of Fordun, that prince of
fabulists, gave further currency to that and other
myths in his Chronicle, which he finished about the
year 1400 a.d. Other monkish writers followed in
the same vein, and the more the ball of fable rolled
the more it gathered volume, until it became at last
a veritable planet in the ecclesiastical nebula.
From other sources, such as Nennius, the Saxon
Chronicler of 891 a.d., the Welsh Triads, the Irish
Annals, and the Albanic Duan, it seems undoubted
that Kenneth MacAlpm's succession to the Pictish
Kingdom was based on his descent from the Pictish
sovereigns. Ungus, King of the Southern Picts,
had a sister Ungusia, who married Aycha IV., King
of Scots, and their son Alpin, who succeeded his
father early in the ninth century, was thus con-
nected in the female line with the royal house of
Pictavia. Succession through a female was an
ackRowledged principle of Pictish descent, and when
the throne of the Picts fell vacant, Kenneth, the
lO THK CLAN DONALD.
son of Al^^in, laid claim to it. The Southern Picts
as a nation acquiesced in an arrangement which,
while it gave them a king of their own royal
lineage, made at the same time for peace and union
between races that had so much in common.
On the other hand we believe it to be equally
mistaken, to maintain, as Dr Skene has done, that,
when Kenneth MacAlpin ascended the united
throne, Dalriada had sunk into utter insignificance,
and ceased to have any existence as a separate
kingdom. It is difficult to speak definitely of a
time so historically dark, and we cannot say
whether Dalriada regained to the full extent its
former independence. But it seems clear that,
however depressed the fortunes of this kingdom
may have been, a royal descent was maintained
from father to son until the ruling family of Dal-
riada was able to provide a king for the new and
united realm of Alban.
If the Picts as a distinctive race seem to pass
out of history after 842 a.d., their disappearance is
apparent and not real. The King of the Dalriads
became the ruler of the united people, and the
Dalriads were consequently regarded as the govern-
ing and presumably the dominant race. The union
further welded togetlier nations similar in language,
customs, and social institutions, nations that quickly
and easily amalgamated into one national system.
Yet, though the two races became one nation, the
actual fusion was only partial. The Picts of the
Central and Northern Highlands were little if at all
aftected by the union politically,^ socially, or racially,
and hence we may regard the Highlanders of Perth-
^ The rict« north of the Grauiiiiaut; were not of course included in the
new Kingtluni.
INTRODUCTOilY. 11
shire and the interior of Inverness- shire as the
purest representatives of the ancient GaeUc stock
of Caledonia, On the other iiand, the Dah'iads
remained to a large extent a distinct people within
their own territory of Oirthirghael.
The Islands as well as the Highlands of Scotland
were in historic times originally inhabited by the
primitive stock of Caledonia, the Picts, or Alban
Gael, with probably an admixture in some districts
of the prehistoric Iberian population. The Hebrides,
however, owing to their insular position, were from
the beginning of the ninth century subject to con-
ditions which had a far-reaching effect upon their
relations to the mainland of Scotland. Before the
union of the Alban Gael and the Dalriadic Scots,
and as far back as 794 a.d., we find from the
Annals of Ulster that " the Islands of Britain were
ravaged by the Gentiles." Indeed, we can gather
from hints somewhat dark and vague that, long
before they had effected permanent settlements in
the Isles, these Gentiles or Scandinavian pirates,
whose galleys swept the northern seas, were the
scourge and terror of the Hebrideans, More defin-
itely tliey were Danes and Norwegians, known in
the Highlands under the designation respectively of
Duhhgall and Fionnghall, or both together as Loch-
lanaich. The Western Isles, the theatre of their
piratical ravages, came to be known to the Gael as
Imise-Gcdl, or the Islands of the Strangers, to
themselves as the Sudereys, or Southern Isles, to
distinguish them from the Nordereys or Orkneys.
The Danes were earlier in the order of invasion,
and the special animosity they displayed in the
ruthless destruction of religious houses like lona and
Lindisfarne, and the consequent destruction of
12 THE CLAN DONALD.
precious historical records, are traceable to well-
known contemporary causes. The cruelties which
the Emperor Charlemagne inflicted upon the Pagan
inhabitants of Saxony and North Germany lired the
Gothic nations with hatred towards Christianity,
and explained the special form which the incursions
of the Danes assumed. During the niiith century
these sea rovers kept the Islands and the Western
seaboard in a state of perpetual turmoil impossible
either to conceive or describe.
When watclifires burst across the main
From Rona, and Uist, and Skye,
To tell that the ships of the Dane
And the red-haired slayer were nigh ;
Our Islesmen rose from their slumbers,
And buckled on their arms,
But few, alas ! were their nunibei's
To Lochlin's mailed swarms ;
And the blade of the bloody Norse
Has filled the shores of the Gael
With many a floatiur corse
And many a widow's wail.
The Danes, however, never made settlements in
the Scottish Isles, whose history for three hundred
years, from about 800 A.D., is bound up with the
Norwegian invasion. This invasion caused the
erection of Norwegian kingdoms in "reland and in
the Western Isles. The Isle of Man and the
Southern Isles of Scotland were the centre of the
Norwegian settlements in the north-west of Eui'ope.
From these islands, which were peculiarly adapted
as strongholds for the Vikings, whose strength lay
in their large and well-built ships, the tide of
invasion flowed in various directions, and the sur-
viving records of the age derive much of their
interest from the adventures of these kings of the
sea.
INTRODUCTORY. 1 3
In considering the origin of this. Norwegian
invasion, we find tliat it is largely accounted for by
a political revolution which occurred in Norway,
There, as elsewhere, the tendency of things has lain
in the absorption of petty nationalities in a larger
imperial unity. In or aljout the year 875 a.d.,
according to the sagas, Harold Harfager, or the
Fair-haired, one of the grea.test and bravest on the
long roll of Scandinavian heroes, having suppressed
the power of a number of minor chiefs, established
himself as King of the whole of Norway. Many of
the independent petty princes or jarls opposed his
pretensions and disputed his title to the crown.
Hather than submit to his rule, and fearing his
vengeance, some of these princes took refuge in the
Western Isles, and, uniting their forces there, they
began to harass Harold's domains. Exasperated by
these frequent incursions, Harold resolved to pursue
his enemies to their retreat in the Western Isles.
He prosecuted the campaign with great vigour, and
his progress was so irresistible that in a short time
he made a total conquest of Man, the Hebrides,
Shetland and Orkney, including Caithness. It is
difficult even now ; how much more so must it have
been in that remote age ? to preserve the loyalty of
a colony of diverse races so far from the imperial
centre ; and the difficulty was continually arising
during the Norwegian occupation of the Isles. The
very next year after the conquest we find the Isles
in open rebellion against the royal authority. The
Norwegian sagas differ as to the details of the re-
conquest of the Isles. According to some, such as
the Zandnama, Harold dispatched a trusty cousin
and councillor, the happy possessor of the euphoni-
ous name of Ketil Flatnose, to restore peace and
14 THE CLAN DONALD.
good government among his island subjects. This
the flat-nosed one very soon succeeded in doing, but
he accomplished more : he declared himself King of
the Isles. According to another and more probable
version of the story — the Lax?ela-saga — Ketil
emigrated from Norway to the Isles, not as the
viceroy of Harold, but because, like the other minor
potentates of Norway, he was obnoxious to him and
unable to resist his power. All the accounts, how^-
ever, agree in saying that Ketil exercised something
like supreme power in the Isles during the remainder
of his life. Flatnose was followed by a succession of
kings, though not of his owai line, whose identity on
the broad plain of history is not easily discernible in
the absence of any law of hereditary succession to
guide us. To attempt to bring historical order out
of the chaos in which that succession is involved
passes the wit of man. Sufiice it to say that these
kings or rulers of the Isles, with few interruptions,
followed one another, either from Norway or Orkney
or from Man or Ireland, until Man and the Isles
were finally added to Scotland by purchase in the
latter half of the thirteenth century. After the
defeat of Haco at Largs, and his subsequent death
at Kirkwall, in Orkney, his son and successor,
Magnus, entered into a treaty with Alexander III.
of Scotland, whereby the latter acquired Man and
the Isles for the sum of 400 merks sterling, with the
additional annual ])ayment to Norway of 100 merks
sterling, to be paid in the Church of St Magnus in
Orkney.
It is difficult to give anything like a true or
faithful picture of the condition of the Western
Isles during the Norse occupation. It does not seem
at all clear that the character of the Celtic
INTRODUCTORY. 15
population, or its social institutions any more than
its language, underwent any palpable or material
alteration. Some admixture of Teutonic blood may
be inferred from the strongly-marked Scandinavian
features sometimes seen in the inhabitants of the
Hebrides, especially in the Island of Lewis. The
native Celt largely predominated all along, but it is
undoubted that the blood of the brave old Vikings
courses through the veins of some of the best types
of the Scottish Highlander. It is also permissible
to think that this Teutonic strain, with its
characteristic tenacity of purpose and sustained
power of effort, combined with Celtic brilliancy and
emotional fervour, differentiates the Highlanders of
the West from more purely Celtic nations, and
places them, both in war and peace, in the front rank
of Euro])ean races. Considering, however, that the
Norsemen and the Celts of the Isles seem to have
lived on terms of mutual friendship after the time of
Harold Harfager, it is singular that the former did
not leave a deeper or more permanent impression.
The explanation probably is to be found very much
in the words of Gregory, with whom in this matter
we are disposed to agree, " that as in all cases of
conquest the change in the population must have
been most perceptible in the higher ranks, owing to
the natural tendency of invaders to secure their
new possessions where practicable by matrimonial
alliances with the natives." In some respects, how-
ever, the Norseman has left his mark upon the
Western Isles. While the language of the people
was preserved unaffected by the invader, the place
names both in the Isles and coastlands of Scotland
bear extensive traces of liis influence. The Celtic
system of land tenure, which was purely tribal,
16 THE CLAN DONALD.
seems to have been largely modified, and the system
of rent borrowed from the Teuton meets us in the
farthing-lands, penny-lands, and merklands to be
found in ancient valuations and conveyances of
landed property. In the folk-lore of the Hebrides,
Lochlin and its kings frequently appear ; and
altogether, in a variety of ways not affecting the
deeper or more characteristic life of the people, the
footprints of the Norseman are to be seen.
Before proceeding to consider the descent of the
Clan Donald, which we purpose doing in the next
chapter, it is necessary that we should take note of
a people called the Gall-Gael, wlioni we liud in the
reign of Kenneth MacAlpin appearing as the allies
of the Scandinavian pirates, and joining , them
everywhere in their depredations. The peculiar
combination of the word Gall, with Gael as the
qualitative part of the compoimd, is naturally
somewhat puzzling to the historian, especially as
the historical references to these people are neither
numerous nor distinct. The name Gall has always
been applied by the Gael to foreigners or strangers,
to men of different race and language from
themselves. It was first applied by them to the
Saxons of Northumbria. The name of Gall-Gael
was first applied by the Irish to the Picts of
Galloway, because the inhabitants of Galloway, being
of the Cruithne or Pictish race, and thus Celtic, had
for long been under the rule of the Saxon Gall of
Northumbria, Afterwards the name came to be
applied to Western Gaels, who, in. their characteristic
modes of. life, and possibly filso through a fusion of
races, came to resemble the Scandinavians of the
Hebrides. They were Galls, that is strangers, in
t-lie .sense that. they had. no settled homes, and, as
DUN AONGHAiS, NORTH UrST.
^-±^L..jiiii
DUN TORQUIL, NORTH UlST.
INTRODUCTORY. 1 7
such, were sea rovers or pirates after the fashion of
the Scandinavians of Innse-Gcdl. But they we^e
also Gaels, recruited from various branches of the
Celtic race, from Pictavia, Dalriada, and Ireland. Tt
is clear therefore that the Gall- Gael were not a race
of Gaels hound together by ties of blood and kinship,
but Gaels whose bond of union was that they were
engaged in similar jDursuits. But it seems necessary
also to state that the Gall-Gael apparently received
their name not alone because the G^el conformed to
the wild roving habits of the Norse Vikings, but
because the two were blended in one, and constituted
one band of sea robbers. This, we think, is clearly
proved by their being so often referred to as North-
men. There seems no evidence whatever to show,
notwithstanding the authority of Dr Skene, that the
Gall- Gael were a race of Celts with territorial
dignities or possessions. They were Gaelic pirates
banded with the Norwegians ; only this and nothing
more. They aj)pear and flit before us for a time on
the stage of history, and disappear mysteriously
without leaving one trace of their identity, neither
territory nor pedigree, not even one name handed
down ; merry-dancers on the horizon, phantoms
which cross our threshold to ruffle the serenity
of our historical calm.
THE CLAN DONALD,
CHAPTER IL
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD.
Rise of the Kingdom of Alban. — Rise and Growth of English
Influence. — Feudal Scotland. — Origin of the Clan Donald. —
Theories on the Subject. — The Dalriadic Origin. — Genealogy
of the Clan down to Somerled.
Before introducing upon the historical stage the
dynasty of Celtic princes, known as the Kings and
Lords of the Isles, it will conduce to clearness of
historical perspective if we trace briefly the rise of
the kingdom of Alban, and its gradual development
into feudal Scotland. The period in Scottish history
covered by the ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries
witnessed the growth of this larger imperial unity,
which commenced to be realised in the reign of
Kenneth MacAlpin. The new name of Alban, by
which the Kingdom of Scone came to be known in
the reign of Donald, the son of Constantino, does
not appear to have arisen from the addition of any
new territory acquired since the union of Pictavia
and Dalriada, and there seems to be no explanation
of the change, beyond the fact that we find it
recorded in the Irish Annals for the first time during
his reign. Thereafter, the Kings were no longer
designated Rages Pictorum, but Bi Alban, and in
the Pictish Chronicle Pictavia gives place to
Albania.
It does not appear that Northern Pictdom,
though reckoned nominally a province of Alban,
ever became fully incorporated with it while it
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 19
retained that name. The relationship between the
Northern and Southern Picts after the accession
of Kenneth MacAlpin is exceedingly difficult to
define. It seems, however, a fair inference from
the dim history of those ages that the division
between the two peoples was not merely geo-
graphical. The union of Dalriada and Southern
Pictavia would have been regarded with little
favour by the Picts of the North, especially as
the accession of the King of Dalriada to the Pictish
throne gave the Scots the prestige of a dominant
race, and had the effect of alienating two com-
munities that were at first homogeneous. Further-
more, the inroads of the Scandinavian marauders all
along the coastlands of the Northern Gael stimulated
the exercise of the law of self-preservation ; threw
them back upon their own resources ; consolidated
their organic unity, and welded them more and
more into a distinct and separate people. During
the succeeding centuries, and until the unity of the
Scottish realm was finally accomplished, the North
presents a scene of conflict and confusion more
intense, if possible, than is found in other parts
of North Britain. The struggle for independence
was long and persistent, and, though more than
once compelled to yield to the invader, the Northern
Gael was able to cast off the alien yoke and assert
his ancient independence. Thus it was that,
hemmed in on the one hand by Scandinavian
incursions, and on the other by their neighbours
and kinsmen from the South, we find the men of
the North, now under the sway of the Norwegian
Earls of Orkney, now under the Kings of Alban,
and at intervals independent of both, under their
own Mormaors. This state of matters continued
20 THE CLAN DONALD.
until, finally, in the reign of David I., the province
was ceded by conquest to the Scottish Crown.
We may now briefly indicate the extension of
the Kingdom of Alban towards the South and East,
and the causes that moulded it under one feudal
monarchy. The history of Alban is parallel in many
respects to that of the Northern Province. Besieged,
on the one hand, by the Anglo-Saxons of the South
and East, it lay open, on the other, to the Cumbrians
of Strathclyde ; while from every point of the
compass the menacing Scandinavian pressed on.
From Kenneth MacAlpin to David I., Scottish history
is a long war of races bent on mutual destruction.
Finally, the Scoto-Celt proved his imperial spirit by
giving a Kingdom to Scotland, despite the adverse
influences that beset him on every hand. Kenneth
III. acquired the ancient Kingdom of Strathclyde,
and his son, Malcolm II., subjected to his sway the
Saxon provinces of the South-East, which com-
prehended Lothian, Berwickshire, and the lower
part of Teviotdale. Thus, after many birth-throes,
the ancient realm of Scotia came into being.
No sooner, however, was the new kingdom estab-
lished than English influence began to be felt, and
the conquest, which force of arms could never effect,
was not unlikely to be accomplished by more silent,
imperceptible, yet no less powerful, influences.
Malcolm Canmore had been early attracted by
the English Court, Avhere, during the misfortunes of
his youth, he had found a friendly refuge. His
admiration for England and its people was evinced
when, from his warlike incursions to Durham and
Northumberland, he carried back with him large
numbero of young men and women, whom he settled
in various parts of his kingdom. His marriage with
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 21
the Saxon Princess Margaret was fraught with many
consequences to the social and reHgious Hfe of Scot-
land. The ancient language of the Court, with the
manners and customs of his fathers, were changed
by the unpatriotic King, and conformed to the
English model. Still further to Anglicise his
country, he offered an asylum to those Saxon
refugees who were compelled to leave their native
land during the reign of the persecuting Norman
Conqueror. With Malcolm, the Saxon importation
ceased, and Donald Bane, his brother, who, according
to Celtic law, succeeded him, issued a sentence of
banishment against all foreigners, and an attempt
was made to stem the tide of Southern influence,
and place Celtic culture once more in the ascendant.
This, however, was only temporarily successful.
Donald Bane was driven from the throne after a
short and troubled reign, and the three sons of
Malcolm Canmore, who followed him in succession,
were steady supporters of the new order. It was in
the reign of David L, who occupied the throne from
1124 to 1153, that the most momentous change took
place in the civil policy and social life of Scotland.
David, who had been educated at the Court of
Henry Beauclerc, became inspired by Norman ideas,
and, before his accession to the throne, was advanced
to the dignity of a Norman baron. In the feudal
system, which, for upwards of 100 years, had
operated in England and transformed its institu-
tions, he found an instrument ready to his hand for
remodelling the customs of the Scottish people. He
introduced a powerful Norman baronetage, by means
of whom he planted, on an extended scale, the
principles of feudal tenure, and a ruling idea of his
reign was to suppress Celtic aspirations and institu-
22 THE CLAN DONALD.
tions, as inconsistent with the new social system and
with loyalty to the crown. Thus did the new feudal
system take root in our Scottish soil, and under its
shadow have flourished those Anglo-Norman institu-
tions which have done so mucli to mould the
national life.
Having thus endeavoured to indicate the trend of
Scottish history down to the twelfth century, the
period at which Clan Donald history begins to
emerge out of the dim twilight of uncertainty, we
hope to shew how this representative and outstand-
ing family were aftected by the new order of Scottish
feudalism. Tiiere still remains, however, to be
considered and disposed of, the important question
of the descent of the Clan Donald ; a question which
we have deemed advisable to take up only after all
other preliminary matters pertainiug to general
Scottish history, and pertinent to our special theme,
had been, we hope, intelHgibly discussed. In our
introductory chapter we drew attention, at some
length, to the various elements that combined to
constitute the Scottish people. To which of the
races that in early times occupied the Highlands and
Islands do the Clan Donald belong ? Taking, for
example, the real founder of the Family of the Isles
in times that are clearly historical — Somerled Rex
hisularum — where are we to look for his origin and
descent ? Was he, as his name indicates, of Norse
extraction 1 was he of Pictish blood, and thus
descended from the ancient Celtic stock of Caledonia?
did he owe his birth to the Scoto-Irish race of
Dalriada ? or was he of the mysterious Gall-Gael ?
In one sense it is impossible, perhaps, to give a
categorical answer to any of these questions. It is
unlikely that he was purely the oflspring of any one
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 23
race. Judging by his name, we should pronounce
him a Norseman, were it not for other circumstances
that point to a different conclusion. He may have
received that name through some ancestress, perhaps
some " fair-haired " ^ Norwegian mother, who also
bequeathed to him the enterprising spirit of the
Vikings. That he was of Norse descent in the male
line is an hypothesis for which there is not a shred
of evidence. The truth is borne in upon us from
manifold sources that the spirit and tendency of the
house of Somerled, and all the interests of his race,
were in direct antagonism to the Norwegian occupa-
tion of the West of Scotland. Obviously it does not
stand to reason that a Norseman should have made
it the main object of his life to overthrow the
supremacy of his own race, and erect a Gaelic
Kingdom in room of the Norwegian power. The
title Righ Fionnghall, by which many of the Chiefs
of the Clan have been distinguished by the High-
land bards and seanachies, is no proof of a Norwegian
descent. It would appear that they received this
distinction because, after the time of Somerled, the
Lords of the Isles ruled over a large extent of
territory which in former times had been subject
to the Kings of Man, to whom the designation Righ
Fionnghall had been originally applied.
It remains now to shew to which branch of the
Celtic tree the Clan Donald owe their descent.
Though the question as to whether the origin of
this family is derived from the Picts or Scots is
a somewhat subordinate one ; seeing that both these
nations were hewn out of the same rock, offshoots of
the Goedelic branch of the Celtic tree ; still it is one
^ Hill's Macdonalds of Antrim.
24 THE CLAN DONALD.
of much importance, and has been earnestly discussed
by the best modern authorities. In deciding upqn
an answer to it, we have to reckon, on the one hand,
with the conclusions of Dr Skene, justly regarded as
one of the most thorough and painstaking of recent
Avriters upon the history and ethnology of the Gael ;
and, on the other hand, with the mass of Highland
and Irish tradition, the accumulation of many
centuries. Gregory, while favouring a Celtic origin,
is indefinite in his conclusions, leaving the problem
of Celtic versus Norse virtually an open question,
and consequently, of course, not condescending upon
the more special issue of a Pictish versus Scoto-
Irish descent. In his "Highlanders of Scotland,"
published in 1837, the work by which Dr Skene
first came into notice as a prominent historical
writer, he strongly supports the theory of the
Pictish descent of the Clan Donald. He maintains
that the Gael of Argyll, who afterwards became
known as the Gall-Gael, were of the Pictish stock ;
that the ancestors of the Clan Donald were of
the Gall-Gael, and that the Orkneyinga Saga,
the traditions of the family, and otlier sources of
historical evidence confirm the same contention.
This writer has not, however, been uniformly con-
sistent in the expression of his views in this
connection. In the third volume of his " Celtic
Scotland," published in 1880, he, no doubt, reminds
us in a footnote that he has had no occasion to alter
the opinion he held in 1837, but he forgets that in
his introduction to the Book of the Dean of Lismore
he had, to a large extent, given away his case in
the statement that " the spirit and tendency of the
whole race was essentially Irish."
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 25
Dr Skene, in his advocacy of this view, lays
great stress on the following considerations. First
of all he quotes at length a letter written in 1543
by a Highland clergyman of the name of John
Elder, a Keddshanks, to Henry VIII. of England, in
which he emphasises the alleged older tradition that
the Macdonalds were, in common with the other
Highland Clans, of the " ancient stoke," and
denounces in no measured terms the " papistical
curside spiritualitie of Scotland," whom he held
responsible for what he deemed the later Dalriadic
tradition. Furthermore, an argument in support of
the same contention is based on a paragraph in a
letter written in 1596 by James Macdonald of
Dunnyveg to King James VI., which is as follows : —
" Most mightie and potent prince recomend us unto
your hieness with our service for ever, your grace
shall understand that our forbears hath been from
time to time your servants unto your own Kingdom
of Scotland."^ From these and other considerations
of less weight, Dr Skene has developed an ingenious
argument to prove that the Scoto-Irish genealogy
of the Clan Donald is an artificial system of no
earlier origin than the fourteenth century, concocted
by Irish and Highland seanachies, and that the
Clan Donald were the principal tribe of the Gall-
Gael who inhabited the coastlands of Argyll, and
were of the primitive stock of Scotland.
It may at once be admitted that some at least of
the main premisses from which Dr Skene deduces
these conclusions are substantially correct. It is
in the highest degree probable that a large pro-
portion of the Highland Clans of the mainland, and
^ The expression " from time to time" meaning here, ag in other ancient
documents, from time immemorial.
26 THE CLAN DONALD.
even some of those that are territorially connected
with the Western Isles in modern times, such as the
Macleans and Mackenzies, are remnants of the
ancient system of Northern Pictland. On the other
hand, Dr Skene, in the course of his argument,
makes an assertion which it is impossible to accept.
He maintains that in the eleventh century the
whole Highlands, including Argyll, were inhabited
by the Northern Picts, of whom the Gall-Gael were
an important tribe. Such a statement as this
implies either the extinction of the Scoto-Celtic
race in the Kingdom of Dalriada after 844 A.D., or
a wholesale migration of that stock into the territory
of the Southern Picts. There does not appear to be
historical evidence for any such extraordinary occur-
rence. A Dalriadic population occupied Argyll for
500 years previous to the reign of Kenneth Mac-
Alpin, and when the union of the Kingdoms took
place, they must have been the preponderating
element in that region. That the race should have
made an exodus out of Dalriada between the ninth
and eleventh centuries is a supposition that makes
excessive demands upon the most vivid historical
imagination.
The proofs adduced in support of these aver-
ments, however much truth they may contain,
cannot be regarded as justifying the conclusions.
The statement that the MacDonalds were indigenous
in Argyll, as shown Ijy the Orkneyinga Sagas, and
that this was the tradition of the Clan, as the letter
of James MacDonald of Dunnyveg illustrates, seem
rather beside the question. From 1596 backwards
to the founding of the Dalriadic Kingdom in the
fifth and sixth centuries, or to the ninth or even the
eleventh century, was a period of time sufficiently
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 27
long to constitute a tradition of very respectable
antiquity. Besides, the same James MacDonald of
Dunnyveg, to whose letter Dr Skene attaches such
importance, wrote another letter in 1615 to the
Bishop of the Isles, which is capable of the very
opposite construction from the theory of a Pictisli
descent. " My race," Sir James writes, "has been ten
hundred years kindly Scottish men under the Kings
of Scotland." The "kindliness" may have been
dissembled on certain memorable occasions, such as
at the battle of Harlaw, but the words are
sufficiently suggestive, as indicative of the true
descent of the Clan. Touching the epistle of John
Elder, we are not disposed to place much reliance
upon the letter of a bigoted Highland cleric at any
time, much less in 1543, when the Beformation
controversy was at red heat. The contents of the
letter itself are evidence enough that we are not
slandering Mr John Elder. The warmth of his
invective and the keenness of his odium theologicum
against the Church, on which he fastens the blame
of what he regards as a false historical conception,
do not encourage us to rely upon his testimony as
a calm and unbiassed authority.
The conclusions arrived at in our Introductory
chapter as to the Gall-Gael are, if tenable, quite
subversive of the theory that the Clan Donald
belonged to them. There is no evidence that the
Gall-Gael were a territorial people or anything more
or less than Gaelic pirates, while, as we hope to
show, every vestige of Clan Donald history indicates
their connection with large territorial, even regal,
possessions.
The fact that Suibne, the son of Cineada ri Gall-
Gael, is recorded by the Irish Annalists to have died
28 THE CLAN DONALD.
in 1034, and that one of the Clan Donald line of the
same name occurs in the genealogies of the Clan,
may possibly have helped to lead Dr Skene to adopt
what we consider an untenable position. Suibne,
the ancestor of Somerled, was the son of Niallgusa ;
nor does the name Kenneth occur in any of the
genealogical lists, a fact that seems conclusive
against identifying the one with the other.
We hope now to be able to show from evidence,
tliat seems on the whole convincing, that the Clan
Donald are descended from the Dalriadic stock of
Argyll. Dean Munro, who flourished like the Red-
shanks cleric in the sixteenth century, and was a
respected Church dignitary of his day, distinctly
favours this conclusion, while the MS. of 1450 and
the genealogy of the MacYurichs, whose history as
seanachies to this family goes back to Muireadach
Albannach in the twelfth century, all afford
2)rima facie evidence of the truth of our contention.
No doubt we are warned against both Irish and
Highland seanachies, and it is necessary that
their statements should be duly weighed, especially
when questions arise affecting the honour and
glory of the family or branch in which they are
most specially interested. Yet even Dr Skene
admits that, from the battle of Ocha, in 478 A.D.,
which forms an epoch in Irish history, the Irish
Annals may be taken as fairly accurate, though
in such details as genealogical links they may not be
strictly so. The same is true of the Highland
seanachies, especially the Book of Clanranald.
Though not perhaps invariably accurate in every
date and detail, yet, on the whole, we believe it to
be the most honest and reliable of all the ancient
authorities on the origin and history of the Clan.
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 29
And the argument from these standard authorities
is strengthened by the natural inference deducible
from the annals of the Clan in historical times.
From the very beginning of the Island dynasty
founded by Somerled there was a close connection
between Ireland and Argyll and the Isles. The
establishment of the Gaelic kingdom was largely
promoted by Irish aid ; matrimonial alliances with
Irish families were frequently formed by the chiefs ;
many members of the family acquired settlements in
Antrim and Tyrone, and the bards and seanachies of
the Isles went for their education to the literary
schools of the North of Ireland. These circum-
stances seem to point all to the same conclusion.
It is necessary for us, however, to go beyond
this, and to consider whether the strong probabilities
of the case are supported by what we can gather
from the history of ancient Dalriada. When the
union of Pictavia and Dalriada took place, and the
seat of Government in the latter kingdom was
transferred from Dunadd to Scone, the shifting of
the political centre of gravity from the coast to the
interior must have seriously affected the population
of Oirthir-Ghael. In circumstances in which society
is insufficiently organised for defence when the
governing power is withdrawn from the extremities,
it is clear that the latter become more open to
foreign invasion. In view of this, it is significant
that it was in the latter part of the ninth century
that the Norwegian invasion began to be felt in the
West, in the coastlands of the Gael and the Isles.
From the latter half of the ninth century onwards
there was a perpetual struggle between the Norse-
men and the native population, a struggle in which
the people of the Isles soon yielded to the power of
30 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Norseman ; but the Gaels of Argyll continued
bravely to resist the incursions of the foe. Not-
withstanding this resistance, the districts both of
Ergadia and Galwallia were largely occupied in the
eleventh century by the Norsemen, for at the battle
of Cluantarf in 1014 there is mention of the Galls or
foreigners of Man, Skye, Lewis, Kintyre, and
Oirthir glutei. Further, when Thorfinn, the Earl of
Orkney, conquered the nine rikis in Scotland in 1034,
he included in his possessions Dali or Ergadia and
Gaddeli or Galloway. This being, in brief, the
general history of Argyll or Dalriada up to the
eleventh century, from the reign of Kenneth
MacAlpin, the question arises, how far the traditional
genealogy of the Clan Donald which makes them of
the stock of Dalriada is to be brought into line with
the well-known historical facts to which we have
adverted ? In order to do this, we consider it
desirable, for the sake of clearness, to trace from the
earliest times the ancestry of the Clan Donald as we
find it in Irish and Highland genealogies.
The early history of the Clann Cholla — the
designation of our Clan from Donald back to Colla
Uais — penetrates far into the mists of antiquity.
Though, in detail, all that glitters is not gold, yet in
the main the seanachies may, without too much
credulity, be taken as fairly historical. The
genealogists, however, take a still further flight into
the dim past when they connect the Clan with a
celebrated Irish King, Conn Ceud-Chathach, Con-
strmtinus Centimachus, or Constantine of the Hundred
Fights. Conn, who was A7-(l Righ, or supreme
king, of Ireland, and swayed the sceptre at Tara,
flourished in the second century of our era, and as
his name indicates, was one of the greatest heroes of
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 31
antiquity. The tradition as to this descent has
undoubtedly been for ages the living belief of the
Clan, and without very strong evidence to the con-
trary, we are not disposed to surrender it. At the
Battle of Harlaw, MacYurich, the bard, sought to
rouse the heroism of the men of the Isles, by stirring
up the consciousness of this kingly descent —
" A Chlanna Chiiinn cuimhnichibh
Cruas an am na h-iorghuill."
And doubtless the same inspiring thought animated
the warriors of the Clan Donald on many another
bloody field. Ewen M'Lachlan, the celebrated bard
and scholar, in his poem to the Society of true
Highlanders, gives to the race of Somerled the same
remote and royal lineage : —
" Before the pomp advanced in kingly grace
I see the stem of Conn's victorious race,
Whose sires of old the Western sceptre swayed,
Which all the Isles and Albion's half obeyed."
The tradition of its descent from Conn has certainly
impressed the imagination of the race and inspired
many of its singers. When we come towards the
fourth century there appears upon the scene another
ancestor of our Clan, hardly less renowned than the
famous Conn, Col] a Uais, who is also styled Ard
High of Ireland. Colla's descent from Constantine
is a matter on which genealogists are not agreed.
The genealogy developed in the MS, of 1450
supplies three or four links which are omitted by
the Clanranald seanachie. Which of the two more
nearly approaches accuracy it is, of course, impossible
to say. The fact that there are discrepancies seems,
however, to dispose of the theory that the Irish
descent of the Clan was an artificial system
32 THE CLAN DONALD.
concocted by Irish genealogists, encouraged by
th ' Scottish ecclesiastics, and adopted by High-
la:: 1 seanachies. Were this the case, we should
have expected, in both cases, an identical and
stereotyped genealogy. The fact that these gene-
alogies, though different in detail, are yet similar in
their main conclusions, is a clear proof that the
Scoto-Celtic origin of the Clan was not artificially
devised to fit in with favourite historical beliefs,
but was a hona-jide and actual tradition.
Colla Uais was, according to the MS. of 1450,
eighth; according to MacVurich, fifth, in descent
from Constantino. He was the eldest of three
brothers, each of whom bore the name of Colla —
Colla Uais, Colla Meann, and Colla da Chrich —
their baptismal names being Caireall, Aodh, and
Muredach. The name Colla seems to have been
given them according to an ancient poem, for being
rebellious, and probably means a strong man—
" Caireall, the first name of Colla Uais ;
Aodh, of Colla Meauii of great vigour;
Muredach, of Colla da Chrich :
They were imposed on them for rebelling."
According to the genealogists, these brothers were
the sons of Eochaid or Ochaius Dubhlin, King of
Ireland,^ and their mother was a Scottish princess of
the name of Aileach, a daughter of Ubdaire, King of
Alba. This lady is celebrated in an ancient Irish
poem as "a mild, true woman, modest, blooming,
till the love of the Gael disturbed her, and she
passed with him from the midst of Kintyre to the
land of Uladh." We can gather from the sean-
achies that, having failed in the attempt to place
Colla Uais on the throne of Ireland, the three
^ Book of Clanranakl in " Celticsc Reliquisc," vol. ii., p. 150.
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 33
brothers crossed the Irish Channel for help from
their Scottish kindred. Probably through the
influence of their mother s relatives, the three Collas
were able to muster a considerable force in Scotland,
at the head of which they re-crossed the Irish
Channel, and with the help of their Irish allies
placed Colla Uais on the regal seat at Tara.
Colla Uais, however, reigned only four years, when
he was dispossessed by Muredach Tirech, his near
relative, who, it appears, had a better claim
to the throne. According to Mac Mliuirich, the
three Collas after this returned to Scotland,
where they obtained extensive settlements ; but
having afterwards been reconciled to Muredach
Tirech, they were invited by him to assist him
in the war against the Clan Ruairidh. On the con-
clusion of the war, the three Collas received extensive
possessions in the North of Ireland as the reward of
their prowess ; but Colla Uais left his share to the
other two and returned to Scotland. After a resi-
dence of fifteen years in Scotland he went on a visit
to Ireland, and died at Tara of the Kings, a.d. 337.
It seems apparent that although Siol Chuiim
thus early established a settlement in Scotland,
their headquarters continued in Ireland. For fully
a hundred years the region, which was afterwards
the Kingdom of Scottish Dalriada, was only a
colony of the Scoto-Irish race ; as has already been
fully narrated.
It was four generations after Colla Uais that the
forward movement of the Dalriadic race occurred
which eventuated in the new kingdom in the region
of Oirthirghael. It is at this point that the Clan
Donald line touches that of the Scottish kings, and
that their common origin and ancestry appear.
3
34 THE CLAN DONALD.
Fergus, the son of Ere, one of the three brothers
who came to Scotland in the fifth century and
founded Scottish Dahiada, was, according to the
MS. of 1450, fourth, and according to the Mac-
Mhuirich genealogy, fifth, in descent from Colla
Uais. MacMhuirich inserts " Maine" between
Fergus and Ere, a variation which, though supported
by some Irish and other authorities, does not seem
to possess much historical probability. The gene-
alogy of the 1450 MS. is, in this respect, supported
by the Albanic Duan.
Fergus Mor, the son of Ere, had two sons,
Domangart and Godfrey. Domangart, the elder
son, succeeded his father, and was the progenitor
of Kenneth MacAlpin and the succeeding line of
Scottish kings. Godfrey, the younger son, was
the progenitor of the line from which the Clan
Donald sprang, and was known in his day as
Toshach of the Isles. It would be absurd to say
that there are no difficulties presented in the
genealogy from Godfrey downwards.^ Links seem
wanting to fulfil the conditions which the lapse of
so many generations demands. Something like
antediluvian longevity would be needed in several
of the links in order to fill up the centuries. Yet
while this is so, the conclusions suggested by the
main drift of the genealogy seem clear enough. If
links are lacking, those that can be subjected to
historical tests are not found wanting in historical
probability. Gilledomnan and Gillebride, Somerled's
immediate ancestors, can easily be identified, and of
the rest, Imergi, called by MacMhuirich Meargaidh,
is mentioned in the Irish Annals, and is very likely
the lehmare of the Saxon Ghronicle, one of the
three kings who submitted to Canut, the Danish
^ For genealogies dowu to Somerlcd vide Apiooudis.
DESCENT OF THE CLAN DONALD. 35
King of England, when he invaded Scotland in
1031.
To sum up our discussion of the Clan Donald
descent, the main conclusions which seem deducible
from the field of enquiry are these : — We are satisfied
that the population of Dalriada continued after 844
to be largely Scoto-Irish, and it is highly probable,
apart from any historical knowledge we may possess,
that after the transference of the royal family of
Dalriada to Scone, the chief power in the west
would fall to some family more or less akin to the
line of Kenneth MacAlpin. This is entirely in
accordance with historical analogy, and is counten-
anced by the authorities so often quoted. It was
undoubtedly in the ninth century that the Clan
C holla rose into greater consequence in Argyll and
the Isles, until the power of the Norsemen
threatened the Gael with extinction. The Norse
invasion of the West of Scotland had, as we
approach the beginning of the twelfth century,
reduced the fortunes of the Celtic population of
Argyll to a state of great depression. If by the
latter half of the twelfth century the Norwegian
power had been checked, and Gaelic influence
re-established in Argyll and the Isles, it was owing
to the prowess and address of one of the most
celebrated on the long roll of Celtic heroes,
Somerled MacGillebride.
1470839
36 THE CLAN DONALD.
CHAPTEE III.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE.— 1 100-1164.
Gilledomiian. — Gillebride na li-iiaimh. — His attempt to recover
the Famil}" Inheritance. — His Faihire. — Rise of Somerled. — -
Early Life. — Gaelic Risinp;. — The MacTnneses. — Somei'led's
Leadership and Strategy. — Regulus of Argyll. — Olave the
Red. — Marriage "with Ragnhildis. — Accession of Godred. —
Rebellion in Man. — Battle off Isla. — Division of Isles.—
Conquest of Man. — Malcolm Macheth. — Somerled's Treaty
with Malcolm IV. — Somerled's Invasion of Scotland. — His
Death, Character, and Position.
In the 11th century the Irish and Highland
Seanachies throw faint rays of hght upon the posi-
tion and prospects of the Clan Cholla. During
the first half of that century it appears that Gille-
domnan, the grandfather of Somerled, was a person
of consequence, and held sway over a consideiuble
portion of Argyll. That he was a leader of some
note may be inferred from the circumstance of his
daughter having been the wife of Harold, one of
the Kings of Norway. In his time the fortunes of
the family were probably at the lowest ebb. Able
hitherto to hold their own against Scandinavian
assaults, the latter seemed destined to obtain a
permanent supremacy, and Gilledomiian was finally
driven from his territories and took refuge in Ire-
land, where, after devoting the latter part of his
life to pious duties, he very probably lived till his
death.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 37
Gillebride, the son of Gilledomnan, who had fled
with his father to Ireland, now made a vigorous
effort to recover the inheritance of his sires. Beino-
among his Irish kindred of the Clan Cholla, in the
County of Fermanagh/ it was determined to place
a force of 400 or 500 men at his disposal to aid him
in vindicating his rights. Accompanied by this
warrior band, Gillebride landed in Argyll, and. made
a gallant attempt to dislodge the invader ; yet the
Norseman had by this time obtained such a firm
hold of the country, that Gillebtide and his followers
were obliged ultimately to retire into the woods and
caves of Morvern. From his compulsory seclusion
in a cave on the shores of Loch Linnhe, this Gaelic
leader came to be known as GUlehride na h-uaimh.
Gregory, without any authority, save one dark hint
from the historian of Sleat, attributes Gillebride's
defeat and consequent seclusion to his alleged action
after the death of Malcolm Canmore, in supporting
the claims of Donald Bane to the throne against
the Anglo-Saxon party. This statement does not
possess much historical 'probability. It was the
aim of Gillebride's life to regain possession of his
ancestral domains from the hands of the usurping
Norseman ; it was ao^ainst them that all his efforts
were directed, and his intervention at any time in
the internal quarrels of the Scottish State is in the
highest degree unlikely.
From this time Gillebride seems to have made
no further effort to regain the territory of his
fathers in the region of Oirthirghael. It is therefore
clear that a crisis has arrived in the history of the
Western Gael, as well as in the fortunes of the Clan
1 The Book of Claurauald in " Reliquiw Celticsc," vol. II., p. 155. Alio
see Hugh Macckuald's MS,
38 THE CLAN DONALD.
Cholla. The Norseman is on the eve, not only of
expelHng him from the Isles, but of crushing his
prestige and authority on the mainland as well.
It was at this critical moment, when Teutonic
ascendancy in the AVest seemed on the eve of
asserting itself finally and triumphantly, that
Somerled arose. Gillebride and his cave vanish
into the unknown, and his warlike son steps upon
the scene of history, to become the terror of the
Norseman and the Achilles of his race.
The events of Somerled's life are, like his gene-
alogy, shrouded in the mists of unverifiable
tradition. They belong to that borderland of
history and legend on which the chronicler can
with difficulty find a secure resting-place for the
sole of his foot. Yet amid the shifting debris of
old-world history, there are certain main outlines
and facts which have crystallised themselves as
genuine and authentic, and afford indications of an
impressive and commanding personality issuing out
of the dim past, possessing immense force of char-
acter, high military talents, great energy and
ambition, combined with a large measure of that
political sagacity and prudence which constitute a
ruler and leader of men.
All we know of the early history of this
renowned Gaelic hero is derived exclusively from
tradition. Hugh Macdonald, the Sleat historian,
who flourished in tlio latter half of the seventeenth
century, embodied that tradition hi a MS. history,
written in the year 1680, and is responsible for
almost every word that has been written since his
time ujjon Somerled's early career. Save when he
is tempted to exalt his own branch at the expense
of others, he is, though not strictly accurate, still a
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 39
fairty reliable exponent of the history and traditions
of his Clan.
When Somerled first comes upon the scene, he is
living with his father in his cave amid the Avilds of
Morvern, an unambitious young man, devoted to
fishing and hunting, and as yet apparently without
any intention of thrusting himself forward as a
leader of men. But the exigencies of the time soon
transformed this Celtic Nimrod into a hero. Amid
his devotion to the chase, he must have had many
hours of reflection upon the fallen fortunes of his
family, and unsuspected depths in his nature were
stirred up by the tale of their misfortunes. The
faded glory of the once kingly house, with all
the humiliating conditions that accompanied its
downfall, seized with irresistible force upon his
imagination, and the resolve to build up again its
ruined state became the passion of his life. Often
must he have wished that the day might come when
he could strike a blow for freedom and the right.
That day at length came, and it found Somerled
ready. It seems that about this time a strenuous
effort had been made by the native tribes of Argyll
to free themselves from the Scandinavian yoke.
Their enemies had also prepared themselves to strike
a decisive blow for the final assertion of supremacy.
The galleys of the Norsemen studded the western
sea, and a descent in force upon the shores of Oirthir-
ghael ensued. The result was a terrible onslaught
upon the native tribes that endeavoured to with-
stand the invading host, and their eventual defeat
ensued. It was observed, however, that one tribe —
the Maclnneses — left the field in good order, led by
a young man tall in stature and valiant in fight,
who had performed prodigies of valour that day.
40 THE CLAN DONALD.
The Maclnneses^ had lost their own leader, but had
found one in Somhairle Mor Mac Ghillchhride.
Some time thereafter this brave sept, loving liberty-
more than life, resolved once more to make an effort
for the achievement of their independence. They
assembled to take counsel as to the course they
should pursue in so critical an emergency. The
Crann tara was sent through the land, and soon
from far and near the men of Argyll, defeated but
not subdued, flocked to the place of rendezvous to
the east side of Benmore. A council of war was
held, but the unanimity so desirable in the face of a
united foe, did not prevail. The leaders of the
various tribes respectively strove with one another
for the chief command. The caiiip was in motion
like an anthill. All began to draw their weapons,
when an aged chief rose in the midst and demanded
to be heard, setting forth at great length the
dangers to which their dissensions exposed them,
and suggesting the appointment to the chief com-
mand of one in whom all had implicit confidence.
He concluded by recommending the choice of
Somerled as one who, from his prowess in the
recent conflict, was well fitted for such a post. To
this they all agreed, and messengers were at once
dispatched to offer him the command. Somerled
had some hesitation in accepting the offer on view-
ing the strength of the opposing force, but he had
recourse to a stratagem which served his purpose
well. Each man was ordered to kill his cow, and
this having been done, and the animals skinned, the
Gaels waited the approach of the enemy. Somerled
now ordered his little army to march round the
eminence on which they lay encamped, which
• ' lor ^liiclmiescs, see Apiciulix.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 41
having done, he made them all put on the cow
hides to disguise themselves and repeat the move-
ment. He finally ordered his men to reverse the
cowhides, and now, for the third time, to go through
the same movement, thus exhibiting to the eiiemy
the appearance of a strong force composed of three
divisions. The stratagem had the desired effect,
The enemy, believing that a formidable force was
coming down upon them, fell into utter confusion.
Somerled, taking advantage of the panic, fell uj^on
the Scandinavian host with great slaughter. The
toe was routed, scattered, and pursued to the north
bank of the Sheill, where they took to their galleys.^
Thus did Somerled strike his first successful blow
for the country of his fathers, and started on his
career of warlike triumph. He was not satisfied
with the success of this preliminary skirmish. With
the instinct of the capable man of action, he took
advantage of that turn in the tide of human affairs
which carries those who watch and follow it on to
power and fortune. Somerled followed up his advan-
tage, prosecuted the war still further into the heart
of the enemy's country, and his forces gathering
strength and confidence with continued success, he
was soon able to drive the Norsemen from Oirthir-
ghael to Innse-Gall. His victories were the first
successful rally which, for hundreds of years, had
been made by the Celts of the West of Scotland
against the Norwegian power.
Somerled having thus gained possession of the
mainland domain which belonged to his sires,
assumed the title of Thane or llegulus of Argyll.
A man who had risen thus suddenly to eminence
and power was likely enough, in view of the past, to
^ Hugh Macdonald's MS. New Statistical Account of Morveru.
42 THE CLAN DONALD.
take advantage of his new position to break still
further the sway of the enemies of his race, not only
over Oirthirghael but over the Western Isles. It
became his settled policy to subdue the Kingdom of
Man and the Isles, and whether or not the erection
of a Celtic Kingdom upon its ruins was his intention
from the beginning of his career, the idea must
have gradually shaped itself in his mind, and the
progress of events enabled him to carry it into
effect. In these circumstances, Olave the Red,
King of Man and the Isles, feeling the shocks the
Norwejjfian Power had received at the hands of the
Celtic chief, and somewhat uneasy in the possession
of the Sudoreys, effected a temporary friendship and
a cessation of hostilities by bestowing his daughter
upon him in marriage, a compact which probably
he would not have cemented so successfully had not
the hero of Argyll, from all accounts, been hopelessly
in love with the fair Ragnhildis. The story of how
he won his bride is told with i^reat minuteness of
detail by the historian of Sleat, who makes it appear
as if the overtures for her hand were all on the side
of Somerled. It was a stratagem, but all is fair in
love as in war. Olave lay encamped in Stoma Bay,
in the neighbourhood of which Somerled also was
cruising. The latter, in course of an interview, in
which he sought to remain incognito, told Olave
that he had come from the Thane of Argyll, who
promised to accompany him on his expedition if he
gave him his daughter in marriage. Olave, recog-
nising the aspirant to his daughter's hand, declined,
it is said, the proffered alHance, but expressing his
willingness to have Somerled's company on his
cruise. A foster-brother of Olave, Maurice Mac-
Neill, was a friend of Somerled, and offered to
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 43
devise means for winning the King's daughter. His
offer was accepted. In the night time Maurice
scuttled the King's ship. Boring several holes in
the bottom, he made pins of the necessary size to
stop them when necessity demanded, but meanwhile
filled the holes with butter. Next day they set
sail, and for a time all went well.
As soon, however, as they came to the stormy
point of Ardnamurchan, the action of the waves
displaced the greasy packing of the holes in Olave's
ship, which immediately began to leak, with
imminent danger of sinking and drowning the King
and all on board. Olave and his men thereupon
called on Somerled, who with his galley followed in
their wake, to help them in their extremity. No
assistance would be granted unless the King swore
that he would give Somerled his daughter in
marriage. The oath was taken ; Olave was received
into Somerled's galley, and Maurice MacNeill fixed
the pins he had prepared into the holes, and the
King's ship, much to his own astonishment, con-
tinued on its way in safety. From that day it is
said that the descendants of this Maurice are called
Maclntyres^ — the sons of the wright.
This is Hugh Macdonald's story, and whatever
foundation there may be for it, it is hardly credible
that the King of Man should have displayed such
reluctance in allying his family with a chief of such
proved capacity and extending influence as Somerled.
The marriage took place in 1140, according to the
author of the Chronicles of Man, who refers to it as
the cause of the ultimate ruin of the Kingdom of
the Isles.
^ Maclntyre, Gael, Mac-an-t-Saoir.
44 THE CLAN DONALD.
In the year 1153-54, the long and peaceful reign
of Olave had a sudden and tragic close. He was
murdered by his nephews, the sons of Harold, who
had been brought up in Dublin, and laid claim to
half the King-dom of Man. The foUowins^ autumn
Godred, the son of Olave, who was in Norway at
the time of his father's assassination, set sail for the
Isles, was received gladly by the inhabitants as
their King, and executed the murderers. Early in
his reign he was called to Ireland by the Ostmen
of the Kingdom of Dublin, which was at the time a
Norwegian principality, to quell disturbances that
had arisen, and assume sovereign power. Victory
rested on his arms, and he returned to Man flushed
with success, and intoxicated with increased
dominion. But prosperity turned his head, and his
arbitrary and tyrannical exercise of power alienated
the loyalty of the Island chiefs. So oppressive and
despotic was his rule that many of the principal
men of the Isles banded themselves together to
resist him.
Thus were events shaping themselves in a way
which powerfully affected the interests and inflamed
the ambition of Somerled. The Isle of Man was
inhabited by a population Avhich was mainly Celtic.
The ruling dynasty Jiad, in the person of Godred,
incurred extreme unpopularity, and these circum-
stances seemed more or less favourable to any
pretensions which Somerled might advance, con-
nected as he was by marriage with the family which
hitherto held sway in the Isles. Thorfin, the son of
Ottar, the most powerful of the disaffected barons,
was chosen as leader of the contemplated rising, and
he made the proposal to Somerled that his son
Dugall should be proclaimed King of the Isles.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 45-
Somerled readily assented to the proposals of
the Islesmen. Dugall, who was only a boy at the
thne, was carried through the Isles and proclaimed
King, while hostages were taken for the loyalty of
the Islesmen and their acquiescence in the new
regime}
This revolution had no sooner been accomplished
than a treacherous sychophant of the name of
PauP — probably as little in nature as in name,
and to whom, doubtless, the smile of the tyrant
was as the breath of life — fled to the Isle of
Man and informed Godred of the startling events
that were happening in the Scottish Isles. Godred,
without delay, equipped a considerable fleet, with
which he sailed to the Isles w^ith the object of
crushing the rebellion. Somerled, having been
apprised of the approach of this large armament,
collected a fleet of 80 sail, and on the night of
Epiphany, 115G A.D.,^ a long, obstinate, and
sanguinary conflict took place ofl" the north coast of
Isla. If we gauge the battle by its results, the
advantage lay with the Thane of Argyll. Peace
was concluded, and a treaty formed between Godred
and Somerled by which the whole of the islands
south of the Point of Ardnamurchan, along with
Kintyre,* came into j^ossession of the latter.
The peace which was thus established proved
of short duration. The history of the time tells
us little or nothing as to the causes of the
second rupture, but within the space of two years
after this treaty with Godred, Somerled invaded the
^ Chronicles of Man Orknej'inga Saga.
- Said to have been Paul Balkansou, Norwegian Lord of Skye.
^ Chronicles of Man.
* Since the time of Magnus Barefoot, Kin tyre was reckoned one of the
Isles.
46 THE CLAN DONALD.
Isle of Man with fifty-three galleys, routed Godred,
and laid the country waste. Godred's power was so
much shattered tltat he was compelled to fly to
Norway and seek aid from his liege lord against
his victorious brother-in-law. But for a period of
six years, during the Ufe-tirae of Somerled, Godred
never returned to his usurped dominion, and the
w^hole kingdom of Man and the Isles lay at the
victor's feet.^
This rapid and triumphant revolution in favour
of Gaelic influence on the western shores of Scot-
land could not be viewed with indifference by the
State, and was the cause of much envy among the
neighbours of the Thane of Argyll. However
unlikely it may be that Somerled's father was
involved in the political complications subsequent
to the death of Malcolm Canmore, it is absolutely
certain that his sympathies, and those of his son,
would be with the Gaelic influence that placed
Donald Bane on the throne, as against the Anglo-
Norman culture which was moulding Scottish
institutions during the reign of Queen Margaret's
sons. Circumstances arose to confirm and increase
any unfriendly feeling already existing between
the house of Somerled and the Crown.
The Province of Moray, inhabited in early times
by the Northern Picts, and long occupying an
independent position as regards the region of
Southern Pictland, Avas, in the reign of David I.,
attached to the Scottish Crown, and Angus, the
last of the Mormaors, was slain in battle in 1130.^
Four years thereafter the rising of Malcolm Mac-
beth and his claim to the Eai'ldom of Moray took
place. This insurrection, with the whole train of
^ Chronicles of Man. - Aunals of Ulster and Innisfalleu,
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 47
relative circumstances, is fraught with such peculiar
interest, and has so direct a bearing upon the life of
Somerled, that it demands more than a passing-
reference. Malcolm Macheth first appears in history
as a monk of the Cistercian monastery of Furness,
founded in 1124, under the name of Wymund. He
is said to have possessed qualities of a high order,
calculated to secure advancement and dignity in the
Church. His prospects of preferment appeared
particularly bright. In 1134, Olave, King of Man,
founded and endowed a religious house at Russin, in
affiliation with the monastery of Furness, of which
Yvo was Abbot, and Wymund was placed in charge
of the new establisliment. His address was so
winning, and his person so commanding, that he
soon became very popular among the Norsemen, and
they requested him to become their Bishop. In
this their desires were gratified. No sooner was
this step of promotion accomj)lished than a new and
unexpected development in the career of Wymund
arose. He declared himself to be the son of Angfus,
Earl of Moray, who had been slain in 1130, and
that he himself had been deprived of his inheritance
by the Scottish King. The King of Man and
Somerled, whose sister^ Wymund afterwards
espoused, recognised the validity of his claim, which,
according to the best authorities, appears to have
been well founded. He gave up the monastic name
of Brother Wymund, and assumed his proper Gaelic
name, Malcolm Macheth. He immediately took
steps to vindicate his claim to the Earldom of
^ Lord Hailes, Vol. I., says : — " Apud Scotiam Somerled et nepotes sui
filii scilicet Malcolmi." It could not have been a daughter of Somerled hy
Ragnliildis, whom he married as late as 1140. Possiblj', though not probably,
it might have been a daughter of Somerled by a former marriage who was
Malcolm's wife, ■ •
48 THE CLAN DONALD.
Moray. Having assembled a small fleet in the Isle
of Man, he sailed to the Western Isles, where he
receiv^ed a friendly reception from Somerled, and
from whence he invaded the mainland of Scotland.
Shortly after this, the Norwegian Earl of Orkney
lent him his powerful support, and gave a strong
proof of his faith in the rightfulness of his pre-
tensions by marrying his sister. His connection
with two such powerful chiefs enabled him for
several years to prosecute his enterprise with a
certain measure of success. He maintained an
irregular and joredatory warfare with David I., at
times retiring to his mountain fastnesses, at others
taking refuge in his ships when pressed by the
royal forces, until at last he was betrayed and taken
prisoner while crossing the river Cree in Galloway.
David, contrary to the character of saintliness he is
said to have possessed, ordered his eyes to be put
out, and imprisone 1 him in the Castle of Roxburgh.^
After Malcolm's capture and imprisonment, his
sons appear to have sought a refuge with their
uncle, the Thane of Argyll, although in their earlier
struggles to recover their family rights, he does not
seem to have taken a very prominent or active part.
His own conflicts with the Norsemen w^ould have
occupied all his energies. It appears that some time
after his imprisonment in Roxburgh, Malcolm
received the royal pardon, and taking up the broken
thread of his monastic life he aga,in assumed the
cowl, and retired to the monastery of Biland in
Yorkshire. The sons of Malcolm Macbeth were
again in rebellion in 1153 after the accession of
Malcolm IV., and there is no doubt that on this
occasion they enjoyed the powerful and strenuous
1 Celtic Scotland, vol. L, })p. 460-64 ; Highlanders of Scotland, vol. II., p. 166.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 49
support of their uncle. Somerled took up arms,
however, not merely in support of the Moray family,
but as a protest against intrigues among the King's
advisers which threatened the subversion of his own
influence and position. The war lasted three years,
and in course of it Donald, the eldest son of Malcolm
Macbeth, was taken prisoner at Whithorn, in Gal-
loway, and sent to the Castle of Roxburgh, where
bis father had been in captivity.^ Such, however,
was the vigour with which Somerled prosecuted
the war, that Malcolm lY., considering prudence
to be the better part of valour, resolved to come
to terms. A treaty was drawn up in which,
among other stipulations, it was agreed that Donald
should be liberated, and Malcolm Macbeth invested
with the Earldom of E-oss.^ That Malcolm was
advanced to this dignity, although he failed to
secure his ancestral position, is proved by letters of
protection granted about this time by the King to
the monks of Dunfermline, and addressed ''Malcolmo
Comite de Ros,"^ &c. The charter, by which Som-
erled effected such a great deliverance for the family
of Macbeth, was so important as to mark an epoch
in the history of such documents. Thus we have
charters by King Malcolm to Angus de Sandside
and to Berowaldus Flandrensis, both " given at
Perth in the year of our Lord immediately following
the treaty between the King and Somerled."*
The peace that was established between the
Crown and Somerled in 1157 seems to have lasted
about seven years. History is not very clear as to
^ Haile's Annals.
^ Skene's Historians of Scotland, vol. IV. ; Wyntoun, vol. II.
3 Celtic Scotland, vol. I., pp. 470-71.
■* Carta . . per Malcolmum regem iv. Dat. apud Pert uatali domino
proximo post coucordiam regis et Somerledi.
i
50 THE CLAiS^ DONALD.
the causes which led to an outbreak of hostihties In
1164. According to tlie Chronicles of Man and the
Scottish historians who have professed to record the
transactions of the age, he had formed the ambitious
design of conquering the whole of Scotland. We
confess to attaching very little value to the opinions
of Scottish historians regarding the history of the
Highlands. Ignorance of the language, customs,
and traditions of the people has so tainted their
utterances ; racial hatred has likewise so blinded
them to facts, that their deliverances on the difficult
problems of Highland history are in the main quite
unreliable.
That Somerled was inspired by ambition it
would be useless to deny, as otherwise he could
never have carved out so illustrious a career, or laid
the foundation of a great historical dynasty. That
an inordinate desire possessed him to enlarge his
already extensive territories by an attack upon the
Scottish Knigdom, is in the nature of things most
unlikely, and inconsistent with the clear judgment
which seems to have marked his policy even in the
most stormy passages of his warlike life. Here, as
on occasions elsewhere, the historian of Sleat seems
to strike the true historical note. The Scottish King:
was anxious to extend his sway over the whole of
Scotland, and showed symptoms of a desire to grasp
the mainland territories of Argyll, Kintyre, and
Lorn.^ Other reasons also may have operated in
causing Somerled to assume the aggressive against
the King. It is a fair inference frc>m the history of
the time that his action represented a movement on
the part of the Celtic population to resist the pohcy
of the Crown, which had for its aim to crush the
1 Hugh Macdoiiald's MS.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 51
independent princes of Scotland in detail. Malcolm
TV. is said to have invaded both Galloway and
Moray in 1160, and to have introduced large
changes into these regions by the removal of the
native population and the introduction of the
Southerner to occupy their places. That this may
have been true to a limited extent need not be
disputed ; but our faith in the statement is not
strengthened when it comes to us on the authority
of John of Fordun. Be this as it may, there is no
doubt as to the proceedings taken by the Crown
against the Celtic chiefs in 1160, and it is in the
highest degree probable that Somerled, by his action
in 1164, sought to make a diversion in their favour
by invading Scotland in force. In addition to
all this, there was the risk to which Somerled's
own interests were exposed. He had suftered
many provocations from Malcolm and his Min-
isters, and so anticipating danger to his posses-
sions and position from their threatening attitude,
he resolved to take time by the forelock,
and strike a decisive blow in self-defence. As a
protest against the unprincipled greed of Malcolm
the Maiden and the unscrupulous and grasping spirit
of his advisers, Somerled in 1164 gathered a great
host, 15,000 strong, from Ireland, Argyllshire, and
the Isles, and with a fleet of one hundred and sixty-
four galleys, sailed up the Clyde to Greenock, where
he disembarked his force in the bay of St Lawrence.
Thence he marched to Benfrew, where the King's
army lay encamped. The records of the time are not
very trustworthy, but such as they are there are
two important inferences to be drawn from them
which are helpful in arriving at a correct conclusion
as to the events that supervened. In the hrst
52 THE CLAN DONALD.
place, it is clear from the statements of the
chroniclers that the King's force was numerically
unfit to cope with the host that Somerled had
brought to the field. In the second place, the
undoubted result of the action was that Somerled
was slain and his army dispersed. Had a battle
been fought it is incredible that the small force
apparently opposed to him would have sufiiced to
baffle the tried valour and skilful leadership of
the Thane of Argyll. Plence the ancient chroniclers^
call in tlie special intervention of heaven to account
for the otherwise unaccountable result. On the
whole, we are disposed to accept the traditional
version as that which best fits in with all the known
circumstances of the case. Feeling reluctant to join
issues with the Highland host, and anticipating
defeat in the open field, Malcolm's advisers fell on
the cowardly and ignominious plan of assassinating
the Island leader. To this end they bribed a mis-
creant of the name of Maurice Macneill, a camp
follower, and he being a near relative of Somerled,
the latter had nothing to fear from his presence
in the camp. This individual, coming in the guise
of friendship, was admitted into Somerled's tent,
and finding him off" his guard, stabbed him to the
heart.^ The hero who was unconquered in the field
was not proof against the assassin's knife, and his
large army, on learning the fate of their trusted
leader, melted away like a snow-wreath, betook
themselves to their galleys, and sadly dispersed.
No doubt a different account from this is given
by the Scottish historians. Those who do not
'■ Claouiclcs of MelrobC, p. l(ji) ; Wyiitoun, lUii ; Fortlouii, p. 2[>2, in
fcikuue's HicitcjriaLis of Scotland. See Appendix,
2 Hugh Macdonakrs MS.
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 53
attribute the result to the direct intervention of
Providence allege that Malcolm's army not only
defeated, but v^ell-nio-h annihilated that of
Somerled. Possibly the retreating host may
have been harassed by the enemy, who hung
upon their rear and cut off some stragglers in
their flight, and this would have lent colour to
the exaggerated tales of slaughter contained in
the records of the age. It is difficult to conceive
how — if Somerled's army, as alleged, was totally
defeated at Renfrew — the territories of the rebel
were neither annexed to the Crown nor awarded
to the hungry Norman courtiers who were yearning
to lay their hands upon them. On the contrary,
Somerled's family suffered no diminution of their
power. E/Cginald, Dugall, and Angus were all left
in undisturbed possession of their father's extensive
domains. We prefer Hugh Macdonald's tradition
to the exaggerated, inconsistent, and imaginative
declamations of the chroniclers, as bearing far more
of the appearance of sober, historical truth. To the
same authority we are indebted for the statement
that the remains of the Thane of Argyll were taken
at the King's expense to lona, and buried there
with great pomp and ceremony ; but the tradition
of the family has always been that Saddel, where
Somerled had commenced the erection of a monastery
which was afterwards completed by his son Peginald,
was the last resting-place of the great Celtic hero.
The Sleat historian tells us that Somerled was
" a well -tempered man, in body shapely, of a fair
piercing eye, of middle stature and of quick discern-
ment." The reference to his stature contained in
this quotation does not seem to harmonise with
the description stereotyped in Highland tradition,
according to which he is styled Somhcdrle Mor
54
THE CLAN DONALD.
MacGillebhride. Yet the application of the epithet
Mot may have arisen, not so much from physical size
as from the general idea of greatness, the com-
manding position of Somerled in the history of his
race, and the description of Hugh Macdonald not
improbably embodies a genuine and authentic
tradition.
RUINS OF SADDEL MONASTEIIY, THE BURIAL PLACE OF SOJIERLED.
Somerled was probably the greatest hero that
his race has produced. It may seem strange that
no Gaelic bard has sung of his exploits, l)ut in his
day and long afterwards, Gaelic singers were more
taken up with the mythical heroes of the Feinn
than with the genuine warriors of their native land.
Others of his line may have equalled him in personal
bravery and military prowess ; but Somerled was
more than a warrior. He possessed not only the
SOMERLED MACGILLEBRIDE. 55
courage and dash which are associated with the
Celtic character ; he had the organising brain, the
fertile resource, the art not only of winning battles,
but of turning them to account ; that sovereign
faculty of commanding the respect and allegiance of
men which marks the true king, the able man of
Thomas Carlyle's ideal. Without the possession of
this imperial capacity he could never, in the face of
such tremendous odds, have wrested the sovereignty
of the Gael from his hereditary foes, and handed
it to the Clan Cholla, to be their heritap"e for
hundreds of years. He was the instrument by
which the position, the power, the language of the
Gael were saved from being overwhelmed by
Teutonic influence, and Celtic culture and tradition
received a new lease of life. He founded a family
which played no ignoble part in Scottish history.
If our faith in the principle of heredity is sometimes
shaken by degenerate sons of noble sires, when the
last links of a line of long ago prove unworthy heirs
of a great past, our faith is confirmed in it by the
line of princes that sat upon the Island throne, and
who as a race were stamped with the heroic qualities
which characterised the son of Gillebride. Somer-
led's life struggle had been with the power of the
Norseman, whose sun in the Isles he saw on the eve
of setting. But he met his tragic fate in conflict
with another and more formidable set of forces.
This was the contest which Somerled bequeathed as
a legacy to his successors. It was theirs to be the
leading spirits in the resistance of the Gaelic race,
language, and social life to the new and advancing
order which was already moulding into an organic
unity the various nationalities of Scotland — the
ever-increasing, ever-extending power of feudal
institutions.
56 THE CLAN DONALD.
CHAPTEE IV.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED.— 1164-1266,
The Sons of Somerled. — Division of Patrimony. — Strife between
Reginald and Angus. — Death of Angus. — Reginald Succeeds
to his Estates. — Character of Reginald. — Question of
Seniority. — Descendants of Dugall Mac Somerled. — The Sons
of Reginald. — Descent of King Alexander upon Argyll in
1221-2. — Descent in 1249.— Position of Ewin of Lorn. —
Donald of Isla. — Angaxs Mor.— Scottish Aggression in Isles. —
Roderick of Bute. — Haco's Expedition. — Battle of Largs. —
Cession of Isles. — Position of the Island Lords.
King Malcolm IY. of Scotland died in 1165, the
year following Soraerled's death at Renfrew, and
was succeeded by his brother, William the Lion.
During the long reign of William (1166-1214) no
further effort seems to have been made to subjugate
Argyll and the Isles. The history of Somerled's
descendants during the century subsequent to his
death is involved in much obscurity. Though the
career of the great Thane is in some respects
shrouded in uncertainty, his personality and enter-
prise gave such a fresh impulse to Celtic aspirations
in the West that it were strange did we not possess
certain clear historical outlines. When the curtain
that fell upon the tragedy of his life's close rises
again, we are still enveloped in mist, and the
shadows cast upon the background of the historical
stage by his successors are, while less imposing, not
altogether so clearly defined. Somerled left a
Celtic kingdom, partly inherited, but all won by
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 57
the sword, extending from the Butt of Lewis to
the most southerly point of Man ; but when the
strong hand of the heroic ruler vanished, Godred,
who for several years had been skulking in Norway,
returned and resumed possession of Man and the
Northern Isles. These latter comprised Lewis and
Harris, Uist and Barra, then known as Innis Fadda,
Skye, CoU,^ and other lesser Isles.
Besides the three sons of Somerled by Bagnhildis,
it is said that he had other sons. One of these, Gille-
Galium, is supposed to have been slain at Eenfrew.^
Another son, by a Lowland woman, was named
GalP MacSgillin, said to have been the progenitor of
the Clan Gall of the Glens ; while the names of other
two. Gillies' and Olave,^ have also been handed down.
According to the Sleat historian, Somerled's oldest
son bore his own name, and succeeded him as Thane
of Argyll. In this statement he does not appear to
have the support of any other authority, yet it
seems to lend a certain confirmation to references in
the Norwegian Sagas to a second Somerled who
flourished during the early years of the ISth
century. '^ This Somerled is spoken of as a
Sudoreyan King, a cousin of the sons of Dugall
MacSomerled, and was in all probability a grandson
of the great Thane ; but which of Somerled's sons
was his father it is, of course, impossible to say. It
seems probable, on the whole, that descendants of
^ Gregory is mistaken in including Coll among the possessions of Dugall
MacSomerled. Coll was a seat of the Norwegian Reginald, and in the poem
Baile Suthain Sith Eamhne, in the book of Fermoy, he is referred to as King
of Coll.
^ Chronicles of Man,
^ Book of Clauranald in " Reliquifo Celticce," vol. II., p. 157.
* According to Hugh JMacdonald, Gillies had lands in Kintyre.
5 Hugh Macdonald's IMS.
•^ Anecdotes of Olave the Black.
58, THE CLAN DONALD.
Somerled MacGillebride, other than those by the
daughter of the King of Man, inherited lands in the
district of Oirthirghael, though all traces of their
territorial position have disappeared. The reason
why the light of history fails us utterly regarding
them we shall consider further on.
In the division of the Southern Isles and a
portion of Oirthirghael among the sons of Somerled
and Ragnhildis, the treaty between Somerled and
Godred, in 1155/ was carried out in this wise: —
Kintyre ^ and Isla, the patrimony of the Clan Cholla
and the early seat of their power in Scotland, fell to
the share of Reginald; Lorn, Mull, and Jura became
Dugall's ; while Bute, with a part of Arran,^ and
the Rough bounds, extending from Ardnamurchan
to Glenelg, were bequeathed to Angus. The
remaining portion of the North Oirthir, extending
from Glenelg to Lochbroom, passed into the hands
of the Lay Abbot of Applecross.
The possessions thus apportioned among the
three sons of Somerled — won by the might of their
father's sword — were, undoubtedly, held by them
as a free and independent principality. Whether
their immediate descendants after 1222, the year
of King Alexander's descent upon Argyll, owned
the superiority of Scotland for their mainland
possessions, is a question to be considered by-
and-bye. That the sons of Somerled entered into
possession of the Southern Isles, which had been
wrested from Godred, owning allegiance neither to
Scotland nor Norway, is an historical fact beyond all
dispute. This proud sense of independence, which
^ See p. 45.
^ From the time of Miignus Barefoot, Kintyre was reckoneil one of the
Isles.
^ T)ie rest of Arran belonged to Reginald,
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 59
brooked no superior, was perpetuated in the race
even after the reahty had passed away, and led to
the eventual downfall of the family of the Isles — a
family characterised by Buchanan as '• clarissima et
potentissima priscorum Scotorum gens." ^
The division of the Somerledian possessions does
not appear to have given unqualified satisfaction.
The partition of Arran especially was fraught with
unfortunate results. Where lands are " compassed
by the inviolate sea," boundaries are easily preserved,
but the line dividing Arran into two equal shares
would have been hard to observe without occasional
friction and the stern arbitrament of war. Keg'inald
having driven Angus and his sons out of both Bute
and Arran, followed them into Garmoran, the
northern possession of Angus. There, in the year
1192,^ a battle was fought, in which Angus was
victorious. Eighteen years thereafter (1210), Angus
and his three sons were killed by the men of Skye.^
It does not follow from this that the fatal battle
was fought in Skye, for undoubtedly that island,
as well as Innis Fadda, were both at that time in
the possession of Reginald, the Norwegian King of
Man and the Isles. According to the author of the
" Historical Account of the Family of MacDonald,"
published in 1819, Angus and his sons were killed at
Moidart, which was a part of their hereditary
possessions, probably in the act of repelling an
incursion of Norsemen from the Isle of Skye, who
still continued to infest the North Oirthir ; and this
is, no doubt, the correct version of the end of this
branch of the house of Somerled.
^ " The most distinguished and powerful family of the ancient Scots."
2 Chronicles of Man. ^ Gregory, p. ] 7, Annals of Ulster.
60 THE CLAN DONALD.
Angus' male line having thus become extinct,
his possessions passed over to Reginald and his son
Roderick. James the son of Angus, however, left
a daughter Jane, who married Alexander, eldest
son of Walter, the High Stewart of Scotland. This
led, in future years, to much trouble as regards the
possession of the island of Bute. After the death of
Angus and his sons in battle, the mainland and
island possessions of the sons of Somerled were
divided pretty equally between the families of
Reginald and Dugall. The relations between these
two branches of the Clan Cholla were never of the
most cordial description, and even at that early date
a misunderstanding arose as to the ownership of
Mull, which lasted over 100 years. The house of
Somerled, however, was all powerful in that region ;
the voice of the Campbell was not yet heard in the
land, and the families of Argyll and the Isles were
vassals of the Clan Cholla.
Reginald of Isla, according to the Irish historians,
seems to have been popular both in Scotland and
in Ireland, feared in war but loved in peace. The
exigencies of the time often led him to the field
of battle, sometimes on the defensive sometimes as
the aggressor ; yet, as has often been true of the
greatest heroes, he loved peace more than war, and
we find him acting the part of peacemaker not only
among his own people, but also on the other side of
the Irish Channel.
It is probably at this stage that we can most
conveniently discuss and, so far as possible, dispose
of the question as to which of the sons of Somerled
was the older, Reginald or Dugall. The seniority of
Dugall would not, for reasons that will afterwards
appear, constitute tlie Clan Dugall the senior
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 61
branch of the house of Somerled, and therefore the
question, though one of hiterest, is not of serious
importance. In those days the feudal law of
primogeniture, by which the oldest son succeeds
to his father's lands, was not operative in the Isles ;
lands were gavelled ^ equally among the male
members of a family, and in more than one case
it is difficult to arrive at definite conclusions
when questions as to seniority arise. It is only
inferentially that we can form an opinion as to
the point at issue. The Seanachies give us no
assistance. M'Vurich is silent on the subject,
althouD^h, in mentionino- the sons of Somerled, he
names Dugall first.
Hugh Macdonald, adopting what is with him a
favourite role, bastardises Dugall, evidently with the
view of placing beyond doubt or cavil the seniority
of the house of Isla. Historians have followed one
another slavishly in miaking Dugall the oldest of
the sons of Somerled. One reason only can there
be for the adoption of such a view. When the
barons of Man and the Isles rose against Godred
in 1155,^ it w^as Dugall who was carried through
the Isles and proclaimed King. This has been
taken as evidence of Dugall's seniority. It may
very well be evidence of the contrary. Most prob-
ably it was because he was the younger son that he
was put forward as his mother's heir for the posses-
sion of Man and the Isles, while Reginald, as the
older son, was regarded as his father's successor in
the hereditary domains of Oirthirghael. We have
already stated that primogeniture did not rule in
^ The word "gavel" is an English corruption of the Gaelic word
" gabhail," which is still used in the Western Isles in the sense of " holding."
^ See pp. 44-5
62 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Isles as regards the inheritance of lands. Yet
the head of the race, whether brother or son to the
last chief, enjoyed certain privileges. Preferably to
others he possessed those lands which had always
been connected with the residence of the head of the
house. Hence, although the territories of Somerled
were divided in somewhat equal portions, it is a
significant fact that the occupancy of the lands of
Kintyre and Isla remained with the descendants of
Reginald. The modern Campbeltown, which was
the cradle of the Scottish monarchy, became in after
times the chief seat of the lords of the Isles in the
peninsula of Kintyre, and went under the name of
Kinloch Kilkerran. It would thus appear that these
lands, which were the seat of the Dalriadic power
and the peculiar patrimony of the Clan Cholla,
became after the days of Kenneth MacAlpin asso-
ciated with that branch of the Scoto-Irish race which
was represented by Somerled and his descendants.
That Reginald and his posterity held this immemorial
heritage of the Clan Cholla in preference to the line
of Dugall seems to suggest the seniority of the house
of Isla. Still further there is a prominence given in
the records of the time to Reginald and his descend-
ants, which clearly points to their being the chief
inheritors of the name and honours of the house of
Somerled.
Even if it were the case, which in our opinion
it is not, that Dugall MacSomerled was the oldest of
the three sons, that fact would not constitute the
Clan Dugall, necessarily, the senior branch of the
Clan Cholla. There are grave reasons for doubting
whether the Clan Dugall, as represented by the
head of that line for upwards of four hundred years,
are at all descended from Dugall MacSomerled. A
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 63
brief glance at the descendants of this Dugall may
be helpful in the solution of the question. Dugall,
son of Somerled, left three sons, Dugall Scrag, Dun-
can, and another son named Uspac^ Hakon, who
appears in the Norwegian Sagas. Uspac stood high
in the confidence of King Haco, who made him a King
in the Sudoreys. It is recorded by the same authority
that in 1228-30, when the Norwegian forces came
south to Isla Sound, the three brothers. Kings
Uspac, Dugall, and Duncan, were already there with
a large armament, and it is interesting to find refer-
ence to the second Somerled as taking part in the
expedition. The Sudoreyan princes invited the
Norwegians to a banquet, but the latter having
heard of the strong wine drunk at the Celtic
symposia (does the potent national beverage possess
this venerable antiquity ?), and having their sus-
picions otherwise aroused, declined the proffered
hospitality. A night attack was made on the
Norsemen, when a considerable number of the
Sudoreyans, Somerled among the rest, were killed.
Dugall Scrag was taken prisoner and protected by
Uspac, who does not appear to have been implicated
in the fray. With this incident Dugall Scrag passes
out of history.
Shortly after this, Olave King of Man, invaded
Bute, then in the possession of the Scots, with a fleet
of 80 ships, and besieged the Castle of E-othesay.
The Norwegians were eventually successful with a
loss of 390 men, and Uspac Hakon, who was among
the assailants, was mortally wounded by a stone
hurled from the battlements. He survived only till
he reached Kintyre, whence his body was borne to
lona.^
^ Anecdotes of Olave the Black. ^ Anecdotes of Clave the Black.
64 THE CLAN DONALD.
After this, Duncan the son of Dugall MacSomer-
led was the only member of the family who seems
to have had any territorial position in the Isles ;
in fact, so far as history records, he was the sole
representative of the line who left behind him a
traceable posterity. As Duncan de Lorn he
witnessed a charter to the Earl of Athole, and
as Duncan de Ergalita he signs the letter and
oath to the Pope of the nobles of Scotland,
on the treaty of Ponteland, in 1244.^ Duncan's
son, King Ewin or, as he is designated in the
Sagas, King John, was the son of this Duncan,
and the representative of the family in 1263.
Historians have assumed that King John or Ewin
was the father of Alexander de Ergaclia who, with
his son John, was the determined enemy of Bruce
in the war of Scottish independence. Now it is
almost as certain as any historical fact connected
with so remote a period can be, that Ewin of Lorn,
the son of Duncan, left no male issue. It seems
clear that his line terminated with two heiresses,
one of whom married the King of Norway and the
other Alexander of Isla, son of Angus Mor. It is
on record that Alexander of Isla, through his wife
Juliana, possessed lands in the island of Lismore,*^
which was part of the lordship of Lorn, and that
Edward I. summoned Edward Baliol before him for
preventing them from enjoying possession of these
lands. It is well established that, according to
the feudal and Celtic laws of territorial possession,
females could not inherit lands except on the failure
of heirs male. Only because of such failure do we
find, first Christina, and afterwards Amie Macruairi,
in the line of Roderick, the son of Reginald, inherit-
^ Kecords of Bcauly Piiory. '^ Orig. Par.
SEAL OF REGINALD, SON OF SOMERLED.
REGINALDUS REX INSULARUM, DOMINUS DE ERGILE.
1164-1207
.•.^.^^^fyr^JB^H^^^^^Hpi^^^l^^^^^^^H
^Hm^^^^^^^
fe^
V
^v
^
^V'.
IVK
\
B
1 ■ f
^H^ ^^y>^fi "i^pmiF ^nji
w^^J .
£^
;^-
"^^^^i^52S!J
^•'
■^^*«'-— =■ ■
jTi^iy
REVERSE SIDE OF THE SEAL OF REGINALD.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED.
65
ing the patrimony of the family. Hence the
succession of Juh'ana of Lorn to a portion at
least of her father's lands, forbids ns to believe that
he left any sons, and strongly suggests tlie conclusion
that the male descendants of Dugall MacSomerled
terminated with Ewin. Supposing, however, for the
sake of argument, not only that Dugall MacSomerled
was the oldest son, but that Alexander de Ergadia,
who flourished in the time of Bruce, was his direct
iijB^
wssi
<l!^
^F'^
^W
^^^^^^^1
- ^4!hj
1
i
'.^H
BBKl .^^^^^1
KILKERRAN LOCir, KINTYKE.
descendant, this is very far from proving that the
Clan Dugall are the senior branch of the Clan Cholla.
In truth, such a conclusion is impossible in view of
the fact that, in 1388 the line of Alexander de
Ergadia terminated in an heiress, who brought over
the lordship of Lorn to her husband, Jolni Stewart.
It is thus clear to a demonstration that the Clan
Dugall, of whom the family of Dunolly is the leading
branch, cannot, on any supposition, be traced back
0
66 THE CLAX DONALD.
in the male line to Dugall, the son of Somerled.
Although we are not writing a history of the Clan
Dugall, it is desirable that their real origin should,
if possible, be pointed out, if for no other purpose
than to give the Clan Donald their true position as
the main branch of the Clan Cholla in the Western
Highlands. An opportunity for looking at the
question in its true bearings will immediately occur.
Meantime our discussion of the question of seniority
as between Keofinald and Duo^'all, the sons of
Somerled, has necessarily led us to anticipate, and
we must now take up the thread of our history
where w'e dropped it. Reginald, the son of Somer-
led, died in 1207. This is the date given by
the Book of Clanranald,^ and is probably correct.
The seal adhibited to his charter to Paisley Abbey
is thus described : — " In the middle of the seal on
one side, a ship filled with men-at-arms ; on the
reverse side, the figure of an armed man on horse-
back with a sword drawn in his hand."' By Fonia,
daughter of the Earl of Moray, Beginald had three
sons — Donald, Roderick, and Dugall. Most authori-
ties mention only two sons, excluding Dugall ; nor
do we find any record of him in tlie division of his
father's lands. Yet the MS. of 1450,' the most
valuable genealogical authority we possess, includes
Dugall among the sons of Reginald ; and not only
so, but traces the descent of the Clan Dugall to him
instead of to the son of Somerled.
As a matter of fact, and in view of all that has
been said, this is the only theory of the descent of
the Clan Dugall that appears on the evidence
^ Reliquifc CelticfC, p. 157.
" Grig. r.ir. Scot., vol. I., p. 2.
•* The Book of Balimolc agrees with the 1150 MS. in this respect, while
the Book of Leocan derives the Clau Dugall frora Dugall MacSomerled.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 67
possible to adopt ; and the value of the testimony
of the 1450 MS. on this question is immensely
enhanced when we remember, that it was in the
years during which the writer of that MS. flourished
that the Dunolly family, the undoubted heads of
their race, were invested by Stewart of Lorn in the
possession of the lands from which they derive their
designation, and ^\hich they have held down to the
present day.^
According to the Irish annalists, the sons of
Reginald were men of very different temper and
calibre from their father. They were found, like
him sometimes, among their Irish kinsmen, but
never as messengers of peace. The following
extract illustrates what manner of men they were : —
" Thomas MacUchtry and the sons of Reginald,
son of Somerled, came to Doire Challuim Chille
with 70 ships, and the town was greatly injured
by them. O'Domhnaill and they completely
destroyed the country.'"
Donald succeeded his father in the lordship of
South Kintyre, Isla, and other island possessions ;
while Roderick obtained North Kintyre,^ Bute, and
the lands of Garmoran, extending from Ardna-
murchan to Glenelg-, all of which formed the
possessions of Angus MacSomerled ; Lochaber
passing to the Comyns.
Oirthirghael and the Isles were now divided into
a number of little principalities, entirely in the
possession of the house of Somerled and of Reginald
of Man as feudatory of Norway. The vicinity of
such enterprising neighbours could hardly fail to be
irksome to the Scottish Kings, and the thirteenth
century witnessed a number of efforts on their part
^ Orig. Par. Scot. " Annals of Uic Four Masters.
5 Orig. Par. Scot., vol. 11., p. 2J.
68 THE CLAN DOXALD.
to brin^' these regions into subjection. Alexander II.
had no sooner ascended the throne in 1214, than
the old disturbers of the realm, the Mac Williams
and MacHeths, rose again in rebellion, and. were
assisted by the potentates of the Isles. In 1221,
after peace had been restored and the royal
influence consolidated, Alexander, fired by re-
sentment against the house of Somerled, made a
descent upon Argyll with the view of carrying out
a long cherished scheme for its con(piest. The
elements however were unpropitious ; his fleet was
driven back by a storm, and as winter was coming
on the attempt meanwhile was abandoned. The
following year the King fitted out a fresh expedition.
According to John of Fordun and Wyntoun, who
alone record the enterprise, the latter in doggerel
lines, ^ Alexander, in the course of his campaign, was
successful in conquering and enforcing the allegiance
of the Celtic chiefs of Argyll. Many it is said
submitted, gave hostages and large sums of money
as an earnest of future allegiance ; while others less
able to defend themselves, and dreadinp- the roval
vengeance, abandoned their ]iossessions and fled —
some to Galloway, where they afterwards proved of
service to their kinsmen in that region ; others to
the protection of their more fortunate kindred in the
Isles. What the alleged conquest of Argyll in 1222
actually amounted to, it is really diflicult to say, in
the absence of historical testimony more reliable
than that of the chroniclers referred to. That in
some instances the descent of the Scots upon
Argyll resulted in the displacement of the Gaelic
chiefs, is in the nature of things probable enough.
On such an hypothesis we can easily account for the
^ See Appendix,
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 69
disappearance of the descendants of Somerled, other
than those by Ragnhildis, from a territorial position
in Oirthirghael, a disappearance which would other-
wise be somewhat difficult to explain. Whatever
results the campaign of 1222 may have had in other
respects, it made little or no impression upon the
power or position of the Island Princes. As evidence
of this we find Alexander II., after wintering in
Aberdeen,^ coming back to the west of Scotland, and
using every means diplomatic and otherwise to
secure Argyll and the Isles. The Clan Cholla were
still a formidable problem in that region. The Kino-
had also to reckon with Norway, and he now sent
ambassadors to the Court of Haco, empowering
them to treat for the purchase of the Isles. Their
proposals were treated with scant favour, and from
that time down to 1249, matters in Argyll and the
Isles continued very much in the same position. In
that year Alexander, taking advantage of the death
of the Norwegian King of Man and the Isles, col-
lected a large force and proceeded to the Hebrides,
declaring " that he would not desist until he had
set his standard east on the cliffs of Thurso, and had
reduced under himself all the provinces which the
Norwegian monarch possessed to the westward of
the German Ocean.""'
The King sailed round Kintyre with his fleet
expecting to find Donald of Tsla overawed by such
a formidable and powerful armament; but it does not
appear that the island lord showed any symptoms of
submission. The King now made overtures to Ewin
of Lorn, whom he sought, unsuccessfully, to win
from the Norwegian alliance. Ewin had recently
been entrusted by Haco with the administration
^ W3'utoun's Clronicle, JBuuk VII., c. 9. - Sagu of Hakoii ]V.
70 THE CLAN DONALD.
of affairs connected with the Norwegian possessions
in the Isles. He held the castle of Kiarnaburo-h on
the West Coast of Mull and other strongholds in
the name of the King of Norway; and having set
before himself the aml:>itious design of becoming
master both of Man and the Isles, he was not likely
to take part in Alexander's canij^aign for a reward
which must, in any case, have fallen short of what
he hoped ultimately to secure. Whether Alexander
in these circumstances would have pursued the
campaign further or to a successful issue it is
difficult to say, for death arrested all his plans in
the small island of Kerrera in the 52nd year of his
age. His army broke up and the campaign closed.
Ewin of Lorn, taking advantage of the lull that
followed the storm, made elaborate preparations
towards the accomplishment of his scheme of taking-
possession of Man and the Isles. He invaded Man
and declared himself King; but his reign was short-
lived. He had no sooner taken possession of the
throne than a messaoj'e was sent to Haco informing'
him of the position of affairs. The Norwegian King-
invoked the aid of Donald of Isla and his brother
lloderick, and this having been promptly and
effectively given, Ewin, who was obnoxious to
the great majority of the Manxmen, was driven
from the Island, and compelled to take refuge in liis
own domains.^ Donald, by rendering this tiniely
assistance, seemed the friendship of the King of
Norway, and the alliance which was thus cemented
between the family of Isla and the Norwegian Crown
continued without interruption until the close of the
Norwegian occupation of the Isles.
' Cliiuuioles of Miui : Tui-faeus.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 71
King Alexander III. being a minor for many
years after his father's death, and Ewin of Lorn
having been humbled by his recent defeat, Donald
of Isla had little to fear from enemies from without,
and during the remainder of his life we hear of him
no more as a man of war. That his life had been a
stormy one, and not altogether free from the crimes
and excesses common in that age, the traditional
historian leads us to infer.^ The same authority
informs us that he and his uncle Dugall having dis-
corded, probably about some barren promontory in
Mull, the latter was killed by Donald. After this
King Alexander sent a messenger to Argyll, Sir
William Rollock, to demand of Donald allegiance for
his lands. Sir William got decapitation for his
pains. Still further, and to fill the cup to the brim,
this man of blood and iron put to death Galium
Aluinn, the son of Gillies, the son of Somerled,
and banished Gillies himself to Ireland, where some
of his descendants remain to this day. It is
not surprising that these deeds of violence, con-
sidered enormities even in an age when might
was right, combined with his early depredations
in the North of Ireland, should when reflection
came have caused qualms of conscience in Donald's
breast, which only the unction of the supreme fount
of spiritual authority on earth could assuage. To
Rome, therefore, the conscience-stricken chief made
a pilgrimage.
We trust that in such an emergency the elements
were propitious, and that, after a long voyage, when
the penitent descendant of Conn arrived in the
Eternal City, accompanied by seven priests — a
sacred number of a sacred order — he was not left
1 Hugh Macdouald's MS.
72 THE CLAN DONALD.
outside by the successor of St Peter longer than the
interests of discipL'ne absolutely demanded. Donald,
having made his confession in the only tongue with
which he was familiar, and this having been made
intelHgible to the Holy Father by the learned clerics
from the Isles, received the absolution that he
craved. Having thus obtained the forgiveness of
the Church, it would appear that Donald, in his
future relations with that body, brought forth fruits
worthy of repentance.^ Like his father and many
of his successors, he enriched the Church with
valuable gifts of land."-' From this Donald the Clan
takes its name, a fact which indicates his prominence
in the history of his race, and the impression he
created on the age in which he flourished. It is also
observable that in his time, or more probably shortly
after it, fixed patronymics came into existence in
the Highlands, while in the Lowlands tlie surnames
adopted were generally territorial. The collateral
branches of the house of Somerled after Donald
were more or less independent of one another,
and in order to avoid confusion, such patronymics
as Macruairi, MacDugall, Mac A.llister, and others
became fixed. After this period, or at anyrate after
the middle of the fourteenth century, there is no
record of a new patronymic springing from the
house of Somerled. The word Donald, which in
Gaelic is DomltnuU, appears in its oldest form as
Domvall = \)nmno Valdos, "a world wielder."^
According to the historian of Sleat, Donald died
at Skipness in 1289, but this date is clearly
incorrect, for many years before then his successor
was head and representative of the family. The
' What amount uf cicdfiice is to lie attaclud Lu Uii.-s sLiuy it i« ilillicult Lo
say. It (l(jc.s nut jioHscs.-i inucli ex facie inubability,
^ Orig. Tar. Scot., Chart, uf Paisley.
^ Vide Book of ])ecr.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 73
date of his death is very probably prior to 124'J,
for before that date we find his son Angus giving
a charter for part of his lands in Kintyre.^ He
was buried in that sacred isle in which, after life's
fitful fever, many of the Kings of Tnnse-Gall
peacefully repose. By a daughter of Walter, the
High Steward of Scotland, he had two sons —
Angus, afterwards known as Angus Mor, and
Alexander.
During the minority of Alexander III., compata-
tive quietness reigned over Argyll and the Isles.
It was different in other parts of Scotland. The
kingdom was torn asunder by factions among the
nobility, and it was not until 11^62, when the
young King came of age, that comparative order
was restored. Once more the idea of annexing the
Isles became the policy of the Crown ; and Alexander
III., adopting the methods of his father, used every
means, both by conciliation and aggression, to
bring the Celtic chiefs of the west under his control.
He made special efforts to secure the allegiance of
Angus Mor of Isla, and seems so far to have suc-
ceeded in disarming the opposition of the Island
lord,^ He held his infant son Alexander as
hostage,^ and an instrument was drawn out declar-
ing the instant forfeiture of Angus if he deserted
the King's cause. The hollow allegiance proved of
short duration.
^ Orig. Par. Scot., Kilkerrau.
^ Matth. Paris, 770. Autiquariun Transactions, 3C7-8. Scriptum
obligatorium Anegi Douonaldi quod exhaeredetur si furisfecerit contra regem
Scotiae. — Sir Joseph Ayloffe's Calendar of Ancient Charters, p. 328. Litera
baronum de Ergadia quod fideliter servient regi sub poena exliaeredatioiiis
contra Anegum filium Doveualdi, quod omnes insurgent contra ipsuui, si nou
fecerit voluntatem regis. — Ibid, p. 342.
^ In the Scottish Chanibei-lain's Accounts there is the followiug entry : —
" For the expenses of the son of Angus, who was the son of Donald, with liis
nurse and a waiting woman for two weeks, the King jjaid 79 shillings and nine
pence."
f4 THE CLAN DONALD.
For some time matters had been ripening for a
decisive conflict between Scotland and Norway as to
the possession of the Isles, We have already seen
that, after the death of Angus MacSomerled and his
sons in Moidart in 1192, their possessions including
Bute, passed to Keginald, and thereafter to his son
E-oderick. As already pointed out, James the son
of Angus MacSomerled left a daughter, who married
Alexander, son and heir of Walter Stewart of Scot-
land, and he in his wife's name claimed the island of
Bute. Roderick resisted this aggression with all
the force at his command, but he was ultimately
disj)ossessed and outlawed. At the same time, in
the North-west of Scotland, events were hastening
the inevitable crisis. An assault was made upon
the Norwegian Kingdom of Man and the Isles by
Ferchar Macintaggart, a son of the Red Priest of
Applecross, and the fii-st of the Earls of Ross of
that family. He had been knighted by Alexander
II. for his services in quelling an insurrection in
Moray, ^ and by the same King he was advanced
to the dignity of Earl of Ross for services rendered
in the suppression of a rising of the men of Galloway.^
Macintaggart and several of his vassals made a
ruthless descent upon Skye. According to the
Norse Sagas, they sacked villages, desecrated
churches, and in wanton fury raised children on
the points of their spears and shook them until
they fell to the ground. Scottish aggressiveness
had thus, both north and south, displayed such
rapacity and violence that the Island Chiefs, having
taken counsel together, resolved to solicit the inter-
vention of Norway. From this conference Ewin of
^ Chrouk-a de Mailios, 117.
2 Clirouica dc Mailros, 145. Orig. Par. Scot., vol. II., 4S6.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 75
Lorn absented himself. Smarting under the
remembrance of the treatment formerly dealt out
to him by Haco, he seemed disposed to make
common cause with Alexander.
Haco, on having been informed of the outrages
perpetrated on his vassals in the Northern Isles,
resolved upon immediate action. Having equipped
a large fleet, he set sail from Herlover on the 7th
July, and coming by Shetland and Orkney, he
arrived in the Isles about the middle of August. In
Skye he was joined by the barons of the North Isles,
and, going south by Mull to Kerrera, by Dugall,^
the son of Roderick. Angus Mor of Isla and Kintyre
soon afterwards joined the Norwegian forces, and
Allan, the son of Roderick, was also associated with
them in the campaign.^ All the jDrinces of the House of
■Somerled, with the exception of Ewin of Lorn, appear
to have formed an alliance with the Norwegians in
this memorable expedition. Roderick of Bute, who
had been their envoy to Norway, accompanied the
Norsemen on their voyage to the Sudoreys, and
during the hostilities that ensued the knowledge of
the western seas which his piratical career had
enabled him to acquire proved of much service.
The losses and indignities which he had suffered
at the hands of the Scottish King and his nobles
spurred him on to many revengeful deeds.
Divisions of Haco's fleet were sent hither and
thither to devastate and plunder on the coasts of
Argyll, led principally by Angus Mor, Roderick, and
his sons Dugall and Allan. Sailing up Loch Long,
and drawing their boats across the isthmus of
Tarbat, they came to Loch Lomond, and penetrating
to the country of Lennox, on the far side of that
^ Haco's Expedition, 77 '■' Ibid.
76 THE CLAN DONALD.
famous loch, they laid it waste with fire and sword.
The result of the early part of Haco's expedition was
the re-establishment of the Norwegian authority in
the Northern Isles and the restoration of Bute to
Roderick.^
Several overtures for peace passed between Haco
and Alexander, but with no definite result. Delay
was the policy of the Scots, and as the equinoctial
gales were within measurable distance — the summer
being past — time was in their favour. Haco w^as
far from the base of operations, and the difficulty of
maintaining his grasp of the Isles on the flank of a
growing power like Scotland, demanded sacrifices
more than commensurate with the interests at
stake. One struggle more was, how^ever, to take
place. The battle of Largs was by no means the
decisive conflict which it was described to have been.
The exaggerated accounts of Scottish historians,
whose imaginations leave 25,000 Norsemen dead
on the fleld, are unworthy of belief On that
memorable occasion, doubtless, the Scots led by
their valiant King fought with determined courage ;
but the battle on land was indecisive, and were it
not that the elements rose in their fury, driving the
fleet of Haco from the coast and dispersing it,
victory might have rested on the Norwegian aims.
Be this as it may, the battle of Largs did not in any
sense result in the conquest of the Western Isles by
Scotland. The cession of the Isles was accomplished,
not by conquest, but by di^Dlomatic negotiations,
carried to a successful issue in 1266, three
years afterwards. The terms of agreement were
that 4000 merks sterling be paid to Norway,
together with an annual tribute or quit-rent of
' Haco's Expedition, p. 65.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 11
100 merks sterling, called the Annual of Norway,
to be paid in the Church of Saint Magnus in
Orkney. The King of Man became a vassal of
Alexander, and the parties to the Treaty undertook
their respective obligations under a penalty of
10,000 merks, to be exacted by the Pope. Per-
mission was accorded to the Norse inhabitants of
the Isles either to emigrate to Norway or, if they
preferred it, to remain under the new conditions.
It is probable, though history does not record the
fact, that many availed themselves of this permission
to return to Norway.
From the generous terms which Alexander
offered to his opponents in the Isles and on the
mainland, it is clear that he did not feel altogether
secure in the possession of his new dominions, and
thus believed a conciliatory policy to be the safest
and best. John of Fordun states that a military
-force was sent to the Isles against the chiefs who
had joined Haco, and that some of them were
executed and all reduced. Fortunately for them-
selves, they were only executed in John of Fordun's
imagination. What we find, on the contrary, is
that even Roderick, the prime mover of Haco's
expedition, continued in possession of all his exten-
sive territories, with the exception of Bute, which
he had to resign. If any one deserved hanging,
from the Scottish point of view, Roderick was the
man. His fate was a very different one. His
family became known afterwards as the Macruairis
of Garmoran and the North Isles. They were often
styled de Insulis, as were other cadets of the house
of Somerled for centuries thereafter — the main line
alone using the designation de He. Ewin of Lorn,
who although hostile to Norway seems to have
/ 8 THE CLAX DOXALD.
preserved a judicious neutrality, continued to enjoy
his ancestral possessions, while Angus Mor of Isla
remained unmolested in his extensive territories.
It is not easy to define with clearness the exact
relation of the House of Somerled to Norway and
Scotland before and after the years 1263-66.
The Southern Isles having been handed down by
Somerled as an independent possession, were similarly
held by his sons and grandsons. There are certain
passages in the Saga on Haco's expedition, which
convey the impression that these Southern Isles were
re-conveyed to Norway. It is stated that Angus
Mor was willing to surrender his lands to Haco, who
afterwards, we are told, " bestowed Ila, taken by his
troops, on the valiant Angus, the generous distributor
of the beauteous ornaments of the hands." ^ It can-
not be true that the territories of Angus Mor were
both willingly surrendered by him, and at the same
time taken from him by force. The series of events
leading to the battle of Largs ; the mission of
Roderick to Norway as the ambassador of the Island
chiefs; Haco's response to their representations in
the equipment of his great armament, all this forbids
the sup2)osition of any hostile movement against the
Island Lords. If Haco desired their loyal co-opera-
tion, it would have been bad policy to begin with
a forcible annexation of their possessions. The
association of Haco with the princes of the House
of Somerled was neither more nor less than the
formation of a league, offensive and defensive, to
repel the aggressiveness of the Scottish realm.
If Norway ceded the Southern Isles to Scotland
in 1266, she gave over what she never possessed
since these Isles were wrested from Godred of
» The Raven's Ode, p. r»7.
THE DESCENDANTS OF SOMERLED. 79
Man in 1156. There is not a scrap of
evidence to show that from the days of Somerled
down to Bruce's Charter to Angus Og, a period
of 150 years, there was any effective acknowledg-
ment of superiority by the princes of the Southern
Isles either to Norway or Scotland, if we except Bute
alone. It is now evident that a new chapter in the
history of the Isles is opening. The feudal system
has, theoretically at least, knit into a complete whole
the social fabric of the Scottish nation. But, with
the people of the Highlands, and particularly with
the Lords of the Isles, the superiority of the Crown
was but a name, and for hundreds of years there was
witnessed a continual struggle on the part of the
Celtic system to assert itself against the claims of
feudal Scotland. In this struggle the Kings of
Innse-Gall were the principal actors. Circumstances
at times may have compelled them to accept of
charters for their lands and render an insincere
allegiance ; but the traditions of independence
long survived, and are largely accountable for the
turbulence and disorder that mark the history of
the Scottish Highlands.
80 THE CLAN DOXxVLD.
CHAPTER V.
BRUCE AMD THE CLAN CHOLLA. -1284-1329.
Death of Alexander III., and subsequent Anarchy. — Angus Mor's
Relation to Scottish Parties. — Convention of Estates Settling
Crown. — Angus Mor favours the Bruce Interest. — Death of
Angus Mor. — Division of Territories. — Alexander of Isla
Supports England. — Defeat by Bruce, Captivity, and Death.
— Angus Og joins Pruce. — Bannoekburn. — Death of Angus
Og.
Alexander III. lived for twenty-two years after the
battle of Largs. His death, in 1284, deprived Scot-
land of one of its wisest rulers, in whose time she
made considerable progress in settled government and
the arts of peace. His tragic end was the cause of a
series of disasters unparalleled in the darkest period of
Scottish history. It was felt by the thoughtful
spirits of the time that the land was on tlie brink of
unprecedented afflictions : —
When Alexandyr our king was dede
"^rhat Scotland led in lowe and le,
Away was sons of ale and brede
Of wync and wax, of gamyn and gle.
Oure gold is changed into ledc —
Christ born into virgynyte
Succour Scotland and remede
That stodt is in perplexyte.^
The death of Alexander's heiress, the Maid of
Norway, on her way to Scotland, in 1290, introduced
still furtiier confusion into the aftairs of the realm,
' Wyntouii,
II
^^ i'S?
^'^
^s.M&i
'^<s '^?a'
(W
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 81
and Edward I., one of the ablest, as well as most
ambitious, of English soldiers and statesmen, sought
to bring the distracted country to acknowledge the
claim of paramount authority advanced by England
since the days of William the Lion, but never actually
admitted. The claims of Balliol and Bruce to the
crown ; the short and humiliating reign of the former ;
the valiant stand for Scottish independence made by
Sir William Wallace ; the rise, the struggles, the
hardships, the eventual triumj)h of the younger
Bruce, and finally his vindication of his country's
freedom, all these followed one another in close and
somewhat rapid succession.
The light which the records of the time throw
upon the relationship subsisting between the Chief
of the Clan ChoUa and the other leaders in the
political turmoil of that period is somewhat dim and
uncertain. It is difficult, therefore, if not impossible,
to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion as to the exact
position and attitude of the Island Chief amid so
many conflicting and tumultuous elements. Refer-
ence has already been made to the state of matters
in the Highlands and Islands at the time of Haco's
expedition, and the allocation of lands that followed
on the Scoto-Norse treaty of 1266. The assertion of
independence characteristic of the Clan Cholla is borne
out by the treatment meted out to Angus Mor of Isla
by Alexander III. Angus, as a matter of policy, had
espoused the cause of Haco of Norway rather than
that of Alexander of Scotland. The formidable arma-
ment, headed by Haco, appeared more than a match
for the Scottish fleet, and Angus Mor, consulting the
interests and independence of his own domains,
unhesitatingly threw in his lot with what seemed to
be the stronger power. In any case, whether the
82 • THE CLAN PONALD.
victory lay with Alexander or Haco, Angus would
probably have held his own.
King Alexander, however, notwithstanding the
opposition of the Island Chief, does not seem to
have interfered effectively with his territorial posi-
tion. There are indications, doubtless, that towards
the end of Alexander's reign Angus appears in
relations towards the crown which are distinctly of
a hostile nature. Evidence of this is afforded by
letters which were addressed to the other barons
of Argyll, in 1282, calling upon them to serve the
King faithfully against Angus Jilius Dovenaldi under
pain of being disinherited.^ If Angus exhibited on
this occasion a spirit of insubordination against the
State, he was not solely responsible for the disturb-
ances which arose in Argyll and the Isles in 1482.
In tliese the MacDougalls of Lorn and their allies
were largely involved, and the disorder seems to
have arisen to such a height as to demand the
interference of the Earl of Buchan, who was the
Constable of Scotland.^ Beyond this there is nothing
to shew that the Chief of the Clan Cholla was
seriously involved in the intrigues of the period, or
that he was keenly or aggressively associated with
any of the factious elements into which the Scottish
nation was then unhappily divided. That Angus
Mor was, shortly after this, on friendly terms with
King Alexander appears from the circumstance that
he was one of the three nobles of Argyll who, in
1284, attended the Convention of Estates convened
to settle the succession to the throne, the other two
being Alexander MacDugall of Lorn and Allan
Macruari of Garmoran.^ At this meeting Margaret,
^ Act Pari. Scot. Appendix. - llymer's Fosdera, vul. II., p. 205.
^ Kymer's Focdera, p. 760.
A FAC-SIMILE OF LETTER BY ANGUS MOR, AND ALEX., LORDS OF THE ISLES,
TO EDWARD I.
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 83
commonly called the Maid of Norway, grand-
daughter of the King, was declared heiress to the
throne. It is difficult to account for the presence
at this meeting of such men as Angus Mor and
his kinsmen, whose aims proved afterwards to be
diametrically opj)osed to those of the King and the
majority of his Parliament. From what followed in
subsequent years, we are warranted in concluding
that the presence of the descendants of Somerled at
the Convention in 1282 did not arise from sincere
concurrence in the decision arrived at, but from the
desire to conform to the royal summons. Another
Parliament met at Scone in April, 1286 — about two
years after the King's death — at which six guardians
of the realm were appointed. In this Parliament a
keen discussion took place between the partisans of
Bruce and Balliol regarding the succession to the
throne, which resulted in the formation of a strong
party against the succession of the Maid of Norway.
In September of the same year a meeting of this
party took place at Turnberry, the seat of the
elder Bruce, and among those present were Angus
of Isla and his son, Alexander. Again, in 1288,
when the Council of the Regency came to be
divided in opinion regarding the succession, the
Chief of Clan Cholla formed a bond of association
with James, High Steward of Scotland, John his
brother, Walter Earl of Menteith, and his two
sons, the Earl of Dunbar, and others who favoured
the claims of Bruce. ^ There is thus no evidence,
actual or inferred, but rather the opposite, that
Angus Mor ever played a part inimical to the
interests of the family of Bruce, although the
frailties of old age prevented his interposing
actively on their behalf The testimony of history
1 CiiiiiraniUa History, 181!l, p. :J1.
84 THE CLAN DONALD.
is clear in favour of the view that he continued
steadfast in his support of the claims of the elder
Bruce, while he was equally consistent in his
opposition to those of Balliol, even after the latter
had been raised to the shadowy honour of king-
ship as the vassal of Edward I. In 1292 King
John Balliol ordered Alexander of Argyll and his
baillies of Lochaw to summon Sir Angus, the son
of Donald, and others to do him homage within
fifteen days after Easter wheresoever he might be
within Scotland, Though his citation was repeated
in 1293, Angus Mor of Isla seems to have given no
response either to the one or the other/ He lived
for a part of the last decade of the 13th century ; but
though, with Byron, we " like to be particular in
dates," the exact year of his death cannot easily
be determined. From the meagre annals of his
time, we can gather that Angus was not behind
his predecessors in those characteristics of courage
and chivalry that always distinguished the chiefs of
Clan ChoUa. He died, according to the Book of
Clanranald, at his seat in Isla, and was buried at
" Columkill, the sacred storehouse of his pre-
decessors, and guardian of their bones."
The extensive territories of Angus Mor were
divided among his sons. Alexander succeeded hun
in Isla and other territories on the mainland of
Argyll ; Angus received the lordship of Kintyre ;
while the lands of Ardnamurchan were bestowed
by King Balliol upon John Spraiigach,^ the
youngest of his sons.
Alexander of Isla appears for the fii'st time on
the historical stage with his father at the meeting
already referred to, at Turnberry, to further the
Bruce interest. In 1291, the next time he comes
' Scot. Act. Pari. - SpraiiKuch signifies the "bold."
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 85
before us, he is found acting an entirely different
character, giving the oath of allegiance to the
English King.^ He had become closely allied by
marriage with the family of Lorn, and through
them associated with the English interest, and
although in his father's lifetime he does not
appear to have taken a leading part on either side,
now, as the struggle becomes keener, we find him
throwing the whole weight of his power and
influence into the scale of southern aggression.
There were, at an early stage of the conflict, many
letters addressed to him from the Eng-lish Court
and in the interests of the English party, and from
the rewards which afterwards followed, the services
which he rendered to that cause seem to have been
very considerable.^
Although the House of Isla has at this stage
begun to take the part of England in the eflbrt
to accomplish the conquest of Scotland, it is only
on an inadequate view of the situation that the
historian can pronounce its representatives to be
lacking in true patriotism. The Scottish claim to
the Western Isles was of too recent date to admit
of a strong feeling of loyalty to the Crown in that
region ; and to accuse the Island princes of that time
of a lack of patriotism in the part they played is a
pure anachronism, and ignores the political condi-
tions of the time. Besides all this, it must not be
forgotten that the sympathies of the Lords of the
Isles must have been with the old Celtic system,
which was only gradually disappearing before the
influence of Teutonic culture ; that they regarded
^ Similiter Alf^xander de Agarithell doniinus de Lorun & Alexander de
Isles, filius Anegu filii Donevauldi, facranientum prestiterunt de se fideliter,
&c. — AylofFe's Cal. of Ancient Charters, p. 291.
- Pcedera Anglia.
86 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Norman barons who had supplanted the old
Mormaors not as the real children of the soil, but
as strangers and interlopers in the land, and that
the Crown itself, as the keystone in the arch of
feudalism, must have appeared to them in the
light of a comparatively modern institution, and
lacking in the lustre of a venerable antiquity.
Hence there is nothing that need suprise us in
the fact that, after the death of Angus Mor, his
son and successor, Alexander of Isla, is found
upon the side opposed to Scottish independence.
In the year 1295 we find the English King
summoning King John Balliol before him to answer
for withholding the lands of Lismore from Alexander
de Insults et Juliance uxore sua} When Edward
received the submission of the Scottish nobility in
1296, we are told that a grant of one hundred
pounds worth of land was given to Alexander of
Isla for services rendered to the English King.^ We
find still further that Alexander held the office of
Admiral of the Western Isles under the Eno^lish
Crown, after the ignominious termination of Balliol's
reign, and it appears that the position was not by
any means a sinecure. From letters addressed to
the English King in 1297,^ it is evident that his
lieutenant, however strenuously he exercised his
commission, found it well nigh an impossible task
to quell the insubordination and turbulence of the
Western chiefs. Among the notables accused of
lawless excesses in regions subject to the authority
of Edward, there is reference to Roderick, the son of
Allan, grandson of Koderick of Bute ; also to Ranald,
another son of Allan, and brother of the said
1 Rotuli Scotiao, vol. L, p. 21. ^ Patent Roll 24, Ed. L, 7, 1296, Sep. 12.
^ Anderson's Historical Documents of Scotland, vol. IL, p. 187.
I
BRUCE AJSD THE CLAN CHOLLA. 87
Roderick, as well as to Lachlan MacRuari, probably
a brother of the former two/ The MacRuari family-
seem to have inherited a large share of the piratical
tendencies of the ancient Vikings, and we find these
Highland rovers, in 1297, invading and carrying
slaughter and depradations into the islands of
Skye and Lewis, and burning the ships in the
service of the King. It is against Alexander of
Lorn, however, also known as de Ergadia, as
the arch offender, the leader and instigator in these
irregularities, that the King's Admiral makes the
chief complaint ; and this is rather a singular
fact, in view of the strong support which, very
shortly thereafter, was given by Alexander and his
son John to the English interest. In the previous
year, 1206, Edward had received Alexander's sub-
mission, along with that of other Scottish noblemen,
at Elgin, and he seems to have been subjected to a
short term of imprisonment ; but immediately after
his liberation he, along with his accomplices, com-
mitted the crimes against the lieges to which the
Lord of the Isles makes reference. One of his
letters he winds up with a mild reminder of
expenses incurred in the various expeditions con-
ducted that year in the King's service, as well as
to a sum of 500 pounds promised him the previous
year, but not yet paid, showing that the sinews
of war, even in that far past time, were no less a
necessity than they are now. It is also interesting
to note that, at the end of another letter, in which
he invokes the royal aid in bringing the culprits to
justice, he seeks to be excused for not having his
1 Ranald we take to be here the equivalent of the Latin Rolandus, it and
Lachlan being MacRuari names, and to be met with in the genealogy of the
1450 MS
88 THE CLAN DONALD.
own proper seal in his possession, and thus having
to adhibit to " these presents " the seal of Juliana,
his wife.-^
From the foregoing circumstances it appears that
Alexander de He had received ample recognition of
his services to the King of England, a recognition
which stimulated him to still more zealous efforts in
his jDatron's cause. From 1297 to 1308 we find no
further mention of Alexander, though in the interval
it is likely enough he did not allow his sword to rust
in its sheath. In 1306 Kobert Bruce was crowned
at Scone, a King without a kingdom, and this was
the beginning of a career as interesting as the most
thrilling pages in the history of chivalry and
romance. The enemies of his house now draw
closer to one another, and a strong combination
was formed against the heroic King. Alexander
of Isla was a powerful and important factor
in this combination. So in 1308 we find him
fighting against Bruce in the district of Galloway,
aided by MacDowall, lord of that region. This
district continued obstinately to resist the King's
authority and was at the time occupied by English
troops. Bruce sent his brother Edward against
them, and he prosecuted the campaign with such
vipfour and success that he soon reduced the
country, defeated the combined forces of Sir
Roland of Galloway and Alexander of Isla on
the banks of the Dee, and compelled the inhabi-
tants to swear allegiance to his brother the King.^
In the pursuit that followed the dispersion of the
Gallowegians and the Islesmen, Edward Bruce took
prisoner " The Prince of the Isles. "^ Alexander,
* Historical Documents of Scotland. - Rj'iucr's Focdera.
^ Fordun a Hcarue, p. 1005,
/
.•/f^mny ^op.^
THE ABOVE SEAL OF ALEX. LORD OF THE ISLES IS ATTACHED TO A DOCUMENT
IN THE RECORD OFFICE, LONDON, A FAC-SIMILE OF THE SUPERSCRIPTION
OF WHICH IS HERE GIVEN.
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 89
however, very soon escaped from Edward Bruce's
custody, and betook himself to the stronghold of
Castle Swen, in North Knaj)dale.^ This fortress
commanded the entrance to Lochs wen, and was
regarded as the key to the districts of Knapdale
and Glassary. As such, it was deemed a position
of the greatest importance. In this Castle King
Robert Bruce, fresh from his victory over Alexander
of Lorn at the Pass of Ben Cruachan, besieged the
Lord of the Isles, and Alexander, after defending
himself for several days with the utmost determina-
tion and bravery, was obliged to surrender to the
King. Bruce sent him forthwith a prisoner to
Dundonald Castle in Kintyre, where he is said
to have died soon after. At all events we hear
no more of Alexander of Isla in the struggle in
which he had taken so prominent a part, and he
falls to be buried out of sight amid the ruins of
the cause he had so strenuously supported. The
fortunes of war had been unfavourable to him and
to his family, and the representation and honours
of Siol Chuinn pass for ever from their grasp.
Alexander left four sons — Reginald, Black John,
Angus, and Charles. These and their progeny,
victims of the fate which raised a younger brother
to the dignity and honour of their father's house,
lost the premier position in the Clan Cholla, though
undoubtedly in the light of primogeniture they were
the senior family of the line of Somerled. Whether
they preserved any vestige of their ancestral pos-
sessions ; whether in the subsequent history of the
Clan their descendants left behind them a local
^ In Buchanan's Account of the Campaign in Galloway, he mistakenly
refers to Alexander as Donaldus himlanus. The Lords of the Isles are a'l
Donald with this historian.
90 THE CLAN DONALD. '
habitation and a name, or whether through the lack
of territorial ^jre6'^i(/e and poHtical influence the
family and name sank into insignificance, is a question
which, meanwhile, must be left unanswered, as it
will more fictingly fah to be dealt with under the
genealogical section of this work.
Angus Og Macdonald succeeded his brother
Alexander, in 1308, both in his lands and in the
chiefship of the Clan. In tracing his career, we
must again traverse a portion of the ground of
general Scottish history embraced in the period
in which his predecessor flourished. In 1301 w^e
find him equally zealous wdth his brother in his
efforts to hold the Western Isles of Scotland in
subjection to the English Crown, and along wdth
Hugh Bisset he appears in a capacity somewhat
similar to that which Alexander occupied four years
previously.^ In a letter addressed to the English
King, apparently written in October of that year,
he reports that up to the Lord's day immediately
preceding Michaelmas, he and the said Hugh Bisset
had been with the English fleet in the island of
Bute, and that, at the time he ^vrote, he was
awaiting the royal commands. Apparently the
loyalty of Alexander of Lorn to the English
interest was still under suspicion. Angus Og, in
his statement to the King, avoids committing
himself to any opinion, either favourable or adverse,
as to the fidelity of the Lord of Lorn. He humbly
requests the King, if he believes in Lorn's loyalty,
to order him to assist himself and Bisset in the
reduction of the country ; but, failing such belief,
^ Let tor from Engus dc Yle to King Edward respecting liis ]irocce(lings
in tin; l.sles of Scotland. Hot. Scot. I., 40-41.
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 91
to forward written instructions that they may,
with Divine help, be able to overcome Lorn and
all other enemies of the King tlironghout the
Western Isles, In the same letter the sons of
Roderick Mac Allan, who seem to have been at
the time in the custody of Angus Og, and whose
loyalty is guaranteed, are recommended to the
royal favour ; and it is requested that they be
allowed to enter into a pledge and compact of
fidelity to King Edward as to their future sub-
jection to his sway.
After this j^eriod, until the memorable events of
1306, history does not seem to record with any
degree of definiteness the conduct of Angus towards
either of the parties that strove for the mastery in
Scotland. There is not much reason, however, to
doubt that he continued consistently to support the
authority of Edward I. But in 1306 there was a
marked chang-e. Bruce's coronation at Scone on
March 27 of that year was soon followed by the
disastrous defeat at Methven, and shortly thereafter
by an unsuccessful encounter with John MacDugall
of Lorn at Dairy, near the end of Strathfillan.
Notwithstanding the magnificent prowess and
courage of the King, his followers were obliged
to retire in presence of superior numbers. Under
the guidance of the Earl of Lennox, whom Bruce,
in the course of his subsequent wanderings, met
on the shores of Lochlomond ; and assisted by Sir
Neil Campbell, whom he had sent on in advance,
the King reached the district of Kintyre, the
country of Angus Og. And here we must pause
for a moment to enquire as to the causes of this
apparently sudden change of front on the part of
92 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Lord of Kintyre/ and his truly Highland and
hosijitable welcome to the royal fugitive. As to
the warmth and friendliness of his reception,
Barbour, the poetic biographer of Bruce, does not
leave us in doubt :—
And Angus of He that tynie was Syr
And lord and ledar of Kyntyr
The King rycht weill resawyt he
And undertook his man to be
And he and his on mony wyes
He abandowynt to his service
And for mair sekyrness gaifF him syne
His Castle of Douaverdyne.
In estimating the causes of this transference of
allegiance from Edward I. to Bruce, we may regard
§Aa4cn
it as possible, though far from probable, that self
interest may have had some weight. We know
that the relations of Angus with the MacDugalls
of Lorn were not of the friendliest, and that an old
feud as to the possession of Miill had not yet been
set at rest. Had Bruce's star been in the ascendant
in 1306, we might understand that considerations of
^ Though Angus' hrotlier, Aloxander, was at this time head of the Clan,
Angus, by disposition of his father, was Lord of Kintyre.
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 93
self interest might have weight in determining
Angus' action. But his friendhness to Bruce was
first shewn at a time when his fortunes were most
depressed and his prospects of success least hopeful ;
and to all appearance there was nothing to gain, but
everything to lose, by espousing the cause of the
newly-crowned King of Scots, The motives by
which Angus Og was actuated at this critical
moment in the fortunes of Scotland are not such
as have been suggested, but are to be found in
less interested and more noble grounds. Angus
Mor, as we have seen, was, in his latter years, a
steady supporter of the claims of the elder Bruce,
claims which appear to have been abandoned at the
fall of Balliol in 1296, when Edward sought to reduce
Scotland to the position of an English province.
During the ten years that had elapsed since Balliol's
deposition, the claims of the family of Bruce were in
abeyance. But now, in 1306, these are once more
advanced with most chivalrous daring by the young
Earl of Carrick, and Angus Og, adopting the
friendly attitude of his father, becomes associated
with the stirring events of the war of Scottish
independence.^
Saddell, in whose castle the Lord of Kintyre
first received Bruce, had many associations with the
family of the Isles, not the least of these being that
the dust of the " mighty Somerled " reposed within
the sacred precincts of its monastery. The Castle
of Saddell, at the head of Saddell Bay, is a large,
square battlemented tower still in a state of perfect
preservation. It measures 17 yards by 10, and
1 That Augus Og and Bruce had been frieiKls in bygone times seems
implied in what Buchanan says, Liber VIII. 30:— "Et cum ne sic quidem sibi
tutus a civiura perfidia et hopiium erudelitate videretur in ^budas ad veterem
quondam annicam tran«niisit. "
94 THE CLAN DONALD.
is about 50 feet in height. The walls are of great
thickness, without buttresses, and a spiral staircase
leads through three sets of rooms up to the
embattled parapet, whence a commanding view
can be obtained of the western sea, as well as
the shores of Kintyre and the picturesque isle of
Arran. The inevitable dungeon in all its mediaeval
gloom is still in evidence as a testimony to the power
and sway of these Western Island Lords. As
Barbour informs us, Angus Og took his royal guest
for greater security to the Castle of Dunaverty,
another Kintyre stronghold, and residence of the
Lords of tbe Isles. Situated in the parish of South-
end, on Dunaverty Bay, five miles east by north
of the Mull of Kintyre, it stood on the summit
of a peninsula of pyramidal shape, 95 feet high,
with a cliff descending perpendicular to the sea.
Defended on the land side by a double rampart
and ditch, it was, both as to site and construction,
a fortress of remarkable strength, and commanded
the approach to that part of Scotland where the
sea between it and Ireland is narrowest. It was
in after times the scene of some remarkable
historical events. But there is now hardly a
trace of the once almost impregnable walls ; only
on the everlasting rocks upon which it erstwhile
stood do the Atlantic surges still dash and foam as
in the days of Angus Og. Even here Bruce did
not tarry long. He knew that his asylum in
Kintyre could not be long concealed, and in the
event of its becoming known prematurely, miglit
expose his friendly host to the ireful vengeance
of the English King. Angus now arranged to
have Bruce quietly and secretly conveyed to
BRUCE AND THE CLAN DONALD. 95
Rachrin,^ a small island on the Irisli coast inhabited
and owned by members of the Clan Donald. Here
the King, befriended by Angus Og, found a safe
retreat during the following winter. This was the
darkest time of Bruce's fortunes, and when the
clouds rolled by and prosperity smiled upon the
cause, Angus Og shared in the triumphs and
rewards which accompanied the glorious day of
revived Scottish freedom.
As the spring of 1307 drew nigh, the hopes of
Bruce began to rise. The romantic interest that
belonged to his career powerfully appealed to the
female mind, and Christina of the Isles, the daughter
and heiress of Allan MacPv-uari of Garmoran, was
among the first to render important aid,^ Keceiving
favourable news from the mainland, the King now
began to meditate a descent upon Scotland, and
having despatched messengers from his little
garrison, he prejoared to take his departure. In
the beginning of 1307, Angus Og placed a chosen
band of Highlanders under the command of Donald,
son of Alastair Mor, and these having crossed to
Arran, were joined by the King, who meanwhile
had taken the decisive step of quitting Kachrin
Isle.^ From that day Angus Og of Isla, and with
him the MacBuaris of Garmoran, were closely
associated with Bruce in the task of vindicating
the independence of Scotland. In his descent
upon Carrick, where he " wan," if not his father's
hall, at anyrate his father's territory, the Islesmen
1 " Ou the south-west frae the promontory of Kiutyre, upon the coast
of Ireland, be four myle to land, layes an iyle callit Eachlaine, pertaining to
Ireland, and possessit tliir money zeires by Clan Donald of Kintyre, four
myles longe end twa myle braid, guid laud, inhabit and mauurit."--Muuro,
1549.
^ Fordun.
^ Claurauaia History, 1M9.
96 THE CLAN DONALD.
bore an honourable part. The only cloud that
darkened the political outlook in 1307 was the
defeat and capture of the King's brothers, Thomas
and Alexander, in Galloway by Koland MacDowall,
lord of that region. It is recorded that Angus
Og took part in that engagement, but escaped the
disaster that overtook his friends,^ Next year,
as has already been narrated, this reverse was
amply avenged. Not only so, but in 1308 the
King wreaked signal vengeance upon the Mac-
Dougalls of Lorn, the most implacable and deter-
mined of his foes. Marching towards Argyllshire,
he totally defeated the Lords of Lorn, both father
and son, took the Castle of Dunstaffnage, and laid
the country waste. Alexander of Lorn was taken
prisoner, and permitted to depart with a safe-
conduct to England, where he is said to have
died soon after in poverty.^
On Angus Og becoming the head of the Clan
Donald, after the defeat and discomfiture of his
brother Alexander, already referred to, he was
able to cast the whole influence of his tribe upon
the patriotic side of the struggle. And so, when
at last the King's toils and perils were crowned
with victory on the field of Bannockburn, Angus
Og and his Islesmen, variously estimated at from
5000 to 10,000 men, were an indispensable factor
in determining the fortunes of the day. The
incidents of that ever memorable field are well-
known to readers of Scottish history, and need
not here be detailed, save so far as they relate
to Macdonald of the Isles and his followers.
These formed a corps of the rear or reserve
^ Clauranuld History, 1819. - Buchamm, Liber VIII., 34.
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 97
division, and was under the King's own immediate
command : —
" Sir Angus of the Isles and Bute alswae
And of the plain lands he had mae
Of armed men, a noble rout,
In battle stalward was and stout.
He said the rear guard he wad maw
And even before him should gae
The vanguard, and on either hand
The other battle should be gaugand,
Behind ane side a little space ;
And the King that behind him was
Should see Avhere there was maist maister
And there relieve them with his banner. "^
It was not until the critical moment arrived that
the men of the Isles were summoned to the fray.
The impetuous Celtic phalanx, like the stag hound
held by the leash, burned to rush upon the foe;
but their native ardour must needs be restrained
until the King's experienced eye saw that their
action should prove of most effect. Despite the
enormous disparity of numbers, the chivalry of
England was beginning to fall into most perilous
confusion before Bruce's skilful dispositions and
the stubborn courage of his army. It was then
the King resolved to bring up his reserves. He
directed Angus of Isla to march the Islesmen to
the assistance of Edward Bruce, who was engaged
with the enemy on the right, and addressed him
in the memorable words which to this day illustrate
the arms of the Clanranald Chiefs: — " My hope is
constant in thee." The stirring lines of Scott in
"The Lord of the Isles" worthily interpret the
spirit of that great and epoch-making scene : —
^ Barbour's Bruce.
98 THE CLAN DONALD.
" One eft'ort more and Scotland's free !
Lord of the Isles, my trust in thee
Is firm as Ailsa rock ;
Rush on with Highland sword and targe,
I with my Carrick spearmen charge ;
Now forward to the shock !"
Angus Og and his men exhibited the trpxlitional
valour of their race on that eventful day. Like
the headlong rush of their native torrents as they
dash and foam over rock and precipice, with the
shrill note of the martial pipe rousing them to
the onset, and with the wild ringing slogan of
the hills echoing to the sky, the brave Islesmen
swept on to meet the southern foe : —
" At once the spears were forward thrown,
Against the sun the broadswords shone ;
The pibroch lent its maddening tone,
And loud King Robert's voice was known— -
Carrick, press on ! they fail, they fail !
Press on, brave soiis of Innisgail,
The foe is fainting fast !"
The attack of the Highlanders and the men of
Carrick at that critical moment settled the fortunes
of the day, and the victory lay A^ ith the " fourth
battle." The great army of 100,000 fled before
the prudent valour of the Bruce and the deter-
mined bravery of the Scots, and Bannockburn was
won.
As a reward for the undoubted services rendered
by MacDonald of the Isles and his Clan at Bannock-
burn, they always thereafter had allotted to them, at
the express desire of the King, the honourable dis-
tinction of a place in the right wing of the royal
army. Bruce, lioM'ever, did not confine his patronage
to sentimental favours of this kind. Out of gratitude
for the yoeman service rendered by the Island chief
BRUCE AND THE CLAN CHOLLA. 99
ill the momentous struggle, he bestowed upon Angus
extensive possessions in addition to those which he
already enjoyed. Besides Isla and Kintyre, the
islands of Mull, Jura, Coll and Tiree, and the
districts of Glencoe and Morvern, fell to his lot.
Lorn was bestowed upon Roderick, son of Allan
Macruari, who, not being considered feudally legiti-
mate, received from his sister Christina, his father's
legal heiress, a large share in her inheritance in
Garmoran and the North Isles. ^ Lochaber, which
had for a long time been in the possession of the
Comyns — the determined foes of Bruce — was
forfeited, and divided between Angus of Isla and
Roderick of Garmoran ; but the latter having,
about 1325, entered into a ti^easonable league
against the Crown — probably the Soulis conspiracy —
was afterwards deprived of that territory, and it
was bestowed upon Angus Og. Bruce was no doubt
well aware of the impolicy and danger to the author-
ity of the Crown involved in the bestowal of such wide
possessions upon a subject, for although the loyalty
of Angus Og himself was undoubted, his successors
might not prove so friendly to the Scottish State.
Indeed, one of the weighty counsels which King
Robert left behind him for the guidance of the
kingdom in future times, w^as not to let the lord-
ship of the Hebridean Isles be in the hands of any
one man.^ Still the services of the Lord of the
Isles were too great to be overlooked, and the only
condition made to neutralise the power which thus
accrued to him was the erection of Tarbert Castle,
in Kintyre, to be occupied as a royal stronghold.
'■ Skene's Highlandei'S of Scotland, vol. II., p, 50.
2 Ne quenquam unum Hebridarum insularum douiiuuni faceieut.
Buiihauan, Lib. VIII., 57.
100 THE CLAN DONALD.
Angus Og married a daughter of Guy or Con-
buidh O'Cathan or O'Kane, one of the greatest
barons of Ulster, Lord of Limvady, and Master of
the whole County of Derry.^ The O'Cathans were
origmally a branch of the Cm el Eoghain, descended
from Neil of the nine hostao^es, Kinsj of Ireland.
The Lord of the Isles obtained a unique dowry
with his bride, whose name, according to the most
generally accepted traditions, was Margaret," but
accordinfff to another, less known but more correct
account, was said to be Ann, Aine, or Agnes. ^ The
lady's portion took the form of 140 men out of
every surname in O'Cathan's territory, and the
descendants of those who left representatives are
known to this day in the Highlands as " tochradh
nighean a' Chathanaich" — "The dowry of O'Cathan's
daughter." The importation of so many stalwart
Irishmen shows that the Highlands were somewhat
sparsely peopled, and that there were no appre-
hensions of a congested population in the days of
Angus Og. It was still very much the time when
might was right — when there prevailed : —
" The good old way, the simple plan,
That he should take who has the j)0\ver,
And he should keep who can,"
and when property could only be held by the strong
hand of him who could muster the biggest force of
armed retainers. In these circumstances, the arrival
of this "tail" of youths from the Emerald Isle, to
help the security of the lady's new domains, was
by no means an unwelcome occurrence. The names
of some of these immigrants have come down by
' Hugh Macdonaia's MS. ; 1700 MS.
* Hugh Maodoiiald'.s M.S.
^ ] rOU MS. Hill's Macdonalds of Aulrim, p. 17. KoU Scot., vol. L, p. 534-
BRTTCE AXD THE CLAN CHOLLA.
101
tradition. Two families, the Miinroes, so called
because they came from the innermost Roe water
in the County of Deny, their name being originally
O'Millans, and the Koses of Kilravock/ rose to
territorial distinction in the North Highlands.
The other names presei-ved by Hugh Macdonald
are the Fearns, Dingwalls, Beatons, Macphersons,
Bulikes of CVxithness, while the MS. of 1700
FIXLAGGAN.
mentions, in addition to the foregoing, Dunbar,
Maclinen, and the MacGilleglasses.
Angus Og's loyalty to Bruce never faltered. It
stands in marked contrast to the policy of the
succeeding Lords of the Isles. Loyalty to Scottish
nationality was, however, a plant of slow growth,
even amonof the m-eat baronial families of the South.
^ The historian of the Kilravock family iloes not dispute, but, on the con-
trary, admits that the family came directly from Ireland, though he maintains
that England was the nursery of the race, whence they maj' have emigrated to
Ireland. Vide Kilravock Charters.
102 THE CLAN DOXALD.
These were, in blood and social ideas, as much Anglo-
Norman as Scottish, and swayed from one side to
the other in the time of conflict just as self-interest
suggested. The case of the Lords of the Isles was
similar, and, if Angus Og was a notable exception to
his line, it was because in following the impulses of
friendship for the great and chivalrous deliverer of
Scotland, he departed from what was in reality the
traditional policy of the Kings of Innse-Gall.
Angus Og died shortly after his illustrious
jDatron (whose death occurred in 1329) in his
Castle of Finlaggan in Is la, and was buried in
the tomb of his ancestors in lona. On his toml:)-
stone are his arms — a ship with hoisted sails, a
standard, four lions, and a tree — and the following
inscription : — " Hie jacet corpus Angusii filii Domhii
Anofusii MacDomhnill de Ila."
SEAL OF ANGUS MOR OF ISLA
1248-94
Legend .
SR Engus De Yle Film Domnaloi.
TOMBSTONE OF ANGUS OG OF ISLA
LORD OF THE ISLES, OB. 1330.
Inscription.
Hie jacet corpus Angusii fiUi Domini
Ang^sli Mac Domhnill de Ila.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA, 103
CHAPTER VI.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA.— 1330-13S6.
John of Isla. — His relation to Scottish Parties. — Treaty with
Balliol. — Forfeiture. — Forfeiture of Eeginald Macruari. — Par-
don and Reinstatement. — Assassination of Reginald Mac-
ruari.— John and the Lands of Garmoran, itc. — John at the
Battle of Poictiers. — His Captivity. — Ransom. — Connection
with the National Party. — Second Marriage. — Constable of
Edinburgh Castle. - High Steward of Scotland. — Rebellion. —
Treaty of Inverness. — Lordship of the Lsles. — -John's
Eminence. — Death. — Controversial Questions. — The Two
Marriages.
John of Isla's succession to the extensive territories
left by his father was ahuost contemporaneous
with the accession of David II., then a mere child,
to the Scottish throne. The woes that tend to
accompany a long minority, and in which Scottish
history largely abounds, were for a few years
mitigated by the firm and sagacious regency of
Randolph, Earl of Moray ; but when his strong hand
w^as removed from the helm of State, Scotland was
again plunged into anarchy and confusion. Disaster
fell upon the Scottish arms at Dupplin ; the power
of the executive was shattered ; English influence
began to make itself felt once more, and Edward
Balliol was crowned at Scone in 1332, and soon after-
wards did homao;e as the vassal of Edward HI. The
cause of Scottish independence, though thus betrayed,
was not by any means crushed ; the spirits of
Wallace and Bruce still ruled tlie j^eople " from their
urrjs." For nine years the patriotic barons, backed
104 THE CLAN DONALD.
by the national sentiment animating the great mass
of the peasantry and middle class, were successful in
maintaining the independence and integrity of the
realm, in the face of domestic disloyalty fomented
by the ambitious English monarch.
The early years of John of Isla's occupancy of the
Island throne were passed during this transition
from the comparatively settled order of Bruce's reign
to the confusions of that which followed, and the
history of the lordship of the Isles during, as well as
subsequent to, that period derives its colouring from
the varying vicissitudes of general Scottish history.
John was undoubtedly one of the most distinguished
of his distinguished line. The circumstances of his
time were not such as to shed the halo of martial
glory on his name. He did not, like his father or
son, engage in a great or epoch-making battle.^ He
did not share in the glory of a great field like
Bannockburn, nor did he play the chief part in an
heroic struggle like Harlaw. But peace has its
victories no less than w^ar, and John's long life
illustrated the exercise of far-sighted and, on the
whole, successful diplomacy. He was animated all
along by the dominant idea of his family, the
maintenance of the honour of his house, and of the
integrity of his ancestral domains. Loyalty to the
Scottish crown was a question of expediency rather
than of principle with the descendant of a line of
chiefs who regarded themselves as hereditary kings
of the Scottish Gael, as well as lords of Innse-Gall.
Viewed in this light, John's conduct amid the stormy
drama of Scottish politics during the fourteenth
century is intelligible enough. Seeking to exercise
independent sway within the Celtic sphere, he
^ Unleas we except Poictiers, of which hereafter,
THE (400D JOH^■ OF ISLA. 105
clearly saw that English influence in Scotland, with
its natural correlative a weak Scottish executive,
would serve his purpose best. This undoubtedly
was his chief motive in espousing the cause of Baliol.
But his attitude of hostility to the patriotic party
was still further strengthened by a difference with
the Regent regarding certain of the lands which he
had inherited from his father. Randolph's successor
refused to confirm him in these possessions, with the
result that when Balliol assumed the crown the Lord
of the Isles became associated with his party as that
which would the more likely establish him in his
just and lawful rights. Hence it came to pass that
on the 12th September, 1335, John entered into a
treaty of alliance with Edward Balliol, in which he
was put into possession of the lands inherited from
his father, and others. This treaty, which was con-
cluded at Perth, was on the 6th October of the
following year ratified by Edward III. at Auckland,
Balliol acknowledging the English King as his
superior and Lord Paramount. Edward's con-
firmation of the treaty to which Balliol and John
of Isla Avere parties contains the tenour of the
compact, and as it throws an interesting light
upon our subject, the substance of it may be quoted
here : —
" The King to whom, itc. We have examined certain letters of
indenture drawn up between the magnificent prince Lord Edward
King of Scotland, our illustrious and most dear cousin, and John
of the Isles, in the following terms : — In this indenture, made at
the town of Perth on Tuesday, 12th December, 1335, between the
most excellent prince Lord Edward, by the grace of God the
illustrious King of Scots, on the one part, and John of the Isles on
the other part, it is certified that the said Lord the King has
granted, in so far as in him lay, to the foresaid John for good
106 THE CLAN DONALD.
and praiseworthy service rendered to himself, and in future to be
rendered by bim and his heirs,
The Island of Ysle (Isla)
The land of Kentyre (Kintyre)
The land of Knappedoll (Knapdale)
The Island of Githc (Gigha)
Half the Island of Dure (Jura)
The Island of Golwonche (Colonsay)
The Island of Mulle
The Island of Sky
The Island of Lewethy (Lewis)
The land of Kenalbadon and Ardinton (Morvern and
Ardnaniurchan)
to be held I)}- the same John and his heirs and assignees. The
same Lord the King has also granted to the same John the ward-
ship of Lochaber until the attainment to man's estate of the son
and heir of Lord David of Strathbolgy the last Earl of Athol.
And for these foresaid concessions the foresaid John of the Isles
binds himself and his lieirs to be leal aud faithful men to the said
Lord the King and liis heirs for ever, and he binds himself and his
heirs to pursue all his foes and rebels whatsoever, on what days,
in what places and ways he may be able to do so. And in security
for the faithful performance of alltliese promises the oath shall be
given by the said John on the holy eucharist, the cup of the altar,
and the missal. Likewise tlie said John wishes and grants that if
the foresaid Lord the King should desire to have from him a
hostage or hostages for greater secnrity, that a cousin or cousins
of his own under age, very nearly related to him, may be
delivered over to the said Lord the King when a siiitablc time
has come, seeing that the said John has as yet neither son nor
heir lawfully begotten of his own body. Besides, the foresaid
Lord the King wishes and grants that at whatever time he may
have an heir of his own body legitimately begotten the office of
godfather to his heir may be granted to the foresaid John.
" But we accept, ratify, approve, and confirm the whole and
each of the contents of the foresaid letters for ourselves and our
heirs so far as in us lies, as the foresaid letters more fully testify."^
It is evident that John liimself was present, and
paid his respects to King Edward when these
important negotiations were taking place. The
^ Roluli Scolia3, vol. I., p. 463.
THE riOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 107
Scottish records of the time indicate that on the
very day on which John's League with Balhol was
confirmed by the Enghsh monarch he received a safe
conduct from that potentate. Intimation "was made
to all sheriffs, bailies, and other faithful subjects
that John and his retinue, servants, and equipage,
whether staying with the King, on their way to see
him, or on their return home, were under his special
protection and care.^ In all this we have evidence
of the value placed by Balliol and. his suzerain
upon the power and resources of the Island Lord,
and his adhesion to the anti-Scottish party. Tliis
alliance with Edward III. continued for several
years, gathering rather tlian losing strength, and in
the records of 1337 we find frequent traces of
friendly intercourse between the English monarch
and the Lord of the Isles. On 3rd December of
that year John received a safe conduct couched in
still more forcible language than that of 1335, and
the most extreme j)ains and penalties are threatened
against such as would cause injury or molestation to
himself or his followers when coming, staying, or
departing from the royal presence. This is followed
on the day immediately succeeding by a commission
to the Earl of Salisbury to enter into a league with
the Lord of the Isles. On the same day a letter is
sent by Edward to John by the hands of this same
plenipotentiary, abounding in the friendliest, the
most honeyed phrases — ejnstola hlandiloqua it is
styled. He calls him his dearest friend, and offers
him the best safeguards in his power, whether he
comes with 60 or 80 or 100 attendants with the view^
of drawing closer the bonds of amity and concord
between them.- The relations between the English
1 Rotuli ScoticC, vol. I., p. 464. - Ibideiu, p. olG.
108 THE CLAN DONALD.
King and John, of which we have evidence in these
transactions, seem to have lasted until a fresh crisis
arose in the position of Scottish parties. Edward,
recognising the power and capacity of the Island
lord, seems to have done all he could to stimulate
his discontent, secure his friendship, and establish
his connection with the party of Balliol.
After a few years' struggle, the patriotic party
was successful in vindicating the independence of
Scotland, and the Steward, the nephew of David
Bruce, having been appointed Regent, and finding
his uncle's cause in the ascendant, arranged for his
return from France to assume his father's sceptre in
1341. Owing to the attitude of John of Isla during
the troublous times of David Bruce's minorit}^ it
miglit naturally be expected that the vengeance of
the King would, on the overthrow of his enemies
and his accession to the tlirone, be directed against
him. As a matter of fact, in or about 1343, John
was nominally forfeited in the lands of Gigha,
Isla, Jura, and Colonsay, all of which were granted
by the King to Angus Macian of Ardnamurchan,^ a
kinsman of his own, and the head of a house that
was yet to play a not unimportant part in the
history of the Highlands. Beginald Macruari
joined with John of Isla in offering a stout and
effective resistance to the royal decree. His posses-
sions seem also to have been involved in the
confiscations of the time, although the Macruari
tenure at that particular period is not altogether
clear. The Island Chiefs were not, however,
strong believers in the efficacy of parchments, and
seem to have felt none the worse of their irregular
relations to the crown. It was not long ere the
' Charter in Haddington's Collection.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 109
exigencies of the Scottish State wrought in favour
of the Island interests. David Bruce, taking
advantage of the absence of Edward III. in France,
resolved to invade England in 1346. Wishing to
bring the whole military force of his kingdom into
action, and with the view of conciliating all whose
hostility might be feared, he pardoned both John
of Isla and his kinsman, Reginald Macruari. The
whirligig of time had brought about its revenges,
and David Bruce repeated the work of Balliol. In
1343 — before the invasion of England, and the
very year of his forfeiture — he confirmed John
in the lands of Durdoman (Duror), Glenchomyr
(Glenco), Morimare (Morvern), Geday (Gigha),
Ardinton (Ardnamurchan), Golwonche (Colonsay),
Mulle, Kernoburgh, and Iselborgh Castles, with
the lands pertaining to them ; Tirayd (Tiree), Yle
(Isla), Dure (Jura), Scarba, Lewis, and Lochaber.^
It will be seen from this that Kintyre, Knapdale
(South), and Skye, which formed part of Balliol's
grant in 1335, are excepted, these lands having
reverted to their former owners. To Ranald Mac-
ruari ^ there were granted the Isles of Uist, Barra,
Eigg, and Rum, and the lordship of Garmoran,
which included the districts of Moydart, Arisaig,
Morar, and Knoydart — all of which formed the
ancient patrimony of the Macruari family.^
On the eve of David Bruce's invasion of England,
there occurred a tragedy which resulted in a con-
siderable enlargement of the power and possessions
of the House of Isla. Reginald Macruari met
with a violent death. The Scottish barons hav-
^ Eobertaon's Index, p. 48-1.
' This Ranald is referred to as " Ranald the White " in the genealogy of
the 1450 MS.
^ RoV)ert8ou'ii Index, p. 48-3.
110 THE CLAN DONALD.
ing been convoked to meet at Perth, Reginald,
obeying the summons, and accompanied by a
considerable body of men, took up his quarters
in the monastery of Elcho, a few miles from the
ancient capital. Reginald held the lands of Kintail
from the Earl of Ross, the instrument being thus
defined : — " Carta Regnaldi filii Roderici de terris
de Kintale in Ergadia Boreali data per Dominum
Ross." ^ The Charter of confirmation for the same
lands is thus described : — " Carta ejusdem Regis
confirmans cartam consessam per Wilhelmum
Comitem de Ross filium et heredem quondam
Hugonis Comitis de Ross Reginalde filio Roderici
de Insulis decem davatorum terre de Kennetale
in Ergadia Boaeali data apud castrum dicti Comitis
de Urcharde, 4th Julii an Dom 1342, testibus
(names of witnesses). Carta Regis est fine data," ^
Mr William Mackay, in his admirable History of
Urquhart and Glenmoriston, makes reference to the
circumstances in which this charter was bestowed.
At that time Glen-Urquhart Castle was in the
keeping of Sir Robert Lauder of Quarrelwood, on
behalf of the Scottish Crown. Mr Mackay says : —
" Within tlic old -wally of his Castle, Sir Robert Lauder eiitei*-
tained right royally. Among the guests who were met together
there on 4th July, 1342, -were William, Earl of Ross; Reginald,
son of Roderick of the Isles ; the Bishop of Moray, the Bishop
Ross, Sir James de Kerdale, Sir William de Mowbray, Sir Thomas
de Lichtoun, Canon of Moray ; John de Barclay, Adam de
Urqiihart, John Yong de Dingwall, ' and many others, clergymen
' The Charter of Reginald, &011 of ilwlerick, for the lands of Kintail, in
Noi-th Argyll, given by the Earl of Ross. Robertson's Index, p. 48-2.
^ The Cliarter of the same King, confirming the Charter granted by
William, Earl of Ross, son and heir of the late Hugh, Earl of Ross, to
Reginald, son of Roderick of the Isles, for the ten davochlands of Kintail,
in North Argyll, given at the said Earl's Castle of Urquhart on the 4th of
July, 1342 A.u. The King's Cliarter is given at the end.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. Ill
and laymen' — a goodly company truly. These all witnessed a
charter by the Earl to Reginald of the lands of Kintail, as a
reward for his services."^
A bitter feud as to the tenure of these lands seems
to have arisen between the superior and vassal, and
the opportunity of wreaking vengeance upon his foe
seemed to the Earl too favourable to be lost. In
the middle of the night he broke into the monas-
tery, surprised the occupants, treacherously and
sacrilegiously slew Keginald and seven of his men
within the holy building, and immediately there-
after betook himself to his northern fastnesses. It
was considered a bad omen by many at the time
that King David's campaign should have been
immediately preceded by so fell a deed.^
The foregoing incident materially affected the
fortunes of John of Isla. In 1337, or shortly there-
after, he had married his third cousin, Euphemia
Macruari, sister of the slaughtered chief In terms
of the Hoyal gift to her brother, Reginald, she
succeeded to the estates, and brought them over to
her husband in 1344. Although John's right
emerged through his marriage, he had also, as a
male heir not remotely akin, a feasible right to the
inheritance. In this way he had a double claim to
Garmoran and the Northern Isles. The Scottish
Government, however, did not regard the matter
in this light. They considered John already too
powerful a subject for the safety of the realm, and
rightly feared that the vast territories to which he
now laid claim threatened a revival of the ancient
kingdom of the Isles. Consequently, they refused
to acknowledge John as the rightful heir of the
Macruaris, or to give him legal investiture in
1 p. 3.-.
- For Wj'utouu on Ranald Macruari'.s death, see Appendix.
112 THE CLAN DONALD.
their possessions. Whatever ostensible reason tlie
Government may have advanced for their action —
and these we shall afterwards consider- — the motives
whicli really animated them were concern for the
safety of the State. It is not surprising that the
proud Chief of the Clan Donald was indignant at
the attitude of the Government, and felt disposed
again to espouse the fortunes of the Balliol party.
In 1346, the year of Reginald Macruari's assassina-
tion, the fortunes of that faction seemed once more
in the ascendant. King David Bruce's invasion of
England opened with disaster. At the battle of
Neville's Cross the Scottish army was defeated with
great slaughter, and the King taken a prisoner to
England. Yet although it might well seem that a
fatal blow had been struck at Scotland's indepen-
dence, and Balliol's position been re-es1jablished by
England's success, neither of these results ensued.
Balliol obtained not even the semblance of kingly
authority ; and the Scottish nobility were successful
in placing the Steward, the next heir to the throne,
in the regency of the kingdom. In 1351, Edward
III., whose attention was largely taken up with his
French wars, concluded a truce with Scotland, which
he renewed from time to time, as he entertained
prospects of replenishing tiie coffers of the State by
a large ransom for the royal captive.
In the circumstances to which we have just
referred, the friction which was caused between
John of Isla and the Government in connection
with the estates of Garmoran does not seem to
have led the Island Chief into aggressive hostility.
From all that we can learn, during the eleven years
of David's captivity in England, John was left in
undisturbed possession, not only of the lands con-
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 113
firmed to him hj the royal authority, but also of
tiie Macruari territories, his right to which was still
unacknowleclo-ed. Certain of the lands which were
granted by David Bruce to John in 1343, namely,
the lands of Duror, Jura, and Mull, and the for-
tresses of Kerneburgh and Isel burgh, of which
John had received the custody, had been held by
John of Lome as the vassal of John of Isla. The
privilege of holding these fortressees had been
accompanied by certain conditions. One of these
was that until John of Lome delivered the Castle
of Kerneburgh to John of Isla he should give
him three hostages, namely, a lawful son of Lachlan
MacAlexander, a lawful son of Ywar MacLulli^ and a
lawful son of John MacMolmari, or of another good
man of his clan ; and another was that John of
Lome should never give the keeping of the castle of
Kerneburgh to a,ny of the Clan Fynwyne (Mac-
kinnon), who, at that time, seem to have had a
settlement in Mull. These, with the exception of
the three unciates of Tereyd (Tiree), next to Coll,
were all resigned to John of Isla, it being stipulated
that the Steward of the three unciates should not
make a domestic establishment (domesticatum) or
a dwelling (habitaculum) on those lands without
leave obtained from the superior. The Island of
Coll was retained by John of Lome, and, in the
deed recording the transaction, was confirmed to
himself and his heirs for ever. These negotiations
took place in 1354, and in the record of the pro-
ceedings we find John of Isla described by the title
" Lord of the Isles."
It may be true, as Gregory says, that there is no
previous record of this particular chief of the Clan
Cbolla being called Dominus Insularum in the
114 THE CLAN DONALD.
annals of that age. It is, however, a most
unwarrantable inference to draw from that fact, as
the same historian does, that the title " Lord of the
Isles" was a new one in the history of the family.
This particular question we propose to touch upon
more fully in a subsequent chapter.
Shortly after this time an incident occurred in
John's career which shows that English influence
had lost its hold upon him, and that in his public
conduct he had allowed himself to be drawn into
the full tide of Scottish policy. In 1354-5, just as a
treaty for the ransom of David Bruce was on the
eve of being ratified, the Scots nobility were per-
suaded by the potent argument of forty thousand
moutons of French gold to break the truce with
England.^ This was followed by a series of hostilities
both in Scotland and France, in both which lands
the able and ambitious Edward III. still sought to
obtain supreme dominion. In 1356, the Black
Prince having penetrated far into the interior of
France, the French King assembled an army vastly
superior in numbers, and determined to cat off his
retreat. A number of Scottish chiefs and nobles
accompanied him to the field, and, among others,
John of Isla,^ with a powerful body of Highlanders.
With all his numerical advantages, the French King
was unable to prevail against the valour of the
English army. In the famous battle of Poictiers,
fought on the 19th September, 1356, the Scots
contingent sustained great losses, and the Lord of
the Isles was taken prisoner. From that date to
16th December of the following year, he was in
1 Scott's History of Scotland, vol. I , p. 201.
^ On the 31st of the jpreceding March, Edward III. sought to bring
John of Isla over to his interest, and a commission for treating with him was
executed ; but this commission was rendered nugatory by John's refusal to
treat. Rymer's Foedera.
THE GOOD JOHN OF LSLA, 115
captivity, the greater jjait of the time in England.
Once more John obtains from the Engh'sh King a
safe conduct for his return to his Island home, but
it is notable that the terms of the document are less
endearing than of old. Sheriffs and bailies and
other faithful ones, however, are told that the Lord
of the Isles, who was a prisoner of the Prince of
Wales his dear son, was in the King's safe conduct
going to Scotland, accompanied by four knights,
with the view of providing the means necessary for
his ransom/
Two years after this we find John of Isla taking
a prominent part in promoting the treaty for the
liberation and ransom of David II., and thus still
further indicating his abandonment of the Eng-
lish alliance and his assumption of a friendly
attitude towards the Crown. It was stipulated
in this treaty that, for the more sure payment
of the ransom of 100,000 marks, twenty hostages
were to be sent to England, and that three
of the following seven were always to be of the
said twenty, viz.: — the Steward of Scotland, the
Earls of March, Marr, Ross, and Sutherland, the
Lord Douglas and Thomas de Murray ; that in the
meantime, during the whole period of the ten years
over which the payments were spread, an inviolable
truce should subsist, in which truce were to be
included Monsieur Ediuanl de Balliol and Johan des
Isles. ^
Soon after the return of David Bruce to the
Scottish throne, a complete revolution took place
in the mutual relations of political parties. The
party adhering to the King was wont to be
regarded as patriotic and national, that of Balliol
1 Rotuli Scotifc, vol. I., p. SV?. - Uobertson's Index, 107-19.
116 THE CLAN DONALD.
being favourable to English influence. But now
David Bruce began to show symptoms that his
long residence in England had enervated his
patriotism. He betokened a willingness to admit
English influence into the affairs of the realm,
and even to promote the nomination of an
English successor to the throne of Scotland. The
consequence was that the Balliol faction became
the party of the court, while the national party,
with the Steward at its head, found themselves
in the cool shades of opposition. Yet although
the Lord of the Isles found himself, for the first
time, in a position in which antagonism to the
Government was consistent with adherence to the
jDarty of Scottish independence ; and although his
connection with this party was further cemented
by his marriage with Lady Margaret, daughter of
the Steward, yet we do not find that he assumed a
strenuous attitude in opposition to the policy of the
King. The date of this marriage, in the absence of
definite information, it is difficult to state with
exactness, but it must have taken place about, and
certainly not much later than, David Bruce's return
from captivity.
We do not purpose at this stage to discuss the
merits of this union, the circumstances of which the
history of the time has left, to a large extent, in
obscurity. The voice of tradition is unanimous as
to the fact that, in order to carry out the marriage,
the Lord of the Isles divorced or abandoned his first
wife. Amy Macruari. In this he had the support
and advice not only of the Steward, but — according
to Hugh Macdonald, the Sleat historian — of his
council, and, pre-eminently, Maclnnes of Ardgour.
The same authority — who, by the way, describes
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 117
Amy as "a ^ood and virtuous gentlewoman" —
throws an interesting side-light upon the pride of
the great Highland Chief, who would not perform
the unwonted act of obeisance — uncovering: his head
in the royal presence on the occasion of his marriage
— but ingeniously evaded the courtesy by not wearing
a head-dress at all, Maclnnes's untoward inter-
vention in the domestic affairs of the family of Isla
was neither forgotten nor forgiven by Amy or her
RUINS OF BORVE CASTLE, BENBECULA.
sons. It is alleged that a commission was given to
Donald, son of Lauchlan MacLean, to slay Maclnnes
with his five sons, and this having been done, he
obtained possession of Ardgour, which his posterity
still enjoy. Amy is said to have lived for a number
of years after her separation from John of Isla, and
to have built Castle Tirrim in Moidart, and Borve
Castle in Benbecula, as well as places of worship, of
which notice shall be taken hereafter/
^ Hugh Macdouald's MS..
118 THE CLAN DONALD.
Although John's connection with the family of
the Steward would naturally, as we have seen,
lead him to espouse the policy of his party, yet
his past conduct, both in war and diplomacy,
in recent years, continued to secure for him the
favour of the Crown. He enjoyed certain high
ofBces of State, his tenure of which does not
seem to have hitherto attracted the attention of the
historian. Such was the confidence that seems to
have been reposed in him, that, in or shortly before
1360, he was appointed Constable of Edinburgh
Castle, a responsible and ,exalted military position,
which reflected much credit upon the character and
ability of the Chief of the Clan Donald.^ This, how-
ever, was not the only function which John, during
these years of loyalty, discharged under the Scottish
Crown. It is, indeed, a singular circumstance that,
in 1364, we find him acting in the highest office
which it was possible for a Scottish subject to occupy,
viz., that of Senescall, or High Steward of the King's
Household,^ an office which had for generations
come down by hereditary descent as the possession
of a family nearly akin to the throne. The history
of the time leaves little doubt as to the reasons for
which, at the period under consideration, John of
Isla, rather than the hereditary holder of the
position, is found discharging the functions of High
Steward of Scotland. liobert, the High Steward,
had, by various Acts of Settlement passed by the
Estates of Scotland, been called to the Crown as
next heir to his uncle David Bruce, in default of the
latter leaving heirs of his body. Queen Joanna died
childless in 1363, and early in the following year
\llotuli Scacarii Eegum Scotorum, vol. IL, pp. 50-78.
"^ Ibidem, pp. 129, 134, UO, 173.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 119
the King, having contracted a violent fancy for a
beautiful young woman named Margaret Logie — of
comparatively humble origin — insisted, contrary to
the advice of his Court, on bestowing his hand upon
her in marriage. This unequal alliance caused an
open rupture between David and his kinsman the
Steward, whose reversion of the Crown would
certainly be disappointed if the fair Margaret should
bear a son. Such was the discord that arose out
of this episode and the angry feelings to which it
gave rise, that the Steward and his son, the Wolf of
Badenoch, were thrown into prison, where they
seem to have been detained for several years. The
royal resentment does not seem, however, to have
extended to the Steward's son-in-law, John of Isla,
for undoubtedly he exercised the functions of
Senescall during a part, at least, of his father-in-
law's imprisonment, a fact which seems to indicate
that he must have been a special favourite with the
King, and kept himself free from the contending
factions of the time.
Two years after John of Isla first comes before us
as Steward of Scotland, he appears as a royal envoy
to Flanders to transact some business for the King.^
Again the history of the age helps us to determine
the nature of the negotiations in which the Lord of
the Isles was engaged during his visit to Flanders.
The payment of the King's ransom was one of the
chief obstacles in the way of a lasting peace between
the two kingdoms, and to secure the regular pay-
ment of the first instalment the Scottish Parliament
had made great sacrifices. It was ordained that the
wool of the Kingdom, apparently its most productive
export at that time, should be sold to the King at a
^ Rotuli Scacarii Regum Scotorum, vol. II., p. 261.
120 THE CLAN DONALD.
low rate, and it was afterwards disposed of under
the King's instructions to merchants in Flanders,
where textile industries seem at that early time to
have flourished, and the surplus produced over prime
cost was applied in discharge of the royal ransom.
John of Isla, in virtue of his office as Senescall, had
the management of the royal revenues, and his
voyage to Flanders in 1366, accompanied by John
Mercer, who was probably better versed than the
Lord of the Isles in the price of wool, was no doubt
undertaken with the view of negotiating with the
Flanders merchants as to the value to be placed
upon the precious commodity which was to yield a
King's ransom.
The burdensome exactions which were thus
necessary for completing the ransom of the King
were felt to be a heavy impost by a country natur-
ally poor and lately impoverished l)y a series of
desolating wars. In the Highlands especially the
taxation was found to be oppressive, and John of
Isla, so recently a high official under the Scottish
Crown, is found, along with other northern barons,
refusing to pay the national taxation or attend a
meeting of the Estates of the realm. ^
Some years before this outbreak of disaffection,
as already stated, the King had thrown the Steward
into prison for his opposition to the royal policy,
but now finding himself unable to cope with the
forces of disorder, he gave him his freedom, in
the belief that he would lend his influence
successfully to the vindication of the authority
of the Crown. The Steward undertook a task
dictated alike by policy and patriotism. His
son-in-law, John of Isla, was the most difficult to
reduce to subjection. There was peace, however,
1 Acts of Scottish Parliament., vol. XII., p. 503, June 12, 1368.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 121
between Scotland and England ; John of Isla had
no foreign ally to whom to turn, and so David Bruce
was able to bring all his resources to bear upon the
Island potentate. At last, after years of open and
successful defiance, the Steward prevailed upon the
haughty and turbulent chief to meet the King at
Inve^rness, when the following instrument of allegi-
ance was finally drawn up in 1369 : —
" To all who may see the present letters : — John de Yle, Lord
of the Isles, wishes salvation in the Saviour of ail. Since my most
serene prince and master, the revered lord David, by the Grace of
God, illastrious King of Scots, has been stirred up against my
person because of certain faults committed by me, for which
reason, coming humbly to the presence of my said lord, at the
Town of Inverness, on the 15th day of the month of November, in
the year of grace 1369, in the presence of the prelates, and of
very many of the nobles of his kingdom, I offered and submitted
myself to the pleasure and favour of my said master, by sup-
pliantly entreating for favour and for the remission of my late
faults, and since my said lord, at the instance of his comicil, has
graciously admitted me to his goodwill and favour, granting
besides that I may remain in (all) my possessions whatsoever and
not be removed, except according to the process and demand of
law : Let it be clearly patent to you all, by the tenor of thesa
presents, that I, John de Yle, foresaid, promise and covenant, in
good faith, that I shall give and make reparation to all good men
of this kingdom whatsover, for such injuries, losses, and troubles
as have been wrought by me, my sons, or others whose names are
more fully set forth in the royal letters of remission granted to
me, and to whomsoever of the kingdom as are faithful I shall
thus far make the satisfaction concluded for, and I shall justly
note purchased lands and superiorities, and I shall govern them
according to my ability ; I shall promptly cause my sons and my
subjects, and others my adherents, to be in peaceable subjection,
and that due justice shall be done to our lord the King, and to
the laws and customs of his kingdom, and that they shall be
obedient to, and shall appear before the justiciars, sheriffs,
coroners, and other royal servants in each sheriflfdom, even better
and more obediently than in the time of Robert of good memory,
the predecessor of my lord the King, and as the inhabitants of
122 THE CLAN DONALD.
the said lands and superiorities have been accustomed to do.
They shall answer, both promptly and dutifully, to the royal
servants what is imposed regarding contributions and other
burdens and services due, and also for the time past, and in the
event that within the said lands or superiorities any person or
persons shall offend against the King, or one or more of his faith-
ful servants, and if he or they shall despise to obey the law, or if
he or they shall be unwilling to obey in the premises, and in any
one of the premises, I shall immediately, entirely laying aside
stratagem and deceit, pursue that person or those persons as
enemies, and as rebels of the King and kingdom, with all my
ability, until he or they shall be expelled from the limits of the
lands and superiorities, or I shall make him or them obey the
common law : And for performing, implementing, and faithfully
observing these things, all and each, I personally have taken the
oath in presence of the foresaid prelates and nobles, and besides I
have given and surrendered the under-written hostages, viz.,
Donald, my son, begotten of the daughter of the Lord Seneschal
of Scotland, Angus, son of my late son John, and one Donald,
another and natui-al son of mine, whom, because at the time of
the completion of this present deed I have not at present ready
and prepared, I sliall cause them to go into, or to be given up at
the Castle of Dumbarton, at the feast of our Lord's birth now next
to come, if I shall be able otherwise on this side, or at the feast of
the Purification of the Blessed Virgin (or Candlemas, 2d February)
next following thereafter, under pain of the breach of the oath
given, and under pain of the loss of all things which, with regard
to the lord our King, I shall be liable to lose, in whatever manner.
And for securing the entrance of these hostages as promised, I
have found my Lord Seneschal of Scotland, Earl of Strathern,
security, whose seal for the purpose of the present security, and
also for the greater evidence of the matter is appended, along
with my own proper seal, to these presents in testimony of the
premises. Acted and given, year, day, and place foresaid."
Two years after the Treaty of Inverness was
ratified, David II. died and Robert II. ascended the
throne.^ Owing to his close connection by marriage
with the reigning family, the subsequent relations
of the Lord of the Isles to the Court were of a
^ In the list of names oi persons who toi.k oath of homage and fealty to
Robert II. on the day after coronation is that of Johannes de Lyle.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 123
friendly nature, and before his father-in-law was
long upon the throne he was confirmed in possession
of a domain which might well be called princely.
It may be stated, generally, that the greater part of
the territories that first belonged in their integrity
to Somerlecl, but Avere afterw^ards divided among the
houses of Isla, Bute, and Lome, were now con-
solidated under one powerful family. One of the
first acts of King Kobert TL, on assuming royal
sway, was to confirm his " beloved son, John of
Isla," in the 300 merklands, once the property of
Allan, the son of Roderick, namely, the lands of
Moidart, Arisaig, Morar, Knoydart, being in the
lordship of Garmoran ; also the Islands of Uist,
Barra, Bum and Eigg, and Harris, being part of
Lewis. This deed was executed at Scone, during
the session of Parliament, on the 9th March, 1371-2.
According to Skene and others who have followed
him as an authority incapable of erring, this was the
first time John of Isla had received feudal investi-
ture of the patrimony of the Macruaris. As a
matter of fact, however, we find that on 4th July,
1363 — the time of John's enjoyment of high court
favour and ofiice — David II. bestows upon him a
Charter of Confirmation under the Great Seal
for all lands possessed by him, by whomsoever
these had been granted, a deed intended to make
good all previous gifts granted by Balliol or by
David, or inherited through his first wife.^ In
the same year there is a grant of these lands
made by John to his son Beginald, born of the
first marriage, with the addition that the castles
of Benbecula and Island Tirrim, and also the lands
of Sunart, Letter-lochletter, Ardgour, Hawlaste, and
sixty merklands in Lochaber, namely, Kilmald^ and
^ Kegister of the Great Seal. - Probably Kilinallie.
124 THE CLAN DONALD.
Locharkaig, are also included.^ This grant Is accom-
panied by a royal confirmation. It is remarkable
that neither John's first wife, through whom he
received the lands, nor her brother Reginald, from
whom she inherited them, receive any notice in the
charter. This gift was further confirmed by
Kobert III. in 1392.^ One point only calls for
remark in the disposition of lands provided for in
this instrument ; but it is of great importance, in
view of future discussions, namely, that these lands
of Garmoran and the North Isles and others were to
be held by Reginald and his heirs from John and his
heirs. Some years later, in 1376, the Lord of the
Isles received three charters for the remainder of
his lands, in which Colonsay, Lochaber, Kintyre, and
Knapdale, and other lands not previously disposed
of, were granted by the King to himself, " John
del He," and his heirs by his wife Margaret, the
daughter of the King. The territories of John
of Isla were, in this manner, divided into two
large divisions or lordships — the first, in the order
of time, being the lordship of Garmoran and the
Northern Isles, possessed by Reginald as the vassal
of John and of John's feudal heirs — the other being
the lordship of the Isles proper, with John himself
as crown vassal, with a special destination of the
lands in question in favour of the second family.
Some idea of the extent of this territory may be
gained by enumerating the different districts in the
following order : —
Mainland Tere,itortes.
The Lordship of Lochaber, including Kilmallie and Kilmonivaig.
The Lordship of Garmoran, including Moydart, Arisaig, Morar,
and Knoydarfc.
Also Morvern, Knapdale, Duror, Kintyre, and Glenco.
^ For Charters see Appendix. ^ Orig. Par. Scot.
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 125
Island Territories.
Isla, Gigha, Colonsay. Lewis, Harris.
Jura and Scarba. N. Uist, Benbecula.
Tiree, Eigg, Rum. S. Uist and Barra.
It is obvious that the Lord of the Isles must have
possessed conspicuous ability, force of character and
prudence, to have been able so to build up the power
and prestige of his race. The circumstances of the
time, no doubt, were favourable to the aggrandise-
ment of the Family of Isla. The successive
transformations in Scottish politics ; the continual
struggle against English domination, and the
frequent weakness of the executive power, rendered
the formation of a semi -independent principality
possible of achievement. But although the condi-
tions were auspicious in view of that end, only a
man of great foresight and commanding personality
could have seized the golden opportunity for
promoting the fortunes of his house. That he
became a man of the first consequence in Scottish
public life— although his loyalty was not above
suspicion — has already been fully set forth, but it
may be added in proof of this that, when the
abortive Treaty of Newcastle for David's liberation
was formulated in 1354, John of Isla was one of the
four barons named as securities for its observance,
the others being the Steward of Scotland, the
Lord of Douglas, and Thomas of Moray.
After 1372 there is little left to record regardino-
John of Isla or his fortunes, until his death in 1386.
Here, as elsewhere, the dulness of the annals
betokened the happiness born of prosperity. The
Lord of the Isles breathed his last in the Castle
of Ardthornish at an advanced age, and his dust
was laid in the Church of Gran, in Hy, where
126 THE CLAN DONALD.
the a>sbes of his father, Angus Og, reposed. His
obsequies ^vel•e observed with great pomp and
splendour by the Churchmen of the Isles, among
whom he was known as the "Good John of
Isla," on account of a miuiificence to their order,
in which he more than vied with the pious liberality
of his fathers.
From Photo, by Messrs G. W. Wilson & Co., Aberdeen.
RUINED KEEP OF ARDTHORNISH CASTLE.
We have purposely refrained from disturbing the
continuity of our narrative by dwelling upon certain
controversial episodes in John's career which have
an important bearing upon the future history of
his family. These cjuestions are in themselves so
important that there is an obvious advantage in
dealing with them in the closing part of the pre-
sent chapter, where they can be treated wdth some
measure of thoroughness rather than touched upon
as mere passing details.
The two marriages of John of Isla open up far-
reaching questions of genealogical interest, which it
THE G#OD JOHN OF ISLA. 127
is not our purpose in this volume to go into with
detailed exhaustiveness. We cannot, however,
avoid disposing, if possible, of one question upon
which future genealogical discussions must hinge,
and that is the regularity, or the opposite, of
John's union with Euphemia Macruari, the heiress
of Garmoran,
Undoubtedly there has been a tradition which
seems to have acquired a certain amount of weight,
that this was one of those irregular unions known
as handfasting which seem to have prevailed to some
extent am.ong the ancient Highlanders, and wliicli,
though recognised in the law of Celtic succession,
were inegular in the eye of the feudal law. We
are not, of course, surprised to find the historian of
Sleat, Hugh Macdonald, stating, not that John
married, but that he lived for ten years^ with the
mother of the first family, seeing that this seanachie
is always ready to cast doubts upon the legitimacy
of heads of branches of the clan whose claims to
seniority might otherwise be preferred to those of
the Chiefs of Sleat. We also place little reliance
upon the conclusions of an ex parte document
compiled in the same interest, in which — very
unnecessarily for proof of the main contention —
the legality of the marriage in question is scornfully
put out of court. ^ It is, however, somewhat sur-
prising to find the Clanranald historian make an
admission so damaging to the legitimacy of the line
from which the Clanranald Chiefs were descended
as that John of Isla " did not marry the mother of
these men (his sons by Euphemia Macruari) from
the altar. "^ It is equally strange that the MS. of
^ Collectanea de rebus Albanicis.
^ Abstract vic^v of the claims to tlio rcprcscntalioii of tlio Lords of tlio
Isles and Earls of Ros.s.
^ Eeliquia) CelticDSj vol. II., p. Ia9.
128 THE CLAN DONALD.
1700, written also in the Clanranald interest, should,
while maintaining the legality of the marriage, do so
with reasons so feeble and inconclusive/
How such a misconception of the true facts of
the case should have arisen can only be accounted
for in one way. The Scottish Government, when
refusing to ackno\vledge John's right to the lands
of Ranald Macruari, supported the refusal by the
allegation that his marriage with Amy was
irresrular, and could not be reconciled with the
principles of feudal tenure. This contention, how-
ever unfounded, and though a mere pretext for
curbing a powerful subject, was quite sufficient,
coming as it did from such high quarters, to impress
the popular mind and create a tradition which
appears to have received a considerable amount of
credit.
That John's marriage with Amy was a perfectly
legal and regular union is a fact amply attested.
That a lady in Amy's position, belonging to a
noble Highland family, should have contracted an
irregular alliance of the nature suggested is in the
highest degree improbable. But apart from this
consideration, which is not without its own weight,
two undoubted facts may be adduced in proof
First of all, there is a dispensation granted by Pope
Benedict XH. to John and Amy permitting them
to enter the state of matrimony. According to the
canon law of the Church of Home, which was then
very rigid, the parties, as third cousins, were Avithin
the forbidden degrees of consanguinity, and this
barrier to their union could only be removed by the
grace of the Church's earthly head. And it may
be stated, in passing, that this very dispensation,
^i^See Appendix,
THE GOOD JOHN OF ISLA. 129
implying as it did some sort of irregularity, may
have been one ground upon which the Government
based their declinature to confirm John in the Mac-
ruari lands, and thus propagated the tradition to
which we have referred.
But there is more than this. In the Treaty of
Inverness the Lord of the Isles, in enumerating the
hostages pledged for the performance of his sworn
allegiance, draws a distinction between his " late
son John and one Donald, another and natural
son of mine."^ This John was the eldest son of
Amy, and is spoken of in the same terms as Donald
his son by the daughter of the Steward of Scotland.
There seems, therefore, no ground for doubting — and
in this the standard authorities are at one — that the
first marriage of John of Isla was a perfectly valid
and legal union. In point of fact, John's marriage
with the daughter of the Steward is exposed to far
more objections, both from a legal and moral point
of view, than his first marriage. Assuming, as the
evidence compels us to do, that the first marriage
was regular, and there being nothing to shew that
Amy was guilty of any conduct unbecoming a true
and faithful wife, the competency of a divorce and
the power to contract a second marriage in her life-
time is subject to very grave doubts. This aspect
of the question, however, we are not disposed, at
present, to discuss. Lookincj at the transaction in
the most favourable point of view, the alliance with
the daughter of the future King of Scotland was
animated by motives of worldly policy rather than
of lofty principle, was a cruel slight upon a pure and
honourable lady, and is an indelible stain upon the
domestic life of " The Good John of Isla."
1 Seep. 122.
130 THE CLAN DONALD.
CHAPTER VII.
DONALD OF HARLAW.
The Succession of Donald to the Lordship of the Isles. — Reginald
and the Crown Charter of 1373. — The position of Godfrey. —
John Mor Tainistear and Alasdair Carrach. — Donald's policy. —
Celtic supremacy. — Alliance with England. — Richard II. at
Finlaggan in Isla. — Rebellion of Alasdair Carrach. — The
Eai'ldom of Ross. — The Lord of the Isles invades the Earl-
dom.— Defeat of Angus Dubh Mackay at Dingwall. — Donald
takes possession of Inverness. — ^March to Aberdeen. — The
Battle of Harlaw. — Defeat of Mar and his Lowlanders. —
Donald retires to the Isles. — The Regent Albany with an
army invades Ross, and takes possession of the Earldom. —
Albany's Campaigns in Argyle. — John of Fordoun's Treaty
of Portgilp. — The Rebellion of John Mor. — Character and
death of the Hero of Harlaw,
Donald, the eldest son of the second marriage of
John of Isla, succeeded his father as Lord of the
Isles, to the exclusion of the eldest survivino- son of
the first marriage. This was not the first instance
in the genealogy of the Clan Cholla in which the
line of succession was diverted from the eldest son.
We have seen how the sons of Alexander, the eldest
son of Angus Mor, were excluded from the succession,
owing to the determined opposition of their father
to the interests of Bruce. It must also be borne in
mind that the line of succession in the family of the
Isles, like that of every other Highland family, was
sometimes regulated more by the Celtic law of
tanistry than by the feudal law of primogeniture.
The title of Lord of the Isles — an assertion of
DONALD OF HARLAW. 131
independence — was itself a Celtic dignity, assumed
by the heads of this family, and not conferred by the
Scottish monarch. It had not been assumed for the
first time by John, as affirmed by Gregory and
echoed by others, who call that chief the first Lord
of the Isles. On the contrary, we find in charters
granted by several heads of the family before the
time of John the dignity of Lord of the Isles
assumed and, in several State documents, acknow-
ledged.^ Somerled himself, the modern founder of
the family, is referred to again and again as both
Dominiis and Rex Insularum, and Reginald his
son, as well as Donald his grandson, are referred to
as Lords of Innsegall, or of the Isles. Gregory
affirms that John, on his marriage with the Mac-
ruari heiress, and adding her patrimony to his already
extensive territories, assumed the title of Lord of
the Isles. But Somerled, the ancestor of John,
possessed a much wider and more extensive terri-
tory, both in the Isles and on the mainland, than
any of his successors. It seems, therefore, clear
that if John assumed this title for the extent of his
possessions he could not have been the first to do so
in the famil}'' of the Isles. In a very ancient MS.
quoted by the Seanachies, Gillebride, the father of
Somerled, is referred to as Righ Eilein Sidir, or
King of the Isles ; while another progenitor of the
family is styled Toiseach of the Isles. Even as far
back as the 8th century, we find reference in an
old Scots Chronicle to the " Chief of the Isles," and
it was only towards the middle or end of the 12th
century, when feudal institutions had been for some
time established in the country, and Latin Christi-
anity had taken root in the soil, that the title of
^ See Chartulary of Paislej^. Registrr of Great Seal, January 1st, 1507.
132 THE CLAN DONALD,
Dominus Insularum first appears on the page of
history.
But the designation which the family of the Isles
seems to have preferred to all others was de He, or
of Isla, to which successive chiefs, from Reginald,
the son of Somerlecl, to John, the last Lord, clung
with the fondness of a first love. We might infer
from this alone, e^^en if there were not other and
stronger indications pointing in the same direction,
that from the very beginning of the history of Clan
Cholla as a family in Argyle, green, grassy Isla, the
Queen of the Hebrides, was the home of the race.
We are far from affirming that the old Celtic lav^^
of tanistry alone, or even principally, operated in the
accession of Donald to the lordship of the Isles and
chiefship of the Clan Donald. While no doubt it
must have been an important factor in disarming
opposition amongst a people thoroughly Celtic and,
to a large extent, influenced by Celtic laws and
usages, there were other and more powerful elements
that conspired to place Donald, and not Reginald, in
the position of head of his father's house. The first
family of John of Isla had been already thrown in
the shade by his splendid alliance with the family of
the High Steward of Scotland through his marriage
with the Lady Margaret, daughter of the now
reigning King, if not also by the degradation of
their mother. Amy Macruari, the unrighteously
divorced wife of the Island Lord. Reginald himself,
the surviving eldest son of the first marriage,
surrendered his rights indifferently, without making
any claim to the honours of his house, and, according
to MptcVuirich, in direct opposition to the wishes of
the men of the Isles. John, the eldest son of the
first marriage, is referred to in the Treaty of 1369 as
DONALD OF HARLAW. 133
then dead, while his son Angus, given as a hostage
on that occasion for the future good behaviour of his
grandfather, did not survive that potentate, and left
no issue. According to the MS. of 1450, than which
there is no higher authority on this matter, Reginald
was the second son of the first marriage of John of
Isla, and, failing the issue of the first son, his
father's feudal heir. The authority of the MS. of
1450 is supported by others, among whom Mac-
Vuirich, who, though he makes no mention of John,
places the name of Reginald before that of Godfrey,
Reginald had already, in the year 1373, received a
Crown Charter of the lands of Garmoran and the
North Isles, all of which were included in the old
Macruari territory ; but the same charter added also
the lands of Swynort, Letter-Lochletter, Ardgowar,
Hawleste, and 60 marklands in Lochaber, namely,
Lochkymald and Locharkage. In this Charter of
1373, Reginald is to hold his lands of John of Isla,
and his heirs. Who was John of Isla's feudal heir ?
Not Angus, the son of John, who, as already stated,
had died without issue. It could not have been
Reginald, now the eldest surviving son of John of
Isla, for Reginald could not be his own vassal. The
next heir after Reginald is Godfrey, but he lay no
claim to the lordship of the Isles, and from what we
know of his character, if his father's heir, he was not
the man to stand tamely aside and allow^ Donald
take possession of the lordship. Besides, the Charter
of 1373 is itself the best evidence that Godfrey could
not have been his father's heir. It seems amply
clear that the policy of John of Isla in securing the
Charter of 1373 for Reginald was to bribe him out of
the succession. If Godfrey had been the eldest son,
it is difficult to see how he could have been so
I'Si THE CLAN DONALD.
utterly ignored by his father. Neither in the
Charter of 1376. which conveys the lands of
Colonsay and others to the sons of the second
marriage, nor in Reginald's Charter of 1373 is there
mention made of Godfrey, or any disposition made
in his favour. The subsequent history of the lord-
ship of the Isles shows very clearly who the heirs
were referred to in the Charter of 1373. Reginald,
though the eldest surviving son, became Donald's
vassal, as the descendants of Reginald continued to
be the vassals of the future lords of the Isles.
Donald, however, undoubtedly became, whether by
a feudal or Celtic law, the superior of all his brothers,
and his succession as Donald de lie leaves no doubt
as to the meaning of the Charter of 1373.
But Donald, besides being backed by the power-
ful influence of the King, his grandfather, and being
in the advantageous position of eldest son of the
family then in possession, appeared in every other
way, as events afterwards proved, to have been fitter
to rule over the vast territories of the family than
Reginald. John of Isla himself took care to disarm
opposition by making Donald in the Crown Charter
of 1373 the feudal superior of Reginald. In all
the circumstances, therefore, and in view of the
unambitious character which we must ascribe to
Reginald, the latter acted wisely in accepting the
situation, and offering no opposition to the Succession
of his brother. Accordingly, as we find from the
Book of Clanranald, Reginald, as High Steward of
the Isles, gave over all the rights and privileges of
the lordship of the Isles to Donald at Kildonan, in
Eigg, and he was nominated Macdonald, and Donald
of Isla, in presence of the principal men of the Isles. ^
^ Book of Clanranald in Keliq. Celfc., p. 161,
DONALD OF HARLAW. 135
Donald had now become not only the feudal
superior of his brothers, but also, by the consent of
the men of the Isles, the chief of the Clan Donald —
another instance of the practical operation of the
unwritten Celtic law which permitted the deposition
of one chief, as well as the election of another who
might not be the direct feudal heir.
Whatever opposition there may have been to
Donald's succession, it appears, by his firm yet
generous rule, to have gradually ceased ; and the
vassals of the Isles had never been so strongly
cemented together, nor at any period in the history
of the lordship of the Isles do we find the followers
of the Macdonald standard stronger in their attach-
ment to their chief than we now find them. This
fact is sufficient proof of Donald's administrative
powers, no less than of his wise and just rule in an
age and at a time in the history of the country when
the strongest often failed. He conciliated his
brothers by the generous terms meted out to them
in the division of the lands of the extensive terri-
tories of which he was the superior. He confirmed
Keginald in the lands of Garmoran, the North Isles,
and others, after the death of his father, John of
Isla. The position and attitude of Godfrey, the
third son of Amy Macruari, does not appear,
however, to be very clear, either at this juncture
or during his subsequent history. We may infer
from the Charter of 1373, by which Uist, with the
Castle of Benbecula and other lands, are conferred
on Reginald, that North Uist had been the portion
allotted by John to his son Godfrey, and that he
possessed it during the lifetime of his father. The
same Insula de Wyst, mentioned in the Charter of
1373, is confirmed to Eanald MacAUan in the
136 THE CLAN DONALD.
year 1498, and all the lands specified in that charter
as being in Wyst are in South Uist. In a charter
conveying the Trinity Church of Oarinish, with the
lands of Carinish and Illeray in North Uist to the
Monastery and Convent of St John the Evangelist in
Inchaffray, Godfrey styles himself Godfridus de
Insidis Dominus de Wyst. But he dates his charter
apud castrum nostrum de Ellantyrum, the principal
residence of the Clanranald. According to the Book
of Clanranald, E/Cginald died in 1386, and Godfrey's
Charter is dated 7th July, 1389. It appears, there-
fore, that on the death of Keginald, Godfrey possessed
himself of Garmoran and other lands granted to the
former, and that he was allowed to keep possession,
notwithstanding a confirmation, in the year 1392 by
Kobert III., of the Castle of Elian tirrim, the lands
of Garmoran and others, to Reginald's heirs. ^
Whether Godfrey was encouraged or in any way
assisted by Donald in this enterprise we have no
means of knowing ; but it is evident that he could
not have kept possession long if Donald had chosen
to oppose his pretensions, and in view of all the
circumstances we are warranted in concluding that
Godfrey made out a plausible claim, as a descendant
of the Macruaries, to the lands of which he possessed
himself The sons of Heginald were likely enough
to have assumed a defensive attitude, and resisted
the aggressive pretensions of Godfrey to the utmost;
but it is difiicult to say, in the absence of any
positive evidence, with what immediate result, even
though supported, as they were, by the Crown
Charter of 1373. It appears to be abundantly
clear that, in the lifetime of Godfrey at least, the
principal lands in the Macruari territory were not
possessed by the sons of Heginald. ^
^ Register of the Great Seal.
SHIELD OF THE LORD OF THE ISLES.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 137
The sons of the second marriage of John of Isla
were amply provided for out of the family inherit-
ance. Donald himself, besides the superiority of
the whole Macdonald territory included in the
lordship of the Isles, possessed directly the lands
of Colonsay and others not included in the grants
bestowed on the younger sons. John Mor Tainistear,
the second son, received a grant of 120 marklands
in Kintyre and 60 marklands in Isla. He became
the founder of the family styled of Dunnyveg and
the Glens, the latter of which he acquired through
his marriage with Margery Bisset, the daughter
and heiress of MacEoin Bisset, Lord of the Antrim
Glens. It will be observed that only certain lands
in Isla were granted to John Mor, whose residence
there was the Castle of Dun-Naomhaig, while
Finlaggan Castle, in the same island, was the
residence of Donald, his brother, the Lord of the
Isles. As matter of fact, the family of John Mor
never did possess the whole of the island of Isla,
either before or after the forfeiture of the lordship
of the Isles, and they never arrogated to themselves
the designation de lie, or of Isla, which was the
peculiar and exclusive designation of the head of
the house of Macdonald, and ceased with John, the
last Lord of the Isles, who died in 1498.
The next son of the second marriage of John of
Isla was, according to the MS. of 1450 — which is
always safe to follow — Angus, who having died
young without issue, there is nothing recorded of
him but the bare name. The fourth son was
Alasdair, afterwards known as Alasdair Carrach,
progenitor of the Macdonalds of Keppoch. On
him were bestowed lands in Mull, and also the
lands of Lochaber, preferring these, according to
138 THE CLAN DONALD,
the Sleat historian, to the lands of Troternish, m
Skye, of which he had his choice.
Besides these, there appears also to have been
another son of the second marriaj^e of John of Isla,
named Hugh, hitherto ignored by the historians of
the family. Kobert the Steward of Scotland, before
he succeeded to the throne, granted, as Lord of
Athol, a charter of the whole thanage of Glentilt to
Eugenius, Thane of Glentilt, and brother of Reginald
of the Isles. ^ From the fact that the lands were
conferred by the Steward, we naturally conclude
that Hugh was of the second family of the Lord of
the Isles, and, therefore, the Steward's own grand-
son. In 1382, a safe conduct, dated at Westminster
on the 21st of October, is granted to Hugh of the
Isles by Richard II., and an escort of six horsemen
accompany him to the English borders.^ In the
same year we find the following entry in the Scottish
Exchequer Rolls : — " Et Hugoni de Insulis, de dono
regis, ut patet per literam suam de precepto sub
secreto, ostensam super compotem sub periculo
computantis iijli."^ Again in the year 1403 we
have : — " Et domino quondam Hugoni de Insulis,
de dono regis, prout pater per literas suas de recepto
de anno hujus compoti ostensas super compotum
vli."^ Skene asserts that the family descended
from Hugh became Mclntoshes from one of them
whose name was Finlay Toiseach, Thane of Glen-
tilt. This is highly probable, for we have never
been able to identify any of the descendants of
Hugh under the name of Macdonald, and from the
fact that the heads of the family were styled Thanes
1 Skene's Celtic Scotland, vol. III., p. 272. Atholl Charter Chest,
" Rotuli Scotiic, vol. 11. , p. 45.
3 Exchequer Rolls, vol. III., p. 92. ^ Ibid., vol. Ill,, p, 576,
DONALD OF HARLAW. 139
or Toiseachs, there is every reason to suppose that in
time they became Mclntoshes.
Though the lands of the lordship of the Isles
were thus divided between the sons of the two
marriages of John of Isla, the superiority of the
whole still remained in Donald, now the acknow-
ledged chief of the Clan Donald, and we are not
by any means disposed to agree with Skene and
others in saying that this division of the lands of
the lordship weakened the power of the Clan
Donald, and finally brought about the downfall of
the lordship itself The real cause of the downfall
of the lordship of the Isles must be sought else-
where, and may be summed up briefly in the
struggle of Saxon against Celt — a struggle which
could only result finally, as we find it did, in a fight
so uneciual, in the triumph of the stronger over the
weaker forces. Instead of weakening the power of
the Lord of the Isles, the division of the heritage of
the family seems very materially to have increased
it. If the intention of the Charter of 1373 was
partly to cripple the resources, influence, and organic
unity of the Island family, that policy certainly did
not succeed, for the cadets of the family themselves,
no less than the other vassals of the lordship of the
Isles, continued to adhere loyally to the Macdonald
standard until the final attempt to set up the Celtic
supremacy in the Isles failed in the rebellion of
Donald Dubh.
The first mention we have of Donald, Lord of
the Isles, in any record, is in the year 1369, when,
according to the Treaty of Inverness, he was given
as a hostage to the king for the future good
behaviour of his father, John of Isla. Donald would
then have been about ten years of age, if we are
140 THE CLAN DONALD.
right in assuming that the second marriage of John
of Isla took place in the year 1358. His compulsory
residence in the Castle of Dumbarton could not in
the nature of things have tended to make him loyal
to the Scottish throne. The policy of the Scottish
State in detaining Donald, and the other sons of the
Lord of the Isles, though the means of bringing
about a temporary cessation of hostilities in the
Isles, proved ultimately an unwise and short-sighted
policy. Donald is no sooner set at liberty than he
assumes a defensive attitude, and he seems deter-
mined to wreak vengeance on his former jailers.
He at once assumed the role of an Independent
prince. He owed no loyalty to the Scottish State ;
on the contrary he looked upon the Kings of
Scotland as interlopers within the Island territory.
The Celt and the Saxon had little In common, and
Donald was intensely Celtic. The two races. In all
their aims and characteristics, in language and in
sentiment, were as wide apart as the poles.
Donald's policy clearly was to set up a Celtic
supremacy In the West, independent of all inter-
ference from the Saxon importation in the South.
It is from this purely Celtic point of view that
his conduct and that of his house must be judged,
and viewing It in this light it may well be justified.
Loyalty to the Scottish State in these circumstances
could hardly be expected, and could not consistently
be observed by the Island Lord. A princely inheri-
tance had been handed down to him through
successive generations of men inspired by the same
motives and actuated by the same feeling of hostility
towards the enemies of their race, and Donald must
now consider how best to preserve it.
DONALD OF HAUL AW. 141
The strained political* relations between England
and Scotland favoured negotiation with the former
country, and accordingly the Island Lord and his
brothers are found visiting the English Court
frequently during the years from 1378 to 1408.
In the year 1378 a safe conduct is granted by
Richard II. to Donald, " filio Johannis de Insulis,
clerico," on his return from the University of Oxford,
where he had been educated for the Church.^ This
Donald is referred to in the treaty concluded
between David 11. and John, Lord of the Isles, in
1369, and is given on that occasion as a hostage for
the future good behaviour of his father." In 1382,
Hugh of the Isles, as we have seen, visits England,
probably as ambassador from the Isles, and is
honoured on his return with an escort of six horse-
men.^ In 1388, the Lord of the Isles and his
brothers, Godfrey and John Mor, visit the English
Court and are received as independent Celtic
princes, while at the same time they enter into a
league with Hichard II., to which John, Bishop of
the Isles, is a party.*
In the year 1400, a safe conduct, dated at West-
minster on February 5th, is granted to John of the
Isles and Donald his brother ^\ith an escort of
80 horsemen.^ From the language in which this
document is couched, it seems the brothers were
^ Rotuli Scotipe, vol. II., p. 11.
2 Vide Ti-eaty of Inverness, p. 121.
^"Salvus Concluctus pro Hugone of the Oute Isles." Westminster,
Oct. 21, 1382.— Rotuli Scotiro, vol. II., p. 45.
^ " Episcopo Sodorensi datur potestas tractandi de confederationibus cum
filiis Johannis, uujjer domini Insularum." — Rotuli Scoticc, vol. II., jj. 94.
^ " Rex universis et singulis admirallis, etc., salu tern Sciatis quod cum
nobilis vir Johannes de Insulis Dorainus Dunwage et de Glyuns et Donaldus
fratur ejus, etc." — Rotuli Scotite in Turri Londouensi, vol. II., 155.
142 THE CLAN DONALD.
received at the English Court with much distinction
and ceremony. In July of the same year we find
the two brothers again visiting England and
entering into a defensive league with Henry lY.^
In the years 1405 and 1408, Donald and John
repeat these visits, and renew their alliance with the
English monarch.^ Thus the exigencies of political
warfare forced the Island family to seek the friendly
alliance of England against an aggressive Scottish
neighbour, and English statesmen were not slow to
take advantage of so favourable an opportunity to
advance the English policy towards Scotland. The
conduct of the Island Lord may appear on the face
of it unpatriotic, but in reality it was not so, though,
as it ultimately proved, it was an unwise and short-
sighted policy. It was a consistent and open
declaration of the policy of his house, and an
assertion of the ancient Celtic independence of his
family. Meantime it served to disarm opposition on
the part of the Scottish State, and secured the
Independence of the Island Lord for a time, though
ultimately it helped to bring about the downfall of
his family.
A peculiar incident In the romantic exile of
Richard II. of England Is an indication of the
friendly alliance between the family of the Isles
and the English Court at the period under review.
The revolution that placed Henry of Lancaster on
the throne of England drove Richard II. , as a State
prisoner, to Pontefract Castle. Shortly afterwards
the news spread abroad that Richard was dead, but,
In reality, and there Is no reason to doubt the
accuracy of the story, he had escaped from his
1 Rymer's Foedera, vol. VIII., p. 146. - Ibidem, pp. 418, 527.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 143
jailers and, in the disguise of a beggar, found his
way to Finlaggan Castle in Isla, the seat of the
Lord of the Isles. Here he was recognised by-
Margery Bisset, the wife of John Mor Tainistear,
brother of the Lord of the Isles. This lady, who
had recently been married to John Mor, had seen
the unfortunate royal exile in her native Ireland,
and immediately recognised him though in such
humble disguise.^ Donald received the deposed
monarch kindly, and hospitably entertained him,
until a safe asylum had been secured for him at
the court of the Scottish King.
The differences between Donald of Isla and his
royal relatives, though at first not very easily
defined, seem to have had the effect of causing a
domestic quarrel between them. Donald and his
brothers, John Mor and Alasdair Carrach, were
accused of want of filial affection towards their
mother, the King's sister. What grounds there
were for this serious charge against the brothers
it is difficult to say, for none were specified, though
we may easily conjecture that the brunt of their
^" Bot in the Out-Tlys of Scotland than
There was a travelland a pure man ;
A Lordis dochter of Ireland,
Of the Bissatis there dwellaiid,
Wes weddyt with a gentleman —
The Lord of the Ilys bruither than,
In Ireland before quhan schee liad bene,
And the King Richard tliar had Fene ;
Quhen in the Islys schee saw this man
Schee let that she weel kend hym than,
Till her maistere soon schee jjast
And thar till hym all sae fast
That hee wes the King of Yugland
That she before saw in Irland,
When hee wes tharin before,
As schee drew than to memore." — Wtntoune,
144 THE CLAN DONALD.
offending was their Celtic tendencies generally, and'
particularly their independent attitude towards the
Scottish State. In these circumstances, and amid
such surroundings, the King enjoined the Earl of
Fife to protect his sister, the Lady of the Isles.
This interference was very naturally resented by
Donald and his brothers, and it so exasperated
them that they immediately raised the standard
of rebellion. Though Donald had made no formal
claim to the Earldom of Ross at this early stage
in the chequered history of that much contested
possession, we may well believe that he followed
closely the course of events, and that he was by
no means a disinterested spectator. On the death
of the notorious Wolf of Badenoch in 1394, the
Castle and lands of Urquhart, which formed part
of the extensive Earldom of Ross, and which were
held by the Wolf in right of his wife, the Countess
of Ross, became the scene of much confusion and
strife. Alasdair Carrach, aided and abetted by
his brother, the Lord of the Isles, threw himself
into the conflict and took possession of the Castle
and lands of Urquhart. His tenure was a short-
lived one. The details of this rebellion have not
been preserved, but it had one result at least in
the imprisonment of Alexander Carrach, who seems
to have rendered himself more conspicuous than
the other brothers, and thus sustained the character
which so w^ell became him in after years. The
imprisonment of Alexander was little better than
a farce, which, having been played out, in the
course of the following year he was released.
Donald, who had been his kindly jailer, had, how-
ever, to appear before Parliament to answer for
DONALD OF HARLAW, 145
his prisoner, which having done, the feigned royal
anger was assuaged.^
When Donald of Isla again appears on the
historical stag^e it is as chief actor in the drama
of the year 1411. He does not appear to have
taken any prominent part in the politics of the
years immediately following the death of King
E-obert III., nor do we find him opposing, or
acquiescing in, the appointment of the Duke of
Albany as E-egent of the Kingdom, though we
may conjecture from after events that he did not
look upon it with favour. The remote situation
of the island lordship, the assertion of independence
on the part of Donald himself, together with the
entire want of sympathy with southern aims,
explains the disappearance of a nobleman of the
Island Lord's rank from the Scottish politics of
this period. It is only when the interests of his
own family and race are at stake that the Island
Chief steps boldly upon the stage and plays a
prominent part. The rumoured resignation of her
rights by Euphemia Lesley, the daughter and
heiress of Alexander Lesley, Earl of Hoss, is the
cause of his now re-appearing from his temporary
retirement. The Earldom of Ross was too great
a prize to be lightly passed over by the Island
Lord, and he eagerly watches his opportunity to
lay hold on it. In extent the earldom comprised
the old district of Hoss, Cromarty, and that portion
of ancient Argyle extending westwards from Glenelg
to Lochbroom, including the coast lands of Kintail,
Lochalsh, Lochcarron, Applecross, and Gairloch.
1 Acts of the Pari, of Scotland, Vul. I., p. 503. April 22, 1398—" Preterea
ordinatum est quod si ofEeratur tractatua ut submissio ex parte rebellaucium
quod uon recipiatur uiai in forma que aequitur viz. quod domiuus iiisularum
et fratres sui Johannes et Alexander et consilarii eorum principales, etc., etc."
10
146 THE CLAN DONALD.
It extended Inland as far east as Urquhart, and
included the parish of Kilmorack, now in the county
of Inverness. In addition to the foregoing the
Earls of Ross were superiors of lands of which the
following are the more important : — In the County
of Aberdeen, the lands of Auchterless and King-
Edward ; in the County of Inverness, the lands of
Innermerky in the lordship of Badenoch ; in the
County of Nairn, the lands of Balmakayth, Both,
Banchre, Bate, Kynowdie, Kinsteary, Kilravock,
Easter Geddes, Dumnaglass, and Cawdor.
This large territory, or at all events Boss proper,
had formerly been under the sway of Celtic maor-
mors, and for centuries had suffered from the
incursions of both Norse and Dane.^ At this time
the Scandinavian element largely preponderated
over the original Pictish inhabitants, but the two
had gradually become amalgamated into one people,
and the Celtic spirit, which had survived the shock
of centuries of Teutonic oppression, seems still to
have pervaded the great body of the population.
The introduction of feudal laws and institutions in
the South aifected, almost simultaneously, the old
order of things in the North. The Celtic maormor
gave place to the Norman baron. The last maormor
of Boss of whom we have any record was Macbeth,
who became King of Scotland in 1040, and was
murdered in the year 1056.^ The first Earl of Boss
of whom there is any notice was Gillanders, of the
Celtic family of Obeolan, who were hereditary lay
abbots of Applecross ; but whether he assumed the
dignity or had it conferred upon him, he is at all
^ Annals of Tigernach. Ncnuius (Irish Version), pp. Ixxvii., Ixxix.
-Reg. Prior S. Andre, p. 114. Chron. de Mailros, pp. 47-51. lunes'a
Critical Essay, pp. 791, 803,
bONALD (yp HARLAW. 14.?
events referred to as Earl in the year 1160.^ The next
Earl of Koss appears to have been Malcolm MacHeth,
who held the earldom only for a very brief period.^
In 1161, William the Lion created Florence, Count
of Holland, Earl of Ross, on his marriage with that
King's sister.^ In or about tiie year 1212, Alex-
ander II. created Ferchard Macintagart, of the
Obeolan family of AjDplecross, Earl of Boss, for
services rendered to the King. He was succeeded
by his son William as second Earl of the new
creation. William was succeeded by his son William
as third Earl. The third Earl was succeeded by
his son Hugh as fourth Earl. Earl Hugh, who
was killed in the battle of Halidon Hill, was
succeeded by his son William as fifth Earl.
Earl William, on the death of his brother Hugh,
his heir, resigned the earldom, but David II.
renewed a grant of it to him and his heirs
male, with remainder to Sir Walter Lesley and
his wife, the Earl's daughter. Thus the line of
succession was diverted from heirs male exclusively
to heirs general, and accordingly on the death of
the fifth Earl in 1372, his daughter succeeded him
as Countess of Hoss. Sir Walter Lesley having
died in 1382, his widow, Euj)hemia, Countess of
Koss, married Alexander Stewart, Earl of Buchan,
to whom the King, at the desire of Euphemia,
confirmed a grant of the earldom, and he after-
wards appears in record as Earl of Boss, to the
exclusion of Alexander Lesley, Euphemia's son.
Alexander Lesley, however, ultimately succeeded to
the Earldom in the year 1398, and dying in 1402,
his only daughter, who bore the family name of
^ Wyntoune. ^ Register of Duufermliue, p. 25.
» P»lg. lUust., vol. I., pp. 20, 21.
148 THE CLAX DONALD.
Euphemia, became Countess of Ross. The mother
of the Countess of Ross was the Lady Isabella
Stewart, daughter of Robert, Duke of Albany, the
regent of the kingdom, and her aunt was Margaret
Lesley, daughter of Sir Walter Lesley and the
Countess Euphemia of Ross. The Lady Margaret
Lesley was the wife of Donald, Lord of the Isles,
and therefore the nearest living relative in the line
of succession to the Earldom of Ross after the
Countess Euphemia.
In the event of Euphemia's death or resignation,
it is obvious that we have abundant materials for a
fierce domestic quarrel, and on account of the
position of the parties, the elements of a stirring
historical drama. The principal actors in the events
that followed were all nearly related by blood to one
another, as well as kindred to the Scottish throne.
Chief in position was Albany, who for many years
held, as Regent, the supreme power in the State.
Devoid of the warlike qualities which his brothers
possessed, in fact a man of suspected courage in the
field, he was intellectually head and shoulders above
all the other sons of Robert II. But his talents,
which undoubtedly were lofty, were prostituted
to dark and selfish intrigue. It is no unfounded
suspicion that he condoned, if he did not actually
compass, the murder of the Duke of Rothesay, his
nephew, and heir apparent to the throne; and if
he did not allow his other nephew James to be
captured by the English, he ofiered no protest
against his long imprisonment. Of determined
resolution and unflinching purpose, he never amid
the various and conflicting currents of State policy
lost sight of his own ends, nor did he scruple to
sweep out of his path whoever stood in the way of
DONALD OF HARLAW. 149
the execution of his designs. Had he been a single-
hearted Scottish patriot, animated by zeal for the
national welfare, and the safety of the State, his
policy in keeping the family of the Isles out of
the succession to the Earldom of E-oss would, from a
national standpoint, have been worthy of all praise.
If the addition of (iarmoran and the North Isles to
the House of Isla in the reign of David II. con-
stituted a source of danger to Scottish supremacy,
the further addition of the Earldom of Ross to the
already extensive Island domains, would make the
Island Lord a still more formidable antao-onist.
But there were interests dearer to Albany than the
Scottish weal. His own interests came first, the
aggrandisement of his family came second in the
order of importance, and the interests of Scotland
came last. But it suited his personal and family
ambition to put on this occasion the last first, and
thus, under cover of patriotism, play the game
which through his far-sighted policy he had so
elaborately planned. The course pursued reveals
the hand of a master in diplomatic arts. Euphemia
Lesley, the heiress of Boss, was sickly, some say
deformed, and not likely to live long.^ If she died
without making a special destination of her posses-
sions and honours, these would in the natural course
of things devolve on Lady Margaret of the Isles.
This was a consummation by all means, fair or foul,
to be prevented, and hence the cunningly devised
plot. The heiress of so much worldly wealth and
^ " Alexander Lesley, Earl of Ross, married Euphame, and had issue a
crookbacked daughter, Euphame " — Rothes MSS. in the Adv. Lib., p. 99.
" Alexander Lesley, after the death of his father, succeeded in the Earldom
Ross. He married Lady Euphame, &c., and by her had issue a daughter
Euphame 'yat was crouchbacked ' " — MS. History of the Earls of Ross in
Advocates' Library, lac. v. 6-17, p. 327.
150 THE CLAN DONALD.
honour is found to have interests that are not of
this world. She is found to have a call from heaven
to devote herself to the exclusive exercise of piety.
She must be secluded from all earthly interests, and
resign for ever every worldly ambition. Above all,
she must not directly or indirectly be brought under
the influence of the Lord of the Isles and his lady.
Euphemia at length betakes herself to a convent,
and the cool and wary schemer that wielded the
helm of State was biding the time when she came of
legal age to resign her rights into his hands. If she
died before then, he probably had another card to
play, but meantime she was secure against all
machinations but his own.
Donald was no match for Albany in this game of
Tpoliticsl Ji7iesse. Whatever were his faults, or those
of his race, they never fought with the weapons of
duplicity or intrigue, though often their victims.
The Lord of the Isles, therefore, had recourse to the
argument which was best understood in the brave
days of old. In addition to the conquest of Ross, it
is said that Donald had other designs, but it is
difficult to conceive what these could have been.
The wild and extensive scheme which historians
have alleged Donald to have conceived of making
himself master of all Scotland is too utterly
incredible, and may be dismissed at once as
unworthy of any consideration. The conflict, more-
over, was not one between Celt and Saxon as such,
nor was the struggle one for the supremacy of the
one race over the other. Unquestionably the
occasion of unfurling the Macdonald banner at this
time was the conduct of Albany, in relation to the
disputed succession to the Earldom of Ross, and
Donald had no higher ambition than to make him-
self master of that extensive territory.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 151
According to the Sleat historian, Donald told the
Governor that he would either lose all or gain the
earldom to which he had such a good title. He
maintained that Euphemia, the heu^ess to the earl-
dom, having become the bride of heaven, and given
up the world, might be regarded as legally dead, and
Lady Margaret of the Isles became ipso facto her
successor/ The contention seemed a sound enough
one, according to the canons of equity, and our
sympathies are naturally with Donald, who, with
chivalrous daring, was prepared to fight with his
strong right arm for what he deemed his own, rather
than with the wily Regent, who pulled the wires of
State, and had the resources of a kingdom at his
back.
The heather was soon aflame, and the fiery cross
blazed through the Isles, as well as through those
mainland regions in which the Macdonald power
was predominant. The whole Clan, with its vassals,
raUied to the fight. From many a glen, and strath,
and isle, the Gaelic warriors hastened to the
rendezvous, where the ancient banner of the Kings
of Innsegall was unfurled to its native breeze. The
Macleans and Mackinnons, the hardy Clans of Mull,
the Clan Chattan from lone Lochaber, and the
Macleods from the rugged hills of Harris and Lewis,
obeyed the call to arms.
On the point of Ardthornish, in Morvern, com-
manding the water-way which washes the shores of
ancient Oirthirghael, stood a residence and strong-
hold of the Macdonalds,
" Which on her frowning steep
Twixt cloud and ocean hung."
^ Euphame "rendered herself religious among the nuns of North Berwick in
Haddingtonshire" — MS. Hist, of the Earls of Ross, &c,
152 THE CLAN DONALD.
Only the walls of its keep are still erect, towering
high above the rocky promontory like a sentinel
grim and hoary keeping watch and ward, where of
old, in the days of its glory, it
" Overlooked dark Mull thy mighty sound,
Where thwarting tides with mingled roar
Part thy swarth hills from Morvern's shore." ^
From its commanding position, Ardthornish was well
adapted as a vantage ground for defence or attack,
by land or sea, and there could be no better
rendezvous for the assembling of the host that was
to invade the Earldom of Ross.
" 'N uair dh' eireas Clann Domhnuill
Na leomhainn tha garg
Na beo-bheithir, mh6r-leathunn
Chonnspunnach, gharbh,
Luchd sheasamh na c5i'ach
Do 'n ordugh Lamh-dhearg,
Mo dhoigh gu 'm bu ghorach
Dhaibh t6iseachadh oirbh."^
" When the valiant Clan D6nuill,
The lions in might.
Like thunder bolts gleaming,
With blades flashing bright.
Brave sons of the Ked Hand,
Declare for the right,
Then woe to the foeman
That meets them in fight."
It was a little after midsummer when Macdonald
and his fleet arrived on the West Coast of Boss-
shire, and the army disembarked at Strome. March-
ing through the great glens of Ross they soon
reached the vicinity of Dingwall. But the conquest
of Boss was not to be unopposed. The county of
Caithness, as might be expected from jts position,
^ The Lord of the Isles. - Iain Dubh Mac Jain-Ic Aileiu,
DONALD OF HARLAW. 153
was from an early period subject to Norse Influence,
and In the course of time came to be occupied by a
population largely Norse In composition. It formed
part of the possessions of the great Norwegian Jarls
of Orkney from the beginning of the 10th down to
the end of the 12th century. The district of
Strathnaver, however, which formed the western
portion of the ancient county of Caithness, differed
from the rest of that region not only by reason of
Its wild and mountainous surface, but also in being
the- abode of a people who, amid the racial changes
that took place In that time, retained their Celtic
blood and speech largely unafiected by Norwegian
admixture. The most powerful clan that occupied
this portion of Caithness at the beginning of the
15th century was the Clan Mackay. It Is said that
at that time Angus Dubh Mackay could bring into
the field 4000 fighting men. The news of Donald's
march through Wester Ross having penetrated to
far Strathnaver, Angus Dubh Mackay determined
to oppose the progress and clip the wings of the
Hebridean eagle. He hastily gathered his forces,
said to have been 2500 strong, and marching to
Dingwall, arrived just as the Islesmen were seen
approaching. He Immediately assumed the ofien-
slve, but failed to stem the tide of the advancing
force. A fierce engagement took place, in which
the men of Caithness, though they fought with the
bravery and firmness characteristic of the Mackay
clan, were routed. Rory Galld, brother of the
chief, and many others were slain, whilst Angus
Dubh himself was taken prisoner. Macdonald of
the Isles having taken possession of the Castle of
Dingwall and garrisoned It, resumed his march, and
proceeded to Inverness by Beauly. At the latter
154 THE CLAN DOxVALD.
place he halted, and divertmg his line of march he
proceeded to Castle Downie and administered a
well-merited chastisement to the Laird of Lovat
and his Frasers, who had the temerity to oppose
the Island Lord's pretensions to the Earldom of
E,oss. Having at length arrived at Inverness, he
planted his standard in the Highland Capital, and
summoned all the fighting men of Ross, and of the
North generally, to his banner. The summons met
with a wide response from the purely Celtic regions
of Scotland, and many, emboldened by the success
that already attended the Island Chief's efforts,
took up arms to support his cause.
According to a MS. history of the Mackenzies,
quoted in the Macdonald Collections, " Murdoch
Nichoil Mackenzie was the only chief in the North
Hig-hlands who refused assistance to Macdonald
when he fought against the Governoi-'s forces at
Harlaw. He v^as taken prisoner by the Earl of
Ross at Dingwall."^ The Chief of the Mackenzies
was at this time of so little consequence that it
was hardly worth while keeping him in " durance
vile" during the absence of the Island Chief at
Harlaw. But he was not the only chief in the
North who opposed Macdonald's invasion of Ross.
A much more powerful individual, in the person of
the Chief of the Frasers, had not only endeavoured
to check Donald's progress through the Earldom,
but afterwards fought against him at Harlaw.
No sooner had Donald mustered the full force
of his followers than he launched on what was
apparently a fresh enterprise. Instead of standing
on the defensive and guarding what he had gained,
he again assumed the aggressive. It has by some
^ Macdonald Collections, p. 1248. - ..
DONALD or HARLAW. 155
been conjectured that, In addition to the invasion
of Ross, there was another and more ambitious
plan of campaign in which Donald expected to
form a junction with his English allies. If this
was so, and we can only speculate, England's own
difl&culties in France proved Scotland's friends in
need, and if Donald cherished any expectations of
southern aid, he was doomed to disappointment.
Donald, though in 2:)ossession of the Earldom of
Ross, well knew that he was not to be left long
undisturbed in the enjoyment of his recent acquisi-
tion, and, taking time by the forelock, he resolved
to push his way eastwards in the expectation of
swelling his ranks as he proceeded, and thus pre-
senting such a formidable and imposing appearance
as to strike terror into the heart of the opposing
host. Besides, Donald, in the course of his quarrel
with the Regent, threatened to burn the town of
Aberdeen, and to put that threat into execution
was, at least, one motive for the intended invasion
of the granite city. The partial or total burning
of the town of Inverness, in which the famous
oak bridge over the Ness perished, though valiantly
defended by a stalwart townsman of the name of
Cumine, and the ravages committed by the Island
host as they traversed the counties of Moray and
Aberdeen ought, without any hesitation, to be taken
with a very large grain of salt. That Donald used
the weapons at his disposal to advantage may well
be believed — those weapons that at that time were
inseparable from and incidental to the fortunes of
war ; but the fire and sword with which he
devastated any portion of the large district of
country through which he passed were not used
wantonly or merely in quest of plunder, though
156 THE CLAN DONALD.
that was always acceptable and needful for the
support of his army, but largely because he had
not received the accession to his ranks which he
anticipated and demanded.
Three weeks of July of the year 1411 had elapsed
when the Highland army, which cannot be estimated
at less than 10,000 strong, quitted Inverness. The
Island Lord himself commanded the main body,
which was composed of the Isles-men, including the
Macleods of Lewis and Harris under their chiefs.
The right wing was commanded by Hector Maclean
of Duart, commonly known as Eachunn Ruadh nan
Cath, while the left was under the command of The
Mackintosh. John Mor Tainistear of Dunnyveg led
the reserve. When the news arrived in Aberdeen
that Donald and his host were on their way to
consign the town to the flames, the panic may well
be conceived. The terror which the approach of the
Highlanders struck into the popular mind has been
reflected in the ballad poetry of the country. Scott,
in " The Antiquary," seems to have caught the
spirit of the time, and the following lines, written,
of course, from the Lowland point of view, show that
Donald was not to have it all his own way on his
memorable march towards Harlaw : —
" Now haud your tongue, both wife and carle,
And listen, great and sma',
And I will sing of Glenallan's Earl
That fought on the red Harlaw.
" The coronachs cried on Benachie,
And doun the Don and a'.
And Hieland an' Lawland may mournfu' be
For the sair field of Harlaw.
" They saddled a hundred milk white steeds,
They hae bridled a hundred black,
With a chafron of steel on each horse's head,
And a good knight upon his back.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 15^
*' They hadna ridden a mile, a mile,
A mile, but barely ten,
When Donald came banking down the brae
Wi' twenty thousand men.
" Their tartans they were waving wide.
Their glaives were glancing clear.
Their pibrochs rung frae side to side.
Would deafen ye to hear.
" The great Earl in his stirrups stood
That Highland host to see :
Now here a knight that's stout and good
May prove a jeopardie :
" What wouldst thou do, my squire so gay
That rides beside my reyne.
Were ye Glenallau's Earl the day.
And I were Roland Cheyne ?
" To turn the rein were sin and shame.
To fight were wondrous peril.
What would ye do now, Roland Cheyne,
Were ye Glenallan's Earl ?
" Were I Glenallan's Earl this tide.
And ye were Roland Cheyne,
The spur should be in my horse's side
And the bridle upon his mane.
" If they hae twenty thousand blades,
And we twice ten times ten,
Yet they hae but their tartan plaids.
And we are mail-clad men.
" My horse shall ride through ranks sae rude,
As through the moorland fern.
Then ne'er let the gentle Norman blude
Grow cauld for Highland kerne."
The chief magnate of the regions of Garioch and
Strathbogie through which Donald and his host
advanced was Alexander Stewart, Earl of Mar, the
Glenallan's Earl of Scott's ballad, and it is a remark-
158 THE CLAN DONALD.
able fact that as the quarrel had been from the
outset between kinsfolk, Donald's career was destined
to be interrupted by a first cousin of his own. The
career of this nobleman is an interesting chapter
in the annals of that wild and romantic age, a
blending together of the lawlessness and chivalry so
characteristic of the time. In early life he had been
the leader of a band of freebooters from the wilds
of Badenoch, with which his father, the notorious
Wolf, known as Alasdair Mbr Mac an Eigh, was
so much associated. By means of his banditti, he
eventually raised himself to the Earldom of Mar.
Having surprised Sir Robert Drummond of Stobhill
in his castle, and probably hastened his end, this
freebooter shortly afterwards took captive Sir
Robert's widow, who was Countess of Mar in her
own right, in her Castle of Kildrummie, and forced
her to give him her hand in marriage. Subsequent
events seem to show that the lady was not unfor-
giving in her resentment at the conduct of this
" braw wooer," although his fii^st advances were none
of the gentlest. When afterwards he appeared
before the castle gates, placing its contents, adjuncts,
keys, and title-deeds, at her disposal, she not only
received him as her husband, but conveyed to him
the earldom with all its wealth and dignities. On
her death, the Earl, inspired by the knight-errantry
of the time, visited foreign lands in quest of adven-
tures. Having taken part in the Continental wars
of the period, and sown his political wild oats, he
returned to Scotland, and now we find him the
chosen leader of the knights and burgesses of Aber-
deen in their preparations to resist the advance of
the men of the Isles.
bONALD OF HARLAW. 159
The battle of Harlaw has been described as a
critical conflict between the opposing forces of civil
order and barbarism, Donald has been pictured as
the leader of plundering bands ; Mar as the repre-
sentative of civilised virtue. In view of the facts
of the case, we can hardly accept of this rough and
ready classification. The feuds of the Lowland
barons, the fire and sword, and rapine, which they
often carried, not only into England, but into each
other's domains, are quite as much opposed to the
laws that regulate civilised communities as the
creachs of their Highland neighbours. This fact
has too often been calmly overlooked by the writers
of Scottish history. No doubt there are very
marked difierences between the forces that met on
the field of Harlaw. The distinctions between Celtic
and feudal Scotland were there brought out into
bold relief. Whether the one was a higher type of
culture than the other ; whether the men-at-arms
who fought in a panoply of mail, with spear and
battle axe, and metal shield, were more refined
specimens of the human race than the plaided and
kilted warriors who fought with claymore, and were
protected by their wooden sliields, may be a matter
of opinion ; but the one type is not further removed
than the other from the civilisation of to-day.
When the news of Macdonald's march through
Moray went abroad, the gentlemen of Aberdeenshire,
with their armed retainers, assembled under the
leadership of the Earl of Mar. Mail-clad mounted
knights, armed to the teeth after the manner of
Norman chivalry, the number of which is not easily
determined, but generally estimated at a little more
than a thousand men, rode off to meet the foe.
Inferior in numbers to the forces of the Isles, the
160 THE CLAN DONALD.
disadvantage was heavily discounted by the com-
pleteness of their equipment and their strong
defensive armour. Mar advanced by Inverury, and
came in sight of the Highland army at the village
of Harlaw, some ten miles from the county town of
Aberdeen, whither had flocked to his standard the
gentlemen of Aberdeen, Angus, and the Mearns.
The Ogilvies, the Lindsays, the Carnegies, the
Lesleys, the Lyons, the Livings, the Gordons, the
Abercrombies, the Arbuthnots, the Bannermans,
the Leiths, the Douglases, the Barclays, the
Mowats, the Duguids, the Fotheringhams, the
Frasers, and the Burnets — all were there in stern
defence of hearth and home. Mar himself com-
manded the main body of his small force, while Sir
Alexander Ogilvie, Sheriff of Angus, and Sir James
Scrymgeour, Constable of Dundee, led the van-
guard.
Donald's army, consisting chiefly of the Macleans,
the Mackintoshes, the Camerons, the Mackinnons,
the Macleods, and all the vassals of the lordship of
the Isles, was drawn up in imitation of the old
Pictish mode, in the cuneiform order of battle.''
Donald himself commanded the main body, with the
Macleods of Lewis and Harris as his lieutenants ;
while the right and left respectively were under the
command of Hector Boy Maclean of Duart and
Mackintosh. John Mor Tainistear stood at the head
of the reserve. The courage of the men of the Isles
was roused to the most patriotic fervour by the
stirring appeal of MacYuirich, the Tyrtaeus of the
campaign, to remember the ancient valour of the
race of Conn — •
^ Logan's Scottish Gael, Ed. 187G, Vol. I., p. 155.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 161
" A chlanna Chuinn, cuirnhnichibh,
Cruas an am na h-iorghuill." ^
" Sons of Conn remember
Hardihood in time of strife."
The Highlanders, armed with broadswords, bows
and axes, and wooden shields, rushing forward with
furious onset and shouting the slogan of their clan,
were received by the Lowlanders with steadiness
and valour. Sir James Scrymgeour, Constable of
Dundee, and Sir Alexander Ogilvie, Sheriff of
Angus, who with a band of knights occupied the
van of the Lowland army, endeavoured to cut
their way through the Highland columns that were
bearing down upon them like a flood, but they were
soon overwhelmed and slain. In other parts of the
field, the contest raged with fury. The brave Mar
with his knights fought on with desperate courage
till the Lowland army was reduced to a skeleton ;
but it was only after the long summer day had
faded away at last, and the dark curtain of night
enfolded the blood-stained field, that the exhausted
combatants sheathed their blades. The Lowland
army was annihilated, and the flower of the chivalry
of Angus and the Mearns lay dead upon the field : —
" There was not sin' King Kenneth's days,
Sic strange, intestine, cruel strife
In Scotlande seen, as ilka man says^ —
Where monie likelie lost their life ;
Whilk made divorce 'tween man and wife,
And monie children fatherless.
And monie a ane will mourn for aye.
The brime battle of the Harlaw."
^ Prosnachidh-catha, le Lachlainn M6r Mac Mhuirich Albauaich, do
DhnmhnuU a He, Righ Innsegall, latha Oath Ghariach. This exti-aordinary
poem is given in full in the Collection of the Stewarts only, and it was printed
for the first time in Ronald Macdonald's Collection in 1776, where only a few
lines are given.
162 THE CLAN DONALD.
To the east of Scotland, Harlaw was a miniature
Flodden, and the wail of a hundred years later over
that bloody field, " that the flowers of the forest
were a' wede away," would not have been inappro-
priate here. On Mar's side, according to the
Lowland chroniclers, 500 were killed and many
wounded. Among the men of note who fell were
Sir Alexander Ogilvie, Sheriff of Angus, Sir Thomas
Murray, Sir James Scrymgeour, Sir Alexander
Irvine of Drum, Sir E-obert Maule of Panmure,
Sir William Abernethy of Salton, Sir Alexander
Straiten of Lauriston, Sir Robert Davidson, Provost
of Aberdeen, James Level, Alexander Stirling, and
Lesley of Balquhain, with his six sons.
On Donald's side 900 are said to have fallen,
among whom were Gilpatrick MacBory of the
Obeolan family, and Lachlan Macmillan, who, with
Norman and Torquil Macleod, were the first at the
head of their men to charge the Lowland host.^
Besides these, according to Hugh Macdonald, " two
or three gentlemen of the name of Munroe were
slain, together with the son of Macquarry of Ulva,
and two gentlemen of the name of Cameron."^ The
brave Hector Roy Maclean of Duart and Irvine of
Drum fought hand to hand until they both fell
together.
Trustworthy records of this famous fight there
are none. Lowland historian and ballad composer,
as well as Highland seanachie, described what they
believed must and should have happened. Certain
main facts, however, we are assured of That both
sides fought with valour and determination, and
that Scotland alone was capable of being the nursing
MacVuirich in Reliquiae Celticte, p. 213.
2 Hugh Macdonald in Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 301,
DONALD OF HARLAW. 163
mother of such heroes, may well kindle the pride of
Lowlander and Highlander alike. Yet the field of
Harlaw, in proportion to the number engaged there,
was one of the greatest reverses that ever befell the
Scots. To say in the face of such a calamitous
reverse that the Lowland army was victorious at
Harlaw, as some historians have alleged, is to be
blind to the most obvious facts. It is admitted on
all hands that Macdonald's army could not have
been under 10,000 strong. Of these, according to
the Lowland estimate, 900 lay dead on the field,
and granting that as many more lay wounded,
Donald's force when the fight ceased numbered at
least 8000 strong, ready to renew the contest with
the returning day. The Earl of Mar himself lay
covered with wounds on the field. Five hundred of
his small force lay dead around him, while the
remainder of his army lay mostly wounded, and
unable to renew the fight. These are facts, if the
Scottish historians are to be believed, but the con-
clusions they arrive at are not obvious, and cannot
in reason be justified. That Macdonald of the Isles
at the head of 8000 clansmen, or even half that
number, retreated in dismay before a wounded leader
lying prostrate on the field of battle surrounded by
a mere handful of men, most of whom were crippled
with wounds, cannot easily be believed by any
unprejudiced person. If Donald ever expected
English help, he now realised that he must do
without it, and knowing well that all Lowland
Scotland was arrayed against him, he judged it the
wisest policy to betake himself to his Island fast-
nesses. There is every reason to believe that this
was his main motive in not pursuing his campaign
further against the Duke of Albany, while at the
164 THE CLAN DONALD.
same time the Island Lord must have experienced
the same difficulty which confronted Montrose,
Dundee, and Prince Charles, in after times, of
keeping a Highland army gathered from widely
scattered districts for any length of tim& together
in the field.
The Scottish historians, ignoring all such con-
siderations, and bhnded by race prejudice, have
inferred from the retreat that followed what they
call a drawn battle the defeat of Macdonald at
Harlaw. Very different accounts of the famous
engagement are given both by the Highland and
Irish historians. Hugh Macdonald, MacVurich, and
many others, refer in no vague terms to the complete
overthrow of the Lowland army ; while the High-
land bards, who are never inspired by defeat,
celebrate the victory of the men of -the Isles in
their loftiest strains. The Irish Annals are no less
emphatic, as may be seen, among others, from the
Annals of Loch Ce : — " A great victory by Mac-
dhomhaill of Alba over the foreigners of Alba ; and
MacGilla-Eoin of Macdonald's was slain in the
counter wounding of that victory."^
The battle of Harlaw was fought on the 26th of
June, 1411, and resulted, as we have seen, in well
nigh the total annihilation of the Lowland army.
On the news of the crushing defeat at Harlaw
reaching the ears of the Regent Albany, he made an
unusual display of military spirit and activity. He
resolved without delay on an invasion of the Earldom
of Ross, and putting himself at the head of a
sufficiently strong force, he advanced to Dingwall,
took possession of the castle, and established, with-
out any opposition, his authority through Ross.
' Annala of Loch Co, by W. M. Heunessy, 1411. Vol. II., p. 137.
DONALD OF HARLAW. 165
Donald and his clansmen had retired to their Island
strongholds. Within his own domains, the Island
chief was impregnable, for his naval force was
superior to the whole Scottish fleet at that time.
He must, however, defend his mainland territories,
and here the Regent, who determined to crush his
power and humble the Island Lord, had his ojopor-
tunity. In the following year, smarting from the
humiliation and defeat at Harlaw, Albany resumed
hostilities, proceeded at the head of an army to
Argyle, and attacked Donald where alone he could
do so with any chance of success. The records of
the period are very obscure as to the fortunes and
reverses alike of the Regent's campaign against the
hero of Harlaw ; but subsequent events indicate
very clearly that Donald held his own, and that
Albany was baffled in the effort to humble him.
The story of the treaty with the Governor at
Polgilb, now Lochgilp, where we find Donald coming
forward humbly, laying down his assumed independ-
ence, consenting to become a vassal of the Scottish
crown (which he was already — at least nominally),
and delivering hostages for his future good behaviour,
is given on the authority of that unreliable
choronicler, John of Fordun, and as he is corrobo-
rated by no authority whatever, but, on the
contrary, flatly contradicted by subsequent events,
we refuse to receive it as anything but the purest
fable. Such a treaty would undoubtedly have
been looked upon as an event of national import-
ance, yet the national records are dumb regarding
it. No contemporary chronicler. Highland or Low-
land— if we omit John himself— records this
successful termination of a rebellion so formidable
as to have shaken the Scottish State to its very
166 THE CLAN DONALD.
centre. Both In the Chamberlam and Exchequer
KoUs we find references made to the campaign of
Albany against the Lord of the Isles in Argyle, but
not the remotest reference is made to the alleged
treaty of Polgilb. What we find is the complaint
made that the Governor had not been recouped
for conveying an army to Polgilb against the
Lord of the Isles, and for his expedition to Ross
against the Caterans for the tranquillity of the
realm. ^ If the Lord of the Isles, as John of
Fordoun would have us believe, had surrendered
at Polgilb and given hostages, the tone of the
Scottish Chamberlain would have been more tri-
umphant, and direct reference would have been
made to such an important event. Donald well
knew he could not take j)ossession of the Earldom
of Ross against all Scotland, and that he had
resolved to make no further attempt in that
direction his retreat from Harlaw clearly proves.
His position in the Isles was too strong to be
successfully attacked. Why, therefore, should he
surrender at Polgilb ? The fiction may be placed
side by side with that other fable of the defeat,
death, and burial of Donald at Harlaw, where his
tomb is pointed out to this day !
Albany undoubtedly took possession of the Earl-
dom of Ross, and prevented the Lord of the Isles
from pushing his claim to that important inheritance ;
but Donald held undisputed sway to the day of his
death within his own island principality. In no
sense can Donald be said to have enjoyed the
Earldom of Ross, save during those weeks when he
^ " Neque pro expensis suis factis cum transitu exercitus semel apucl
Polgilb contra dominuni Insularum, et una alia vice apud Rosse, pro pacifi-
cacione regni contra Ketheranos."— Exchequer Rolls, vol. IV., p. 213 ; vol,
IV., p. 239. The Chamberlain Rolls, 14.
DON"ALD OF HARLAW. 167
invaded and occupied the district by force of arms.
He never was, and never could have been de jure,
Earl of Boss. The Regent carried his point. In
1415, Euphemia resigned the earldom in favour of
her grandfather, who thereafter conferred it on his
son, John Stewart, Earl of Buchan.
The next time the Lord of the Isles emerges from
his retirement is in a domestic quarrel with his
brother, John Mor Tainistear, a quarrel which seems
to have assumed a formidable appearance from the
array of neighbouring clans that appear on either
side. The cause of the quarrel seems to have arisen
from differences over some lands in Kin tyre, claimed
by John Mor as his share of his father's patrimony.
The real instigator was the Abbot Mackinnon, who,
from his position as a churchman, was a man of con-
siderable influence in Argyle, and with whose family
John Mor's own relationship was none of the purest,
if the historian of Sleat is to be believed. Maclean
and Macleod of Harris espoused the cause of John
Mor, while Donald was supported by Macleod
of Lewis, the Mackintoshes, and other vassals
of the Isles. The issue was not for a moment
doubtful. John Mor was defeated, and, passing into
Galloway, where Donald pursued him, he found his
way to Ireland, and took refuge in the Antrim glens.
He and his brother Donald, however, were shortly
thereafter reconciled.-^
The hero of Harlaw now passes finally from the
public gaze, and, joining one of the religious orders,
lie finds solace for his declining years in the exercise
of quiet religious duties. The main features of his
character have ah-eady passed under review. He
stands before us, if not the greatest in a long line of
^ Hugh Macdonald in Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 303.
1^8 THE CLAN DONALD.
distinguished chiefs of his family, a powerful and
impressive personality, a leader who sustained the
best traditions of the Clan Cholla, and who kept
untarnished, in peace and war, in the senate and in
the field, the name and fame of Macdonald. By far
the most powerful nobleman in the realm, both from
the extent of his immense territories and the influ-
ence he exercised over his many vassals in the Isles
and on the mainland, Donald also possessed the
qualities of a statesman. He entered into repeated
alliances with England. In the year 1389, among
the allies of that country, consisting of several
foreign princes and others, we find the name of
Donald, Lord of the Isles, and commissions at
difierent times are issued by the English Kings to
treat with the Island Chief on the footing of an
independent prince. Some authorities affirm that
the Lord of the Isles died in France in the year
1427, but these go on the assumption that Donald
was Earl of Pvoss. The Earl of Ross who died in
France in that year, having been killed at the battle
of Verneuil, was John Stewart, Earl of Buchan, on
whom the Earldom of Boss was conferred on the
resignation of Euphemia Lesley, in 1415. We have
already assumed that the second marriage of John,
Lord of the Isles, took place about the year 1358,
and that he, the eldest son of that marriage, men-
tioned in the treaty of 1369, must have been ten
years of age when in that year he was given as a
hostage to David II. The year of Donald's death is
somewhat uncertain, though 1423 seems approxi-
mately correct. If this is so, he must have attained
to the age of 64 when he died. He breathed his
last at his Castle of Ardthornish in Morven, and was
buried with befitting pomp and solemnity in the
tomb of his ancestors at lona.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 169
CHAPTER VIII.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS.— 1425-1449.
Alexander's Accession to the Lordship. — James L returns. —
Earldom of Ross in the Crown. — James L visits Inverness. —
Convention. — State of Highlands. — Murder of John Mor. —
Dispute about Garmoran. — Murder of Alexander MacGorrie. —
Imprisonment of Lord of Isles. —His Liberation.— His Revolt.
— Surrender at Holyrood. — Captivity in Tantallon, Inver-
lochy. — Release of Alexander. — Miu'der of James I. — Alex-
ander receives the Earldom. — Appointed Justiciar. — Favours
to Mackintosh. — Death of Alexander, — His Character.
Alexander of Isla, Donald's eldest son, succeeded
on his father's death to the dignities and possessions
of his house. Donald's heroic effort to secure the
Earldom of Ross as the lawful inheritance of his
wife did not meet with complete success, and
although the Sleat historian strives to make it
appear otherwise, the testimony of all the most
undoubted authorities is at issue with him. The
Earldom, which, after Euphemia's resignation, was
bestowed by the Regent upon his son, the Earl of
Buchan, fell vacant again in 1424, upon the fall of
that nobleman at the fateful battle of Verneuil, and
thereupon reverted to the Crown. Indeed, many
years were to elapse before the rightful heir of the
Earldom was to be invested with the position for
which so much blood had been shed on the memor-
able field of Harlaw.
In 1424, an event fraught with much importance
to general Scottish history took place. On the
170 THE CLA^ DONALD.
death of Robert, Duke of Albany, in 1420, he was
succeeded m the Eegency of the Kingdom by his
son Murdoch. A man of feeble capacity for rule, he
proved utterly unable to control the turbulent spirits
of the time, and the government of the country
gradually subsided into utter anarchy. At last, in
despair at the political chaos for which his own sons
were so largely responsible, Murdoch entered, with
some degree of earnestness, into the negotiations for
the young King's ransom, with the final result that
James was released from captivity in England, and
restored to his ancestral throne.
It has been alleged by historians, notably by
Gregory, that one of the earliest acts of James' reign
was to restore the Earldom of Ross to the heiress of
line, the mother of Alexander, Lord of the Isles. In
proof of this, reference is made to what is certainly
recorded, that in 1426 Alexander, Lord of the Isles
and Master of Ross, was one of the " assiers" that con-
demned the Regent, his two sons, and the Earl of
Lennox to death.^ It is also on record that, in 1427,
Alexander of Yle, Lord of the Isles, in a charter
dated at the island of Saint Finlaggan in Yle, and
also in another charter bestowing a grant of the
lands of Barra and of Boisdale in South Uist on
his " alumpnus and armiger," Gilleownan, one of
the family of Macneill, calls himself Master of Ross.^
From these references, it has not unnaturally been
inferred that the mother of Alexander, " Lady Mary
of the Yles and of Rosse," had been invested by the
Crown with her hereditary rights and honours, and
that the Lord of the Isles had been duly acknow-
ledged as heir apparent to the Earldom of Ross.
Yet the historical references in question prove
^ Balfour's Annala of Scotland. ^ Oj.jg_ pg^^.^ g^j^j.^
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 171
nothing beyond the fact that Alexander styled
himself Master of Eoss, and that he received the
title as a matter of courtesy. Nothing can be
clearer, as we shall hereafter show, than the tenure
by the Crown of the powers and privileges of the
Earldom at a much later date than 1426. Still,
Lady Mary of the Isles had every right in law
and equity to the Earldom, so long as she lived,
with reversion to her heir, and the continued
assumption of its rights and functions by the
Crown was rightly considered an illegal usurpation.
Hence, despite the action of the King, the Lord of
the Isles and his mother seem to have laid claim,
at anyrate to the titles of the Earldom, during the
reign of James I. Whether the more substantial
interests involved accrued to them, in whole or in
part, is a question that we purpose considering at a
later stage.
Alexander's position on the jury, before which
so many of the Scottish nobles were arraigned for
treason in 1426, appears to suggest a certain measure
of royal favour. It was not long, however, before
his relations to the Crown underwent a complete
revolution. The storm-cloud had been gathering
in the Highlands, was assuming darker and more
ominous hues, and was soon to burst in fury, bringing
disaster and desolation in its train. James had
devoted the first two years of his reign to the
reduction of the lawlessness which had so widely
prevailed in the southern regions of his kingdom,
and already a measure of tranquillity had ensued.
Now, in 1427, he turned his attention to the High-
lands, which, during the late corrupt administration,
had lapsed into a state of virtual independence. The
bonds of sovereignty had been dissolved, and every
172 THE CLAN DONALD.
man did that which was good in his own eyes.
James I. was undoubtedly one of the ablest states-
men that ever occupied the throne of Scotland. Tlie
main lines of his policy, which he handed on to his
successor, were absolutely indispensable for the
general welfare of the realm. The keynote of that
policy was to curb the dangerous and increasing
power of the nobility, and it is evident that the
vindication of the sovereign authority as supreme in
the State was, in those days, the only guarantee for
the maintenance of law, order, and individual liberty
among all classes of the people. The struggle of the
Crown with those great nobles, who in their
own districts exercised power that was well nigh
unlimited, is the explanation of much of the civil
discord that prevailed in Scotland during the
fifteenth century. While the policy of James I.
was thus in its main design well conceived, yet it
is plain that, in applying his remedies to the
diseases of the body politic, he displayed a harshness,
as well as impatience, which sometimes defeated the
ends he had in view, and proved, eventually, the
cause of his tragic fate. Hence it was that his
palliatives, instead of soothing at all times the
unhealthy social organism, sometimes produced an
unwholesome and dangerous irritation. The effects
of a long period of misrule were not to be cured in a
day. The Herculean task of cleansing the political
Augean stables was one that demanded the exercise
of patience as well as energy.
After the battle of Harlaw, the Castle of Inver-
ness, which, from its position, lay peculiarly exposed
to hostile operations, had been fortified and recon-
structed on a larger scale than before under the
supervision of the Earl of Mar. In 1427 it played
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 173
an important part in the royal policy of Reform.
In this the third year of his reign, James marched
to Inverness at the head of a formidable army, and
accompanied by the leading Lowland barons. There
he convened a Parliament, and summoned the Crown
vassals and others to be present. The citation met
with a large response. From the far north came
Angus Dubh Mackay, who in 1411 unsuccessfully
opposed Donald of the Isles at Dingwall, but who
was the most powerful chief in the Celtic region of
Caithness, and a leader of 4000 men. Kenneth
Mor Mackenzie, a leader of 2000 men, with his son-in-
law, John Koss, WilHam Leslie, Angus de Moravia,
and Matheson, leaders of 2000 men, likewise
responded to the call. From Argyllshire came John
Macarthur of the family of Campbell, the leader of
1000 men, and James Campbell, to the place of
rendezvous. The principal leaders of the Clan
Donald, Alexander Lord of the Isles, and Alexander
MacGorrie of Garmoran, obedient to the King's
citation,^ came also to this convention, which was
destined to leave its mark upon the general history
of the Highlands, but esi^ecially upon the annals of
the Family of the Isles.
There is much obscurity, it is needless to say,
resting upon the history of these years, and the
influences that determined the conduct of the King
in the events that followed the Parliament of Inver-
ness are far from being easy to gauge. Some clues,
however, we do possess which seem to lead us to a
certain extent through the labyrinth of confusion,
anarchy, and treachery which are characteristic of
the time, and explain the political convulsion into
which the Western Highlands were plunged. The
'■ Fordun.
174 THE CLAN DONALD.
first and most important of the causes productive of
this state of matters was the murder of John Mor
Tainistear, the founder of the family of Dunnyveg
and the Glens, whom even Buchanan, that sweeping
denunciator of the Highland Chiefs, speaks of as a
man illustrious among his own countrymen.^ John
Mor's death was the tragic culmination of a series of
intrigues promoted by the courtiers of King James,
and apparently winked at by royalty itself The
hungry Scottish barons who shaped "the whisper of
the throne " were jealous, many of them, of the
power and independence of the Lords of the Isles,
and, instigated by their counsels, James resolved to
curb and break the power of Alexander, who doubt-
less by this time was manifesting a very natural
impatience at his mother's prolonged exclusion from
the earldom of Boss. He further resolved to take
John Mor into his confidence, with the view of
investing him with the territories of which he
decided to deprive the Lord of the Isles, ostensibly
on the ground that John, being Alexander's uncle,
was more nearly akin, by blood, to the Crown.^ The
Lord of Dunnyveg did not entertain the proposals
favourably, and an individual of the name of James
Campbell is said to have received a commission from
the King to arrest him under cover of a friendly
interview. Whatever the powers granted under
this commission, whether Campbell received instruc-
tions to perpetrate the bloody deed that followed
or not, certain is it that John Mor was the victim
of the blackest and most abominable treachery. He
received a message from the King's delegate to meet
him in peaceful guise at Ard Dubh point in Isla, for
the purpose of communicating the royal pleasure.
^ Rerum Scoticorum Historia, Liber X. cap. XXX.
'^ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 175
John Mor came to the place of meeting attended by
a slender retinue, and in the course of the interview-
was attacked, overpowered, and slain. ^ It was a
shameful and most villainous deed, and it is to be
feared that the King's hands were not altogether
innocent of the blood that had been shed. Sub-
sequent events do not clear him of the suspicion
of treacherous conduct, and there is strong reason
to believe that, while the King's orders were vague
and undefined, his commissioner only too well
understood the spirit and purpose of his instruc-
tions. In Campbell he found a willing instrument
ready to his hand, and it is to be noted that now
for the first time there fell athwart the path of
the Family of the Isles the shadow of that ill-
omened house which was to be its evil genius in
time to come.
The murder of the Lord of Dunnyveg caused
deep resentment among many powerful Scottish
families, and the King's policy was not so generally
popular that he could afibrd to incur the odium
which it undoubtedly entailed. Especially through-
out the Highlands were feelings of the deepest
resentment, accompanied by a desire for vengeance,
aroused, and the confusions of the time became
worse confounded by the spirit of antagonism to the
throne, which the dark suspicions that fell upon the
King, evoked. The King protested that he had not
planned the murder, and had the assassin tried for
his life, while Campbell continued to assert that,
though not possessed of written instructions, he had
the royal authority for what took place. These
were among the leading circumstances which, on
account of the turmoil they created in the High-
1 Hugh Macdonald's MS. Balfour's Annals, Vol, I,, p. 157,
176 THE CLAN DONALD.
lands, led to James' march to Inverness, and his
summoning a convention of the Highland chiefs.
This, however, was not all. John Macarthur,
another scion of the House of Campbell, had taken
the opportunity afforded by the unsettled condition
of the country to advance a claim to a portion of
the lands of Garmoran and the North Isles. His
pretensions to these territories were based upon
a charter by Christina, daughter of Allan MacRuari,
to Arthur, son of Sir Arthur Campbell, Knight,
early in the fourteenth century.^ Christina,
being her father's heir, was acting within her
legal rights in this disposition of the lands in
question ; but what her reasons were for putting
them past her brother Roderick, who, though not
feudally legitimate, she made her heir for the rest
of her property, is a question which, at this time of
day, it is impossible to answer. Whatever validity
such an instrument may have possessed, whether it
received the necessary royal confirmation or not, it
is clear that several conveyances of the lands in
question had taken place since the days of Christina,
and that any claim founded upon her charter must
have been of the most shadowy and baseless descrip-
tion. The occupier of Garmoran in 1427 was
Alexander MacGorrie, according to Skene, and
Gregory, the son, but more probably the grandson,
of Godfrey, son of John of Isla.^ The Clan Gorrie
had, apparently, still the ascendancy over the
progeny of Reginald, and, whether by right or by
^ Arthuro Campbell filio Domini Arthuris militis de terra de Muddeward
Ariseg et Morderer et iusulis de Egg et Rumrae et pertenari.
^ According to Buchanan and others, his surname was MacReury, the
patronymic of Amy, John of Isla's first wife. According to Fordun, he was
MacGorrie, this latter palrouymic having been used for several generations as a
surname by Godfrey's descendants. There is no Alexander, son of Godfrey, in
any of the genealogies.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 177
the Strong hand, were in possession of Garmoran and
the Castle of EUantirrim, which had been seized by
Godfrey in 1389. Alexander, the representative of
the family in the year of the Inverness Convention,
was a leader of 2000 men, and would be very
unlikely tamely to submit to any aggressive action
which the Macarthur claimant might be disposed to
take. Attempts at possession on the one hand and
vigorous resistance on the other would, during the
late discredited administration, lead to a state of
continued disorder in the regions of North Argyll.
All this must have been aggravated by the feud which
undoubtedly existed between the Clan Ranald and
the Clan Godfrey as to the occupancy of the vast
region conferred upon and confirmed to Reginald
and his descendants in 1373. In view of the fore-
going circumstances, of which the scant annals of the
time give us but intermittent glimpses, there were
rich possibilities of feud and bloodshed, and it is
certain that the social system of the Highlands
presented a scene of wild and chronic dispeace
demanding the serious attention of the Crown.
The events that took place in connection with the
King's visit to Inverness cannot very well be esti-
mated apart from more complete information than is
at the historian's disposal. Yet, so far as we can see,
the proceedings that were conducted under the royal
authority are incapable of justification upon any code
of ethics. They bring out the character of James I. in
an aspect of meanness and deceit unbecoming in any
one, but particularly so in a King, and leave a dark
and ineffaceable stain upon the history of his reign.
These Highland chiefs came as they were summoned
to a free and open convention of the nobles of the
north, trusting to the faith and honour of his
12
178 THE CLAN DONALD.
Majesty. As the event shows, the confidence was
misplaced. On their arrival at Inverness, they were
all immediately apprehended. Some were led to
prison, each being immured in a separate apartment,
while others became the victims of a judicial butchery
which has few parallels in Scottish history. The
King is said to have chuckled at the success of his
most unkingly manoeuvre, and to have given vent to
his satisfaction in a Latin couplet ex tempore, which
Scott thus freely translates : —
" To donjon tower let the rude troop be driven,
For death they merit by the cross of heaven." ^
James Campbell justly expiated his crime, but the
slaughter of Alexander MacGorrie of Garmoran,^ along
with others, seems, in the absence of any evidence of
guilt, and without the vestige oi a trial, a monstrous
exercise of royal power.
The foregoing incidents must have powerfully
affected the relations of the Lord of the Isles to the
Crown. The murder of his uncle, John Mor, Lord
of Dunnyveg, and of his cousin, Alexander of Gar-
moran, must have created the deepest indignation in
the breast of the Island Lord, and would have aggra-
vated his previous discontent and displeasure at his
own continued deprivation of the Earldom of Ross.
History does not clearly record his share in the
troublous times prior to the convention of Inverness ;
but, judging from Alexander's character and subse-
quent conduct, it is safe to say that his attitude
would not have been passive. Little is definitely
known beyond the fact that the Lord of the Isles
^ This couplet, according to Forduu, ran : -
" Ad turrem forteni ducamus caute cohortem
Per Christi sortem meruerunt hi quia mortem,"
^ Balfour's Annals of Scotland.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 179
and his mother, the titular Countess of Ross, were
among the Highland potentates or, as Burton would
style them, the " beasts of prey," whom the King
entrapped and incarcerated at Inverness.
One of the Scottish chroniclers tells us that
Alexander, Lord of the Isles, was the " fomentor
and foster father" of the northern rebellion, while
"Angus Duffe, Kenneth Moire, John Robe, Alexander
Mackmurkine, and Alexander Macrorey," are char-
acterised as " his gray hondes,"^ Whether the
relation of Alexander of Isla to the Highland
chiefs whose names are quoted was of a nature
to justify the canine simile, there is not sufficient
evidence to show ; but it is clear that the Royal
policy towards the Highlands at this juncture was
not of a nature to mitigate the widespread disorder
that had reigned for so long a period.
James I. is not without his defenders in the
bloody and treacherous policy of 1427. Burton,
whose calmness at once deserts him when he treads
the heather, justifies the King in the somewhat
savage remark " that there was no more notion of
keeping faith with the Irishry, whether of Ireland
or Scotland, than with the beast of prey lured to its
trap." A sentiment of this nature cannot be seri-
ously regarded save as a melancholy instance
of Lowland prejudice and racial rancour. The
perusal of such I'emarks is irritating to the Celtic
mind, but as an illustration of the falsehood of
extremes we can afford to pass them by.
The Lord of the Isles was not detained in
custody at this time for more than a couple of
months. He had to accompany the King from
Inverness to Perth, where, on the 1st March, 1427,
^ 3alfour's Annals of Scotland, vol. L, p. 157.
180 THE CLAN DONALD.
in presence of the whole estates of the realm, he is
said to have received a royal admonition as regards
his past delinquencies, but on promise of amendment
was restored to favour and set at liberty. It is
also said that his mother was retained as a hostage
for his loyalty in the island of Inchcolm, in the
Firth of Forth.^
It was not to be expected that, after the extra-
ordinary events of 1427, matters were to settle
down in the Highlands, as if neither cruelty nor
treachery had been enacted in the name of justice.
The King found that his methods of dealing with
a proud and independent people were not conducive
to the promotion of peace, and the embers of dis-
affection which he had sought to remove were
fanned into the hot flame of rebellion. It was
hardly to be expected also that the Lord of the
Isles should immediately forget the treatment to
which he himself had been subjected, or the ruthless
slaughter of his relatives, which had recently taken
place. Events proved that his countrymen and
vassals sympathised with him. No sooner did he
return to his island territories than the standard
of revolt was at once unfurled. Collecting 10,000
men from the Isles and from the earldom of Hoss,
he invaded the mainland of Scotland in 1429. The
district of Lochaber, the country of Alastair Carrach,
seems to have been the headquarters of the Lords
of the Isles — at any rate of Alexander and his
successor — when engaged in warlike operations
on the mainland. With Lochaber as the basis
of his movements, Alexander marched to Inver-
ness— a town which on all such occasions received
the unwelcome attentions of the fierce warriors from
^ Balfour's Annala of Scotland, pp. 157-8.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 181
the West. Alexander, after the manner of his
father, consigned Inverness to the flames, wasted
the crown lands in its neighbourhood, and thus
avenged, to some extent, the indignity he had
suffered, and the oppressive deeds that had been
perpetrated two years previously within its walls.-^
The Lord of the Isles found, however, that he
had measured himself against a King who, whatever
had been the blunders and faults of his administra-
tion, was prompt and vigorous in action as he was
on many occasions wise and prudent in counsel.
Thus it was that, having failed to storm the Castle
of Inverness, and having retired into Lochaber,
Alexander soon found himself pursued by the
King's army. The circumstances were of a nature
to render defeat inevitable, Even before retiring
from the siege of Inverness it was found that the
rapid approach of the royal army was followed by
disaffection among the Camerons and Mackintoshes,
the two most powerful vassals of the Isles. In
Lochaber the situation became desperate when the
disaffected clans deserted and ranged themselves
under the royal standard. After this the King's
vigorous attack was impossible to resist successfully,
and the Lord of the Isles was constrained to sue
for peace. The King insisted on an unconditional
surrender, but Alexander was not, at the outset,
disposed to accede to terms so extreme.
The character and sequence of the events that
followed are far from clear. Aecording to Buchanan,^
Alexander retired to the Isles, and meditated flight
to the north of Ireland, where Donald Balloch, son
^ Testimony to this is borne by the Exchequer Rolls, vol. IV., p. 416, as
follows : — " pro combustione clicti burgi per Dooiiuum lusularuni reoellem
domini regis £58 Ss."
' Lib, X., 32. Rerum Scoticarum Historia.
182 THE CLAN DONALD.
of John Mor Tainistear, and now head of the
Family of Dunnyveg, possessed extensive sway
and influence. While there is nothing inherently
improbable in this account, it does not seem to fit in
with the facts that are generally accepted. It is
difficult to see how, if Alexander had retired to the
Isles, the ignominy that followed need have occurred.
The pursuit by the King's troops became so hot that
Alexander was driven south, step by step, to the
very headquarters of the enemy's power. The
sequel, as told in works of history, was a humiliating
episode. The proud representative of the Kings of
Innse-Gall must have been in terrible straits, indeed,
ere he placed himself in a position not only abject
but grotesque. On Easter Sunday the King and
his Court were assembled in the Church at Holy-
rood to celebrate the sacred festival. Before the
high altar, it is said that Alexander presented
himself in attire so scanty that the congregation
was deeply impressed. The authorities are so con-
flicting as to be untrustworthy. According to one
writer he appeared in a white shirt and drawers/
according to another he came with a rope about
his neck.^ We are inclined to think that
Alexander, even in the hour of his extremity,
would still have worn the garb of his country, a
garb unfamiliar to the minions of the Court, and
hence, quite possibly, the tradition may have
obtained currency that he appeared before the King
in his shirt. On bended knee, holding his bonnet in
one hand and the point of his sword in the other,
he made his submission. On the intercession of
the Queen, the proffered sword was accepted, and
Alexander's life was spared, but he was committed
^ Forduu. 2 Balfour's Auuuk of Scotland, pp. 147-8.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 183
a prisoner to Tantallon Castle, under the custody of
William Douglas, Earl of Angus, His mother, who
was blamed for instigating him to rebellion, was
still a jorisoner at Inchcolm.
The Clan Donald bitterly resented the humili-
ation to which the Lord of the Isles was now,
a second time and in aggravated form, subjected.
It was resolved by the foremost leaders of
the Clan to strike a blow for honour and for
vengeance. The whole strength of the Clan was
mustered under Donald Balloch, Lord of Dunnyveg,
who, though still a youth,^ was a redoubtable
champion, the most distinguished warrior of his
race. His career was destined to be stormy, but
those writers who express horror at the violence of
some of his acts should have remembered that,
according to the code of honour of his day, the
filial duty devolved upon him of wreaking vengeance
upon the Scottish State, which he rightly held
accountable for the murder of his father by the
hand of treacherous hirelings.
The Boyal army lay encamped in Lochaber, under
the leadership of the Earls of Mar and Caithness.
These noblemen were the King's lieutenants in that
region, whose function it was to extinguish any
sparks of disaffection to the Crown that might still
be lingering in the north. It was once more the
destiny of Mar to meet the Clan Donald in deadly
combat, and another Donald, nephew to him whose
prowess he felt at Harlaw, was now to prove himself
a foeman worthy of his steel. It is strange that
Mar should have under-estimated the warlike
qualities of his opponents ; though it is possible
enough that the recent discomfiture of the men of
the Isles in Lochaber may have bred undue con-
^ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 309.
184 THE CLAN DONALD.
fidence. Relying on the superior armour and
discipline of his host, he sat calmly in his tent
playing cards with Mackintosh, who still acted the
part of a disloyal vassal.^
Meanwhile, the fighting men of the Clan Donald,
under their brave leader, were drawing nigh. From
their imprisoned chief in Tantallon Castle a message
had come to all faithful friends and clansmen to face
the foe bravely, whatever the consequences might be
to himself, and now, burning with the memory of
wrongs sustained, and inspired by devotion to the
head of their house, they longed to meet the enemy in
the field. From far and near, wherever the Lord of the
Isles held sway, the loyal vassals and their followers
mustered under the ancient banner. The fiery cross
flew from glen to glen, from isle to isle, nor did it
fly in vain. The lines of Sir Walter Scott — though
composed to the air of a Cameron piobroch, whose
Donald Dubh was not Donald Balloch, but the chief
of the Clan Cameron— are so spirited and rousing
that they well be quoted here. Sir Walter's
"Piobroch of Donuil Dubh" was undoubtedly intended
to glorify Donald Balloch and his host : —
*' Piobroch of Donald Dhii,
Piobroch of D6nuil,
Wake thy wild voice auew,
Summon Clan Coniiil.
Come aAvay, come away,
Hark to the summons !
Come in your war array,
Gentles and commons.
" Come from deep glen
And from mountain so rocky,
The war pipe and peimon
Are at Inverlochy.
^ Hugh Macdonald's MS. -
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 185
Come every hill plaid and
True heart that wears one,
Come every steel blade and
Strong hand that bears one."
The Maclans of Ardnamurchan, MacAllans of
Moydert, the followers of Ranald Bane, brother of
Donald Balloch — these, with the rest of the Clan
Donald, the Macleans, MacDuffies, and Macgees,
sailed in their galleys to Inverskippnish, two miles
distant from the E-oyal forces at Inverlochy.
The scene of the ensuing conflict was the country
of Alastair Carrach, uncle to the Lord of the Isles,
who, by the disposition of his father, had receiv^ed
Lochaber as his inheritance. It is said that about
this time there was a proposal on the part of the
Crown to deprive the Macdonalds of their rights in
Lochaber and to bestow the same upon the Earl of
Mar,^ but there seems no evidence to shew that such
a transference ever took place. If, however, Alastair
Carrach considered his patrimony to be in danger,
his interest in the approaching battle must have
been much intensified. With two hundred and
twenty archers he marched to the aid of Donald
Balloch's forces, and took up his position on the hills
above Inverlochy.
The Earl of Mar found that a far more serious
game than he had been playing was now on hand,
and that the men of the Isles, of whose approach
he was warned, were rapidly bearing down upon
his encampment. At last the critical moment
arrived when the Highland host came into conflict
with their Southern foes. The issue was not long
doubtful. The wild onset of the Islesmen, who
carried death upon the blades of their claymores
^ Hugh Macdonald's MS.
l86 THE CLAN DONALD.
and Lochaber axes, plunged the Earl's army into
confusion, while the galling fire of Alastair Carrach's
archers, whose successive volleys from the heights
seemed to darken the air, still further carried des-
truction into the ranks of the enemy. The result
was the complete discomfiture and utter rout of the
King's army, accompanied by great slaughter. The
Earl of Caithness, sixteen of his personal retinue,
a number of Lowland knights and barons, with
hundreds of the rank and file were left dead upon
the field. The Earl of Mar was wounded in the
thigh by an arrow, and, accompanied by one atten-
dant, had to take refuge in the hills. Hugh
Macdonald, the historian of Sleat, narrates certain
adventures which befell the Earl of Mar subsequent
to his reverse at Inverlochy. In his wanderings
among the mountains, during this not least interest-
ing episode in his eventful career, he and his servant
are said to have fallen in with women who were
tending cattle. Having obtained from these a little
barley meal, the wanderers mixed it with water in
the heel of the Earl's shoe — no other vessel being
available — and the pangs of hunger were, for the
time being, appeased. Despite the simplicity of the
meal and the strange utensil in which it was pre-
pared, to the Earl it was the sweetest morsel he
ever tasted, while in remembrance of the occasion he
is said to have composed the Gaelic stanza : —
" 'S maith an cocaire 'n t-acras
'S mairg a ni tailceas air a' bhiadh
Fuarag eorn a sail mo bhroige
Biadh a b' fhearr a fhuair mi riamh.''^
^ The following is a free translation : — ■
" The paugs of hunger are a skilful cook,
Woe to the man who scorns the humblest brew,
The sweetest fare of wliich I ere partook
Was barley meal and water in my shoe."
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 187
But the Earl's adventures were not quite over.
Fleeing through Badenoch in disguise, and hard
pressed by the pursuers, he was sheltered in a hut
among the hills by an Irishman named O'Birrin, and
hospitably though rudely entertained. The Earl
told his host, who was ignorant of the stranger's
rank, that if he ever was in need he was to go to
Kildrummie Castle, and there ask for Alexander
Stewart, when he would hear something to his
advantage. In the course of time, O'Birrin arrived
at the Castle, and found, to his great astonishment,
that it was the life of the Earl of Mar which he had,
in all probability, saved. The Earl desired him to
bring his wife and son to Kildrummie, but this the
Irishman declined to do, as his wife was too old to
leave her native district. After some days, O'Birrin
was sent on his way rejoicing in 60 milch cows, and
with an invitation to his son to come and settle at
Kildrummie. The son came and acquired a freehold
from the Earl, which was occupied by his descen-
dants for many generations.^ Such stories as these
well illustrate the conditions of life in those old
unsettled times. The latter in particular, showing
as it does a generous appreciation of bygone kind-
ness, not too common in the world, casts a pleasing
light upon the character of Mar, and happily relieves
a story of strife and vengeance.
After the battle of Inverlochy, the first but not
the last fought by the Clan Donald in that region,
Donald Balloch, having routed the chivalry of Scot-
land, and ravaged the country of the Camerons and
Mackintoshes in revenge for their desertion of the
Lord of the Isles in the unfortunate hostilities in
Lochaber, returned with much booty to the Isles,
^ Hugh Macdonald's MS.
188 THE CLAN DONALD.
and thence took ship to his Irish territories. The
feelings of the defeated Camerons were poetically
immortalised in the well-known piobroch of Donald
Dubh, to which reference has already been made.
The words^ to which the music is wedded lament
the discomfiture of the Clan Chattan and Clan
Cameron, and both words and music abound in
mournful cadences and wailing repetitions. The
following lines, not a translation but an enlarge-
ment, so to speak, of the original words of the
piobroch, are supposed to convey the sense of defeat
and humiliation on the part of Alexander of Isla's
disloyal vassals : —
Piobroch of Donald Dubh,
Piobroch of D6iiuil,
Sad are thy notes and few,
Piobroch of D6nui].
Proud is Clan Donald's note,
Gaily their banners float
O'er castle, tower, and moat
At Inverlochy.
Routed we are to-day,
Spearman and bowman,
Victory in the fray
Gone to the foeman ;
Lost many a hero's life,
Sad many a widowed wife,
Triumph in battle's strife
Eests with Clan D6nuil.
Mighty Clan Chattan's fled,
Famous in story,
Gone from the battle red.
Vanquished and gory.
Where is Clan Vurich's host 1
Great is Clan Donald's boast,
Long shall the field we've lost
Heighten their glory.
* The version here referred to is the original Gaelic by some unknowa
author,
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 189
The news of the revolt and of the battle of
Inverlochy filled King James with wrath and con-
sternation, believing, as he did, that the turbulence
of the Highland chiefs had been effectually quelled
at Inverness and Lochaber. He accordingly took
measures to put down the disturbers of the peace
with a strong hand. He got Parliament to impose
a land tax to defray the expenses of the new
campaign which lie felt it necessary to undertake
against the Highlanders. He soon made his
appearance at Dunstaffnage Castle, in the neigh-
bourhood of Oban, with the view of proceeding to
the Isles and visiting with condign punishment
Donald Balloch and his coadjutors. The state-
ments of Scottish historians regarding the events
that followed are exceedingly unreliable and to be
received with great caution. It is averred that
all those who had taken part in the insurrection,
except Donald Balloch, came to James at Dun-
staffnage and made their submission, while 300 of
them were hanged or beheaded, and that, as the
conclusion of the whole matter, the head of the
Lord of Dunnyveg was sent from Ireland as a
present from Odo, Prince of Connaught, to the
King/ The amount of truth in this version of
what took place may be tested by the accuracy of
the reference to the arch offender, Donald Balloch
himself Long ere the King's arrival at Dunstaff-
nage the hero of Inverlochy was safe beyond
pursuit. Through his mother, Marjory Bisset,
he had inherited the territory of the Glens in
Antrim, a region to this day associated with the
family of Dunnyveg, and there he found a secure
retreat from the anger of the Scottish King. The
^ Chronicle of the Earls of Ross, pp. 11-12.
190 THE CLAN DONALD.
Scottish Court, however, was misled into the belief
that Donald Balloch was no more. Word was sent
by James to Hugh Buy O'Neill, an Irish chief of
Ulster, with whom he had been for some time previ-
ous associated in a friendly league against England,
with the request that he should capture Donald
Balloch and send him to Scotland alive or dead.
O'Neill was desirous of retaining the King's friend-
ship, while he was reluctant to take hostile action
against the powerful Lord of Antrim. With a
humour, grimmer and more ghastly than is usually
met with in the Emerald Isle, a human head, dis-
severed from the body, was somehow got hold of, and
sent to James as the head of Donald Balloch. The
deception served its purpose, for it was the decided
belief for many a day among the Scottish nobles,
and Scottish historians have gravely placed it on
record, that the Lord of Dunnyveg and the Glens
had actually been put to death, and the Scottish
King laid the flattering unction to his soul that the
most formidable warrior of the Clan Donald must
now, perforce, cease from troubling. That Donald
Balloch did not lose his head through the agency of
O'Neill, but that he lost his heart irretrievably
through O'Neill's daughter, is abundantly attested
by a matrimonial alliance which was soon afterwards
cemented between the families. Lowland historians,
as already stated, and among the rest Buchanan,^
were taken in by the pretended decapitation ; but
many years after the first two Jameses had been
gathered to their fathers, Donald Balloch was once
more making a mighty stir on the stormy scene of
Scottish civil war.
The battle of Inverlochy was fought in the early
weeks of 1431, by which time the Lord of the Isles
1 Liber X., chap. 36.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 191
had been pining a prisoner in Tantallon Castle for a
space of well-nigh three years. But now the time
was rapidly approaching when he was to be set at
liberty. At first sight it seems somewhat remark-
able that a King who had proved himself so inexor-
able to offenders against his authority should have
displayed such leniency to the Lord of the Isles,
when others had been made to endure the last
penalty of the law. His conduct in this particular
instance towards a subject who had been more than
once guilty of rebellion, was not characteristic of
his policy or methods. It is hardly to be accounted
for by Alexander's kinship to the throne, as the
blood of many of the King's relatives had already
flowed upon the scaflbld. The reasons, however,
may not be far to seek It is probable that hj this
time the King had discovered the impolicy of harsh
measures, and that at a time when murmurs of dis-
content were beginning to be heard in other quarters,
the more prudent course was to put an end, if
possible, to the quarrel with the Lord of the Isles.
The supposed death of Donald Balloch had also, to
the King's fancy, removed the most formidable dis-
turber of the peace, and a favourable opportunity
alone was awanting to open the gates of Tantallon
Castle and set the prisoner free. Such an oppor-
tunity soon arose. In October, 1431, the heir to the
Scottish Crown — afterwards James 11. — was born,
and it is said that during the public rejoicing con-
nected with this auspicious event, an amnesty was
granted to a number of political delinquents, and,
among others, to Alexander, Lord of the Isles, who
was restored to his freedom, dignities, and posses-
sions.^
^ MS. History of the Mackintoshes,
193 THE CLAN DONALD.
If the early years of Alexander's public life were
crowded with troublous events, after 1431 his career
was peaceful and prosperous, his life being spent in
the enjoyment of the honours, and the discharge of
the duties of his high position. It has been the
prevailing belief among historians that at the date
of Alexander's liberation from Tantallon, he not
only received restitution of his ancestral rights as
Lord of the Isles, but likewise full investiture of the
Earldom of Ross. Of this latter, however, there
does not seem to be anything like adequate or
satisfactory proof The evidence seems all the
other way. It is unquestionable that the functions
of the Earldom of Hoss lay in the Crown as late as
1430. No doubt at that time Alexander, Lord of
the Isles, lay a prisoner at Tantallon, which might
be adduced as a reason for the Crown possessing
the Earldom, seeing that the possessions and
dignities of the family had been forfeited. The
contrary will appear from consideration of the
following facts : — On the 11th April, 1430, there
was an enquiry made at Nairn, in presence of
Donald, Thane of Cawdor, regarding the tenure
of the lands of Kilravock and Easter Geddes, an
enquiry rendered necessary by the destruction of
the ancient writs in the burning of Elgin Cathedral
in 1390. In the record of that inquisition, it is
stated with the utmost clearness, that the lands in
question were held from the Crown in ward for the
Earl of Boss, who had not received the Crown
confirmation as such since the death of the last
Earl of Ross in France six years previously.-^ Still
stronger testimony to the same effect is borne by a
Crown charter of James I. to Donald, Thane of
' The Family of Rose of Kilravock, pp. 127-128.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 193
Cawdor, on 4th September, 1430, which opens'-
with the words, " James, by the grace of God King
of Scots and Earl of Koss."^ Nor is this all. It
appears from the evidence of contemporary records
from 1431 down to 1435 that payments of £10,
£24, and £34 were made out of the Koyal Treasury
to the Countess of Ross as " Dowager Lady of the
Isles." Two inferences may be drawn from these
references without straining the probabilities of the
case. In the first place, it may reasonably be sup-
posed that the King, who drew the revenues of the
Earldom, acknowledged by these payments a certain
moral right to them on the part of the Lady of the
Isles, and, in the second place, her designation in
these accounts, not as Countess of Ross, but as
Dowager Lady of the Isles, seems an undoubted
proof that, as late as 1435, James continued to
withhold his formal recognition of her title to the
Earldom.^
There is, in fact, the best reason to believe that
the Lord of the Isles did not enter into possession of
the Earldom of Hoss during the life-time of James
I., and however good and equitable his claim to the
privileges of that high position, no effective right
could accrue to him without the acknowledgment of
the supreme fountain of property, as well as honour,
in the realm. James I. was assassinated on the 21st
February, 1437, and the first charter proceeding
from Alexander, in his capacity as Earl of Ross, is
dated September of the same year. This seems
to suggest that in the interval the Regents acting
for the young King had given the Lord of the Isles
^ Jacobus Die gratia rex Scotorum ac Comes Rossiiv;. — The Thaues of
Cawdor, p. 11.
^ Exchequer Rolls, vol. IV., 541.
13
194 THE CLAN DONALD.
Investiture of the Earldom, which the late King so
long continued to withhold. During the half-dozen
years that intervened between Alexander's restora-
tion and the death of James, the chronicles of the
age have little to say about the Lord of the Isles,
and although we may naturally suppose that he
would have occupied an attitude of opposition to
the Court, it is evident that he stood apart from
the conspiracy by which the dark deed of murder
was plotted and perpetrated. A period of quiet
had come to Alexander after the tempestuous
episodes of his earlier years, and down to the
close of his life he and his vassals enjoyed the
happiness of the nation whose annals are dull.
James II, was only a child of six at his father's
death. Either by the will of the late King, or by
the ordinance of a Parliament called at Edinburgh
the year after his death, two Kegents, Sir William
Crichton and Sir Alexander Livingstone of Cal-
lendar, were given the supreme power in the State,
and they, in the exercise of their functions, appointed
Archibald Earl of Douglas Lieutenant-General of
Scotland. It is probable that the friendship between
the Lord of the Isles and the Douglas family, which
afterwards assumed a form dangerous to the State,
led to the advancement of Alexander to the high
position which he occupied, not only as Earl of Boss^
but as Wardf n, or Justiciar, or High Sheriff of the
whole region north of the Forth, an office which we
find him exercising in 1438, the year following the
death of James I.^ The tenure of an office so
important implied the confidence of the Crown, and
we find in 1438, and on occasions afterwards, that
John Bullok, Bishop of Boss, was Alexander's
^ Vide Charter in Family of Innee.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 195
delegate to the Council of Regency, when he
wished to consult the supreme authority as to his
judicial duties in the North, ^ During the long
minority of James II., the name of Alexander of
Isla appears frequently in the records of the north,
and there is every reason to believe that the con-
fidence reposed by the State in his distinguished
abilities and force of character was amply justified
in the performance of his judicial duties. The office
of Justiciar gave him command of the town of
Inverness, where many of his Courts were held,
and there is something surely of the irony of history
in contemplating the turbulent rebel, the fierce
incendiary of 1427, now appearing in the Capital of
the Highlands representing in his own person the
supreme majesty of the law. It may well be
believed that the feelings of the Invernessians would
be of a somewhat mingled nature on Alexander's
appearance amongst them in this unwonted guise.
There is no evidence, however, that the Earl of Ross
exercised the duties of his office in any unjust or
oppressive manner. An exception to this may
possibly be the case of Donald Dubh, the Chief of
the Clan Cameron. It will be remembered that
this chief and his clan, though vassals of the Lord
of the Isles, treacherously deserted him during the
hostilities of 1427, and went over to the King's side.
This desertion by the Clan Cameron, as well as by
the Clan Chattan, proved disastrous to Alexander,
and was the direct cause of his discomfiture and
humiliating surrender. The Lord of the Isles would
have been more than human did the memory of his
betrayal not rankle in his breast. According to the
^ Book of Douglas, vol. I., p. 440 ; Exchequer Rolls, vol, V., p. 33.
196 THE CLAN DONALD.
code of honour of the time, to forget and forgive so
grave an injury without due reprisals would have
been regarded as pusillanimous and cowardly. And
now Nemesis has come. The Scottish Government
has put in Alexander's hands a powerful w^eapon of
revenge by giving him authority over the persons and
property of the lieges in the north, and in this case
he is not slow to exercise it. Donald Dubh was
dispossessed of his lands in Lochaber, and forced to
take refuge in Ireland.
The Clan Maclean, also vassals of the Isles, were
already in possession of extensive lands, and were
rapidly rising in importance as a territorial family.
A number of years previous to the dispossession of
the Clan Cameron, a scion of the House of Maclean,
John Garve, a son of Lachlan Maclean of Duart, had
received from Alexander of Isla a grant of the lands
and barony of Coll, and now he obtains the further
grant from him of the forfeited lands of Donald
Dubh. It is rather singular that the Mackintoshes,
who were equally disloyal to Alexander in 1427,
escaped the outpourings of the Island potentate's
wrath. No doubt, in the latter case, there were
relationships by marriage, though such alliances
between Highland families were not always effective
in averting feuds and bloodshed. In any case, the
Mackintoshes made up the peace with Alexander,
and remained on the same terms of vassalage as
before. Tlie favour shewn to the Clan Chattan by
Alexander was indeed excessive, for it was at the
expense of a branch of his own family, the House of
Keppoch. The family of Alastair Carrach was for-
feited in 1431 for their action in the rising of Donald
Balloch ; but it does not appear that the Lord of the
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 197
Isles, on his own restoration to his Hberty and
possessions, made any attempt to reinstate them
in their lands. Instead of that, we find him, in
1443, not only confirming Mackintosh in the
lands he formerly possessed, but also giving him
a grant of the patrimonial lands of the Keppochs.
This unjust and unfriendly action was strenuously
and successfully resisted by the Lords of Lochaber,
who refused to bow to the majesty of parchment, and
for hundreds of years there is witnessed the singular
spectacle of a clan, in actual possession of their
ancestral acres, holding them without a scrap of
title,, without any instrument of tenure, save their
good sharp broadswords and the strength of their
right arms. Alexander still heaps favours upon the
Chief of the Clan Chattan, for we find him in 1447
granting him the bailliary of all Lochaber in per-
petual fee and heritage. This was a most important
as well as lucrative appointment, and was of a nature
to lead to still greater sway and influence.
There seems little reason to doubt the statement
of Scottish historians that Alexander, despite his
apparent loyalty and the confidence reposed ia him
by the Council of State during his latter years, was
drawn into that league with the Douglas family
which, in after years, descending as an heritage
to his successor, proved at last the ruin of his
House. We find the Lord of the Isles and Doug-las
having an interview in Bute in 1438, and although
the purpose of the meeting was not disclosed, it not
improbably had reference to the treasonable compact
which, though not finally concluded at that time,
was in serious and earnest contemplation.^ It was
1 Tlie Douglas Book, vol. I., p. 440.
198 THE CLAN DONALD.
in March 7, 1445, that the three Earls — Crawford,
Douglas, and E-oss— subscribed and sealed the
offensive and defensive league which, for the
parties concerned, bore such disastrous fruits.^
Not much more that is noteworthy remains to be
recorded of the latter years of Alexander de He.
According to the Chronicle of the Earls of Ross^ he
died at his Castle of Dingwall, and was buried in
the Chanonry of Ross on the 8th May, 1449. His
mortal remains were not conveyed to their kindred
dust in Hy, within whose chapel of Oran the Lords
of the Isles for many a generation found their last
resting place. Alone of all the heads of his race he
lies beneath the shadow of that once noble fane ^ —
desecrated and converted into a stone quarry by
that stout defender of the faith, Oliver Cromwell
— but from the desolation and wreckage of the
time not a vestige has survived to mark the place
of sepulture of the great Earl of E,oss.
From all that we can gather, Alexander was
little past his prime when he died. But his youth
of trouble and hardship may well have sown the
seeds of premature decay and hastened the length-
ening of the shadow. Despite some humiliating
episodes of his younger days, he worthily upheld
the name and honour of his line. The testimony
borne by the ancient record of his race bears out
the view that while he was valiant in the field
he was kindly and generous towards his dependants,
and that he ruled his vast territories, in his latter
years, with tranquil and beneficent sway.^ If his
early career was turbulent and warlike, his latter
^ Balfour's Aniicals of Scotland, vol. L, p. 173.
- pp. 10-11. 3 Fortrose Cathedral. ^ Ibid.
ALEXANDER DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS.
199
life was full of peace and dignity, and he handed
down unimpaired to his successor the great and
ancient heritage of his fathers.
SIGILLUM ALEXANDRI DE YLE DOMINI INSULARUM ET ROSSTE.
200 THE CLAN DONALD.
CHAPTER IX
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS.
John de He, Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles. — The Earl a
Minor when he succeeded. — Minority of James II. — League
between the Earls of Ross, Crawford, and Douglas. — The
Earl of Ross in Rebellion. — Murder of the Earl of Douglas. —
The Earl of Ross and his Ross-shin; Neighbours. — Raids on
Orkney by the Islemen. — Meeting of Douglas and Macdonald
at Dunstaffnage. — Invasion of the King's Lands by Donald
Balloch. — Raid of Lismore. — Discomfiture of Bishop Lauder.
— The Lady of the Isles Escapes from the Highlands. — John
receives favours from the King. — He is appointed one of the
Wardens of the Marches. — The Earl of Ross at the Siege of
Roxburgh. — Treaty of Ardthornish.
On the death of Alexander of Isla, Earl of Ross, in
1440, his son John succeeded him both in his island
and mainland territories. The period was a com-
paratively quiet and prosperous one in the history
of the family of Macdonald. Alexander, after many
struggles and vicissitudes, had succeeded at length
in uniting to the Lordship of the Isles the mainland
inheritance of his mother, and thus both in extent
of territory and influence he had elevated himself to
a pinnacle of power unequalled even by the Lord of
Douglas in the South. The policy of Alexander seems
to have been dictated by the wise and firm reso-
lution not to involve himself again in an open quarrel
with the Scottish State. Though his sympathies
lay entirely with Crawford and Douglas, having,
as stated in the last chapter, entered into a
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 201
league with them, he played no active part in
the civil commotions in which these noblemen
were such able actors. Far removed from the
base of operations, he remained an interested
spectator of a kingdom torn asunder by factions
and transformed into a stage on which the actors
played each for his own hand. This wise and
prudent policy evidently did not commend itself to
Alexander's son and succe'ssor, John. The state of
matters in the Highlands at the death of Alexander
favoured the continuation of a defensive rather than
an aggressive policy. The state of matters in the
South was very different. The kingdom was still in
the throes of a long minority, and suffering from the
woes pronounced upon the nation whose king is a
child. The assassination of James I., whose wise, if
sometimes harsh, rule had done so much to restore
order and tranquillity throughout his kingdom, was
contemplated with secret satisfaction by those
turbulent noblemen whose excessive power the King
had so successfully curbed. Now that his powerful
personality is removed, and the reins of State are
placed in other hands, we can readily conceive how
those ambitious and yjovverful banms, on whose
feudal privileges the King had encroached, would
seize the opportunity with which fortune favoured
them and devote their energy towards the restora-
tion of lost power and prestige. The moving spirits
in the struggle for place and power were the
Douglases, the Livingstons, and the Crichtons, the
great object governing the policy of each being the
destruction of the other, while the great body of the
lieges groaned under the cruellest oppression.
While Lowland Scotland was thus distracted by
petty feuds and tumults, the Highland portion of
the kingdom seems to have enjoyed comparative
202 . THE CLAN DONALD.
peace and prosperity. This is true in an especial
manner of the extensive domain over which John,
Lord of the Isles, held sway, and it was mainly
owing to the wise policy of his father, Alexander.
There was no call for an aggressive policy on the
part of John in the circumstances in which he found
himself on his accession to the honours and dignities
of his house. By taking part in the quarrels of his
Southern neighbours, he had everything to lose, and
it is difficult to see what, under the most favourable
circumstances, he could have ultimately gained by
pursuing a course so unwise and unj)atriotic. He
was already in possession of a vast territory, and
surrounded by loyal vassals and cadets of his house.
But John was a minor at the time of his father's
death, and this, no doubt, largely accounts for the
rash policy which he pursued on the very threshold
of his career. From an entry in the Chamberlain
Bolls, it would appear that that official charges him-
self with the rents of the lands of the barony of
Kynedward for two years, that barony being in
ward through the death of Alexander, Earl of Boss.^
This means that John was either a minor or had not
at this time received confirmation of the lands of
the barony of Kynedward But an entry in the
Exchequer Bolls of the year 1456 leaves no doubt
as to the age of the Earl of Boss when he succeeded
to that dignity. In this entry reference is made to
the barony of Kynedward as having been in ward
for three years, during which the Earl of Boss was
a minor.^ John was, therefore, eighteen years of
1 Chamberlain Rolls, vol. IIL, p. 527.
'■' " Et non onerat se de firmis terrarum baronie de Kynedward, que
fuerunt in manibus domini regis in warda per spaciuni trium annorum, que
extendunt se ad quingentas marcas per annum et ultra, cum tenandiis
ejusdcm, ante saisinam datam Johanni Comiti Rossie, quia ex gracia domini
regis in minore etate consti tutus intravit in eisdem," &c., &c. — Exchequer
Eolls, vol. VL, p. 158. Vide Ibidem, vol. V., p. 393.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 203
age when he succeeded his father in 1449. Bub
though thus still of tender years, he would not have
lacked for counsel at so critical a moment in his
career as head of the House of Macdonald. The
veteran Donald Balloch, Lord of Dunnyveg and the
Antrim Glens, was the principal Councillor of the
Island Lord, as well as Captain of the Clan Donald,
and there were other cadets of the family who had
attained to considerable power and influence in the
Highlands and Islands. These were the Clanranald
branch, the Macdonalds of Ardnamurchan, the Mac-
donalds of Glencoe, and the Macdonalds of Keppoch.
Surrounded by these, as well as by the other vassals
of the family, whether at Dingwall or at Ardthornish,
John had little to fear from his foes inside or outside
the Highland boundary.
Both at Dingwall and at Ardthornish, the Earl
of Boss held Court on a scale approaching that of a
sovereign prince. From several charters granted by
him, we find the names of his councillors and the
offices held by them in the government of the Isles.
Donald Balloch comes before us as president of the
Council, while Maclean of Ardgour and Munro of
Fowlis were Treasurer of the Household and
Chamberlain respectively : other ofiices were held
by Maclean of Dowart, Macneill of Barra, Mac-
donald of Largie, and others of the vassals of the
Isles. One of the first charters granted by John on
his becoming Earl of Boss was that to the Master
of Sutherland of the lands of Easter Kindeace for
his homage and faithful service, and among the
witnesses are the names of several members of the
Island Council. The Earl of Boss, however, did not
confine himself to the affairs of his own principality.
It would have been well if he had. He had barely
204 THE CLAN DONALD.
succeeded to his patrimony when we find him in
league with the Earls of Douglas and Crawford.
These noblemen had raised the standard of revolt
in the Lowlands, and had set all law and order at
defiance. Both were selfish, cruel, and ambitious,
and being possessed of great power and influence,
their rebellious attitude was a constant menace,
and a source of danger, to the Scottish State.
Their extensive estates gave them the command
of a powerful army of military vassals, but this
only stimulated their ambition to grasp at still
greater power, and they seem to have set before
themselves no less a task than the dismemberment
of the kingdom. A mutual oath was entered into
between them, " that each of them should be aiding
and assisting against all the world, to the friends
and confederates of one another."^ Into this
dangerous league the young Earl of Eoss threw
himself, prompted, no doubt, by the vain ambition
of acquiring yet greater power and adding to his
already far too extensive domains. Only a momen-
tary lull, and the heather is ablaze. It is not in
the north alone the standard of revolt is raised, the
whole kingdom is thrown into a turmoil of rebellion.
The confederate lords are acting in concert. The
signal is given, and the dogs of war are let loose.
The Earl of Ross, who had married the daughter
of Sir James Livingston, the King acting in the
interesting capacity of matchmaker, was no doubt
somewhat disappointed at not receiving the tocher,
with the promise of which His Majesty had clinched
the matrimonial bargain. But the disgrace and
attainder of Livingston intervening was the cause,
no doubt, why the royal promise was not imple-
1 Buchanan, vol. II., p. 239, Ed. 1821.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 205
merited. Neither the nonpayment of the tocher,
however, nor the disgrace of Sir James, was the
prime motive for the conduct of the Earl of Ross
in the present revolt against the King's authority.
It was, as we have seen, part of a great scheme,
into which John had entered with the insurgent
lords of Douglas and Crawford, and from which he
hoped to gain a much greater prize than Elizabeth
Livingston's dowry.
The Island Lord summoned his vassals to his
standard, and from island and mainland they rally
to the fray. The details of this formidable rebellion
have not been recorded, but the great outlines of
the transaction remain. John, at the head of a
large body of his vassals, marched to Inverness,
and without much opposition took the Castle,
which having strongly garrisoned, he proceeded to
Urquhart. He claimed the lands of Urquhart as
part of the Earldom of Hoss, which lands, with the
Castle, had formerly been in the possession of his
family. The stronghold of Urquhart, which was
almost impregnable in its great size and strength,
was now held for the King. The Island Lord at
once attacked it, and after a short but stout resist-
ance on the part of the garrison, John became
master of the situation. His father-in-law, Living-
ston, who on hearing of the commotion in the
North had escaped from the King's custody, was
made governor of Urquhart Castle by John.
Intoxicated with the success which attended him
at Urquhart and Inverness, he marched southwards
through Moray, and taking the Castle of Ruthven,
another royal stronghold, he committed it to the
flames. The King, who had evidently not yet
discovered the treasonable league between Douglas,
206 THE CLAN DONALD.
Crawford, and Macdonald, devoted all his energy
and resources to the Southern portion of his kingdom.
At all events, no immediate step was taken to
punish the island rebel, and that potentate remains
defiantly in possession of his recent conquests.
James II., who had just come of age, was not by
any means wanting in administrative capacity or
military ardour. Both were very soon put to the
test. The Southern portion of his kingdom, torn
and distracted by the feuds of the Lowland barons,
had become a fertile region of all confusion and
rapine. It required the possession of a steady
judgment and a firm hand to restore order and
good government, and the energy of the young
monarch was taxed to the utmost in the attempt
to accomplish this desirable result. The King's
whole attention, therefore, being meanwhile devoted
to his unruly subjects in the South, the Earl of Boss
and his clansmen enjoy the benefit of complete
immunity from the royal vengeance. But the tide
of affairs, after a brief Interval, took a sudden turn,
and the Island Lord appears in a new light. The
treasonable league between Macdonald, Douglas,
and Crawford, very probably recently renewed, was
at length discovered by the King, and he at once
realised the powerful combination arrayed against
him.
Meanwhile an event happened which changed the
King's plans, and helped to break up the league
between the confederate lords in an unexpected
manner. The Earl of Douglas, on his return to
Scotland, and at the instigation of the English
Court, put himself without delay in communication
with Macdonald and Crawford, and in order to carry
out the elaborate scheme against the Scottish State,
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 207
Douglas opened the campaign by summoning his
vassals and retainers to his standard. One only, it
would appear, disobeyed the call, and, asserting his
independence, refused to join in the insurrection.
This bold vassal, whose name was Maclellan, was
closely allied by blood to Sir Patrick Gray, a courtier
of high standing in the King's household. Douglas,
highly incensed at the conduct of his retainer,
ordered his arrest and imprisonment at Douglas
Castle. On the news of the imprisonment of
Maclellan reaching the Court, the King at once
despatched a messenger demanding the release of
the prisoner. Divining the purport of the royal
messenger's visit, and knowing well that his presence
betokened no good omen, Douglas gave orders
privately to have Maclellan beheaded. This defiant
conduct on the part of Douglas, so utterly regardless
of the King's authority, roused the indignation of
James, who would have taken immediate steps to
bring him to justice if he had not dreaded his
power. Meantime the King, suppressing his indig-
nation, prudently determined to have a secret
conference with Douglas in the Castle of Stirling,
ostensibly with the purpose of making a better
citizen of the haughty baron. James gave his
assurance under the Great Seal for the personal
safety of the Earl. Relying on the Boyal assurance,
Douglas sped to Stirling, where the King and Court
then resided, and presented himself before His
Majesty. The King remonstrated with him for his
treasonable proceedings, and especially for the league
he had entered into with Macdonald and Crawford.
The proud Lord of Douglas listened with impatience
to the reproaches of his Sovereign, and, at length,
defied James, whereupon the King, losing all control
^0^ THE CLAN DONALD.
of his temper, drew his dagger and stabbed the rebel
lord. The courtiers present rushed to the scene,
and in a few moments the unfortunate nobleman
succumbed to their vengeance. It is impossible to
justify the conduct of the King. Whether pre-
meditated or in a fit of temper, no justification can
be pleaded for an act committed in direct violation
of his solemn promise to protect the person of his
victim. There can be but little sympathy, on the
other hand, for the murdered noblemao, whose own
hands were not free from blood, and whose career
throughout was marked by the most cruel and
tyrannical actions.
Thus the first blow was aimed at the Macdonald,
Crawford, and Douglas league, but it did not
prove effective. The leading spirit of the cabal was
removed only to make room for another Douglas,
whose chief aim was to perpetuate the policy
of his house towards the Scottish State, The
aspect of affairs in the Highlands present a very
favourable contrast to the state of matters in
Lowland Scotland. It would be difficult to
conceive a picture darker in its outlines than
that drawn by the hand of a well-known historian
of this period in the history of Scotland south of
the Forth. The history of the Highlands may
be searched in vain for a parallel, often as that
history has been perverted to suit the prejudices
of the Lowland mind. The cold-blooded murders,
the selfish schemes to gratify family ambition, the
cruel oppression and tyranny, which stain the
whole social fabric, are on a scale unequalled by
the darkest period in the history of Celtic Scotland.
The governing principle in such a state of society
invariably is to keep and acquire as much as
!^DEID*SCH^^tTO^THE*ENI>
'i^cTbr^c if tij^fe^
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 209
possible whether by fair means or foul. Judged
from this point of view, the present attitude of
the Island Lord may well be justified.
The temporary discomfiture of the Douglas party,
and the strong measures taken by the King and his
advisers to put down the rebellion of Crawford, were
not without their effect on the Earl of Hoss. The
King appointed the Earl of Huntly, a nobleman of
great courage and ability, lieutenant-general of the
kingdom, and granted him a commission to proceed
against the rebel Earls of Crawford and Ross. Huntly
devoted his attention, in the first place, to Crawford,
whom he defeated in a pitched battle near the town
of Brechin. Though not personally present in this
engagement, the Earl of Boss sent a contingent of
clansmen to the assistance of the Earl of Crawford.
Huntly's plan of campaign was to attack the rebel
lords one after the other, and defeat them in turn.
Macdonald, who still held his own in the North,
realising his danger, began to make elaborate
preparations to resist the threatened invasion of
the King's lieutenant. The formidable defence
made by the Earl of Boss struck terror into the
heart of the invading host, and Huntly, who had
penetrated as far as Moray, retired in dismay. No
further attempt was made, at least meanwhile, to
subdue the Northern potentate. The Earl of
Huntly's services were required elsewhere, and
the Douglasses seem to have taken up the whole
attention of the King. In any case, the Earl of
Boss still continued to hold the castles of Inverness
and Urquhart, and suffered no diminution of his
power in the North. Though in league with
Crawford and Douglas, he cannot be said to have
taken an active part with them in the recent revolt
14
210 THE CLAN DONALD.
against the Scottish Government. He prudently
remained at home, and allowed his confederates to
fight for their own hand. The King was too busy
elsewhere to attack him in the North, and the
Island Lord was a formidable problem at any
time.
Though free from Southern interference, the
Earl of Ross was not without his troubles at home.
Ever since the Macdonald family settled in Ross-
shire, the neighbouring clans, and even some of the
vassals of the Earldom, looked with a jealous eye
on their growing power and influence. Chief among
these were the Mackenzies, at this time of no great
account as a clan, the Mackays, and the Suther-
lands. Sir Robert Gordon, in his " Earldom of
Sutherland," gives accounts of the clan battles, or
skirmishes, that took place about this time in the
North. He records how the Earl of Ross, accom-
panied by a force of between 500 and 600 clansmen,
had the presumption to invade Sutherland and
encamp near the Castle of Skibo. Macdonald's
object in invading Sutherland seems to have been
to harry the country, injure the inhabitants, and
carry off as much spoil as circumstances would
permit. John, Earl of Sutherland, however, being
far above soiling his own hands in a petty quarrel
between his vassals and Macdonald of the Isles, sent
a Neill Murray (the descent of Neili still remains an
open question) with a company of the brave men of
Sutherland to give battle to the invading Macdonald
host. The issue was not for a moment uncertain.
The Macdonalds, after a sharp conflict, were put to
flight, and they beat a hasty retreat to Ross witliout
spoil. Though for the time repulsed, the Mac-
donalds were not quite annihilated, and recuperating
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 2ll
their exhausted energies, they made another
incursion into Sutherland in the hope of repairing
the loss they sustained at the hands of Neill Murray
at Skibo. Penetrating into Strathnaver, they were
met on the sands of Strathfleet by Robert Suther-
land, brother of the Earl of Sutherland, at the head
of " some men assembled in all haste." Here the
Macdonalds were again defeated, which was to be
expected, and believing discretion to be the better
part of valour, they never again invaded the
territory of the great Eaii John of Sutherland. Sir
Robert Gordon is, of course, writing up the Earls of
Sutherland, and, in the process, he considers it to
be his duty by way of contrast to write down all
who oppose themselves to his family gods. From
the well-known character of his book, it is not
necessary to enter here into any detailed criticism
of its value historically. His clan stories and gene-
alogies, so persistently repeated by others, should
be received with due caution, and, if in any way
associated with the family of Sutherland, for what
they are worth, which, in our opinion, is very little.
Sir Robert Gordon was a family seanachie, and his book
is marked by the blemishes that generally taint such
works and render them often practically valueless as
guides to historical research. It is amusing to read
the glowing accounts given by this historian of the
prowess in the field, the eloquence in council, and
the domestic virtues of his Earls of Sutherland, most
of which unfortunately are contradicted by the stern
facts of history. The independence of Scotland
would have been delayed, it is hard to say how
long, if the prowess of the Earl of Sutherland had
not secured it for ever on the bloody field of
Bannockburn. An Earl of Sutherland was never
212 THE CLAN DONALD.
wanting when the welfare of the realm was at stake,
and this country will never know all it owes to that
great family of which Sir Robert Gordon was so
faithful a chronicler.
There is no doubt some slight foundation for Sir
Robert Gordon's stories of the clan feuds of tiiis
period. Macdonald of Lochalsh, Hugh of Sleat,
and Roderick MacAUan of Clanranald, were always
ready, when not engaged against the Saxon, to
pounce upon their Celtic neighbours. The Munroes,
the Rosses, the Mackenzies, the Frasers, and others,
were quite as ready to give them a warm welcome.
Nothing is more likely to have happened than a
series of plundering raids by Roderick of Clanranald
and the other leaders of the clan into Sutherland,
and we can imagine without much effort the con-
sternation of the natives at the approach of these
plundering bands. We confess to finding it some-
wliat difficult to imagine any such scenes of
siaaghter as are alleged, in Sir Robert Gordon's
pa.ges, to have been witnessed at Skibo and on
the sands of Strathfleet. CWachs, however, were
common to both Highlands and Lowlands ; but so
far as the annals of the time furnish us with any
hints, this period was, on the whole, an uncommonly
quiet and prosperous one in the history of the Clan
Cholla. The quiet periods in the history of the
Highlands and Islands, consisting of those intervals,
generally short, during which the Lords of the
Isles and their vassals maintained friendly
relationships with the Scottish Government were,
however, only relatively tranquil. It was seldom
the House of Isla was free from those domestic
feuds which bulk so largely in the traditions of
the country. The seanachies, embodying these
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 213
traditions in their manuscripts, give us vivid,
if sometimes exaggerated, pictures of the marauding
and piratical expeditions engaged in by the restless
spirits of those times. The stories told by some of the
seanachies, when brought under the light of authentic
history, are found in many instances to be wonder-
fully reliable. Both MacVuirich and Hugh Mac-
donald refer to a raid on the Orkney Islands by
the young men of the Isles, led by Hugh Macdonald
of Sleat, brother of John, Earl of Boss.^ Authentic
records of the time not only confirm this raid but
refer to a series of other raids on Orkney, and other
Norse possessions, by the men of the Isles. In a
manifesto by the bailies of Kirkwall and community
of Orkney the complaint is made that the Orkneys
were habitually overrun by bands of Islesmen sent
thither by the Earl of Ross, designed as "ah antiquo
inimicus capitalist These invasions were of yearly
occurrence during the reign of James II. The
Islanders, according to the manifesto, plundered,
burned, and ravaged the country, and carried off
cattle and whatever else they could lay their hands
on.^ In a letter by William Tulloch, Bishop of
Orkney, dated 28th June, 1461, the same complaint
is made against the men of the Isles, and the Bishop
alludes to the efforts which he was then making to
come to an arrangement with the Earl of Ross to
put a stop to these marauding expeditions.^ What
success attended these laudable efforts on the part
of the good Bishop history does not record. The
Earl of Ross and his Islesmen are soon required
^ Hugh Macdonald in Collect?.nea do Rebus Albanicis, p. 306 ; MacVuirich
in Reliq. Celt., p. 213.
^ Diplomatarium Norwegicuni X., 606.
3 Ibidem, 599.
214 THE CLAN DONALD.
elsewhere, and little time is left for raids, naval
or other, in the North.
The Earl of Douglas, who had long kept the
Lowlands in a perfect turmoil of civil war, was
finally defeated by the King's forces at Arkinholme,
in Annandale. Disappointed of expected English
aid, and having been declared traitor to the Scottish
State, Douglas, as a last resort, betook himself to
Argyleshire, where, in the Castle of Dunstaffnage,
he was received by Donald Balloch Macdonald,
who may not inappropriately be called the
lieutenant-general of the Isles. ^ Here the Earl
of Ross, who had come from the North, and
Douglas met in solenni conference to decide what
steps should be taken in the present emergency.
The result of their deliberations was soon apparent.
Both, with equal sincerity, vowed vengeance on the
royal party. Douglas having persuaded the Island
Lord, apparently without much difficulty, to espouse
his cause, and thus set the ball a-rolling, hastened
across the border into England, where he was cordially
received by the Duke of York. Macdonald imme-
diately prepared for an invasion of the King's lands,
and summoning his clansmen and vassals, he soon
gathered to his standard a force 5000 strong.
The command of this force he bestowed on the
veteran Donald Balloch, whose prowess in many a
field had been the admiration alike of friend and
foe. A fleet of 100 galleys was equipped for the
expedition, and Donald, directing his course towards
the mainland, proceeded to Inverkip, where he
landed his force. There appears to have been no
opposition oftered to this formidable armament, and
Donald was allowed, not only to land unmolested,
^ Lives of the Douglases, p. 203. Origines Par. Scotise Appendix, p. 826.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 215
but on penetrating into the country he carried fire
and sword everywhere he went with impunity.
From Inverkip he directed his course towards the
island of Arran, which, with the Cumbraes and
Bute, he invaded in turn, burning and plundering
wherever he went. Donald's object primarily, how-
ever, was not plunder but revenge, and this he now
gratified to the full. After besieging the Castle of
Brodick and burning it to the ground, he next
attacked the Castle of Bothesay, which having
taken, he made himself master of Bute. According
to the Auchinleck Chronicle, he carried away
immense spoil from this and the adjacent islands
and mainland, includino^ a hundred bolls of meal, a
hundred bolls of malt, a hundred marts and a
hundred marks of silver, five hundred horses, ten
thousand oxen and kine, and more than a thousand
sheep and goats. The loss in lives and property
does not appear to have been very great in pro-
portion to the strength of the invading forces. If
we are to believe the chronicler, there were slain
only " of good men fifteen, of women two or three,
and of children three or four."^ It w^ould appear
from this that Donald's object was not so much to
punish the natives as the superiors of the lands
which he had invaded, and according, therefore, to
the standard of the time, the Island leader, tempering
his revenge with mercy, behaved in the circum-
stances in a manner worthy of some commendation.
Donald's conduct, however, in the episode which
followed, and with which his naval raid was con-
cluded, is deserving of the severest condemnation.
Lauder, the Bishop of Lismore, a Lowlander, had
evidently through over-zeal in the exercise of his
^ Auchinleck Chronicle.
216 THE CLAN DONALD.
sacred calling made himself obnoxious to the men of
Argyle. Instead of going cautiously to work, and
making himself acquainted with the mode of living
of the people, with the oversight of whom he had
been entrusted, he exercised discipline v^ith a strong
hand, and sought to bring the inhabitants into
conformity with the ways and manners of the South.
This he found by no means an easy task. The
people, of whose language and manners the bishop
was utterly ignorant, stubbornly resisted his reforms,
and were driven by his high-handed policy to com-
mit outrages on his person and ravage and plunder
the sacred edifices of his diocese. The bishop had
besides, as one of the King's Privy Council, afiixed
his seal to the instrument of forfeiture against the
Earl of Douglas, and this only added another to his
already many offences against the Lord of Dunnyveg.
Donald now had his opportunity of punishing the
obnoxious prelate, and without delay he proceeded
to Lismore, where the bishop resided, and besieged
him in his sanctuary. After ravaging the island
with fire and sword, he put to death the principal
adherents of the bishop, in all likelihood natives of
the Lowlands, while the prelate himself escaped
with his life by taking refuge in the Cathedral
Church of his diocese. Without wishing to condone
the conduct of the Island leader in any way, it may
be permissible to say that this prelate, by his short-
sighted and unwdse policy, had himself done nmch
to provoke this and other outrages on his sacred
calling and jurisdiction. That, however, does not
warrant the outrages committed on this or on
former occasions on the Bishop of Argyle, and
Donald Balloch nowhere comes before us in a worse
light than in his expedition to Lismore.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 217
No immediate action seems to have been taken
by the King to punish the rebel Lord of Dunnyveg,
or his chief, the Earl of Ross, in the recent treason-
able proceedings. In Argyle and the Isles it would
have been vain to attack them. The Scottish navy
at this time was not fit to cope with the strong
maritime power of the Isles, and this probably was
the principal reason why the King thought it
prudent not to hazard an expedition to Argyle.
In any case there is no record of the pains and
penalties which should have fallen on the devoted
head of the sacrilegious spoiler of the sacred Island
of Lismore. One incident may be recorded which
throws light on the turmoil into which the Douglas-
Macdonald league had thrown the Highlands and
Islands. Feeling no longer safe in these regions,
John of Isla's consort, the Lady Elizabeth Living-
ston, escaped with all haste from the country, and,
finding her way to Court, threw herself on the
protection of the King. According to one of the
Scottish historians, this lady married the Island
Lord with the laudable view of toning down his
rugged disposition and making him a loyal Scottish
subject. In this, it would appear, the Lady
Elizabeth utterly failed, and her return to Court at
the present juncture is a clear indication of the
policy of the Earl of Ross towards the executive
government, as it also makes only too apparent the
wide gulf that separated racially the North from the
South. The King received the Countess of Ross
with much cordiality, and a suitable maintenance
having been assigned her, she appears to have
remained at Court during the remainder of her life.
The Earl of Ross, weakened by the defeat of the
Pouglas party, finally sent messengers to the King
218 THE CLAN DONALD.
offering to repair the wrongs he had committed on
his majesty's heges, and promised in anticipation of
the royal clemency being extended to him to atone
with good deeds in the future for his rebellious
conduct in the past. The Earl well knew that his
wisest policy in the present state of affairs was to
make his peace with the King. He could not very
long stand out in his present attitude and expect
much success to attend his efforts in opposition to
the Scottish Government. But he appears to be
perfectly sincere in his desire to be reconciled to the
King, and there is reason to believe that in this
loyal attitude he would have remained, if evil
counsel, to which he had been at all times
susceptible, had not prevailed. The King at first
was not disposed to treat with John on any terms,
but finally, by a judicious union of firmness and
lenity, and dreading another insurrection in the
Highlands, his Majesty granted the Northern
potentate a period of probation during which he was
to shew the sincerity of his penitence. Mean-
while the King summoned a meeting of Parliament
to consider the affairs of his realm. Whether the
Earl of Hoss was present at this meeting, or was
represented, does not appear very clear, but it seems
that much attention was devoted to the Highlands
and Islands, and that many good and salutary
laws were passed for the welfare and peace of the
realm generally. The Earl of Boss, it would appear,
is now on his good behaviour, for, according to the
good Bishop Lesley, the King in this Parliament
" maid sic moyennis with the principallis captanis of
the His and hielands that the same wes als peacable
as ony parte of the Lawlandis, and obedient as weill
in paying of all dewties of thair landis to the King,
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 219
als redy to sarve in wearis with greit cumpanyis."^
" The principallis cajiitanis of the His," including no
doubt the hero of the recent naval raid, had from all
appearance been suddenly converted, but lilie most
sudden conversions, there do not appear to have
followed any results of a permanent kind.
Notwitiistanding the friendly relations in which
the Earl of Ross now stood to the Crown, the
King, in a Parliament held at Edinburgh in 1455,
deprived him of both the castles of Inverness and
Urquhart.^ Next year, however, the Castle of
Urquhart, together with the lands of Urquhart
and Glenmoriston, were granted to John at an
annual rent of £100.^ To these were added at
the same thne the lands of Abertarff and Strath-
errick,* and to still further confirm the loyalty of
the Island Lord, the King conferred upon him the
lands of Grennane in Ayrshire.^
What conspicuous services were rendered to the
State by the Earl of E-oss after his sudden con-
version history does not record, but his behaviour
seems to have been such as to warrant us in
believing in the sincerity of his repentance. The
King himself must have received some proof of
his loyalty, for in the year 1457 His Majesty
appointed John one of the Wardens of the
^ Historic of Scotland by John Lesley, Bishop of Ross, p. 27.
^ " Thir ar ye lordschippis ande castellis annext to ye croune
Item ye hous of Innurness and Ureharde and ye lordschippis of thame and ye
lordschippe of Abernethy with ye wattles maylis lunnerness togidder with ye
baronyis of Ureharde glenorquhane bouiche bonochare anuache Edderdaill
callyt Ardmanache peety brachly Stratlierue with ye pertineutis." — Acta
Parliameutorum Jacobi II., vol. II., p. 42.
2 Exchequer Eolls, vol. V., p. 217.
* " Et allocate eidem de firmis terrarum de Abertarf et Strathardock de
termino huju^j compoti, concessarum dicto comiti Rossie apud Tnvernys per
dominum nostrum regem." — Exchequer Rolls, vol. V., p. 222,
^ Ibidem, vol. VI., 236.
220 THE CLAN DONALD.
Marches, an office of great importance and respon-
sibility/ No doubt the King's policy was to
attach John to his person and Government. In
bestowing upon him this office of trust under his
Government, the King evinced his desire to cure
the northern potentate of his rebellious tendencies,
and wean him from the influence of those factions
whicb had been so baneful in the past. As a
further proof of his confidence, the King appointed
John with other noblemen to conclude a truce with
England.^
The history of the Highlands during the next
few years, so far as the Earl of Ross is concerned,
is almost a blank. The only reference to him in his
official capacity which we have been able to find is
in a document preserved in the Kilravock Charter
Chest, and which bears that the Earl granted Hose
of Kilravock permission to " big ande upmak a toure
of fens." The document, which is written in the
vernacular of the 15th century, is in the following
terms : —
" Joline of Yle, Erie of Ross ande Lord of the His, to all ande
sundry to quhais knawlage thir our present letteris sail come ;
Greeting : Witte us to have gevyn ande grantit and be thir pre-
sent letteris gevis ande grantis, our full power ande licence till
our luffid cosing, man ande tennand, Huchone de Roos, baron of
Kylravok, to fund, big, ande upmak a toure of fens, with barmkin
ande bataling, wpon quhat place of strynth him best likis, within
the barony of Kylravok, without ony contradiction n or demavnd,
questionn, or any obiection to put in contrar of him or his ayris,
be vs or our ayris, for the said toiire ande barmkyn making, with
the bataling, now or in tyme to cum : In witness hereof, ve haf
gert our sele to ther letteris be affixt at Inuernys, the achtend day
of Februar, the yer of Godd a thousand four hundretd sixte yer."
1 Rymer XL, 397. " Ibidem, 397,
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 221
The time soon arrived when the Earl of Ross,
emerging' from liis temporary obscurity, acts a part
very different from that which he was accustomed
to play on the stage of Scottish history. In
the year 1460, James II. entered on his campaign
against England. The truce between the tw^o
countries to which, as we have seen, John, Earl of
Hoss, was a party had not lasted long. The King
opened his campaign by attacking the Castle of
Roxburgh, an important frontier stronghold, then,
and for long prior to this time, in the possession of
the English. Here he was joined by the Earl of
Ross at the head of 3000 clansmen, "all armed in
the Highland fashion, with habergeons, bows and
axes, and promised to the King, if he pleased to pass
any further in the bounds of England, that he and
his company should pass a large mile afore the rest
of the host, and take upon them the first press and
dint of the battle."^ The Island Lord was received
with great cordiality by the King, who commanded
him, as a mark of distinction, to remain near his
person, while his clansmen meanwhile set themselves
to the congenial task of harrying the English borders.
The unfortunate and melancholy death of the King
from the bursting of a cannon at the very com-
mencement of the siege of Roxburgh virtually
brought the campaign against England to an end,
and the Earl of Ross had no opportunity of proving
his own fidelity, or the courage and bravery of his
clansmen. The untimely death of the King in the
flower of his youth and at the very beginning of his
vigorous manhood exposed the country once more to
the dangers attendant on a long minority. James,
during his comparatively short reign, had proved
^ Lindsay's History of Scotland,
222 THE CLAJSr DONALD.
himself a wise and judicious ruler. Of this we have
ample evidence in the success which attended his
efforts in destroying the overgrown power of the
house of Douglas, and attaching to his interests such
men as the Earl of Ross.
Shortly after the death of the King, on the 23rd
of February, 1461, a Parliament was held at Edin-
burgh to consider the affairs of the realm, when the
Queen -mother was appointed regent during the
minority of her son, the heir to the throne, then
only in his seventh year. This Parliament, which
was largely attended by all the estates of the realm,
was also attended by John, Earl of Ross, and many
other Highland chiefs. Though no detailed record
of it remains, we can gather from the main outlines
of the proceedings the elements of civil commotion
in the near future. Parliament had no sooner dis-
solved than an insurrection broke out in Argyleshire,
the fertile region of dissensions. The cause of the
commotion w^as a quarrel between Allan Macdougall,
of the house of Lorn, and his brother, John Ciar
Macdougall. Allan, who was a nephew of Donald
Balloch Macdonald, lay claim to certain lands in the
possession of John Ciar. This claim the latter
resisted, but he was overpowered by Allan, and
imprisoned by him in a dungeon on the island of
Kerrera. This was the signal for a rising on the
part of the friends on both sides, and a bloody
conflict ensued. Allan was defeated, but as a result
of the commotion, the whole Western Highlands
were thrown into the wildest confusion.^ In the
southern portion of the kingdom the aspect of
affairs presents no brighter prospect for the future
^ Buchanan, vol. II., 279. Auchinleck Chronicle, 58.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 223
prosperity of the country. The welfare of the
nation is sacrificed to the private ambition of
factious nobles.
The Earl- of Ross, whose loyalty, as we have seen,
was so conspicuous during the latter portion of the
reign of the late King, now that that strong
personality is removed from the helm of stabe,
allows himself once more to become the victim of
the Douglas faction. By a judicious combination of
firmness and moderation, the King had disarmed
the enmity of the Island Lord, and had James
not been cut off so prematurely, there is every
reason to believe that John would have continued
loyal to the Scottish throne. The death of the
King, however, soon plunged the Scottish State into
the difficulties that are always inseparable from a
minoritv. It will be remembered that the last Earl
of Douglas had been forfeited in all his estates, and
was now undergoing his sentence of banishment at
the Court of Edward IV. Douglas had, in the days
of his prosperity, maintained friendly intercourse
with the family of York, and now that Edward IV.
seemed in a fair way to crush the House of
Lancaster, Douglas would fain hope that the power
and influence of England might be directed towards
the restoration of his lost territories and position in
Scotland. Meantime the banished Earl watched
with deepest interest the passing phases of political
feeling between the English and Scottish crowns,
and he left no means unused to win his old aUy,
the Earl of Ross, from the friendly relation in
which he now stood towards the Government of
the northern kingdom. As had often happened
in the past, the difficulties which England had to
224 THE CLAN DONALD.
deal with at home and in France had hitherto
proved a barrier against active interposition in the
affairs of Scotland, and the Wars of the Roses had
particularly absorbed all the energies of the House
of York. In the year to which we have come,
however, the two events already referred to, the
accession of Edward lY. to the English throne
and the death of James II. of Scotland, seemed
to shed a gleam of hope on the broken fortunes
of the exiled Earl. Edward lent his countenance
to the Douglas scheme all the more readily because
the Scottish Court had afforded an asylum to his
opponent, Henry of Lancaster, whose defeat at
Taunton had driven him to Scotland, while it
placed Edward on the English throne. Various
schemes were devised in Scotland for the restora-
tion of the exiled English monarch, all of which
proved futile. To counteract these and divert the
Scottish rulers from their object and neutralise
their efforts, Edward lent a willing hand to Douglas
in his desperate scheme. The King of Scotland was
a child, and past experience had taught that a
Scottish regency, accompanied as it often was by
faction and conspiracy, would afford scope for the
execution of such a scheme as Douglas might devise
for his restoration to the honours which he had
forfeited.
The time had evidently come when the old league
with the Macdonald Family might be revived in a
bolder spirit and with more ample scope. In these
circumstances we are not surprised to find that a
few weeks after the King's death the first overtures
are made to the Earl of Ross for the formation of
an offensive and defensive league with England.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 225
That the Enghsh Government was the first to move
in the matter is evidenced by the fact that the writ
empowering the Commissioners from England to
treat with the Lord of the Isles was issued on the
22nd of June, 1461, while the ambassadors from the
Isles were not formally commissioned until the 19th
October following. The English Commissioners to
the Isles were the banished Earl of Douglas, his
brother, John Douglas of Balveny, Sir William
"Wells, Dr John Kingscote, and John Stanley.
The following is the text of the writ appointing
the English Commissioners : —
" Ambassiatores Assign antur ad Tract andum cum Comitb
ROSIAE.
Rex omnibus ad quos (fee. salutem. Sciatis quod nos de fidelitate
et provida circumspectione
carissimi consanguine! nostri Jacobi Comitis Douglas ac
dilectorum et fidelium nostrorum Willelmi Welles militis et
Johannis Kyngescote legum
doctoris necnon
dilectorum nobis Johamiis Douglas et
Johannis Stanley.
Plenius confidentes assignavimus et constituimus ipsos comitem
Willelmum Johannem Johannem et Johannem ambassiatores
commissaries sive nuncios nOstros speciales ad conveniendum cum
carissimo consanguineo nostro Johanne comite de Rosse ac
dilecto et fidele nostro Donaldo Ballagh
seu eorum ambassiatoribus commissai'iis sive nunciis sufficientem
potestatem ab eisdem consanguines nostro Comite de Rosse et
Donaldo in ea parte habitentibus. Necnon ad tractandum et
comicandum cum eisdem de et super cunctis materiis et negotiis
nos et ipsos consanguineum nostrum comitem de Rosse tangentibus
sive concernentibus ac de et in materiis et negotiis predictis
precedendis appunctuandis concordandis et concludendis.
Ceteraque omnia et singula in premissis et eorum dependentiia
debita et requisita concedenda facienda eb expedienda, Promitt-
entes bona fide et verbo regio in hiis scriptis quod omnia et
singula que in premissis vel circa ea per ambassiatores commissarios
15
ii26 THE CLAN DONALD.
sive nuncios predictos appunctuata concordata et conclusa fuerint
rata grata firma habevimus pro perpetuo. In cujus &c.
T. R. Apud Westminstrem xxij die Junii. Per ipsam regem." ^
For consideration of the proposals about to be
submitted to the English envoys, the Lord of the
Isles with his council, a body that existed in
connection with the family from the earliest times,
met and deliberated in the Castle of Ardthornish,
which, in the time of John, Earl of E,oss, was the
meeting place on important and State occasions.
The Douglasses and the other Commissioners of
Edward seem to have come all the way to
Ardthornish to lay their proposals before John
and his privy council. What the conclusion
arrived at, after mature and solemn deliberation,
was, we are not informed. In any case, it was
necessary that the tentative compact must be
considered and ratified in the great English
capital itself To represent the interests of
^ Ambassadors are appointed to Treat with the Earl op Ross.
The King to all to whom, kc, salvation. Know ye that we, trusting
very fully in the faithfulness and prudence of our dearest cousin James Earl
of Douglas and of our dear and faithful William Welles, Knight, and John
Kyngescote, Doctor of Laws, also of our dear John Douglas and John Stanley,
have nominated and appointed these same, the Earl, William, John, John and
John our special ambassadors, commissioners or messengers, for meeting vrith
our dearest cousin John Earl of Ross and our dear and faithful Donald Balloch
or their ambassadors, commissioners, or messengers having sufficient power
from our same cousins the Earl of Ross and Donald Balloch — on that part.
Also for treating and communicating with these same concerning and with
regard to all matte-s and affairs touching and concerning ourselves and our
cousin Earl of Ross and with regard to what is contained in the matters
and affairs aforesaid that have to be proceeded with, determined, agreed upon
and concluded. And other matters all and each which ought to and must
needs be granted, carried out and arranged as in the premisses and their
conclusions. Promising in good faith and by our royal word in these
documents that all and each of the items in or bearing upon the premisses
that shall have been appointed agreed upon and concluded by the foresaid
ambassadors, commissioners or messengers we shall hold settled agreeable to
us and fixed for ever. In testimony of which, &c.
T. R. At Westminster 22nd day of June. By the King himself.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 227
the Macdonald Family at Westminster, two
Commissioners were appointed. Ranald Bane
of the Isles, son of John Mor Tainistear, and
founder of the family of Largie, and Duncan,
Archdean of the Isles, were appointed to meet
the English Commissioners ; and it was no ordinary
sign of confidence that they were entrusted with
such important and delicate negotiations. The
English Commissioners appointed to meet the
Commissioners of the Isles at Westminster were
Lawrence, Bishop of Durham, the Earl of Worcester,
the Prior of St John's, Lord Wenlock, and Robert
Stillington, Keeper of the King's Seal. The treaty
that was concluded in the name of the English
King and the Earl of Ross, with the Earl of
Douglas as the moving spirit of the plot, was
bold and sweeping in its provisions. It was
undoubtedly treasonable to the Scottish State,
but the whole history of the family of the Isles,
and in a measure, of that of Douglas, was a
continued protest against the supremacy of the
Crown. From the terms of the treaty, it would
appear that the object in view was nothing less
than the complete conquest of Scotland by the
Earls of Ross and Douglas, assisted by the English
King. The Earl of Koss, Donald Balloch, and
John, his son and heir, agreed to become vassals
of England, and with their followers to assist
Edward IV. in his wars in Ireland and elsewhere.
For these services, and as the reward of their
vassalage, the Earl of Ross was to be paid a
salary of £200 sterling annually in time of war,
and in time of peace, 100 merks ; Donald Balloch
and his son John were to be paid salaries respec-
tively of £40 and £20 in time of war, and in time
228 THE CLAN DONALD.
of peace half these sums. In the event of the
conquest of Scotland by the Earls of Ross and
Douglas, the portion of the kingdom north of the
Forth was to be divided equally between the Earls
and Donald Balloch. Douglas was to be restored
to his estates in the south. On the division of the
north being completed, the salaries payable to the
Macdonalds were to cease. ^ In case of a truce with
the Scottish monarch, the Earl of Ross, Donald
Balloch, and John his son, were to be included in
it.^ This extraordinary treaty is so important in
its relationship to the Family of the Isles that we
give it here in full : —
3 " FoEDus INTER Edwardum reqem Angliae et Johannbm
COMITBM ROSSIAE ET DOMINUM InSULARUM, DE 8UB-
jugando scotiam, et eam partiendo inter dictum
comitem et comitbm douglas ; cum confirmationb
Kegis Edwardi.
Rex omnibus ad quos tkc. salutem. Notum facimus quod
vidimus et intelleximus quedam appunctuamenta concordata
conclusa et fiualiter determinata inter commissarios nostros ac
ambassiatores commissarios et nuncios carissimorum consanguine-
orum nostrorum.
Johannes de Isle comitis Rossie et domini Insularum.
Donaldi Balagh et
Johannes de Isle filii et heredis ejusdam Donaldi
sub eo qui sequitur tenore verborum.'^
1 Rymer'a Foedera, vol. XL, 483-87. Rotuli Scotite, vol. II., 407.
* Hector Boece's History of Scotland, App. 393,
^ Rotuli Scotise in Turri Londinensi, vol. II., pp. 405-7.
^ League between Edward King of England and John Earl op
Koss and Lord of the Isles concerning the Conquest of
Scotland and the Division thereof between the said Earl
OF Ross and the Earl of Douglas ; with the Confirmation
OF Kino Edward.
The King to all to whom, &c., salvation. We make it known that we have
Been and understood that certain matters have been agreed upon, concluded
and finally determined between our commissioners and the ambassadors,
commissioners and messengers of our dearest cousins John of Isla Earl of lloss
and Lord of the Isles and Donald Balloch and John of Isla son and heir of the
eame Donald who follows after him in the order of the names.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 229
We
Laurence bishop of Duresme
John erle of Worcestre
Robert Botill' priour of Seint Johns of Jerusalem in
Englonde
John lord Wenlok and
Maister Robert Stillyngton keper of the kynges
prive seal
deputees and comissaries to the most high and mighty prynce
Kynge Edward the Fourth kyuge of Englonde and of Fraunce
and lorde of Irlande
and
Reynold of the Isles and
Duncan archediaken of the Isles
ambassiatours comissaries or messagers of the full honorable lorde
John de Isle erle of Rosse and lorde of the Oute Isles to all thos
that this presente \Yrityng endented shall see or here gretyng.
Be it knowen that we the seid deputees commissaries and ambas-
satours by vertu of power committed unto us whereof the tenures
ben expressed and wreten under after longe and diverse tretes and
communications hadd betwix us upon the maters that folwen by
vertu of the seid power have appoynted accorded concluded and
finally determined in maner and fourme as folweth FURST it is
appointed accorded concluded and finally determined betwyx us
that the seid John de Isle erle of Rosse Donald Balagh and John
of Isles son and heire apparant to the seid Donald with all there
subgettez men people and inhabitantes of the seid erldom of Rosse
and Isles aboveseid shall at feste of Whittesontide next commyng
become and be legemen and subjettes unto the seid most high
and Christen prince Kynge Edward the Fourthe his heires and
Buccessours kynges of Englond of the high and mighty prince
Leonell sonne to Kynge Edward the Thridde lynially descendyng
and be sworne and do homage unto hym or to such as he shall
comitte power unto you at the seid fest of Whittesontide or after
And in semble wyse the heires of the seid John th' erle Donald and
John shall be and remaigne for ever subjettis and liegemen unto
the seid Kynge Edward, his heires and successours kynges of
Englonde as it is aboveseid yevinge unto his highnesse and his
seid heires and successours as well the seid John th' erle Donald
and John as theire heires and successours and eche of them verrey
and trewe obeysaunce in obeinge his and there commaundementea
230 THE CLAN DONALD.
and do all thyng that a trewe and feithfull subjette oweth to doo
and bere to his soveryane and lige lord and as hit accordeth to his
ligeauuce ITEM the seid John th' erle Donald and John and eche
of them shall be alwaye redy after the seid feste of Whittesontide
vipon convenable and resounable warnyng and commaundement
yeven unto them by the seid most myghty prynce Edward kynge
of Englonde his heires and successours kynges of Englonde of the
seid Leonell in fourme aboveseid descendyng or be eny other on
his or their behalf es haA'yng power therto to do diligente and
efFectuall service with and to all them uttermost myght and power
in suche werres as the seid most high and myghty prynce his
heires and successours kynges of Englond as is above seid shall
move or arreise or to moved or arreised in Scotlande or ayenste
the Scottes in Irlande or ayenst the kynges ennemyes or rebelles
there and in the same werres remaigne and continue with all ther
aide myght and power in such wyse as they or eny of them shall
have in commaundement by the seid high and myghty prince his
heires and successours and as longe as it shall please hym or them
ITEM the seid John erle of Rosse shall from the seid feste of
Whittesontyde next comyug yerely duryng his lyf have and take
for fees and wages in tyme of peas of the seid most high and
Christen prince C mere sterlyng of Englysh money and in tyme of
werre as longe as he shall entende with his myght and power in
the said werres in maner and fourme aboveseid he shall have
wages of CCli sterlyng of Englysh money yerely and after the rate
of the tyme that he shall be occupied in the seid werres ITEM
the seid Donald shall from the seid feste of Whittesontide have
and take duryng his lyf yerly in tyme of peas for his fees and
wages XXli sterlyng of Englysh money and when he shall be
occupied and intende to the werre with his myght and power and
in maner and fourme aboveseide he shall have and take for his
wages yerly XLli sterlynges of Englysh money or for the rate of
the tyme of werre ITEM the seid John soun and heire apparant
of the said Donald shall have and take yerely from the seid fest
for his fees and wages in the tyme of peas Xli sterlynges of
Englysh money and for tyme of werre and his intendyng therto
in manere and fourme aboveseid he shall have for his fees and
wages yerely XXli sterlynges of Englysh money or after the rate
of the tyme that he shall be occupied in the werre And the seid
John th' erle Donald and John and eche of them shall have gode
and sufficaunt paiment of the seid fees and wages as well for tyme
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 231
of peas as of werre accordyug to thees articules aud appoyntementes
ITEM it is appointed concluded accorded and finally determined
that if it so be that hereafter tlie seid reaume of Scotlande or
the more part therof be conquered subdued and brough to the
obeissaunce of the seid most high and Christen prince and
his heirs or successours of the seid Leonell in fourme
aboveseide discendyng be th' assistence helpe and aide of
the seid John erle of Rosse and Donald and of James erle
of Douglas then the seid fees and wages for the tyme of peas
cessyng the same erles and Donald shall have by the graunte of
the same most Christen prince all the possessions of the seid
reaume beyonde Scottyshe See they to be departed egally betwix
them eche of them his heires and successours to holde his parte
of the seid most Cristen prince his heires and successours for
evermore in right of his croune of Englonde by homage and
feaute to be done therefore ITEM if so be that by th'aide and
assistence of the seid James erle of Douglas the seid reaume of
Scoctlande be conquered and subdued as above'^then he shall have
enjoye and inherite all his owne possessions landes and inheri-
taunce on this syde the seid Scottyshe See that is to saye betwix
the seid Scottyshe See and Englonde suche he hath rejoiced and
be possessed of before this there to holde them of the seid most
high and Cristen his heires and successours as is aboveseid for
evermore in right of the coroune of Englande as well the said erl
of Douglas as his heires and successours by homage and feaute to
be done therefore ITEM it is appointed accordett concluded and
finally determined that if it so be the seid most high and myghty
prince the kynge after the seid fest of Whittesontide and afore
the conquest of the reaume of Scottelande take any trewes or
abstinaunce of werre with the kynge of Scottes then the seid erle
of Rosse Donald and John and all their men tenantes officers and
servantes and lordships landes tenementes and possessions whereof
the same erle of Ross Donald and John or eny of them be nowe
possessed within Scottland and the seid erldom of Rosse and also
the isle of Arran shall be comprised within the seid trewes or
abstinaunce of werre olesse then the said erle of Rosse signifie
unto the high and myghty prince the kynge before Whittesontide
next comyng that he woll in nowe wyse be comprised therein
ITEM it is appointed accorded conclused and finally determyned
that the seid John erle of Rosse Donald and John shall accepte
approve ratifie and conferme all these presente articles appoynte-
232 THE CLAN DONALD.
mentes accordes conclusions and determinations and thereunto
gave thaire aggrement and assent and in writyng under there
seeles of amies sende and delyvere it to the seid most Cristen
kynge or his chaunceler of Englande afore the furst day of Juyll
next comynge receyvynge att that tyme semblable tres of ratifi-
cation of the seid appoyntementes to be made undre the grete
seall of the seid most high and myghty prynce All these thinges
in maner and fourme aboveseid we the seid commissiaries and
ambassatours have appointed accorded concluded and finally
determined and that they shall be trewly observed and kepte we
permitte by vertue of our sevei-all powars and commissions yeven
and made unto us whereof the tenures worde by worde ben such
as folwen.
Edwardus dei gratia Rex Angliae et Franciae et
dominus Hibernie omnibus ad quos presentes
litere pervenerint salutem.
Sciatis quod nos de fidelitatibus et providis circumspectionibus
Venerabilis px-ioris Laurentii Episcopi Dunolm' ac
Carissimi consaunguinei nostri Johannis comitis Wygorn
Necnon dilectorum et fidelum nostrorum Roberti Botill' prioris
Sancti Johannis Jerusalem in Anglia
Johannis Wenlok
de Wenlok militis et Magistri Roberti Stillyngton legum doctoris
custodis privati sigilli nostri
plenius confidentes assignavinms et constituimus ipsos episcopura
comitera priorem Johannem et Robertam ambassiatores commis-
sariis sive nunciis sufficieutem potestatem sub eo consauguineo
nostro comite Rossie in ea parte habitentibus necnon ad tractandum
et coinmunicandum cum eisdem de et super cunctis materiis et
negotiis nos et dictum consanguineum nostrum comitem Rossie
tangentibus sive concernentibus ac de in materiis predictis pre-
cedendis appunctuandis concordandis concludendis determinandis
et finiendis ac appunctuamenta concordata conclusa determinata
et finita per eosdem vice et nomine nostris in scriptis redigenda
seu redigi facienda ac etiam sigillanda. Ceteraque omnia et
singula in premissis et eorum dependentiis debita ut requisita
concidenda et facienda et expedienda. Promittentes bona fide et
verbo regio quod omnia et singula que in premissis vel circa ea
per ambassiatores commissarios sive nuncios nostros predictos
quatuor vel tres eorum appunctuata concordata conclusa deter-
minata et finita fuerint rata grata firma stabiliter habebimus pro
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 233
perpetuo. In cujus re testimonium has literas nostras fieri
fecimus patentes.
T. Me ipso apud Westminstrem octavo die
Februarii anno regni nostri primo. Bagot.^
Johannes de Yle comes Rossiae dominus Insularum omnibus ad
quos presentes litere pervenerint salutem. Sciatis quod nos de
fideHtate et provida circumspectione consanguineorum nostrorum
Konaldi de Insulis et
Duncani Archedeaconi Insularum
Plenius confidentes assignavimus et constituimus ipsos Ranaldum
et Duncanum ambassiatores commissarios sive nuncios nostros
speciales ad conveniendum cum escellentissimo principe Edwardo
dei gratia rege Angliae et Franciae et domino Hibernie seu ejus
ambassiatoribus commissariis sive nunciis sufficientem potestatem
sub eodem excellentissimo principe Edwardo dei gratia rege
Angliae et Franciae et domino Hibernie in ea parte habitentibus.
Necnon ad tractandum et communicandum cum eisdem de et
super cunctis materiis et negotiis nos et dictum excellentissimum
principem tangentibus sive concernentibus ac de et in materiis
^ Edward bt the Grace of God King of England and France
AND Lord of Ireland to all to whom these present Letters
shall have come — salvation.
Know ye that we being fully confident of the faithfulness and prudence
of the venerable prior Laurence Bishop of Durham, and our dearest cousin John
Earl of Worcester, also of our dear and faithful Robert Botill, prior of St John
Jerusalem in England, John Wenlok of Wenlok, Knight, and Master Robert
Stillyngton, doctor, Keeper of our privy seal — have nominated and appointed
these, the Bishop, Earl, prior John and Robert ambassadors, there being also
commissioners or messengers possessing full power under our cousin Earl of
Ross on that part, for treating and communicating with these same con-
cerning and regarding all matters and affairs touching and relating to us and
our said cousin the Earl of Ross and regarding the matters aforesaid to be
proceeded with, appointed, agreed upon, concluded, determined, and ended,
and that the points agreed upon, concluded, determined, and ended by these
same, in turn and by name must be entered among our writs or must be
drawn out and sealed, to be so entered. And the other mattfers, all and each
in the premisses and their conclusions must as required be finished, carried
out, and arranged. Promising in good faith and by our royal word that all
and each of the matters in the premisses or bearing upon these as shall have
been agreed upon, concluded, determined, and ended, whether by our
ambassadors, commissioners, or messengers aforesaid, or by four or three of
them, we shall hold as settled agreeable to us and firmly fixed for ever.
In testimony of which we have caused these our letters patent to be written.
Testified by myself at Westminster, the eighth day of February, in the
first year of our reign. Bagot,
234 THE CLAN DONALD.
predictis precedendis et appunctuandis concordandis concludendis
determinandis et finiendis ac appunctuata concordata conclusa
determinata et finita per eosdem vice et nomine nostris in scriptis
redigendis sen redigi facere ac etiam sigillaudis. Ceteraque omnia
et singula in premissis et eorum dependentiis debita et requisita
considenda facienda et expedienda. Promittentes bona fide et
christianitate qua astricti deo in hiis scriptis quod omnia et singula
que in premissis vel circa ea per ambassiatores commissarios sive
nuncios predictos vel unam eorum appunctuata concordata con-
clusa determinata et finita fuerint rata grata firma et stabilia
habebimus pro perpetuo. In cujus re testimonium has literas
nostras fieri fecimus patentes.
Ex castello nostro Ardtbornis decimo nono
die niensis Octobris anno Domini millesimo
quadringentesimo sexagesimo primo.^
In whittenesse whereof to that on' partie of these indentures
delyvered and remaignyng towardes the deputees and com-
missaries of the said high and myghty prynce Kynge Edward we
^ John of Isla Earl of Eoss Lord of the Isles, to all to whom the present
letters may come — salvation. Know ye that we, fully trusting in the faith-
fulness and prudence of our cousins,
Eonald of the Isles and
Duncan Archdeacon of the Isles,
have nominated and appointed these same Ranald and Duncan our special
ambassadors, commissioners or messengers, to meet with the most excellent
prince Edward by the grace of God King of England and France and Lord of
Ireland, or his ambassadors, commissioners or messengers, having full power
under the same most excellent prince Edward by the grace of God King of
England and France and Lord of Ireland — on that part. Also for treating
and communicating with these same concerning and with reference to all
matters and affairs touching or relating to us and the said most excellent
prince and concerning the matters aforesaid to be proceeded with and
appointed, agreed upon, concluded, determined and ended — the matters
appointed, agreed to, concluded, determined and ended by these same in turn
and by name having to be entered among our writs or drawn out and sealed
that they may be thus entered. And the rest all and each ought as required
in the premisses and their conclusions to be finished, carried through and
arranged. Promising in good faith and by the Christianity by which we are
bound to God in these documents that all and each of the matters in the
premisses or bearing upon them, appointed, agreed to, concluded, determined,
and ended by the foresaid ambassadors, commissioners or messengers aforesaid
or by one of them, we shall hold settled, agreeable to us, fixed and fast for
ever. In testimony of which we have caused these letters patent to be
written.
At our Castle of Ardthornish, the nineteenth day of the mouth of
October, the year of our Lord one thousand four hundred and sixty one,
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 235
the seid Raynald and Duncan ambassitours and commissaries of
the seid erle Rossie have putte our seales and signe manuelles.
Writen att London' the xiij dey of Februer
the yere of the birth of our Lorde
MCCCCLXII and the furst year of
the reigne of the high and myghty
prince Kynge Eward the Fourth above
rehersed.
Nos vero eadem appunctuamenta concordata conclusa et finaHter
determinata ac omnia et singula in eisdem contenta et specificata
rata et grata habentes eadem acceptamus approbamus ratificamus
et confirmamus eisdemque nostrum assensum primiter et con-
censum damns et adhibemus et in eisdem vigore robore et virtute
remanere et haberi volumus ac si per nos appunctuata concordata
conckisa ct tinahter de terminata fuissent necnon ea onuiia et
singula ad omnem juris efFectum qui exinde poterit tenore pre-
sentium innovamus. Promittentes bona fide et verbo regio nos
dicta appunctuamenta concordata et conclusa et finaliter deter-
minata omnia et singula in eisdem contenta quatiiius nos
concernant pro parte nostra impleturos et observaturos imper-
petuum. In cujns &c.
T. R. Apud Westminstrem xvij die martii.
Per breve de prevato sigillo et
de data predicta auctoritate &c." ^
Such was the Treaty of Ardthornish, a diplomatic
instrument most darinf^ in its conception and big
with the fate of the Island Family. Considering the
commanding position John already occupied, it is
^ But we, holding these same points agreed to, concluded aud finally deter-
mined, as well as all and each of the matters contained and specified in them,
accept, approve, ratify and confirm them, and we give and adhibit our assent
and consent in chief, and wish them to remain and be held in these same in
their strength, force, and validity, as if they had been appointed, agreed upon,
concluded, and finally determined by ourselves ; also, we renew all and each
of these things with the full effect of law which shall henceforth exist in the
tenor of these letters. Promising in good faith and by our royal word that
for our part we shull fulfil and observe the said points agreed upon and con-
cluded and finally determined in all and each of their contents so far as they
may concern us, for ever. In testimony of which, &c.
Royal certification — At Westminster, 17th day of March.
In brief from the private seal and
Ou the date aforesaid by authority, &c.
236 THE CLAN DONALD,
strange he should have allowed himself to be
entangled in a scheme so wild and perilous. He
was already by far the most powerful noble in
Scotland, with a vast territory and almost regal
sway. But he seems to have been ambitious of
acquiring still greater power and prestige. The bribe
held out to him proved a strong temptation, and
undoubtedly influenced his conduct in the step he
took ; yet the scheme was so wild that we are
amazed at the eagerness with which he entered
into it, and at his simplicity in allowing himself to
be blindly led into so hollow an alliance. It is
plain that the scheme did not emanate from the
brain of the Earl of Ross. On this, as on critical
occasions before, John was under the controlling
influence of wills stronger and more persistent than
his own. It was the scheme of a bold and desperate
man who was playing a hazardous game for tre-
mendous odds. For the provisions of the Treaty of
Ardthornish we are indebted mainly to the banished
and forfeited Earl of Douglas. But there was
another party to the contract who must not be
overlooked. Donald Balloch was thoroughly imbued
with the Celtic spirit, keen, restless, and eager, the
determined foe from his early years of the Scottish
State, and still in his declining years burning for
dangerous and exciting adventures. From these
and other circumstances we may well believe that
his voice would have been loud for the league
embodied in the Treaty of Ardthornish.
This remarkable compact between the Lord of
the Isles and the English King, with the Earl of
Douglas as the moving spirit of the plot, implied
the adoption of military measures to carry its
provisions into effect. The events that followed
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 237
almost immediately after the ratification of the
Treaty seem to suggest an understanding between
the parties that no time was to be lost in taking the
contemplated action. On the side of the Earl of
Ross proceedings were taken with almost precipitate
haste. The two foremost Clan Donald warriors of
the day were placed at the head of the vassals of
Ross and the Isles. First in command was Angus
Og, son of the Lord of the Isles, who now for the
first time makes his appearance upon the arena of
war, but who had already, though scarcely more
than a boy, begun to show indications of the daunt-
less courage, the unconquerable spirit which future
years were more vividly to disclose. Second in
command was Donald Balloch, the hero of Inver-
lochy, a fight the memory of which was beginning
to grow dim in the minds of the generation that
witnessed it.
The Lord of Dunnyveg and the Glens of Antrim
had only once unsheathed his sword since he over-
threw the Earl of Mar in Lochaber, but he was still,
though past his prime, well nigh as formidable an
antagonist as of old, always to be found where the
hurricane of battle was brewing, now, as of yore, the
harbinger of strife, the stormy petrel of Clan Donald
warfare. Angus Og, destined to play the leading
part in the decline and fall of the Lordship of the
Isles, was a natural son of the Earl of Boss. The
historian of Sleat, whether inadvertently or of set
purpose, would make it appear otherwise, and says
that Angus Og was the issue of a marriage with a
daughter of the Earl of Angus. ^ There is no
evidence that such a marriage ever took place, and
John had no male issue by his wife, Elizabeth
Livingston. The question is placed beyond dis-
^ Hugh Macdouald in Collectanea de Eebus Albanicis, p. 315.
238 THE CLAN DONALD.
pute by a charter which was afterwards given to
John in confirmation of his possessions, and in which
it was provided that, faiUng legitimate heirs male,
the title and estates were to descend to his natural
son Angus/ The mother of Angus is said to have
been a daughter of Macphee of Colonsay, so that the
heir of the Lordship of the Isles was of gentle if not
legal origin.
The army of the Isles, under the leadership of
Angus Og and Donald Balloch, marched to Inver-
ness, once more the theatre of warlike operations.
Taking possession of the town and castle, the latter
one of the royal strongholds in the north, they at
once, in the name of the Earl of Boss, assumed
royal powers over the northern counties, commanded
the inhabitants and all the Government officers to
obey Angus Og under pain of death, and to pay to
him, as his father's lieutenant, the taxes that were
exigible by the Crown. In this way did the Earl
of Ross attempt to carry into immediate and forcible
execution the provisions of the Treaty of Ardthornish.
It is hardly credible that John would have taken a
step so daring and extreme did he not expect that
the English portion of the Treaty would have been
carried out at the same time by the dispatch of a
strong body of auxiliaries to form a junction with
the Highland army. There is evidence that an
English invasion of Scotland was contemplated at
the time, and that apprehensions of its imminence
prevailed in the Eastern Counties. Especially in
the town of Aberdeen the Provost and inhabitants
were warned to keep their town, sure intelligence
having been received that an English fleet was on
1 Reg. Mag. Sig. VII., No. 335. Acts of Pari., vol. II., p. 189-90. Had-
diugtuu Collectious, vol. I., p. 336.
JOHN DE ILE, EARL OF ROSS. 239
the way to destroy not only Aberdeen but other
towns upon the coast. ^ Had Edward IV. been able
to support the action of the Earl of Ross in the
North by throwing an army across the border in aid
of the Earl of Douglas, it is quite possible that the
State might have fallen, and Scotland have lost the
independence for which she had made such heroic
struggles. Fortunately for the Kingdom of Scot-
land, this was not to be. The Wars of the Roses
were still raging in the sister country, and the
resistance of the heroic Margaret of Anjou to the
pretensions of the House of York absorbed the
energies of the reigning power. Edward IV. was
unable to dispatch the expeditionary force to the
assistance of the Highland insurgents, the scheme
for the division of Scotland, after the manner pre-
scribed in the Treaty of Ardthornish, came to naught,
and the rebellion finally collapsed.
What actually followed the campaign of Angus
Og and Donald Balloch, whether they were caUed
to account and subdued by force of arms, or whether
matters were allowed to adjust themselves with-
out any active measures being undertaken by the
State, are questions upon which the annals of
the age do not throw much light. It seems clear,
however, that, whether through want of will or
power, no decisive steps were taken to award to
the Earl of Ross any punishment commensurate with
his disloyalty. It must be remembered, however,
that the full measure of the treason was very far
from being known. The invasion of the northern
counties, with the seizure of Inverness, and whatever
hostilities accompanied the proclamation of sover-
1 Buchanan, Lib. XII., c. 19. Note (3).
240 THE CLAN DONALi).
eignty, must have come to the knowledge of the
Government ; but the serious aspect of the whole
affair, the negotiations embodied in the Treaty of
Ardthornish, still remained a secret buried out of
sight in the archives of the English Crown at
Westminster. It needed but a favourable oppor-
tunity for that explosive document to bring dismay
and consternation to the minds of those involved.
DECLINE OP THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 24 1
CHAPTER X.
DECLINE AND FALL OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA.— 1462-1498.
Events following Ardthornish Treaty. — Its Discovery. — Cause of
Discovery. — Indictment. — Summons. — Forfeiture. — Expedi-
tions against John. — He Submits. — Resignation. — Partial
Re-instatement and New Honour. — Charter of 1476. —
Sentiment in Isles. — Angus Og. — His Attitude. — Rebellion in
Kuapdale. — Invasion of Ross. — Feud with Mackenzie. —
Lagabraad. — Bloody Bay. — Abduction of Donald Dubh. —
Raid of Athole. — The Probable Facts. — Angus' Reconciliation
to his Father. — Assassination of Angus Og. — Alexander of
Lochalsh. — Invasion of Ross. — Battle of Park. — John's Final
Forfeiture and Death.
The Earl of Ross does not appear to have suffered
either in dignity or estate after the rebellion of
1463. For at least twelve years after that maddest
of engagements, the Treaty of Ardthornish, he
pursued the even tenor of his way with little or no
molestation from the Scottish State. That John
maintained his position intact is evidenced by Crown
confirmations of grants of land bestowed upon his
brothers Celestine and Hugh. These twelve years,
from 1463 to 1475, are years of well-nigh unbroken
darkness so far as the Lordship of the Isles and the
Earldom of Ross are concerned. The rebellion of
1463, short-lived though it was, and comparatively
little as we know of its details, left abundant seeds
of future trouble. There is undoubted reason to
believe that John was summoned to appear before
the Parliament of 1463 to answer for his conduct
under pain of forfeiture, but despite the threatened
242 THE CLAJSr DONALt).
penalties, the Earl of Ross, whose love for these
conventions seems never to have been strong, did
not put in an appearance/ Whether it was that
his command of the Scots tongue was limited, and
he did not care to mix with the Southern nobles for
that reason, or whether he ignored the jurisdiction
of that august body, we know not, but certain it is
that on almost all occasions he was represented at
the Scottish Parliament by procurators, his proxy in
1467 having been his armour-bearer, William, Thane
of Cawdor. Owing to John's non-compearance at
the Parliament of 1463, his case was postponed, and
the Parliament adjourned to meet in the city of
Aberdeen on the Feast of St John the Baptist the
same year.^ Of neither of these Parliaments have
any records survived, but subsequent proceedings
clearly show that John still elected to remain in
his Castle of Dingwall rather than respond to the
summons of the High Court of the realm. That
same year there is evidence that efforts were not
awanting to bring the rebel to task, though these
do not appear to have been conducted with much
earnestness or resolution. Several Poyal Commis-
sioners, including the Earl of Argyle and Lords
Montgomery and Kennedy, and Treasurer Guthrie,
came North to lay the royal commands before the
Earl of Ross, for it is on record that expenses
amounting to £12 10s 4d were allowed them for two
days' sojourn at Perth on their way to Dingwall
Castle.^ Definite knowledge of the result of this
mission we do not possess. The probability is that
John was neither punished nor forgiven, but was
left, like Mahomet's cofiin, in a condition of suspense
as to his standing with the Crown, and this leaving
^ Asloan MS., 23-60. ^ Ibid. ° Exchequer Rolls ad tempus.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 243
of the matter undecided explains why, in after years,
the Government was enabled to ^o back upon the
delinquencies of 1463. Although the Treaty of
Ardthornish was still a secret, the Government
seems to have had sufficient evidence that John had
been guilty of treason against the Crown by the
assumption of royal prerogatives in the North, and
the appropriation of taxes and revenues pertaining
to the Crown alone. He and his brother Celestine
were justly accused of having retained the Crown
lands in 1462-3, as well as £542 5s 7d of the farms
of Petty, Leffare, Bonnach, Ardmannach, the vacant
See of Moray, &c,, wrongfully and without the
King's warrant.^ It was probably no easy task for
the Earl of Ross to prevent disturbances breaking
out between the restless Islesmen by whom he was
surrounded and the occupants of the lands adjacent
to his territories. We find, in 1465, reckoning
made of the wasting and burning of the lands of
Kingeleye, Bordeland, Drumdelcho, Buchrubyn,
Drumboye, Turdarroch, and Monachty, to the extent
of £31,^ for all of which the Earl of Ross and
his followers were held responsible. Quarrels were
likewise breaking out occasionally betwixt the Earl
of Boss and his neighbours in the East of Scotland.
Thus, in 1473, and in the month of August, there is
strife between himself and Alexander of Setouii
regarding the lands of Kinmundy, in Aberdeenshire,
so much so that the matter evokes the royal dis-
pleasure, and an Act of Parliament is procured to
provide for the punishment of the culprits, though
we are not enlightened as to the nature of the
penalty administered.^ A feud also arose with the
1 Exchequer Rolls, vol. VI., p. 356. ^ jbjd^ p. 357.
^ Acta Auditorum.
244 THE CLAN DONALD.
Earl of Huntly in 1474, and this also was the theme
of remonstrance by the King, who, in the month of
March, sent letters to both Earls " for stanching of
the slachteris and herschippes committit betwixt
theer folkis."^
Whatever may have been John's relations to the
Scottish Crown, on the one hand, or to his neigh-
bours in the North and West, on the other, his
intercourse with his own dependants seems to have
been of the friendliest and most peaceful character.
So true is this that beyond the granting of charters
to some, and the confirmation of grants to others,
the records of the period have almost nothing to say
as to the relations between the superior and his
vassals of the Earldom of Koss, while in the Lord-
ship of the Isles, since the last outbreak of Donald
Balloch, a wonderful and unwonted calm seems to
have reigned from 1462 to 1475. All this is an
indication that whatever may have been the foreign
relations — if we may use the term — of the Earl of
Ross and Lord of the Isles, there seems to have
been harmony and concord between his subjects and
himself.
At last the ominous quiet is broken, and all at
once there is a great convulsion and upheaval. The
Treaty of Ardthornish is exhumed, dug out of the
oblivion to which for twelve years it had been con-
signed, and in which, no doubt, its perpetrators
prayed that it might for ever rest, and the rash and
daring instrument, which aimed at the destruction
of a great State, is thrust upon the notice of an
astounded and indignant nation. The Scottish
Government felt that the ship of State had been
sailing among hidden yet dangerous rocks, and that
1 Treasurer's Accounts, vol. I., 48.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 245
serious disaster had by no means been a remote
contingency, and it was determined to take resolute
and immediate action against the only party to the
compact on whom the hands of the Executive could
be laid. The Earl of Douglas was an outlaw beyond
Scottish jurisdiction ; Donald Balloch was secure
from danger amid the Antrim glens ; and so the
Earl of Ross, perhaps the least culpable of the con-
tracting parties, becomes the victim and scapegoat
of the conspiracy.
Highland historians do not afford us much assist-
ance in tracing the causes which led to the disclosure
of this treaty, a disclosure which was, to all appear-
ance, a gross breach of faith on the part of the
Power in whose archives the document must have
been preserved. Yet the causes that led to the
revelation of the secret may be estimated with
tolerable accuracy, if not with absolute certainty.
In 1474 Edward IV. was contemplating the invasion
of France, and, in the circumstances, he deemed it
his wisest policy to secure his frontiers at home by a
treaty of friendship with the Northern Kingdom.
A treaty was consequently drawn up, the main pro-
vision of which appears to have been, that a contract
of marriage should be entered into between the
Prince of Scotland, son of James HI., and Cecilia,
daughter of the English King, the subjects of this
interesting arrangement having attained respectively
to the mature ages of two and four years. Into the
details of this international compact, which never
came to anything, it is beside our present purpose to
enter. We refer to it because it indicates new and
friendly relations between the two countries, and
because it would be impossible for Edward IV.,
under the conditions that had arisen, to continue
246 THE CLAN DONALD.
the promises of support to the Earl of Douglas, or
abide by a treaty which was a standing menace to
the quiet and integrity of the sister land. There
was nothing therefore more natural than that in the
course of friendly negotiations between the two
kingdoms, in 1474, the Treaty of Ardthornish should
have issued out of its obscurity, and become the
signal for hostile proceedings against the Earl.
After the discovery of the Treaty, the Govern-
ment seems to have lost little time in calling John
of Isla to account for his twelve-year-old treason,
and an elaborate process was instituted against him
in the latter months of 1475. On the 20th
November of that year. Parliament met, and an
indictment containing a formidable record of his
political offences was drawn up. In the forefront of
the crimes of which he is accused stands the Treaty
of Ardthornish, but other charges of treasonable con-
duct are likewise included in the document. The
various letters of safe conduct to English subjects
passing to and fro between the two countries, the
rebellion of 1463 and the imperative commands
issued then to the King's lieges to obey his bastard
son Angus on pain of death ; the campaign of Donald
Balloch, his siege of Rothesay Castle, and his
depredations in Bute and Arran, with the slaughter
of many of the King's subjects, events of a much
earlier date than the Treaty of Ardthornish ; in fact,
the whole sum of John's offences from the beginning
are all narrated with greater or less fulness. John
himself, hereditary Sheriff of Inverness, being under
the ban of the law, Alexander Dunbar of Westfield,
Knight, Arthur Forbes, and the King's herald, are
conjointly and severally appointed Sheriffs of Inver-
ness, by special royal warrant for the legal execution
DECLINIi; OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 247
of the summons. These emissaries of the law are
commanded to present the summons personally to
John, Earl of Ross, in presence of witnesses, and it
is enjoined that this be done at his Castle of Ding-
wall, but the prudent proviso is inserted, if access
thereto should with safety he obtained. Failing this
safe delivery of the citation at the Castle, it was
provided that it should be made by public pro-
clamation at the cross and market place of Inverness,
while it bore that the Earl of Boss must appear in
presence of the King at Edinburgh, at the next
Parliament to be held there on the 1st December
following. It is noticeable that, while the Parlia-
ment which authorised the summons met on the
20th November, 1475, the document was issued
under the great seal at Edinburgh, on the last day
of the previous September. It is evident that
Parliament was simply called together to endorse
what the royal prerogative had already enacted.^
The next step in the process was the execution of
the royal summons, and this also took place before
the meeting of Parliament on 20 th November. The
copy of the execution of citation being drawn out,
not as usual in Latin, but in the Scots tongue of the
day, may here be quoted verbatim, though very
much a repetition of what has gone before : —
"The xvj day of Octobere zeire of oure Lorde J*^ iiii° Ixxv
zeres I Unicorne pursewant and Sheriff of Innuerness in thus part
specially constitiit be our souerain lord the King be these his
letteres past to the Castell of Dingwail in Roisse and askit
entrance to the presens of Johne Erie of Rosse and lorde of His
the quhilk I couth no get and than incontinent at the zetts of
samyn Castell I summond warnit and chargit peremptorly the
said John erle of Rosse to compear personaly befor our souerain
lord the King in his burgh of Edinburgh in his next pliament thar
^ Acts of the Scottish Parliament, vol. II., p. 108.
248 THE CLAN DONALD.
to be holdin the first day of the moneth of december next to cu
with coutinuation of days to ansuer til our said souerain lorde
hienes in his said parliament upon the tresonable comonyng with
o\ir souerain lordes ennemys of yngland and for the tresonable
liges and baudes mad be him with Edvarde King of Yngland and
Inglysmen And for the tresonable comonyng with the tratour Sre
James of Douglas sumtyme erle of douglas And for the tresonable
help council fauore and supple gevin be him to the sayme
tratour And for the tresonable gevin of save conductes to our
souerain lordes ennymys of yngland And for the tresonable
usui'pacione of ouere souerain lordes autorite in makin of his
bastard sone a lieutennand to him within ouere souerain lordes
Realme, and comittand powere to Justify to the dede oure
souerain lordes lieges that ware in obedientis to him And for the
tresonable connocacione of ouere souerain lordes lieges and
sezeing of his castel of Roithissay in bute and birning slaing
wasting and distrueying of oure souerain lordes lieges and
landes of the He of bute efter the forme contenit in letteres And
also to ansuere upone al uder crymys ofFensis transgressionis and
tresonable dedes comittit and done be the said Johne erle of
Rosse tresonably againe ouere souerain lorde and his Realme and
til al ponctis and articulis contenit in thes letteres and efter the
forme of the samyn And this execucione I maid befoir thir witnes
donalde waitsone m°beth Thome donaldsone wil adamsone Johne
of paryss and diuersis utheris And attour the samyn day befoir
the samyne witnes 1 summond the said Johne to compere as
said is in al forme and effect aboue writtyne And also the samyn
day at the markat corsse of Inuernes I summonde be opin
proclamacione the said Johne erle of Roysse in forme and effect
aboue writtyne to ansuere till the punctis and al articulis contenyt
in this summondes as said Is befor thir witnes Johne leffare henry
finlaw bailzeis of the said burgh Johne of dunbare Archibald
brothy and diuersis utheris In wittness of this my executione I
have affixit my sele to this my Indorsyng day zeire and place
befor writtin
" Et sic est finis executionis" ^
Two other similar instruments containing weari-
some repetitions of the summons and, to the non-legal
mind, abounding in superfluities follow after the
foregoing, the sum and substance of the enormous
^ Acts of the Scottish Parhament, vol. II., p. 109.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 249
mass of verbiage being that John is cited to appear
at Edinburgh before a Parliament to be held on the
1st of December, 1475. In due course the Conven-
tion of the Estates of Scotland met, and full
certification was given that the Earl of Ross had
been lawfully cited at the cross and market place
both of Dingwall and Inverness, John not com-
pearing, Andrew, Lord of Avondale, Chancellor of
Scotland, by command of the King, charged him in
presence of the assembled nobles with the high
crimes and misdemeanours already fully detailed ;
upon which it became the unanimous finding of
Parliament that his guilt was established. Finally,
judgment was given by the mouth of John Dempster,
Judge for the time being of the Court of Parliament,
that for the treason proven against him, John, Earl
of Ross and Lord of the Isles, had forfeited his life
as well as his dignities, offices, and possessions,
which latter were thereby alienated not only from
himself, but also from his heirs forever, and attached
to and appropriated by the Crown. ^
These drastic proceedings of the Scottish Parlia-
ment, were immediately followed by formidable
preparations, to wring from the attainted noble by
force what he would not voluntarily concede. Colin,
Earl of Argyle, already scenting from afar the broad
acres of the Island lordship, willingly adopted the
role of public policeman, and accepted with alacrity
of a commission to execute the decree of forfeiture
which had recently been pronounced.^ It does not
appear, however, that Argyle was entrusted with
the reduction of the Earl of Poss to submission, for
in the following May a strong expeditionary force
was raised and divided into land and naval sections,
^ Acta of Scottish Parliament, vol. II., p. 111. - Argyle writs,
250 THE CLAN DONALD.
under the command of the Earls of Athole and
Crawford respectively, for the invasion of John's
extensive territories.^ As it turned out, forcible
measures ceased to be necessary when, on the advice
of Athole, the King's uncle, John at last agreed to
make a voluntary submission and throw himself
upon the royal mercy. Once more Parliament met,
and on 1st July, 1476, John appeared before it with
all the semblance of humility and contrition. On
the intercession of the Queen and the express
consent of the nobles, John was there and then
pardoned and restored to all the honours and posses-
sions he had forfeited. Apparently this investiture
was only a form for enabling him to denude himself
of a large portion of his inherited estate. The same
day on which he was re-instated he made a voluntary
resignation of the Earldom of Ross and Sheriffdom
of Inverness and Nairn, with all theii- j)ertinents,
castles, and fortalices to the King. He did so, the
record says, of his own pure and free accord ; but
we may well believe that this renunciation was the
condition of his being restored to favour. On the
same day the King confirmed to Elizabeth, Countess
of Ross, all the grants of lands within the Earldom
formerly made to her by the Crown, as not being
included in the foregoing renunciation.^ John,
having made these concessions, received in recogni-
tion of his obedience a new distinction. He still
remained John de He, and retained the ancient
heritage of his house with the old historic dignity,
the Lordship of the Isles, which no Scottish monarch
had bestowed and, from the Celtic standpoint, none
could take away ; but the ancient honour, with all
^ Chronicle of the Earls of Ross, pp. 15, 16.
^ Acts of the Scottish Parliament, vol. II., p. 113.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 251
the proud memories it enshrined, was now combined
with the gaudy tinsel of a brand new, spick and span
title of Baron Banrent and Peer of Parliament.
It soon appeared that the King and Government
were not completely satisfied with the reduction
which had thus been made in the power and
possessions of the Chief of Clan Donald. On the
26th of July, the same month that witnessed his
surrender, resignation, and partial reinvestiture, he
received a formal charter^ for all the territories
which it was resolved by the Government he should
be peimitted to retain. This charter contains evi-
dence that John was deprived of territories other
than those he gave up in his resignation of 1st
July, namely, the lands of Kintyre and Knapdale,
with which exception all the other estates which
belonged to him in the Lordship of the Isles
were allowed to remain in his possession. The
historian of Sleat connects the loss of these
lands with certain dealings which John had with
Colin, Earl of Argyle, and while the details of his
story do not seem very probable, there is every
likelihood that that wily and unscrupulous nobleman
and courtier may have had something to do with
that unfortunate occurrence. This charter of 1476
contained other important provisions connected with
the transmission of the still important possessions
and honours of the House of Isla. John had no
legitimate male issue, but the family succession was
secured to his natural son Angus, and failing him,
to his natural son John and their heirs after them,
failing legitimate issue of their father's body.
It is thus plain that the situation, however
disastrous, was not withoiit its compensations, and
1 Reg. Mag. Sig. VIII., No. 132.
252 THE CLAN DONALD.
that John issued out of the terrible ordeal in which
the Treaty of Ardthornish placed him, with as little
loss of outward estate as could possibly have been
expected in the circumstances. Others not more
guilty had lost life and property. The comparatively
fortunate result may be attributed, less to his own
sagacity and force of character, than to the leniency
of the Crown, and contemporary records are pretty
clear in showing that, in the eyes of the King, blood
was thicker than water, and that John's kinship to
the royal line of Scotland had much to do with the
large measure of clemency that was displayed.
Had John been a stronger man than he was, with
the political calibre of his namesake " the good," or
had he possessed the lofty qualities of his father
and grandfather, he might either have avoided the
pitfalls that lay in his path, or made a better fight
for the interests at stake when the liour of trial
came. But John, even discounting the forces he
had to contend with, was the weakest potentate of
his line, and there must be something after all in
the verdict of Hugh Macdonald, that he was a
" meek, modest man. . . . more fit to be a
churchman than to rule irregular tribes of people."
Taking all these things into consideration, the
position in which John found himself after the con-
vulsion of 1475-6 was still not unworthy of the
traditions of his house ; and the family of Isla,
though the glory of their territorial position was
much bedimmed, still occupied one of the highest
places among the nobles of the land. It also
appeared as if an era of peace and friendship with
the Crown was beginning to dawn upon the House
of Macdonald when, not long after the reconstruction
of John's estate, his son Angus married a daughter
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OE ISLA. 253
of that eminent Scottish courtier, Colin, Earl of
Argyle. That instead of a time of peace, a period of
almost unprecedented turmoil and conflict was at
hand, events were soon to show.
The scant records of the time distinctly prove
that the large sacrifice of his status and possessions,
which the head of the Clan Donald had been com-
pelled to make, proved exceedingly unpopular among
those chieftains and vassals who were directly
descended from the family of the Isles. The exalted
station of the head of the House of Somerled shed a
reflected lustre, not only on the chiefs of the various
branches, such as the Clanranalds, the Sleats, the
Keppochs, and others, but upon every individual
who bore the name, and in whose veins ran the
blood of Macdonald, and who exulted in the prestige
and renown of his chiefs. For many ages the Lords
of the Isl ?s had represented the ancient Celtic spirit
and social life in Scotland, which outside their
influence had been rapidly disappearing, and despite
the paramount and growing power of the Scottish
national system, these potentates had continued to
maintain, and even to enlarge, their territories.
Hence the idea was bound to prevail and gather
force, that the Lord of the Isles, in surrendering
great interests without afibrding his devoted vassals
the chance of striking a blow in defence, had failed
to keep untarnished the name and honour of his
clan. Tlie historian of Sleat has recorded that a
chief cause of John's unpopularity, during the days
of his undiminished greatness, among his Clan
Donald vassals, lay in his improvident grants of
land to the chiefs of other clans who were vassals of
the Isles, such as the Macleans, Macleods, Maoneills,
and others. All these, however, occupied extensive
^5i THE CLAN DONALD.
tracts of territory in feu from John's predecessors,
and it does not appear from the evidence of history
that John was in this respect so much more lavish
than his sires, or that he to a large extent
impoverished the heritage of his Family. In the
eyes of those who sighed over the fading glory of
his House, the gravamen of his offence consisted in
his not only parting with the Earldom of Ross,
which was, after all, but a recent possession of the
Island Family, but what was perhaps more galling
to the amour j^^^opre of the Clan, his tamely giving
up the patrimonial lands of Kintyre and Knapdale,
the heritage of the Clan Cholla from far distant
times. This was undoubtedly the universal and
deeply seated sentiment of his Clan — a sentiment
not only in itself excusable, but springing from a
just self-respect, and burning as it did with a fiery
glow in the bosom of many a valiant clansman, it
needed only a leader or head to give it fitting and
powerful expression.
It is equally intelligible that the other vassals
should have regarded the crisis from a somewhat
different point of view. The clans other than Clan
Donald, who held their lands from John, had greatly
increased in power and dignity under the kindly
sway of the Lords of the Isles. The loss of sway
by their superior did not, however, imply their
decadence. On the contrary, the greatness of the
Family of the Isles overshadowed their attempts at
self-assertion, and the signs of a new order of things,
in which they might rival the historic house in pro-
perty and influence, were naturally not unwelcome.
Thus there came to be a parting of the ways between
those clans that held their territories, less on account
of ties of kinship, and more by the bonds of feudal
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 255
tenure, and those other tribes who regarded the
Lord of the Isles, not merely as the superior of their
lands, but as the acknowledged head of their race.
No doubt these other clans, forming as they did a
component part of the Island lordship, were still
deeply interested in the preservation of the Celtic
system which that lordship represented, and, as a
matter of fact, we find them in after years fighting
strenuously for its restoration. Yet at this parti-
cular crisis these clans were undoubtedly less zealous
for the maintenance of the honour and glory of the
House of Isla than the Clan Donald itself, and that
most probably for the reasons that have been
assigned. Hence we find them adhering to the
Lord of the Isles in his attitude of concession and
submission, while the Clan Donald, eager for the
maintenance of the ancient power of the Family,
sympatliised with a policy of greater boldness and
less compromise, while they found in Angus Og, the
son and heir of John, the hero and exponent of their
aspirations.
We are far from giving an unqualified assent to
the verdict of previous writers who have dwelt uj)on
the career and character of Angus, All modern
historians who have discussed the theme, from
Gregory^ — who says that the violence of his temper
bordered on insanity — down to the latest historian
of the Clan, have limned his portrait with brushes
dipped in darkest hues. To say the least of it, the
materials for the formation of any such judgment
are of the scantiest. That Angus behaved with
brutal violence to his father, is a statement that has
been accepted upon the sole authority of the historian
of Sleat, who has circulated not a few myths in
^ Highlands and Islands, p. 54.
256 THE CLAN DONALD.
connection with the Clan of which he writes. The
tradition of filial impiety he has embodied in the
strange tale, that Angus Og in his family residence
at Finlaggan drove his father out of seven sleeping
apartments successively, at last compelling him to
take shelter under cover of an old boat for the night,
and that next morning, on returning to the house, the
old man uttered maledictions against his son.^ A
legend such as this, in which, like all legend, there
may be a germ of truth, would need strong con-
firmatory evidence to make it credible in all its
improbable details, and may very well hav^e been
propagated by the vassals of the Isles other than
Clan Donald, who supported the yielding policy of
John, and were antagonistic to the stronger attitude
of his son. That in the circumstances which led
Angus in public matters to oppose his father,
regrettable scenes may have occurred, angry words
been spoken, and stormy interviews taken place by
which the two became estranged, may freely be
admitted. That Angus was hot tempered and even
violent, in an age when the Pagan virtues of courage
and determination were more esteemed than the
Christian graces of patience and self-restraint,
especially in a fierce and warlike community, need
not be denied; but that his fiery temper partook of
the insanity and unreasoning fury which historians
one after another have described, there is really no
evidence to prove. It is not surprising that the
circumstances of his family and race, and the
depressed condition into which they had fallen
under his father's reign, proved vexing to a proud
and resolute spirit, and if it is borne in mind that
his eflbrts were all along directed towards the re-
'■ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISL.i. 257
building of the ruined fabric of the family state,
his conduct will appear intelligible, and from his
particular standpoint worthy of praise.
Whatever estimate may have been formed of
Angus Og by the outside world — and, no doubt,
he proved himself a terror to his foes — he was
certainly a great favourite with those of his name
and lineage. Not only did they esteem his heroism
and regard him as the restorer of their pristine
greatness, but they loved him for his own sake.
He possessed the popular manners and generous
impulses of his race. He was open-handed and
liberal with his means, and while he was brave as
a lion on the field of battle, he followed with zest
those sports and recreations with which even the
most warlike beguiled the tedium of peace. He
was a keen lover of the chase, and his unbounded
hospitality in the banquetting hall was affectionately
remembered in after times. He also seems to have
possessed the same pleasing aspect and luxuriant
flowing locks which were characteristic of his scrip-
tural prototype — the rebellious son of David. ^ Such
was unquestionably the verdict of his contemporary
clansmen, and their devotion was evinced by the
unanimous support accorded him in all his under-
takings. Such could hardly have been the case
had Angus Og been the deep dyed villain whom
certain historians have portrayed.
There is very great uncertainty as to the sequence
of events during the years that followed the for-
feiture and partial restoration of John, Lord of the
Isles. Down to the fall of the Lordship of the Isles,
chronological difficulties abound. There is evidence,
however, that from 1476 onward, Angus Og, sup-
^ Poem by John of Knoydart in the Dean of Lismore's book.
17
258 THE CLAN DONALD.
ported by the general sentiment of the Clan, resisted
what with some reason was considered his father's
pusillanimous surrender. Undoubtedly the begin-
ning of the long series of troubles, which filled the
remaining years of the history of the Lordship of the
Isles, was associated with John's deprivation of the
lands of Knapdale and Kintyre. Castle Swin, in
North Knapdale, long ago the scene of Alexander
of Isla's discomfiture by Bruce, and destined in a
future century to play a part in the annals of the
Clan, was from 1476 to 1478 the scene of operations
evidently carried on for the restoration of the sur-
rounding territory to the family from which, in the
opinion of its vassals, it had been unrighteously
diverted. Whether the Lord of the Isles had been
art and part in the rebellious proceedings or not, he
was held responsible for what was done, and the
following summons issued to him in 1478 contains an
account of the hostilities which called for the
attention of the Government : — •
"Parliament held in Edinburgh 6th day of April, 1478.
" The seventh day of the moneth of Aprile the secund day of
the said Parliament Johnne lord of the His lauchfully personali
and peremptoiirli summond to the said day to ansuer to owre
souerain lorde the King in his said parliament for his tresonable
assistence covmsale fauoures help and supportacioune geveing to
his Rebellis and tratoures being In the Castell of castelsone^ And
for art and part of the tresonable stuffing of the said Castell with
men vitalis and Arm is for weire And for the tresonable art and
part of the holding of the said Castell contrare to the Kinges
maieste. And for his manifest Rebellioun agane the King oure
souerain lord making weire apoune his lieges Attoure his forbid-
ding And for supportacioune and Resetting of the Kingis Rebellis
donald gorme and Neile Makneile and thair complices the quhilkes
dali Invades the Kinges lieges and distrois his landes. And for
uther tresouns transgressionis and Rebelliouns again oure said
■* Castle Swin,
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 259
soueraiu lordes maieste wro* and committit. The said lord being
oft tymes callit and not comperit the summonds being lauchfull
tyme of day biding thereafter Ouer souerain lord with the
avise of the thre estatis continewis the said cause and accioun of
summondis maid uppoune the said Johnne of Islis to the secund
day of the moneth of Juin nixt to cum with contlnuacioune of
dais to his parliament to be haldin at his burgh of Edinburgh
And to begyn the first day of this moneth of Juin forsaid w*
continuatione of dais.
" In the sammyn forme strinth and effect as it now is." ^
The opinion has been advanced that a second
forfeiture ensued as a consequence of the rebelHon
which the foregoing citation records, and that,
similar to the first, it was soon followed by John's
second reinstatement in his property. The evidence
for this belief is contained in a charter of 16th
December, 1478, containing very nearly the same
provisions as that of 1476. Had not the forfeiture
taken place a second time, it is supposed that this
re-grant would have been unnecessary, both charters
having been given under the hand of James III.,
and neither requiring confirmation save in such cir-
cumstances as we have described. It is not clear,
however, that any such forfeiture and restoration
took place in 1478, or that the charter of that year
contains proof of such. As the tenor of tliat docu-
ment shows, there is simply a confirmation by the
King, now having attained his majority, of the
grant made by him, as a minor,^ to John, Lord of
the Isles, in 1476. In other respects, both charters
are in identical terms. Similar provision is again
made for continuing the family succession through
Angus Og, and as John, the second son of the Lord
of the Isles, is not mentioned in the deed, we
conclude that he died in the interval. It seems
1 Acts of Scottish Parliament, vol. XH., p. 115.
260 THE CLAX DONALD.
probable that John satisfied the Government that
the irregularities complained of had been perpetrated,
if not without his knowledge, at anyrate contrary to
his wishes, and that he was successful in procuring
pardon for his son, Angus Og, who was now
beginning to display decided symptoms of unwilling-
ness to accept of the situation created by the
misfortunes of his father.
From 1478 to 1481 a fair condition of tran-
quillity seems to have prevailed in the Highlands
and Islands generally. The Government seem to
have been so convinced of the loyalty of John of
Isla. that in the latter year large tracts of land in
Kintyre, formerly in his possession, were now
re-conveyed by royal charter for his life-time, as an
acknowledgment of faitliful service. It may be of
interest to some of our readers if the places desig-
nated in this charter are here detailed. They are
as follows : —
"The 12 merklands of Kille'wnane, the 6 merklands of Owgill,
Auchnaslesok, Acheucork and Kenochane, the 9 merklands of the
two Knokreuochis, Glenmorele, Altnabay, BaduflP, et Areakeauch ;
the 5 merklands of the two Tereferguse and Largbane ; the 3
merklands of Kynethane and Hening ; the 6 merklands of the two
Knokantis and Calybole ; the 5 merklands of Lossit and Glen-
hawindee ; the 4 merklands of Balleygrogane and Cragok ; the 8
merklands of Catadill, Gertmane, Gartloskin, Bredelaide, and
Keppragane ; the 2 merklands of Balleubraide ; the 4 merklands
of Kilsolaue ; the 2 merklands of Achnaclaich ; the 2 merklands
of Teridonyll ; the 1 merkland of Lagnacreig ; the 1 merkland of
Kerowsovre ; the 1 merkland of Gartloskin ; the 3 merklands of
Glenraskill ; the 2 merklands of Glenvey ; the 4 merklands of
Browneregyn, Drumtyrenoch, Dalsmerill, Lagnadaise, and Enyn-
cokaloch : with the half of the 1 merklands of Kildallok and
LoDochane ; the half of the 2 merkland of EUerich and Arron-
arroch ; the 13 merklands of Cralekill, Macharanys, Darbrekane
and Clagkeile ; claimed by Maknele, lying in the lordship of
Kintyre and sheriffship of Tarbert : — And also he granted to the
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 261
said John for the whole term of his life the lands underwritten,
viz. : — the 12 merklands of Arvmore : the 21 merklands of
Owragag, AchtydownegaU, Scottomrl, Drummalaycht, Downskeig,
the Lowb, Lemnamwk, Gartwaich ; the 31 merklands of Barmore,
Garalane, Achnafey, Strondowr, Glenmolane, Gleuraole, Largbanan,
Barnellane, Kowildrinoch, Glannafeoch, Ardpatrick, Ardmenys,
Largnahouschine, Forleyngloch, Crevyr, and Drumnamwkloch ;
the 4 merklands of Kilmolowok ; the 2 merklands of Drumdresok ;
the 4 merklands of Schengart; the 4 merklands of the two
Bargawregane ; the 2 merklands of Clachbrek ; the 4 merklands
of Barloukyrt ; the 1 merkland of Altbeith ; the 1 merkland of
Cragkeith ; the 27 merklands of Achetymelane, Dowynynultoch,
Renochane, Kilcamok, Gartnagrauch, and Ormsay claimel by
Maklane and Maknele and lying iu the lordship of Knapdale and
sheriffdoms of Tarbert.''^
No sooner, however, did matters seem to be
settlingr down than we find Ancfus Og; and his
clansmen once more launching the thunderbolts of
war. For the events of the period at which we
have now arrived, and embracing a long term of
vears, we have little to guide us beyond the
unreliable, conflicting, and exaggerated accounts
which have been handed down to us by family
historians, and we are like mariners on an unknown
sea, the chart for which is blurred and dim, and the
compass disturbed bv the neighbourhood of magnetic
influences. Out of these materials it seeiiis hopeless
to construct a clear, consistent, or intelligible nar-
rative. In one MS. history of the Mackenzies.
Anofus Oe: is made to fio^ht a battle which took
place after his death ; while his uncle Celestine, who
died in 1473, is killed at the battle of Park in 1491.
The battle of Lagabraad, in which the Mackenzies
were defeated bv Angrus Ogr, has failed to find a
record in the chronicles of that family, while the
battle of Park, in which the Macdonalds were
1 Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., US5.
262 THE CLAN DONALD.
worsted, is honoured with particular and detailed
notice. Such being the character of the records
with which we have to deal, it is obvious that great
caution has to be observed in separating fact from
fiction.
On the whole, there is no reason to doubt that
the invasion of Ross by Angus Og took place in
1481, nor is there any improbability in the story
that it sprung out of one of those family feuds with
which the history of the Highlands so largely
abounds, though doubtless other and deeper motives
may have been at work. On the forfeiture of the
Earldom of Ross in 1475, the Mackenzies, who had
previously been vassals of Macdonald, became
vassals of the Crown, and as such, began to assume
a certain measure of territorial dignity and import-
ance. About that time, or shortly thereafter,
Kenneth Mackenzie, son and heir to Alexander
Mackenzie of Kintail, or as he was known in his
day, Alastair Io7iraic,^ married Lady Margaret of
the Isles, daughter of John of Isla, and half-
sister to Angus Og. The lady is said to have
been blind of an eye, and her value as an eligible
bride was thereby greatly diminished in the
matrimonial market. Yet there is no doubt that
Kenneth Mackenzie, or, as he afterwards came to be
known, Coinneach a Bhlair,^ without any disparage-
ment to his dignity, was considered to have made a
brilliant match in marrying a daughter of the House
of Isla, even with so serious a facial disfigurement as
the loss of one of her eyes. Their married life was
neither long nor happy, and it is clear that Kenneth's
conception of conjugal fidelity was in no wise in
advance of the practical ethics of his day. The
^ Meaning Alexander the upright ^ Kenneth of the Battle, meaning Park.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 263
story goes that Angus Og was in the North, living
in the castle of Balconie, in the parish of Kiltearn, a
house which, with the surrounding lands, appears to
have been left in possession of the Countess of
Ross after the forfeiture of the earldom, and thus
continued a residence of the Macdonald Family in
that region. Angus, true to his reputation for
hospitality, gave a feast to the old vassals and
retainers of his family, no doubt with the object of
ingratiating himself with them, in view of possible
designs in the future. Balconie Castle was under-
going repairs, and the guests were insufficiently
provided with sleeping accommodation. Macdonald
was compelled, in consequence of this deficiency, to
arrange some of the outhouses as sleeping apart-
ments for his friends. Maclean of Duart, Macdonald's
chamberlain, offered to accommodate the redoubtable
Kenneth in the kiln, deeming that, as a friend of the
family, such a liberty might be taken. Kenneth,
with the irascibility bred of an undue sense of self-
importance, considered his dignity grossly insulted
by the bare suggestion of such an idea, and fetching
a blow with all the might of his fist, struck Maclean
in the ear and felled him to the ground. The savage
and gratuitous assault was felt to be a blow no less
aimed at their chief than at his vassal, and the Clan
Donald blood rising, weapons began to be handled.
Kenneth and his retinue, deeming it the more
prudent course to eschew the festivities, immediately
took to their heels. Finding a number of boats on
the shore below the house, they sank all but one, in
which they crossed to the Black Isle, thus for the
time being baffling all pursuit. Next day Kenneth
found his way to Kinellan, and was immediately
followed by a threatening message from Angus Og,
264 THE CLAN DONALD.
commanding himself and his father and household to
quit the place within twenty-four hours, giving the
Lady Margaret liberty to move in a more leisurely
manner, as best suited her convenience. Kenneth
was of course highly incensed on receiving such a
message, and returned an indignant answer, but
meanwhile commenced his reprisals by the cowardly
device of wreaking vengeance upon his unoffending
wife. The method of his revenge has done service
in tales of later times, but there is reason to believe
that Coinneach a Bhlair deserves all the discredit
of being the original inventor of the cruel insult.
He sent his wife home to Balconie riding on a one-
eyed horse, attended by a one-eyed servant, followed
by a one-eyed dog. Soon thereafter he took, with
no ceremony, a lady of the family of Lovat to wife,
showing the free and easy manner in which the
nuptial knot was sometimes tied and loosened in
these olden days.
The proud scion of the family of Isla could ill
brook the additional insult so savage and deliberate
in its conception. The grotesqueness of the
monocular retinue evinced a cruelty and malice
which could be interpreted in no other light than a
wanton and deliberate insult not only to Lady
Margaret but her whole kith and kin. Angus Og
was determined to be avenged upon Mackenzie ; but
it soon appeared that the private feud was but the
pretext for more extensive designs, the invasion and
forcible acquisition of the whole Earldom of Ross.
With this in view, Angus collected a large force in
the Isles, as well as in those regions of the mainland
where the Macdonald influence was still pre-
dominant. The Keppochs, Glengarrys, and many
other clansmen from the Isles rallied to his standard,
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 265
and with a formidable force he set out for Boss.
The Government, by this time realising that they
were face to face with a rebellion of some magnitude,
commissioned the Earl of Athole to march against
and subdue the Islesmen. That nobleman, putting
himself at the head of the Northern Clans, including
the Mackenzies, Mackays, Brodies, Frasers, and
Bosses, took the field against the Western host.
The two armies met at a place called Lagabraad,
and a sanguinary battle was fought, which resulted
in the triumph of Angus Og and the utter rout of
his opponents. There were slain of Athole's army
517 men, the chief of the Mackays was taken
prisoner, while Athole and Mackenzie narrowly
escaped with their lives. ^ So far as we can gather
amid so much uncertainty as to the actual sequence
of events, this battle was fought about 1483. It
proved that Angus Og, as a brave and accomplished
warrior, was second to none of his race, and that if
he had received the possessions of his house intact
he would have died sooner than surrender them.
Soon after Lagabraad, the Government gave
instructions to the Earls of Huntly and Crawford
to lead a new expedition against this formidable and
enterprising rebel ; but it is not clear whether they
took hostile action or did so with complete success.
We are equally in the dark as to the result of
Angus' victory in Boss, or whether he was able to
maintain his hold upon any part of that extensive
region. The next time light falls upon this obscure
period we find Angus in the Isles when the Earls of
Argyll and Athole have brought about an interview
between himself and his father for the purpose, it is
said, of effecting a reconciliation. Well might father
^ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis.
2'66 THE CLAN DONALD.
and son, like the Trojans of old, fear the Greeks
when they came with gifts, and it is not strange
though under such auspices meek-eyed peace would
not descend. The old lord was dominated by the
party of the Court, Angus commanded the steadfast
devotion of the Clan, and with a record of
triumphant success behind him he was not likely to
yield to the representations of the Government
without the retrocession of some at least of the
rights that had been surrendered. It would appear
that the Lord of the Isles had been consistently
loyal in his subjection to the Crown since 1476, and
that the disturbances that took place subsequently,
were regarded as being caused by his warlike son.
When the curtain next rises upon the dramatis
personcB in the Isles, Angus is on the eve of the
battle of Bloody Bay. Once more the Earls of
Argyll and Athole undertook to subdue the un-
daunted rebel, and prepared an expedition for the
purpose. The lords and chief men of the Isles,
those favouring a policy of concession and those
that supported the attitude of Angus, sailed in their
galleys up the Sound of Mull, and ranged along the
opposite side of that beauteous waterway — one of
the fairest scenes of which the Western Highlands
can boast — prepared for the internecine warfare.
The combination against Angus Og had been
organised by the two nobles whose names appear
so prominently in the annals of those years ; but
when the day of battle came they seem to have
kept at a safe distance. Thus it came to pass
that in this fight of saddest omen, the most noted
naval battle in the Isles since the davs of Somerled,
in which the ancient Lordship of the Isles was being
rent in twain, the Lord of the Isles was left in
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 267
command of the force which was to engage the
warriors of his race and name under the leadership
of his own son. The battle fought in the neighbour-
hood of Tobermory was fiercely contested and
sanguinary. Little is known of the details of this
memorable engagement beyond what has been
preserved by the historian of Sleat. Angus Og's
galleys were drawn up on the north side of
Ardnamurchan, and detained by stress of weather
for a space of five weeks. At the end of that time
the laird of Ardgour was observed sailing up the
Sound, and he, on observing Angus Og and his
fleet, at once displayed his colours. Donald Gallach,
son of Hugh of Sleat, and Ranald Bane, son of Allan
MacKuari, chief of Moidart, were in the company
of Angus Og, and they steered towards Maclean's
galley. This was the signal for the opposing force
coming to the assistance of Ardgour, conspicuous
among the rest being William Macleod of Harris.
Ranald Bane grappled Macleod's galley, while one
of Ranald's company, Edwin Mor O'Brian by name,
piit an oar in the stern-post between the helm and
the ship, which immediately became unmanageable,
and was captured with all on board. Macleod was
mortally wounded, and died shortly afterwards at
Dun vegan. Maclean of Ardgour, who was taken
prisoner, had a narrow escape for his life, Angus
Og is said bo have suggested hanging, and this
would probably have been his end were it not
that the Laird of Moidart, with a touch of humour,
interceded for him on the ground that, if Maclean's
life was taken, he himself would have no one to
bicker with. This view seems to have commended
itself to the leader, and on Ardgour taking the oath
of fealty he was spared, presumably to save Clan-
268 THE CLAN DONALD.
ranald from too monotonous a life.^ Here we are
afforded but a glimpse of an incident in this famous
sea figlit, the result of which was the discomfiture
of Angus Og's opponents and his own secure estab-
lishment as the Captain of the Clan Donald. So
far as we can calculate without accurate data, the
Battle of Bloody Bay was fought in 1484.^
Fateful events followed each other in rapid
succession during these later years of the Lordship
of the Isles, and very shortly after this victory of
Angus Og, an incident occurred which aggravated
the enmity between the opposing parties, and
became a fruitful cause of trouble for many years
to come. It is not to be forgotten that the agents
in provoking this outburst of renewed bitterness
were the two noblemen who, a few short months
before, are alleged to have done their utmost to
bury the hatchet of strife. Angus Og, as has
already been stated, was married to a daughter
of Colin, Earl of Argyle, probably about 1480, and
at the time of the battle of Bloody Bay this lady,
and an infant son Donald, were living in the family
residence at Finlaggan. The Earl of Athole, with
the connivance and assistance of Argyle, who
furnished him with boats, crossed secretly to Isla,
stole the infant son of Angus, and delivered him
to Argyle, who immediately sent him under careful
guardianship to the Castle of Inchconnel in Lochow.
The reasons for this shameful abduction do not
appear to us very far to seek. We do not wish to
bestow unmerited censure even upon the inveterate
enemy of the House of Isla, but facts, however
repulsive, must be stated unreservedly. Even the
^ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis.
^ According to a History of the Clan Maclean, by " Seanachie," the Lord
of the Isles was taken prisoner by his son at this battle — p. 24.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 269
most strenuous apologists of the House of Argyle
can hardly get the facts of history to prove that
they were either unselfish or unrewarded in their
vaunted support of Scottish nationality, or that
their conduct amid the turmoil of Highland politics
was noble or disinterested. The abduction of
Donald Dubh was an act of unspeakable meanness,
and was instigated by the basest motives. So long
as there was an heir to the Lordship of the Isles, so
long was there a likelihood at least, of the Mac-
donalds retaining the family inheritance, and so
long must there be a postponement of the family
of Argyle entering into possession of their estates.
To prevent, if possible, the Macdonald succession,
Argyle gets hold of the heir presumptive, with the
view of retaining him a perpetual prisoner. Still
further to prevent the succession of his grandson,
he concocted and got the Government to believe
the story of Donald's illegitimacy — a pure fabrica-
tion to promote his sinister ends. If Donald Dubh
was really illegitimate, that fact would of itself sufi&ce
to prevent his succession to the honours and posses-
sions of the Clan Donald, and, in the circumstances,
the Government would be most unlikely to grant
a charter of legitimation in his favour. Hence, if
the story had been true, the measure of consigning
Donald to perpetual captivity, would have been alto-
gether unnecessary. It was because of Donald's legal
birth, and his undoubted right to succeed his father,
that the dastardly device was adopted of stealing
the unoffending and ill-starred child, and making
him virtually a prisoner for life. Our aspersions
on the conduct of Argyle in connection with this
particular event are warranted by the testimony
of history. How, indeed, can we contemplate
without indignation the character of a man who,
270 THE CLAN DONALD.
to further his own schemes of pohcy, not only-
consigned an innocent grandchild to a living death,
but cast an unfounded suspicion on the fair fame
of his own daughter ?
It is not by any means surprising that this
abduction, in which A thole was the catspaw of the
crafty Argyle, caused the deepest resentment in the
breast of Angus Og, and no sooner did it come to
his knowledge than he took immediate steps to
execute vengeance on the actual perpetrator of the
deed. Collecting a band of warriors in the Isles,
Angus sailed with a fleet of galleys up to Inverlochy,
a landing-place which, from its position in the far
interior, was well adapted for a descent upon any
part of the North of Scotland. The Highland host,
disembarking in this historic scene, marched through
the great mountain passes of Lochaber and Badenoch
until at last, swooping down upon the lowlands of
Perthshire, they passed into the region of Athole.
Tidings having reached Blair of the rapid approach
of the Islesmen, and time not availing for the organi-
zation of defence, the Earl and Countess of Athole,
with a number of dependants and retainers, and a
large quantity of valuable effects, took refuge in the
sanctuary of the Church of St Bridget's. There
is great uncertainty as to the events that followed.
The facts of history have in this connection been so
twisted and misplaced, and the religious preconcep-
tions of the narrators have so obscured the issue,
that it is well nigh impossible to extricate the real
occurrences from the mythological haze in which
they are enveloped. The consequence is, that modern
Scottish historians have presented us with a blend
of legend and fact which does great credit to their
imagination and eloquence, but very little to their
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 271
critical acumen. The historian of Sleat, who at no
time is the apologist of Angus, flatly denies the
story of the burning of St Bridget's, and it is, no
doubt, to be placed in the same category of fabulous
traditions as other conflagrations with which the
family historians of the North of Scotland have
credited the Clan Donald. The same authority
remarks, with truth, that the Lords of the Isles
were generous benefactors, and not the destroyers
of churches, and this is more than can be said of
some of the historical houses that rose upon the
rains of their fallen state. Certain facts connected
with the raid of Athole seem beyond dispute. That
Angus and his followers invaded the sanctity of St
Bridget's; that they took captive within that shrine
the Earl and Countess of Athole, in revenge for the
abduction of Donald, Angus' infant son, and that
probably a quantity of valuable booty at the same
time was seized ; that Angus took the high-born
captives with him, by way of Inverlochy, to Isla, as
hostages for the restoration of his son ; that the
hurricanes of the wild western sea may have engulfed
some of the treasure-laden galleys on their home-
ward voyage ; that the leader and his captains in
after times went back on a pilgrimage, probably
directed by Mother Church, to seek the divine
mercy at the shrine which, in their wrath, they had
desecrated but not destroyed, doing so with all the
outward symbols of contrition which the piety of
the age prescribed ; and that the Earl and Countess
of Athole were unconditionally set free from their
captivity in Isla after the expiry of a year — all this
appears to be fairly well authenticated. But the
exaggerations and improbabilities that have gathered
round the facts in the pages of the credulous chroni-
272 THE CLAN DONALD.
cler — that Angus and his men burnt churches whole-
sale in the course of their march through Athole ;
that they tried three times to fire the Church of St
Bridget's, which at first miraculously resisted the
devouring element ; that when they launched out
into the open sea they were seized with such judicial
frenzy that they were unable to steer their ships,
which consequently were driven by the tempest on
a rock-bound coast and wrecked — all this belongs to
the large mass of fable with which the history of the
period so much abounds. The act of sacrilege and the
subsequent act of penitence are both characteristic of
the time. The atonement so humbly offered by
these fierce warriors from the Isles is a gleam of light
athwart the dark tale of vengeance. It shows how,
even amid the violence of war and rapine, the sense
of responsibility was but asleep, needing but the
shock of some convulsion or catastrophe to rouse it
into active being. The Raid of Athole took place
about the year 1485.
Little is known of the subsequent career of
Angus Og, until the tragic close which seems to
have taken place some five years later. So far as the
government of the Isles was concerned, his position
was unquestioned, and had his life been prolonged,
the vigour and determination of his character would
not improbably have done much to restore the
ancient power of his family. A pleasing feature in
these latter years lay in his reconciliation with his
father. Angus Og seems never to have abandoned
his scheme for the conquest of Ross, and it was
probably with the view of reducing to subjection
the old vassals of the Earldom, and particularly of
chastising the Mackenzies, that he took his last
/^ TOVT
POVER,
lORD OF^e'lLLIS
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 27S
fatal journey to the North. Angus halted at Inver-
ness, where, as was his wont, he gave hospitable
entertainment to his friends and allies in that
region. The story is told by the historian of Sleat
with his usual amplitude of detail, and bears upon
the face of it the mark of truth.
The heir of the Lewis had been recently a minor
under the tutelage of Rory Black Macleod, whose
daughter was married to the Laird of Moydart.
Kory the Black coveted the succession, and refusing
to acknowledge the true heir to the Lewis, assumed
the lordship himself His schemes, however, were
thwarted by Angus Og, who displaced Bory from
the position he usurped, and put the rightful heir in
possession, acting in the matter as the representative
of his father, of whom the Macleods were vassals.
The Lady of Moydart, Bory the Black's daughter,
moved by hatred of Angus for thus vindicating a
righteous cause, compassed his death. There was a
harper of County Monaghan, named Art O'Carby,
who was either in Macdonald's retinue or a
frequenter of his establishment. This Lnsh Orpheus
conceived a violent passion for the daughter of
Mackenzie of Kintail, who was at feud with Angus
Og, and it would appear that the Lady of Moydart
put Mackenzie up to the scheme of promising his
daughter in marriage to O'Carby if he did away
with the heir of the Isles. He made the harper
swear never to disclose the secret of who instigated
the deed. The Irishman undertook to carry out the
dark conspiracy, and in token of his villainous
intention was wont, when in convivial mood, to
repeat doggerel verses of his own composition, of
which the following is a couplet : —
18
274 THE CLAN DONALD.
" T' anam do Dhia a mharcaich an eich bhall-bhric
Gu bheil t' anam an cunnart ma tha puinnsean an Gallfit."
*' Rider of the dappled steed, thy sovil to God commend,
If there is poison in my blade, thy life right soon shall end."
One night after Angus had retired to rest, the
harper entered his apartment, and perceiving he was
asleep, killed him by cutting his throat. O'Carby
was apprehended, but never confessed who his
tempter was, or what inducement was held out as a
reward for the murderous act. Jewels found upon
him which formerly belonged to Mackenzie and the
lady of Moydart proclaimed their complicity in the
crime. The harper, according to the cruel fashion
of the time, was torn asunder, limb from limb, by
wild horses.^
Thus fell Angus Og, and although the Sleat
historian tells us that his father's curse visited him,
his theory of retribution hardly fits in to the facts
of his own narrative. Angus fell a victim, as better
men have done before him, to the malignant spite of
an unscrupulous and designing woman, and that not
for any deed of cruelty or oppression, but for
upholding the cause of justice in the succession to
the Lordship of Lewis. With Angus vanished the
best hopes of the Clan Donald for the restoration of
their proud pre-eminence, and there is surely pathos
in the thought that, as the Founder of the Family
in historic times had his warlike career cut short by
treachery, so now three hundred years later the last
direct representative of the line save one, also died
by the assassin's knife. Our estimate of his char-
acter and the date at which we have placed his
death, are both confirmed by the Irish Annals of
Loch Ce, in which at the year 1490 the tragedy is
^ Hugh Macclonald in Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 319.
DECLINE OP THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 275
thus referred to : — " MacDhomhnaill of Alba, i.e.,
the best man in Erin or in Alba of his time, was
unfortnnately slain by an Irish harper, i.e., Diarmaid
Cairbrech, in his own chamber."^
At the period to which we have now come, it
may well be said that, although many bright pages
of the story of the House of Somerled still remain
to be written, yet its heroic age as the dominant
power in the Western Isles of Scotland is beginning
to pass away. After the death of Angus, the Clan
Donald were never afterwards united under a leader
so able, or in whom they reposed such confidence.
From 1476 down to his death his father's head-
ship of the house was nominal ; for it was round
Angus that the kindred clans rallied at every
juncture that arose. On his death, John again
became the effective ruler in the Isles, and there
was still a possibility, had he possessed an imperial
spirit, of the Lordship of the Isles being maintained.
Not long after Angus' death, John, though still far
short of extreme old age, ceased to take an active
part in the government of his territories, which he
seems to have surrendered to his nephew, Alexander,
son of Celestine of Lochalsh. Alexander acted
ostensibly in the interests of Donald Dubh, who,
though still in prison, was undoubtedly heir
apparent to John ; but as there was little hope of
his ev^er being released, Lochalsh doubtless contem-
plated, with few misgivings, his own succession to
the Lordship of the Isles. At the same time it is
clear, from subsequent events, that notwithstanding
Donald's continued captivity, the Islesmen were
^ The name of the assassin given in the above authority differs from that
given by Hugh Macdonald, which is " Art" (not Diarmaid) " O'Cairbre,"
Hugh Macdonald in Coll. de Rebus Alb., p. 318,
276 THE CLAN DONALD.
unanimous in regarding him as his grandfather's
rightful heir.
It had often been the fate of the last Earl of
Ross to be under the influence of wills more imperi-
ous and resolute than his own, though, strangely
enough, he offered a stubborn resistance to the aims
and policy of his son. It was so now in his declining
years. He who had so strenuously resisted the
resolute stand made by Angus against the encroach-
ments upon the family estates, now abandoned every
attempt to curb the turbulence of his nephew, Alex-
ander of Lochalsh. Whether he approved of the
rising of 1491, or whether he made unavailing pro-
testations against it, we are unable to say. All we
know is that Alexander seems, without any delay,
to have taken up the schme for the invasion of
Koss, which was interrupted by the death of Angus
Og. Owing to his territorial position in Wester
Ross, Alexander naturall}'' possessed great influence
in that region. The extensive lands of Lochbroom,
Lochcarron, and Lochalsh were his, and he doubtless
expected that the other vassals of the earldom,
always of course excepting the Mackenzies, would
attend the summons to his banner. In this he was
to a large extent disappointed. Still his following
was a formidable one. The whole power of the
island and mainland Macdonalds, along with the
other vassals of the lordship, and the Clan Cameron,
who were vassals of Alexander for the lands of
Locheil, formed no inconsiderable array, and with
all these resources at his back, he might hope, with
some prospect of success, to win back the inheritance
which his uncle had lost. Indeed, he possessed far
greater resources than Angus Og was ever able to
command, in view of the divided state of the Lord-
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 27f
ship of the Isles in his time. We have no reason to
doubt the personal bravery and prowess of Alex-
ander, but he seems to have lacked that inexplicable
power of organising forces and leading them to
victory w4iich is born with a man, and constitutes
the true commander. Alexander and his army,
taking the time-honoured highway, marched through
Lochaber into Badenoch, where they were joined by
the Clan Chattan, under the command of Farquhar
Mackintosh, captain of the Clan. Arriving at Inver-
ness, which he stormed and garrisoned, and where
he was joined by Hugh Rose, younger of Kilravock,
the only vassal of the Earldom that seconded his
undertaking, Alexander next directed his march
towards Ross. Invading the Black Isle, he and his
host penetrated to its extremest limit, plundering
the lands of Sir Alexander Urquhart, Sheriff of
Cromarty. Authorities are agreed that at this stage
Lochalsh divided his forces into two sections, one
detachment having been sent home with the spoil,
while the other marched to Strathconan to ravage
and lay waste the Mackenzie lands. Like almost all
the chronicles of this age bearing upon the history
of the Highlands, the aimals of this campaign
abound in absurd inaccuracies and exaggerations.
When we find a mythical Celestine^ performing deeds
of valour, and meeting with a hero's death ; Angus
Og or his father" taken prisoner, but soon thereafter
magnanimously released by Coinneach a Bhlair ;
Alastair lonraic, who died in 1488, giving his
benediction to his son before going to battle ; a
supernatural being of diminutive stature appearing
^ For this and the most of the other fictions, the aijocryphal MS. history
of the Mackeuzies, belonging to the Cromartie Family, is responsible.
2 It is difficult in some parts to make out wliether John of Isla or his son
Angus is meant.
278 THE CLAN DONALD.
and vanishing mysteriously, and in the interval
doing great havoc among the invaders,^ — when we
find all this taking place at the Battle of Park in
1491, we are warned that the stories of the Northern
chronicles of the time must be accepted with great
reserve. In these circumstances, we do not attach
the slightest credence to the legend of Contin Parish
Church being set on fire by Alexander of Lochalsh
and his men on their march from Strathconan.
Neither do we believe that Alastair lonraic, having
departed this life three years previously, could have
congratulated his people — as he is said to have done
— that now this sacrilegious act had enlisted Omni-
potence on the side of the Mackenzies. The whole
bombastic and inflated Mackenzie history of Blar na
Pairc is correct only in this one particular, namely,
that the Macdonalds were worsted, and had to retire
from Ross.
So far as we can gather, the sober facts of history
in this connection are clear enough. Alexander and
his men arrived at Park late in the evening after
harrying and laying waste the lands of Strathconan.
Wearied with the day's labours, they slumbered on
the field, and apparently committed the fatal over-
sight of keeping neither watch nor ward. Mean-
while Kenneth of Kintail, who was by all accounts
a brave warrior, had assembled his available strength,
and now under the silence of night, while the Isles-
men were asleep, bore down upon their encampment."^
The Macdonalds were taken completely by surprise,
and there ensued one of those panics which some
times, like an electric shock, have been known to
pass through bands of armed men. Their con-
fusion became hopeless and inextricable, and was
^ New Statistical Account of FoMvrty, p. 255.
2 Hugh Macdoiiald in Cull. <Se-Re)). Alb., p. .321.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 279
aggravated by the boggy nature of the ground
which lay between them and the river Conon, but
with which their enemies were well acquainted.
There is no reason to question the tradition that,
while many were put to the sword, a considerable
number were drowned in the Conon, towards which
they were driven by their triumphant foes. Such
was the Battle of Park, an illustration of the
advantage possessed by an enemy, resolute and
wary, taking an encampment by surprise. The
result was the retirement of Alexander of Lochalsh
from Ross, and his abandonment for the time being
of all attempts to accomplish its conquest. It has
been held by some that Park was fought in 1488,
but the evidence is all in favour of the later date.
Angus Og was alive in 1488, and it is not likely
that he would have played a subordinate part in
such a campaign, or that Alexander would have
borne the prominent part he did had Park been
fought in the lifetime of John of Isla's son. We
find also that in 1492 Sir Alexander Urquhart
obtained restitution on behalf of himself and others
for the spoil carried away by the Islanders, and it
is very unlikely that a claim of such magnitude
would have lain dormant from 1488.^ Hence there
seems little doubt that the Battle of Park was
fought in 1491.
The invasion of Boss, undertaken undoubtedly
with the view of gaining forcible possession of the
Earldom, which was since 1476 vested in the Crown,
could not fail to be regarded as an insurrection
against the State, and, as such, calling for the
^ The apoil amounted to 600 cows autl oxeu, SO lior«es, 1000 .slieei), 200
swine, 500 bolls victual— plenishing £300 in value, and £'600 of the mails of
the Sheriff's lands.
280 THE CLAN DONALD.
severest measures. Whether John of the Isles
approved of his nephew's rebelUon or not, it appeared
to the authorities that the time had come for depriv-
ing him finally of every vestige of power he possessed.
If he aided and abetted in the proceedings of 1491,
he would appear to the Government in the light of
a hopeless rebel, into whom the experience of forty
years failed to instil the lessons of loyalty. If he
disajiproved of but failed to prevent the disorderly
proceedings in Boss, his deprivation would seem
equally called for, on the ground of his utter inability
to exercise authority in the regions or over the
vassals subject to his sway. It was on one or other
of these grounds that in May, 1493, John was
forfeited in all his estates and titles, and this
measure was formally implemented by himself in
1494, when he made a voluntary surrender of
them all.^
Thus fell the Lordship of the Isles, and with it
the dynasty which for hundreds of years had con-
tinued to represent, in a position of virtual inde-
pendence, the ancient Celtic system of Scotland.
The natural result of such a catastrophe was that
for a long term of years the region that had been
ruled by these Celtic princes was subject to pro-
longed outbursts of anarchy and disorder. There
arose a vacuum in the social system which the
authority of the Scottish State, anti- Celtic as it had
increasingly become, failed adequately to fill up.
Social order depends as much upon sympathy with
the governing Power as upon force, and the amal-
gamation of the Celtic and Saxon elements of
Scottish society must inevitably prove a long
[>vocess. Still further, while the feudal position of
^ There .-^eem^ to be no public record of thia tinal forfeiture.
DECLINE OF THE HOUSE OF ISLA. 281
the Lordship of the Isles was one that Parliament
could abolish, the Highlanders regarded it, not as a
feudal, but as a Celtic dignity, older than, and inde-
pendent of, the Scottish State — a dignity which no
individual could surrender, and no King or State
could destroy. Thus it was that for two generations
after John's forfeiture Highland politics swayed
between efforts on the part of the Crown to reduce
the Clans to subjection, on the one hand, and
spasmodic movements by the Clans, on the other,
to restore the Celtic order which they loved, by
rallying to the banner of one scion of the Family of
the Isles after another, each of whom laid claim, with
more or less appearance of justice, to the ancient
honours of his house.
Events of consequence transpired between John's
political demise in 1494 and his death in 1498, but
these will more ajDpropriately fall to be considered
in a succeeding chapter. At this stage we can most
fittingly record the few facts that are known
regarding the declining years of the last of the
Earls of Ross and Lords of the Isles. What we do
know of the fallen potentate during his latter days
gives us a sad picture of departed greatness. He,
the descendant of kings, lived as a pensioner upon
the bounty of James IV. down to the day of his
death, having his clothes and shoes and pocket
money doled out to him like a pauper. The general
belief has been, and historians have consistently
followed one another in stating, that after his
forfeiture John lived and died an inmate of the
Monastery of Paisley, an institution that had in
former years enjoyed the munificent patronage of
the House of Isla. The records of the period tell a
somewhat difierent tale.^ The monastery doubtless
^ High Treasurer's Accounts.
282 *HE CLAN DONALt>.
was his home, but he sometimes left it, paying
visits, among other places, to his old dominions in
Lochaber and the Isles. At last we find him falling
sick at Dundee, where he dies in an obscure lodging-
house, and the sum due to his landlady and the
expenses of his " furthbringing'" are charged to the
Scottish Treasury.^ All this is quite consistent with
the tradition that his remains were buried at his
own request in the tomb of his ancestor, Bobert II.,
in the ancient Abbey of Paisley,^ whither they must
have been conveyed all the way from Dundee.
Here closes the record of a " strange eventful
history" — and as we part with this last of the line
of Somerled, who swayed the sceptre of the Gael in
the ancient Kingdom of the Isles, we conclude with
the legend which seems more descriptive than any
other of so much glory and so great a fall, Sic
transit gloria mundi.^
1 " Item (Feb. 5, 1498), to Pate Sinclair, to send to Dunde to pay for
Johuue of Islis furthbringing and berying, and to lones his gere," i.e., to
settle with his landlady. — The High Treasurer's Accounts.
2 Hugh Macdonald in Coll. de Reb. Alb., p. 317.
^ Successive historians have spoken of John in his latter years as the
" aged" Lord of the Isles ; but as he was only 18 when he succeeded his father
in 1449, he could only have been 67 at his death.
THE CLA^ DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 283
CHAPTER XL
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV.— 1493-1519.
State of the Highlands after the Forfeiture of the Lord of the
Isles. — James IV. visits the Highlands, and holds Court at
Duustaffnage. — Several Highland Chiefs submit to the King.
— The King at Tarbert in Kintyre. — Left Garrisons at
Tarbert and Duuaverty. — Revolt of the Clan Iain Mhoir. —
The King at Mingai'ry receives Submission of many of the
Highland Chiefs. — Legislation for the Isles. — Rebellion of
Alexander of Lochalsh. — The King grants Charters at his
new Castle of Kilkerran, in Kintyre. — The King revokes
Charters formerly granted by him to the Highland Chiefs. —
Rebellion of Donald Dubh. — Legislation for the Highlands. —
Appointment of Sherifts. —The position of the different
Brandies of the Clan Donald.— The Highlanders at Flodden.
— First Rebellion of Sir Donald of Lochalsh. — Second Rebellion
of Sir Donald of Lochalsh. — His Death.
The fall of the Lordship of the Isles, consequent on
the forfeiture of John, resulted, as might have been
expected, in much disorder and bloodshed. The
Celtic system, which had flourished for centuries
under the suzerainty of the Scottish State, was
deeply rooted in the Highlands and Islands, and
was not easily supplanted by the desperate policy of
destroying " the wicked blood of the Isles" pursued
by the King and his advisers. The Celtic system,
on the whole, had worked well, and suited the genius
of the people. This will become apparent if we draw
a parallel between the state of the Highlands during
the period of the Lordship of the Isles and that
which followed down to the abolition of the Herit-
284 THE CLAN DONALD.
able Jurisdictions. No doubt the downfall of the
Lordship of the Isles and the final overthrow of the
Celtic system were brought about entirely by the
restlessness of and the short-sighted policy pursued
by the Island Lords themselves, and considering the
chequered history of each successive head of the
family, we only wonder how the present catastrophe
has been averted so long. If John, the last Lord of
the Isles, had pursued a more prudent line of policy
towards the Scottish State, the Celtic system would
undoubtedly have lasted longer, and its gradual
merging into feudal Scotland would have averted
much of the bloodshed and turmoil of the next
hundred years.
James IV. set himself to solve the difficult and
formidable problem before him with much energy
and perseverance. His policy at first, though firm,
was conciliatory. He resolved on visiting the High-
lands, making himself acquainted with the vassals of
the Isles, and with the real state of matters in the
altered circumstances consequent on the forfeiture of
the Island Lord. On the 18th of August, 1493, we
find him at DunstafFnage, where he held Court, and
received the homage of several Highland chiefs, and,
among others, of John of Dunnyveg, John Cathanach
his son, John Maclan of Ardnamurchan, and Alex-
ander of Lochalsh.^ In October of the same year he
visited the North Highlands, very probably not on
State business, but on one of those frequent pilgrim-
ages which he took to the shrine of St Duthus in
Tain.^ James was so desirous of conciliating the
^ At " DunstaSynch," the King, on the 18th of August, 1493, confirms
John Ogilvy in the barony of Fingask. — Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., No. 2171.
- On the 25th of October, 1493, the King grants a charter, at the Castle
of Dingwall. Gregory is mistaken in saying that the liing held Court at
Mingarry on tha,t date. — Vide Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., 2181.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 285
Clan Donald vassals that he knighted Jolin of
Dunnyveg, the son of Donald Balloch, and Alex-
ander of Lochalsh, and confirmed them in their
lands.^ The honour conferred on Alexander of
Lochalsh and the leniency shown to him are all the
more remarkable on account of his recent rebellion
against the King's authority. It would appear that
he, and not Donald Dubh, notwithstanding the
charter of 1476, which makes Angus Og heir to the
Lordship of the Isles, is of all the Macdonald chief-
tains the one looked upon as having the best claim
to the forfeited Island honours, and the most likely
to push that claim. It was, no doubt, with this in
view that the King, wishing to attach Alexander to
his interest, conferred upon him the honour of knight-
hood. The favour bestowed on the son of Donald
Balloch was no less remarkable, in view of the
treasonable conduct of both father and son in con-
nection with the Treaty of Ardthornish. The other
Clan Donald vassals, consisting of Allan of Moydart,
John of Sleat, John Abrachson of Glencoe, and
Alister Maclan of Glengarry, had not yet acknow-
ledged the new order of things. The only chieftain
of the Clan Donald who made any show of loyalty
was Maclan of Ardnamurchan, whose allegiance and
services at this time and afterwards were amply
requited at the expense of the other clansmen.
Notwithstanding the King's conciliatory measures,
the Islanders seem slow to accept them. The King
was perhaps too precipitate in his legislation for the
Highlands. We have no reason to suspect his
sincerity, but his zeal was without knowledge. The
Scottish Kings had not hitherto troubled themselves
much with the personal oversight of their Celtic
' Treasurer's Accounts, 1494,
286 THE CLAN DONALD.
subjects. A wide gulf separated Highlander and
Lowlander, both socially and racially, and it was not
to be bridged over by a few flying visits by King
James to Kintyre and Mingarry. These visits
lacked the sympathy in dealing with the situation
which would have cemented the Highland chiefs to
the Scottish throne. The policy of legislating for
the Highlands from the Lowland point of view was
pursued, and as subsequent events show, it proved
futile, if not indeed disastrous. The Highland
problem was one the solution of which seemed
entirely beyond the capacity of the Lowland mind.
Though, as we have seen, a few of the vassals of the
Lordship of the Isles had made a show of allegiance
at Dunstaflfnao'e, manv others still remained unsub-
missive. Their conduct rendered it necessary for
the King to again visit the Highlands. At the
head of a strong military force he pushed his way
westwards as far as Kintyre.^ The Castle of
Tarbert was erected, as we have already seen, by
Robert Bruce to check the power of the Island
Lords. Here the King, with the view of strength-
ening the defences of the important peninsula of
Kintyre, left a strong garrison. He also took
possession, apparently without any opposition, of
the Castle of Dunaverty, a stronghold of the
Macdonalds, in South Kintyre, which, situated on
the top of a tremendous precipice, nature, assisted
by art, rendered impregnable. Having made
Dunaverty secure, as he thought, against any
possible assault, the King returned South by sea.
What success attended his visit to the Highlands
in the way of receiving the submission of those
chiefs who had hitherto held aloof we have no means
^ Treasurer's Accouuts for 1494.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 287
of knowing, though it would appear from after
events that the success of his expedition in this
respect fell far short of his expectations. He had
already so far conciliated the Clan Iain Mhoir by
confirming them in at least the principal lands
which they held under the Lords of the Isles, that
opposition on their part was not looked for. The
King, however, had taken the precaution in case of
revolt to place the district of Kintyre under mili-
tary surveillance. By this bold stroke of policy he
expected to overawe the men of Argyle, but he soon
found out his mistake. Though the district of
Kintyre was resigned by John, Lord of the Isles, in
1476, many of the same lands were afterwards
restored to him in 1481, and whether the lands
possessed by the Clan Iain Mhoir were in any way
affected either by the forfeiture of 1476, or the
restoration of 1481, there seems every reason to
believe that the family were in possession of almost
the whole lordship of Kintyre in 1494. It was
not, therefore, we think, the loss of their lands in
Kintyre, as suggested by Gregory, that roused this
family into opposition to the King's policy ; it was
rather the presence of a military force in their midst
that the proud spirited Lords of Dunnyveg could
not brook. The King had barely gone on board the
ship that was to carry him back to Dumbarton,
when Sir John of Dunnyveg, assisted by his son,
John Cathanach, besieged Dunaverty. After a
stout resistance on the part of the Lowlanders, Sir
John and the men of Kintyre took possession of the
Castle, and hanged the King's governor over the
precipitous rock on which that stronghold stood.
The King, who from the deck of his ship witnessed
this horrible deed, vowed vengeance, as might have
288 THE CLAN DONALD.
been expected, on the Lord of Dunnyveg, who
by and by was made to pay the penalty of his
daring.
It may be as well at this stage to refer to the
confusion which seems to exist with reference to the
family of Dunnyveg and the part played by the
different members of that family in the history of
this time. It has generally been believed that the
rebel who defied the King in Kintyre was John
Cathanach, while his father, John, the son of
Donald Balloch, has been entirely dropped out of the
history of the family. No doubt John Cathanach
played a conspicuous part in the history of those
stirring times. He had been fostered with the
O'Cathans, his mother's kin, in Ireland, where love
to the Saxon was not, we may be sure, one of the
graces with which his young mind was imbued.
In any case, John's character was intensely Celtic,
and he bore no love to his Saxon neisfhbours. Some
have asserted that John, the father of John Cath-
anach, died before his own father, Donald Balloch.
We find Donald Balloch witnessing at Isla a charter
of John, Lord of the Isles, on the 20th of August,
1476, and-a.s we hear no more of him, and being a
very old man, he probably died shortly after that
event. ^ At all events, as we shall soon see, his son
John, and his grandson, John Cathanach, perished
together for the part they took in the affair of
Dunaverty. That the John who was knighted by
the King shortly before this time was not John
Cathanach, but his father, is proved beyond any
manner of doubt by the royal charter of lands in
Isla granted to John Maclan of Ardnamurchan for
apprehending " Johannes de Insulis de Glennys
1 Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., No. 1277.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMICS IV. 289
militis, Johannes Caynoch, ejus filii, et complicum
suorum."^ The King, immediately on his return
South, sent a messenger to Kintyre to summon Sir
John of the Isles for treason, which no doubt refers
to his conduct at Dunaverty.^ Sir John ignored
the summons, but the King employed other and
more effective means of apprehending the rebel.
Maclan of Ardnamurchan, as we have seen, is
already in high favour with his sovereign. There
had been a dispute between him and Sir John of
Dunnyveg over the lands of Suanart, and therefore
no love was lost between the clansmen. Maclan
had besides married a daughter of the Earl of
Argyle, and through this matrimonial alliance had
become a tool in the hands of that crafty nobleman,
which he was not slow to use against the Clan
Donald. Instigated by Argyle, Maclan treacher-
ously apprehended at Finlaggan, in Isla, in the end
of the year 14 94, " Sir John of the Isles and Glens,
John Cathanach his son, and their accomplices,"
and brought them to Edinburgh, where, after being
convicted of high treason, they were all hanged on
the Boroughmuir, and their bodies were buried in
the Church of St Francis, then called the New
Church.^ The exact date of the execution of Sir
John of Dunnyveg, and his son John Cathanach, is
not given by any authority, but it may be taken for
gr-anted that it took place shortly after they were
apprehended, and, therefore, about the beginning of
1 Argyll Charter Chest. The Charter is dated 29th March, 1499, and is
given in full in " The Book of Islay," pp. 28-30.
^ In the Treasurer's Accounts for the year 1494, the sum of £6 13s 4d is
charged as having been paid to a messenger " to passe to summond Sir John
of the Ills of treasone in Kintyre and the expensis of the witnes." — Pitcairn,
vol. I., p. 116.
^ MacVuirich in Reliq. Celt., p. 163.
19
290 THE CLAN DONALD.
the year 1495. According to Gregory, four sons of*
John Cathanach were executed with their father on
the Boroughmuir, but the references he gives are
the Charter of 1499, ah^eady quoted, MacVuirich,
and Hugh Macdonald. In the charter there is no
reference to any son of John Cathanach, while
MacVuirich has it that three sons of John Cathanach
were executed, namely, John Mor, John Og, and
Donald Balloch.^ Hugh Macdonald, in his MS.,
printed in the Collectanea de Bebus Albanicis, says
that " Alexander of Kintyre and his two sons, one
of whom was called John Cathanach, were by the
Kinof's orders hansfed at the Borrowmuir, near
Edinburgh, because after the resignation of John of
the Isles they neither would take their rights from
the King nor deliver up to him those lands which
Macdonald had in Isla and Kintyre."^ In the
portion of his manuscript still unpublished, Hugh
Macdonald, referring to John Cathanach, says that
at the instigation of Argyle and Glencairn, Mac-
Ian of Ardnamurchan apprehended him and his
two sons, John Galld and John Gallach, and
brought them to Edinburgh. Thus we see how
Hugh Macdonald contradicts himself as well as
MacVuirich, while Gregory, so persistently and
slavishly copied by all who have come after him,
misquotes both Hugh Macdonald and MacVuirich,
as well as the Charter of 1499. In that charter it
is stated very clearly that Maclan of Ardnamurchan
is rewarded for apprehending " John of the Isles and
Glens, Knight, John Cathanach, his son, and their
accomplices." We have no hesitation in accepting
the authority of the charter and refusing to accept
^ MacVuirich in Reliq. Celt., p. 163.
2 Hugh Macdonald in Coll. de Rebus Alb., p. 324.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER. JAMES IV. 291
statements so confusing and contradictory as those
of Hugh Macdonald and MacVuirich.
All the sons of John Cathanach, as well as Alex-
ander and Angus Ileach, would have found refuge
from the Koyal vengeance and the persecution of
Maclan in the Antrim Glens. According to Mac-
Vuirich, Maclan destroyed nearly the whole race of
John Mor. He pursued Alexander, the son of John
Cathanach, to the Glens of Antrim, which evidently
at that time were thickly wooded, for Maclan
expended much wealth in making axes to cut down
the trees, so that the Lord of the Glens and his
followers would have no hiding place within their
ov/n territory.^ Maclan, however, notwithstanding
all the gold and silver spent by him on instruments
of destruction, did not succeed in driving Alexander,
the son of John Cathanach, out of the Antrim Glens.
Though banished from Scotland, the Clan Iain
Mhoir held considerable sway in Ireland, and were
able to check the progress of the English invaders
through Northern Ulster. It is almost certain
that none of them ventured to return to Scotland
durinof the lifetime of James IV.
After the episode of Dunaverty, the King paid
several visits to the Highlands in close succession.
Many of the chiefs still held out, but James was
determined to bring them to subjection. Besides
the Castles of Tarbert and Dunaverty, which he had
already garrisoned, he also placed strong garrisons
in Mingarry, and Cairnburgh,^ in Mull, and having
secured these, which were the most important
defences in Argyleshire, he set about making pre-
parations for a military exjiedition on a large scale.
^ MacVuirich in Reliq. Celt,, p. 165.
" Treasurer's Accounts for the year 1494,
292 THE CLAN DONALD.
About midsummer, 1495, he left Glasgow at the
head of a strong force, and marched to Dumbarton.^
At Dumbarton he embarked his troops, and pro-
ceeded by the Mull of Kin tyre to Mingarry, in
Ardnamurchan, where he held Court.^ Awed by
the presence of so formidable an armament in the
Western seas, many of the chiefs hastened to Min-
garry and paid homage to the King, among whom
were Allan of Clanranald, John of Sleat, and Donald
of Keppoch. Maclan had already shewn much zeal
in the King's service, and had recently been rewarded
by a gi-ant of lands in Isla.^ Thus all the Macdonald
vassals within the Lordship of the Isles, with the
exception of Macdonald of Glencoe and the banished
Macdonald of Dunnyveg, submitted to the King,
and the aspect of affairs augured well for the future
government of the Southern Highlands at least.
The King went back to Edinburgh quite elated
at the success of his efforts, and to ensure the success
of his policy he called a meeting of his Council, and
submitted to them measures for the better govern-
ment of the Isles. The Council passed an Act which,
in the present unsettled state of the Islands, if
carried out, could hardly fail to be productive of
good fruit. This Act provided that every chief must
be answerable for the serving of summonses and
other writs against his own clansmen, under the
penalty of being himself liable to the party bringing
the action. "* As a result of these proceedings, several
chiefs appeared before the Council in Edinburgh,
' Treasurer's Accounts for the year 1495.
- " At Meware iu Ardmurquhaue the King granted a charter on the 18th
May, 1495, to Sir WiUiam Stirling of Ker."— Reg. of Great Seal, vol. II., No.
2253.
^ Reg. of Great Seal, 14th June, 1494, vol. II., No. 2216.
■» Acta Dom. Con. VIII., folio 39.
TFIE CLAN DONALD UNDEE JAMES IV. 293
among whom were Maclan of Ardnamurchan, Clan-
ranald, and Keppoch, and bound themselves by a
bond of £500 each to refrain from injuring one
another/ What effect this Act had on those whom
it concerned, we know not, but it manifests, at all
events, the earnest desire of the King to bring about
peace and good government in the Isles.
The state of matters in the North Highlands did
not render it necessary for the King to devote so
much attention to that region. We find hini indeed
often visiting the North during those years, but
always in a ver}'- different capacity from that in
which we find him in Argyleshire. The great object
of the King's visits was the shrine of St Duthus in
Tain, which, in James's eyes at least, had a peculiar
sanctity. His father had endowed the Church of
St Duthus, and the King almost yearly went to
Tain to worship at the sacred shrine. Interesting
glimpses may be gathered from the Treasurer's
Accounts of the King's visits to Hoss-shire. On one
occasion we find him at Dingwall, after his devotions
in Tain, evidently bent on devoting his time more
to the pursuit of pleasure than to the exercises
of piety. The Treasurer charges to tlie Scottish
Exchequer the sum of ten shillings and six-
pence given to the King "for playing at tho
cartis," while one shilling and sixpence is paid to
the " maddins" that sang l)efore His Majesty. Tlie
neighbouring magnates send presents to the King.
Lord Lovat sends " ane hert and ane ram," the
Bishop of Eoss " ane selch and oysteris," while
another sends " ane flacat of aqua vite." Twenty
years have now elapsed since the Lord of the Isles
resigned the Earldom of Ross, but the vassals of the
^ Acta Dominorum Concilii, VIII., fol. 39.
294 THE CLAN DONALD.
Earldom were not in any way affected by the final
forfeiture of that nobleman and the fall of the Icland
Lordship. With very few exceptions, the vassals of
Koss never were very sincere in their attachment to
the Lords of the Isles, while, on the contrary, the
vassals of the Isles had always been loyal, and when
therefore the Lordship of the Isles came to an end
through the forfeiture of John in 1493, the result
was open rebellion on the part of the Islesmen
against the Scottish State. We have seen that
Alexander of Lochalsh was not among the Mac-
donald chieftains who paid homage to the King
at Mingarry Mackenzie of Kintail, a vassal of
Koss, and Mackintosh, one of the vassals of
the Isles, were at this time thrown into prison
in Edinburgh. Mackenzie, though nearly related
by marriage to the Island family, was very pro-
bably convicted for the excesses committed by him
after the Lochalsh rebellion of 1491, and not for any
help he had given, or was likely to give, to the
rebels of the Isles. His family, on the contrary, had
all along opposed the Lords of the Isles in Ross-
shire. The case of Mackintosh was entirely different.
Besides his close blood relationship to the Lords of
the Isles, his family had been greatly enriched by
them with grants of lands in Lochaber. It is likely
enough, therefore, that his imprisonment at this
time was the result of his opposition to the new
order of thinofs both in Ross and in the Isles.
Though the northern portion of the Highlands was
thus meanwhile in a comparatively quiet state, it was
not destined to remain so for any length of time,
Alexander of Lochalsh, notwithstanding the favours
bestowed upon him by the King, ventured once more
into the arena of rebellion. His motives in raising
again the flag of revolt are not far to seek. His former
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 295
rebellion undoubtedly brought about the final for-
feiture of the Lord of the Isles, and he perhaps
thought the present a favourable opportunity to
strike a blow for the restoration of the family
honours in his own person. The King had of late
paid little attention to Highland politxs, his
Majesty's time being absorbed by English intrigue,
and that foreign impostor, Perkin Warbeck. It is
not at all likely that Lochalsh had the Earldom of
Ross in view, though, according to Hugh Macdonald,
he put forward a claim as tutor for Donald Dubh.
It appears that the King himself looked upon Alex-
ander as the nearest heir to the forfeited Lord of the
Isles, for he received a promise from His Majesty
that the tenants of the Lordship would have security
in their holdings.^ It is hardly conceivable that with
so small a following Lochalsh could have had the
presumption to attempt the restoration of the Island
Lordship in his own person. This, however, and
nothing less, was the goal which he had set before
himself, and he no doubt expected that the vassals
would all in time join his standard. He opened his
campaign by making a descent on his Ross-shire
neighbours, in revenge for his defeat at Pai k. After
ravaging several districts with fire and sword, he
was at length met at Drumchatt by the Muniois
and Mackenzies, and, according to the historian of
the Sutherland Family, was there defeated with
great slaughter.^ Alexander now betook himself to
the Isles, and went south as far as Colonsay, with
the view, according to Hugh Macdonald, of raising
more men to recover his lands in Ross,^ but more
probably with the object of creating a rebellion for
1 Vide Charter to I^uald MacAUan oi C'.aniaiuild in KugisLer of Great
Seal, vol. II., No. 2438.
- Gordou'd Family of Sutherlaud, p. 77.
* Hugh Macdonald, iu Coll. de Kebus Alb., p. 321.
296 THE CLAN DONALD.
the purpose of recovering the Island Lordship. In
this, however, he was not successful. The strong
defensive measures taken by the King had had their
effect on the Islesmen, and they were not prepared,
however much they wished it, to join in an insur-
rection against the Scottish Government. Alex-
ander of Lochalsh had barely time to mature his
plans, whatever these may have been, for he perished
by the hands of the assassin, at Orinsay, very soon
after his arrival at Colonsay. The foul deed was
perpetrated by his own kinsman, Maclan of Ardna-
murchan, either to please the King, or Argyle, or
both. According to the seanachies of Sleat and
Clanranald, Maclan had as his accomplice on this
occasion Alexander, the son of John Cathanach,^ but
that hero, as we have seen, took refuge in Ireland
after the execution of his father and grandfather in
1495, and as he did not venture to set foot on
Scottish soil again for many years after the murder
of Alexander of Lochalsh, he cannot have been
guilty of the serious crime alleged against him.
The King after a short interval again devoted
his attention to the South Highlands. Not
regarding the two fortresses of Tarbert and
Dunaverty as affording sufficient protection to his
lieges in Kintyre, he built another stronghold at
Kilkerran. In the summer of 1498 he visited
Kintyre, and held court at Kilkerran, where several
chiefs came to meet him and renew their allegiance.
Here the King granted several charters, the first of
which is dated on the 30th of June, while the last is
dated on the 5th of August, which indicates a long
stay on this occasion at his new Castle of Kilkerran.^
1 H. Macdonald, in Coll. de Kebus Alb., i^. 321. MacVuirich, in Reliq.
Celt, p. 165.
- Register of the Great Seal, vul. II., pp. olo-18.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 297
Part of that time at least was devoted to the
setthng of disputes between the Clanranald and
Clan Uisdean on the one hand, and the Clan
Uisdean and the Macleods of Dunvegan on the
other. On the 3rd of August the King granted a
charter of lands in Uist to Ranald MacAllan for
services rendered by him in time of peace, and again
on the 5th of the same month other lands in Uist,
Eigg, and Arisaig are granted to him.^ In the
latter charter the King confirms to Ranald the
lands resigned in his favour by John, the son and
heir of Hugh of Sleat. The Clanranald family,
however, never obtained possession of the lands in
Skye and North Uist, formerly held by Hugh of
Sleat. The King also on the 5th of August granted
a charter of lands in Benbecula in Uist, in Moror,
and in Arisaig, to Angus Reochson MacRanald, all
of which formerly belonged to Hugh of Sleat. ^ At
the same time the lands of Troternisli, with the
bailliary of that district, were granted to Torquil
Macleod of Lewis and his heirs by Catherine,
daughter of Archibald, Earl of Argyle.^ Here it is
evident "we have material for family feuds for many
a long year to come.
The King had no sooner returned from his long
sojourn in Kintyre than he revoked the charters
recently granted by him, as well as all others
which he had formerly granted to the vassals
of the Isles. What induced him to change his
policy so suddenly, in view of its apparent
success, is not at first sight easily understood.
We are not long, however, left in any doubt
as to the real cause of this sudden turn in the
i Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., No. 2437 and 2i38.
- Ibidem, No. 2349. ^ Ibidem, No, 1424.
^98 tMe clan DONALD.
tide of affairs. The King early next year visits
Kintyre to initiate his new policy. He grants a
commission of lieutenandry to Archibald, Earl of
Argyle, over the whole Lordship of the Isles, and
appoints him Keeper of the Castle of Tarbert and
Bailie of Knapdale. He also gave the Earl a com-
mission to let on lease for three years the whole
Lordship of the Isles, except Kintyre and Isla.^
Thus it is only too evident who had induced the
King to change his plans in regard to the Govern-
ment of the Isles. The crafty Argyle succeeded in
persuading the evidently too impressionable James
that he had acted far too leniently towards the men
of the Isles, and that a less conciliatory policy would
in the long run prove the wisest. The King's
conduct in breaking faith with the Islanders and
yielding to the evil counsel of the wily schemer
cannot be too severely condemned. It was conduct
altogether unworthy of a King, and such as to make
us suspect the genuineness of his motives in every
previous effort made by him to legislate for the
Islands. Argyle succeeded in attaining the object
of his ambition, but not, as we shall soon see, in
making the Islanders more law abiding, or more
loyal to the throne. His administration had, on
the contrary, the very opposite effect. It seems
that the King, no doubt at the instigation of
Argyle, had resolved to expel the Macdonald land-
holders from their possessions, as well as other
vassals who were supposed to be favourable to the
claims of Donald Dubh, and others, to the Lordship of
the Isles. As long as any claimant to the forfeited
Island honours remained there was danger of an insur-
rection in the Islands, and the King had evidently
^ Register of the Privy Seal, Book I., folio 3 ; also fol. 108, 122.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 299
come to the conclusion that the only cure for these
disaffected Islanders was expulsion from their
possessions. This proved, however, a difficult task,
but James was determined to give effect to his new
scheme. To strengthen his government in the
Highlands, he began to parcel out the lands of the
Lordship of the Isles among his own favourites.
To John Maclan of Ardnamurchan, presumably
" for his good and faithful service done and to be
done" to the King, and " for the taking, trans-
porting, and handing over to him of the rebels, John
of the Isles and Glens, John Cathanach, his son,
and their accomplices," a charter was granted of
many lands in Isla and Jura.^ To Stewart of Appin
the King granted a charter of the lands of Glencoe
and Duror f while Lord Gordon, the eldest son of
Huntly, received a charter of many lands in
Lochaber.^ The first step taken in the process of
expelling the vassals of the Isles was to summon
them before the Lords of Council for not having
charters for their lands, but, as might have
been expected, none appeared in response to the
summons, and decree accordingly was pronounced
against them.* This was the signal for rebellion.
Donald Dubh, who had been kept in custody ever
since he was a child, was looked upon by the
Islanders as the heir to the Lordship of the Isles.
It was also well known to the Government, though
for political reasons it was not acknowledged, that
Donald was the lawful son of Angus Og, who, by
an Act of Parliament in 1476, was declared heir
to his father, John, Lord of the Isles.
1 " The Book of Islay," pp. 28-30.
" Register of the Privy Seal, Book T., fol. 99.
^ Register of the Great Seal, vol, II., No. 2259.
■* Acta Com. Con. XI., folio 13.
300 THE CLAN DONALD.
The Islanders were now compelled by the harsh
measures adopted against them to take steps to
defend their territories, and they naturally turned
to Donald Dubh as their legitimate leader. Means
were taken secretly to effect Donald's escape from
Inchconnel, where he was kept a close prisoner by
his maternal grandfather, the Earl of Argyle. This
was accomplished, evidently without much difficulty,
by the men of Glencoe, who, by what MacVuirich
calls " a fenian exploit," broke into his dungeon and
released the heir of Innsegall.^ Donald had no
sooner been set free than he betook himself to the
Isles. He was loyally received by the vassals,
and was forthwith proclaimed Lord of the Isles.
Torquil Macleod of Lewis, who was one of
the most powerful of the vassals of the Isles,
was the first to join the standard of the
newly proclaimed Island Lord, and being closely
related to him by marriage, he took Donald
meanwhile under his protection in his Castle of
Stornoway. The Macdonald standard was now once
more set up in the Isles, and the old vassals, with
very few exceptions, made haste to join it. The
Macleans, the Camerons, the Mackinnons, the Mac-
leods, the Macneills, the Macquarries, and others,
were all ready to strike a blow for the fatherland
and the heir of the House of Isla, The rebellion
very soon assumed a formidable appearance, and the
Islanders, being determined to restore the old Celtic
order of things, sought the assistance of both England
and Ireland. This we learn from the proceedings of
the Parliament which met in 1503, but there is no
evidence of the assistance sought having ever been
rendered, and it may have been, after all, nothing
more than mere suspicion on the part of the Scottish
'■ MacVuirich, in Reliq. Celt., p. 168.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 301
Government.^ What defences the Islanders made
against a Lowland invasion, or whether they waited
to be attacked in the Isles, we have no means of
knowing, for very meagre details of this insurrection
have been preserved. It is very probable, however,
that the Islanders were themselves the aggressors,
and that they did not wait to be attacked. As
evidence of this, we learn from the proceedings
of the Parliament which met in 1505 that the
Islanders, under Donald Dubh, invaded the main-
land hi 1503 and advanced to Badenoch, which they
wasted with fire and sword.' At the same meeting
of Parliament a letter was read from John Ogilvy,
Deputy Sheriff of Inverness, setting forth that he
had been unable to apprehend Torquil Macleod,
summoned for assistance given to " Donald Yla
bastard sone of umquhile Anguss of ye His alsua
bastard sone of umquhile Johne lord of ye His," and
for insurrection, and taking part in invading the
King's lieges in " maner of batell." It appears from
Ogilvy's letter that Donald Dubh was proclaimed
not only Lord but King of the Isles, and that his
ambition was to set up a Celtic Kingdom altogether
independent of Saxon Scotland.^ The letter also
refers to the depredations committed by the Islanders
on the King's lieges on the mainland, and it would
appear from the whole tone of it that the rebels had
ravaged the country to a considerable extent before
their progress was stopped by the Royal forces.
The King, who was fully aware of the movements
of the Islanders, recognised the magnitude of the
revolt against his authority, and without delay took
the strongest measures to quell the rebellion. He
^ Acta of the Parliament of Scotland, vol. IL, p. 240.
2 Ibidem, p. 263. ^ Ibidem, 263-4.
302 THE CLAN DONALD.
now probably saw the folly of his harsh proceedings
in the Isles and the policy inspired by Argyle. A
meeting of Parliament was summoned to consider
the situation in the Highlands, and elaborate
preparations were made to bring the unruly inhabi-
tants into subjection. Torquil Macleod of Lewis,
the leader of the vassals in the Isles, was declared
rebel, and all his lands in the Isles and on the
Mainland were forfeited to the Crown. ^ Efforts
were made at the same time to win over the other
Island leaders, but in vain. In these circumstances,
the King fell back on his original policy of expelling
" the broken men," or, in other words, all the
rebellious vassals of the Isles and their adherents.
For the carrying out of this measure, commissions
were given to the Earl of Huntly, Lord Lovat,
and Munro of Fowlis, but no success attended their
eiforts, whatever these may have been, and the tide
of rebellion still rolled on with great fury. At length
the Government adopted still stronger measures.
It was resolved to proceed against the rebels both
by sea and land, and an effort was made once more
to secure the services of some of the rebel chiefs by
offering them large bribes, with the alternative of
the pains and penalties of treason. Lachlan Maclean
of Do wart had been already forfeited and declared
traitor for " maintaining, fortifying, and supplying
of Donald, bastard and unlauchtfull sone of Anguss
of the Ylis, bastard son to umquhile Johne of the
Ilis."^ Ewen Allanson of Lochiel had also been
declared traitor for intercepting the King's letters,
and the " withhaldin of his messingers and berars of
ye said letrez in presone."^ The Government ordered
^ Acta Dominorum Concilii, Book XII., p. 123.
2 Acts of Pari., vol. II., p. 247. ^ ibidem, p. 248,
TtlE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 303
letters to be sent to Maclan, Maclean of Lochbuy,
Macleod of Dunvegan, Ranald Allanson of Clan-
ranald, MacNeill of Barra, Mackinnon, Macquarrie,
and Torquil Macleod, informing them of the forfeiture
of Laclilan Maclean of Dowart and Ewin Allanson
of Lochiel for usurping the King's authority and
offering them, if they should assist in bringing these
rebels to justice, grants of half their forfeited lands ;
while in the event of their refusing to give this
assistance, they shall be " reputt art and part takars
with thaim and be accusit and followit on tresonne."^
The Earl of Huntly undertook to deliver the letters
of Ranald Allanson and Mackinnon, Argyle those of
Maclan and Maclean of Lochbuy, while to the Bishop
of Boss was entrusted the hazardous task of
delivering the letter of Torquil Macleod of Lewis. ^
It is somewhat surprising to find the name of
Torquil Macleod, so recently declared traitor,
amongst those to whom overtures were made on
this occasion by Government. His name was
included probably on the suggestion of his father-in-
law, the Earl of Argyle, with the view, even at this
late hour, of winning him over to the side of law
and order. Of the fate of the Government missives
the annals of the time have nothing to say, but it is
certain that no heed was paid to them by the rebel
chiefs.
These overtures having entirely failed in their
object, the Government prepared for an invasion of
the Highlands and Islands on the most elaborate
scale. One division of the royal forces, commanded
by the Earls of Marshall and Argyle, was sent to
1 Acts of the Parliament of Scotland, vol. II., p. 248.
- Ibidem,
304 THE CLAN DONALD.
invade the Islands from the South by Dumbarton,
while another division under the command of the
Earl of Huntly, with the Earl of Crawford and Lord
Lovat, went North. The Castles of Strome and
Ellandonan were the most important places of
defence on the West Coast of Eoss-shire. Huntly
undertook to reduce these, and to supply, or raise,
men, to keep them, which was " rycht necessar for
the danting of the Isles/' on condition that the King
should furnish a ship and artillery for the purpose.^
What success attended the efforts of Huntly to
reduce the Islesmen we know not, but it is evident
the artillery necessary for the storming of Ellan-
donan and Strome were not forthcoming, and that
without such aid it was v^ain to attack them.
The Castles of Kintyre had been in possession of
the King since 1493, but as the rebellion centred
more in the North than in the South Isles, these
were for the present practically valueless as places
of defence. No details of the movements of either
division of the royal army have been preserved.
We can, however, infer that little success attended
their efforts to suppress the rebellion in the Isles.
We can well understand the difficulties in the way
of the invading forces owing to the inaccessibility of
the Islands and their natural defences, but these
were all in favour of the rebels, who might have
held out much longer if only unanimity had
prevailed in their counsels. They lacked the per-
severance and stolid patience of their opponents,
and as success did not attend them in their first
rush for the attainment of their object, they began
to give way to despair.
1 Acts of the Pari, of Scotland, vol. II., p. 240-249.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 305
The King himself now headed a new expedition
to the Isles, but he had got only as far as Dum-
barton when an insurrection in the southern division
of his realm compelled him to return. A naval
force, however, under Sir Andrew Wood and Robert
Barton, was despatched to the Isles, while a land
force was sent under the Earl of Arran. Huntly
renewed operations in the North evidently with
greater success than had formerly attended his
efforts in that region.^ Wood and Barton directing
their course to the West Coast of Argyleshire, and
the Island of Mull, reduced the Castle of Cairnburgh
and otherwise overawed the inhabitants. The flame
of rebellion in the Isles was thus being gradually
extinguished, and some of the disaflected chiefs
were already beginning to show signs of surrender.
Macleod of Dun vegan, who had recently joined the
King's party, and Maclan of Ardnamurchan, sent
messengers to Court informing the King of the state
of matters in the Isles, and assuring him at the
same time of their readiness to assist him to the
utmost of their power to put down the insurrection.
In response to these representations, James, with
characteristic energy, at once set about collecting
an army, at the head of which he marched into
Argyleshire. John Barton was sent with a fleet to
the Isles. Whether any resistance was at first
oflered on the part of the Island Chiefs does not
appear, but before the King returned South they
all, with one notable exception, came forward and
gave in their submission. The rebellion was now
suppressed, and the King generously extended a
free pardon to the rebels, all except Torquil Macleod
^ Treasurer's Accounts for 1505.
20
306 THE CLAN DONALD.
of Lewis. The public records furnish us with only
the broad outlines of this rebellion, and only vague
hints are given as to the conduct of the leading
spirits in the movement. The only reference to the
part played by Donald Dubh and his followers is
that to which we have already alluded, and beyond
this invasion of the district of Badenoch by the
Islanders, we have not the slightest hint as to the
manner in which they conducted the war against
the Saxon. It is evident, however, from the
repeated attacks m.ade by the Lowland forces, and
the failure of one expedition after another, that the
Islanders gave a good account of themselves in the
fiofht. The unfortunate Donald Dubh, who had
been partly at least the cause of so much turmoil
during these years, and who had made so gallant a
fight for his rights, is again made a prisoner. One
of the charges made against Torquil Macleod in 1506
is his refusal to deliver up Donald Dubh to the
King. He, however, finally surrendered him to
Lachlan Maclean of Dowart, now on his good
behaviour, and he in turn gave up the fugitive to
the King. The King sent Donald a prisoner to the
Castle of Edinburgh.
Torquil Macleod still held out, fearing, no doubt
with good reason, that, if he submitted, the pardon
which had been extended to the other rebels would
be withheld from him. After being summoned to
appear before Parliament and refusing to attend, he
was again declared traitor, and his lands were for-
feited. His lands on the mainland, consisting of the
extensive districts of Coigach and Assynt, were
given in life -rent to Mackay of Strath naver, for his
good services aiid assistance in putting down the
THE CLAX DONALD UNDER JAMES TY. 307
rebellion,^ The Earl of Huntly was sent with a
force against Torqiiil, and, proceeding to Lewis, he
besieged and took tlie Castle of Stornoway. Torquil,
however, managed to make good his escape, and was
never, so far as ^ve know, brought to task for his
share in the rebelHon of Donald Dubh. We learn
from a spirited poem by the family bard, MacCalman,
the high estimation in which this Lord of Lewis was
held by his clansmen and followers : —
'■' Many liis gifts which we might praise,
Torquil of the fatuous race ;
His are a hero's strength and vigour,
Which he brings into the fight.
I say of him, and say in truth.
Since I have come so well to know him,
That never was there of his age
Better King who ruled in Lewis.
Not braver of his age was Cuchulliu,
Not hardier was he than Torquil." -
In 1508, Andrew, BishojD of Caithness, Ranald
Allanson of Clanranald, and Alexander Macleod of
Dunvegan were commissioned by the King to let
for five years, to sufficient tenants, the lands of
Lewis, and of Waternish, in Skye, which were
forfeited by Torquil Macleod of Lewis.'' When the
extensive estates of the Siol Torquil, consisting of
Lewis, and the district of Waternish, in the Lord-
ship of the Isles, Coigach, in the Earldom of Ross,
and Assynt, in the Earldom of Sutherland, were
restored to the family, in 1511, the rebel Torquil
was probably dead, for, if living, he would not have
^ " Rex, — pro bono servitio in resistatioue et invasioue rebellium suorum,
— concessit Odoni Makky in Stratlinavern, pro tempore ejus vite, — ten-as de
Assent et Ladachchogich, i*cc., quequidem regi pertinebant ratione forisfacture
super Torquellum Makoloid olim de Le%vis," &c. — Eeg. Mag. Sig., vol. II., 3202.
- The Book of the Dean of Lismore, p. 146.
3 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. III., fol. 166.
308 THE CLAN DONALD.
allowed his brother, Malcolm, take possession with-
out striking a blow for his rights.^ Now that
the last spark of rebellion had been extinguished,
comparative peace and order prevailed throughout
the Islands, and it does not appear that the King's
threat of expelling the " broken men" had been
carried out, at least to any appreciable extent. A
very different policy seems to have been pursued.
In the Parliament which met in 1503 an important
Act was passed bearing on the Highlands and
Islands, and which could hardly fail to have in
time a salutary effect on these regions. This
Act reformed the administration of justice, which
hitherto in the Highlands had been under the
jurisdiction of the old sheriffdoms. In the preamble
a complaint is made in the strongest terms of the
lawlessness and disorder that prevailed in the High-
lands, and especially in the Isles. The new sheriffs
appointed under the Act were to hold courts at
Tarbert in Kintyre for the Southern Isles, and at
Dingwall and Inverness for the North. ^ The Earl
of Argyle was appointed to the office of King's
Lieutenant in the Southern Isles, while to the Earl
of Huntly was committed the administration of
justice in the North.
This legislation and the policy pursued generally
towards the Highlands were, for a time at least, pro-
ductive of good results. The King now paid special
attention to the Highland portion of his kingdom,
and he seems to have been successful at last in
attaching the Islesmen to his interest. He had
made himself acquainted with the real condition of
affairs in the Highlands by his frequent visits, and
through personal contact with the chiefs he had been
1 Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. IL, No. 3578. ^ Acts of Parliament, vol. II., p. 241.
TflE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 309
able ultimately to restore order and peace among
them. We cannot praise too highly the King's
conduct for the conciliatory manner in which he
acted towards the Islanders after the rebellion of
Donald Dubh, and it says much for his sagacity as a
ruler that he had been able, in so short a time, to
bring about changes so beneficial in circumstances so
difiicult. There is every evidence that to the end of
his reign he retained great popularity with all classes
of his Highland subjects.
The light which the history of that time throws
on the position of the different chieftains of the
Clan Donald and their relationship to the Crown
waxes somewhat dim after the suppression of
the rebellion. The King, as we have seen,
revoked in the year 1498 all the charters which
he had formerly granted to the vassals of the
Isles. It appears that during the remainder of
his reign he made no further grants of lands to
the Macdonald chieftains, with the exception of
Ma clan of Ardnamurchan and Kanald Allanson of
Clanranald. The other chieftains were allowed to
keep possession of their lands without any title.
Maclan, largely no doubt influenced by the Earl
of Argyle, had all along remained firm in his adher-
ence to the King's cause, and he now reaped the
reward of his loyalty in large grants of lands which
the King bestowed upon him in Isla, Kintyre, and
elsewhere. In 1494, James granted him, for his
willing obedience and good service, a charter of
lands in Isla and Morvern — forfeited by the Lord
of the Isles — with the office of Bailie of the lands
of Isla, which Maclan had formerly held of John,
Lord of the Isles. ^ In 1499 the King makes a
ster of the Great Seal, vol. IL, Nu. 2216.
310 THE CLAN DONALD.
fm^tlier grant of lands in Isla and Jura to Maclan,
extending in all to 200 marklands/ In 1505, "for
the good, faithful, and willing service done to him.
by his dear John Makkane of Ardnamurchane," the
King confirms him in all the lands formerly granted
to him in Isla and Jura, and in the lower part of
Ai^dnamurchan and Suanart, with the Castles of
Mingarry and Dunnyveg, and the office of bailliary
formerly conferred upon him," Again, in 1506, the
same lands are confirmed to him.^ Maclan was
therefore at this time the most influential and
powerful chieftain of the Clan Donald.
Of aU the families of the house of Somerled, the
Macdonalds of Dunnyveg and the Glens fared worst.
Their history is somewhat obscure during this
period. The survivors of 1495, escaping from the
vengeance which overtook Sir John and his son,
John Cathanach, in that year, took refage in their
own territory and amongst theu^ relatives in
the Antrim Glens. Hugh Macdonald, in the un-
published portion of his manuscript, referring
probably to the period after King James's death
at Floddeu, tells how Maclan of Ardnamurchan
sent his two sons, at the head of a body of men,
from Isla to the Glens of Antrim to capture Alex-
ander, the son of John Cathanach. Alexander was
at Glensheich with 140 men when the Maclans and
the men of Isla landed. He at once attacked the
invaders, and after a sanguinary encounter, the Isla
men were worsted and most of them slain, among
the latter being Maclan's two sons. During the
engagement the Smith of Isla, followed by 50 men,
deserted the Maclans and joined the banner of the
^ Argjle Charters.
- Keg. Mag. Sig., vul. 11., No. 2895. =* Ibidem, vol. IL, Xu. 3001.
THE CLAX DOXALD UXDER JAMES IV. 311
Lord of the Glens. Alexander, with his men,
took the enemy's boats and crossed over to Isla.
MacNiven, the Constable of Dunnyveg, gave him
possession of that stronghold, and informed him
that Maclan was on Island Lochgorm, which
Alexander forthwith besieged, and Maclan was
compelled to surrender. Before doing so, however,
and agreeing to smTender his lands in Isla to
Alexander, the latter implemented the bargain by
faithfully promising to marry Maclan's daughter.^
Alexander of Dunnyveg appears to have taken no
part in the rebellion of Donald Dubh, and it is
certain that from 1495 to the death of King James
in 1513 he held no lands in Scotland.
Less perhaps is known of the history of the
family of Hugh of Sleat at this period than of
any of the families of Macdonald. John of Sleat,
the eldest son of Hugh, for some unknown reason
passed over his estates to the family of Clam^anald,
and ignored the claims of his brothers. This seems
altogether strange in view of the diflerences which
had lasted now for some time between the two
families over lands in Benbecula, for which Hugh
of Sleat held a charter. It would appear, for some
reason or another, that John had quarrelled with his
brothers, and took these steps to exclude them from
the succession. But though the conveyance of the
lands of Hug;h of Sleat to the Clanranald was ratified
by a charter of confirmation from the King in 1498,
to which we have abeady referred, it is certain that
the Clan Uisdean kept possession of their lands both
in Skye and in North Uist, though they had no
legal title. John of Sleat himself died at the very
beginning of the sixteenth century, and he tlierefore
^ Hugh Macdouald's MS.
3l^ THE CLAN DONALD.
could not have taken any part personally in the
rebellion of Donald Dubh. Donald Gallach, how-
ever, the second son of Hugh of Sleat, who became
head of the family on the death of John, played a
prominent part in the insular insurrection ; but his
career was cut short, according to the tradition of
the country, by the hand of his brother, Gilleasbuig
Dubh. From a " Respitt " granted by the King to
Gilleasbuig, and dated at Edinburgh in 1508, it
would appear that, though accused of other crimes,
the murder of Donald Gallach was not specially laid
to his charge. On the contrary, what we find is a
" Respitt to Archibald Auchonsoune of the Ilys and
XXVIII. utheris (because of thair grit lawbouris
deligence and gude and thankfull service done be
his hienes in the perserving and taking of Auchane
Duncane Dowsone, Sorle his sone, and Donald Mule
Makalester, his rebellis, and being at the home ;
and for the bringing and delivering of thaim to
be maid to his gude grace (or to quham he ordanis
thame to be deliverit be his writingis) for the
slauchter of umquhile Donald Hutchonsoune other-
wayis called Gauldlauche, bruder to the said
Archibald. And for all otheris Slauchteris, Here-
schippis, Birningis, Reffis, Murtheris, &c., before
the date of his Respitt ; for bhe space of 19
yeris. Providing alwayis that gif his said Rebellis
beis not broclit, &c., his Respitt to be of none avail,
&c. (Subscript per dominum Regem apud Edin-
burgh)."^ The persons charged here with the murder
of Donald Gallach are Auchane Duncane Dowsone,
Sorle his sone, and Donald Mule Makalester, evi-
dently Gilleasbuig Dubh's former accomplices. There
need be no donbt, liowever, notwithstanding the
' Pitcaini's Criminal Trials, vol. 1., p. lOS.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 313
attempt to shield him on the part of the Govern-
ment, that Gilleasbuig was guilty, not only of the
murder of Donald Gallach, but also of the murder of
Donald Herrach, in North Uist. These two alone
stood between him and the accomplishment of the
ambitious scheme which he had conceived of posses-
sing himself of the family inheritance. In this he
succeeded, but he soon made himself so obnoxious to
the adherents of the family that they compelled him
to surrender his newly acquired dignity. Gilleasbuig
had to reckon, not only with the Clan Uisdean, but
also with the Clanranald ; for, as we have seen, the
King had confirmed to them the lands surrendered
by John of Sleat, both in Skye and in North Uist.
Thus, hemmed in on all sides, Gilleasbuig abandoned
himself to a wild and lawless career, and in a short
time he and his piratical band became the terror of
the Western Isles. According to Hugh Macdonald,
Gilleasbuig was expelled from the North Isles by
Ranald Bane MacAUan of Clanranald, and having
taken refuge in the South Isles, he was joined by
E/Onald Mor and Alester Bearnach MacAlister, with
whom he remained for three years. With these as
his lieutenants, Gilleasbuig, at the head of his band,
plundered all the ships that passed through the
Southern seas.^ By whatever means, he, however
succeeded in again taking possession of a portion
of the territories of Clan Uisdean, and, turning
King's evidence, he was pardoned by Government
for his past crimes and misdemeanours. In
1510, at a Justiciary Court held at Inverness,
precept of remission is issued to Gilleasbuig Dubh,
Bailie of Troternish, and others, John MacGille-
martin and sixty -three others, for common
^ Hugh Macdonald.
314 THE CLAN DONALD.
oppression of the lieges, and for resetting, sup-
plying, and intercommuning with the King's rebels,
and also for fire raising/ Shortly after this
Gilleasbuig is confirmed in the office of Bailie of
Troternish, which he had assumed, by a Privy
Council missive, and the tenants of Troternish are
enjoined not to disturb him in the possession of that
extensive district.^ Thus Gilleasbuig Dubh became
at least de facto head and leader of the Clan Uisdean,
and he continued to occupy that position during the
remainder of his life. His tenure of his usurped
jDosition was, however, a short-lived one, for we find
that, on the 10th of March, 1517, the King gave to
Lachlan Maclean of Dowart the 4 marklands of
Scalpa, in the Lordship of the Isles, pertaining to
His Majesty through the decease of Archibald,
bastard son of Hugh of Sleat, without legitimate
heirs.^ According to Hugh Macdonald, Gilleasbuig
Dubh was murdered while out shooting on Ben Lee,
in North Uist, by his nephews, Donald Gruamach
Macdonald Gallaich and Banald Macdonald Her-
raich.
The position of the Clanranald at this period is
somewhat obscured by the contradictory statements
of historians in regard to their attitude towards the
Scottish Government. At one time we find them
in high favour with the King, but on the change of
policy by James in 1498, they undoubtedly, like the
other Islanders, broke out into open revolt against
his authority. There are indications of their having
been shortly after this received into royal favour,
but these are not clear enough to warrant us in
concluding that they had not rallied round the
^ Inveruessiana, by Mr Fi-aser-Mackintosh, p. 193.
2 Reg. Sec. Sig. IV., fol. 70. ^ Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. III., Nu. 134.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 315
standard of Donald Dubh. There appears to be
little doubt that they supported to the last the
pretensions of that unfortunate man. On the
suppression of the rebellion, however, we find them
again in favour at Court. The King, on the 23rd
of August, granted at Stirling to Ranald Allanson,
of Island Begram, while his father was still alive,
the lands of Sleat in Skye, with the Castle of
Dunskaich, the lands of Illeray, Paible, Paiblisgarry,
Balranald, Hougarry, Watna, Scolpeg, Griminish,
Vallay, Walls, Islandgarvay, Orinsay, Talmartin,
Sand, Boreray, and Garrymore, all in North Uist,
and Lordship of the Isles. ^ Very soon after this the
Clanranald Chief, Allan MacBuarie, was according
to Gregory, brought before the King at Blair- Athole
and executed for some undefinable crime. Gregory
gives as his authority the Book of Clanranald, but
MacVuirich makes no reference to the crime, trial,
or execution, of Allan MacBuarie, though, if the
traditions of the Clan are to be believed, that
" demon of the Gael and fierce ravager of Church
and Cross" richly deserved capital punishment."
We infer from MacVuirich, on the contrary, that
Allan was well received by the King, and that
having obtained a confirmation of his lands by the
hand of his Majesty, he died at Blair- Athole in
1509.^ The same story is repeated in almost every
detail of Allan's son and successor, Banald, who
having gone to pay homage to the King at Perth,
died there in 1514.*
Little or nothing is known of the history of the
Macdonalds of Glencoe at this time, though we may
1 Reg. Mag. Sig., vol. IL, No. 2873.
2 Vide poem by Fiulay, the red-haii-ed bard, ou Allan MacRuarie in " The
Book of the Dean of Lismore," p. 143.
' MatVuh-ich in llclici. Celticre, p. 169.
^ Ibidem, p. 169.
316 THE CLAN DONALD.
conclude from their act in liberating Donald Dubh
from Inchconnel that they played a prominent part
in the troubles that followed.
The Macdonalds of Keppoch shared alike the
fortunes and the reverses of the other branches of
Clan Donald. They followed the banner of Donald
Dubh with the other clansmen, and did so probably
with less compunction on the score of consequences
than any of the clans, for the gallant Keppochs were
among the few who acted independently of Royal
Charters. They were occupied later on with
domestic differences which fall to be dealt with
more appropriately in our next rather than in this
volume.
The Chief of Lochalsh, who was a minor at the
time of his father's death, was too young to take
any part in the recent insurrection. It seems that
the King, on one of his visits to the Highlands,
persuaded the sons of Alexander of Lochalsh to
accompany him to Edinburgh, no doubt with the
view of teaching them, among other things, loyalty
to the Scottish throne. They remained at Court for
several years, and many references are made to
" Donald of the His, the King's hensboy," in the
Treasurer's Accounts of that time. Several items
appear in these Accounts of payments for Donald,
in passing to and from the Isles, and for clothes and
other necessaries, and also for Konald of the Isles,
who no doubt was another son of Alexander of
Lochalsh.^ Donald, who, for his residence in the
Lowlands was called by the Higlilanders " Donald
Gallda," became a great favourite with the King,
who, it is said, knighted him on Flodden field.
' Treasurei-'s Accounts, 1508-13. Acta Doaiinorum Concilii, Book 2-i.
p. 186.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 317
The King, besides, gave him possession of bis
father's lands of Lochalsh.
We find no reference made to the family of Glen-
garry at this time in the history of the Clan Donald,
though we may be sure they had an active share in
the attempt of the Islanders to set up the Celtic
supremacy once more in the Isles. They afterwards
became a powerful family on succeeding by marriage
to the lands of the Macdonalds of Lochalsh.
We have thus endeavoured to trace briefly the
history of the different branches of the Family of
Macdonald subsequent to the fall of the Lordship of
the Isles, and the changes brought about by that
event in their attitude towards the Scottish State.
With one exception, they had all united in the
attempt to set up again the Celtic 7'egime in the
Isles, and though during the lull that followed the
storm they appear to acquiesce in the new order of
things, they are far, as we shall soon see, from being
satisfied with it. To Argyle had been entrusted the
government of the South Isles, with a plenitude of
power dangerous in less unscrupulous hands. To
Huntly was committed the government of the North,
with equal power over the King's lieges in that
region. The men to whom the government of the
Highlands and Islands was thus committed were
both grasping and unprincipled noblemen, whose
chief aim was to enrich themselves at the expense of
the old vassals of the Isles. In these circumstances,
peace could not be expected to reign long in these
regions. The King himself did not now visit the
Highlands so frequently, being engaged elsewhere,
and in those transactions which proved finally so
disastrous to the country and to himself To the
dark field of Flodden James was followed by many
318 THE CLAN DONALD.
of the hardy clans of the North, includmg the Mac-
donalds. Here they fought with the courage and
bravery characteristic of the sons of the mountains,
and suffered so severely at the hands of the English
pikemen as to have been well nigh annihilated.
Some historians have attributed to the Highlanders
a large share in bringing about the defeat of the
Scottish army at Flodden. Eager to engage in a
hand-to-hand fight, so characteristic of Highland
warfare, they broke their ranks and threw them-
selves with great violence on the foe. Notwith-
standing this irregularity on the part of the
Highlanders, the defeat of the Scottish army was
brought about mainly by the wrong-headedness of
the King himself, who paid the penalty of his
obstinacy with his life. On the morning after the
battle, the body of the gallant James was found
among the thickest of the slain. The character of
the King in the administration of the aifairs of his
kingdom deserves, in many respects, our admiration.
Great activity and earnestness, combined with much
patience and moderation, characterised most of his
efforts to restore order and good government
throughout his kingdom, and it is safe to say that
none of his predecessors had been altogether so
successful in the government of the Highlands and
Islands.^ The King's death had the effect of
bringing disorder and confusion into every depart-
ment of the State. The removal of so strong a
personality from the chief place in the counsels of
the nation had an immediate and inju.rious effect
on the condition of his Highland subjects.
^ In the Register of the Great Seal and Treasurer's Accounts for the years
1488-1513, wc have ample evidence of the King's administrative powers and
indomitable energy.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 319
The surviving Highlanders had no sooner returned
from Flodden than the standard of rebellion was
again raised, and Sir Donald of Lochalsh was pro-
clainied Lord of the Isles. It is not necessary at
this stage to enter with any minuteness into the
claims of Sir Donald Gallda to the Lordship of the
Isles. Donald Dubh still remains a prisoner in
Edinburgh Castle, but even after him there were
others who might put forward claims at least as
good as those of Sir Donald of Lochalsh. Sir Donald
himself, it is said, affirmed that he claimed the Lord-
ship of the Isles for Donald Dubh. At a meeting of
Islesmen, held at Kyleakin, Alexander of Dunnyveg,
according to Hugh Macdonald, proposed Donald
Gruamach of Sleat for the Lordship of the Isles.^ It
seems to us that at this time it was not a question
with the Islanders who had the best claims among
the competitors to the Island Lordship. What they
desired above all was a change in the government of
the Isles, and they were, therefore, prepared to rally
round any leader likely to bring about this result.
This explains the readiness with which they joined
the standard of Sir Donald of Lochalsh. The Mac-
leods of Lewis and Harris, Maclean of Dowart,
Alexander of Dunnyveg, Chisholm of Comer, and
Alexander Maclan of Glengarry now rally round the
newly proclaimed Lord of the Isles. Sir Donald, at
the head of a considerable force, and assisted by
Alexander of Glengarry and Chisholm of Comer,
oj)ened his campaign by invading the lands of John
Grant of Freuchy, in Urquhart, which he laid waste
with fire and sword. Having next directed his
attention to the Castle of Urquhart, he besieged it
and expelled the garrison. According to Mr William
^ Hugh Macdouald, iu Collectanea cle Rebus Albanicis, p. 322.
320 THE CLAN DONALD.
Mackay, in his " Urquhart and Glenmoriston," the
spoil that fell to Sir Donald was rich and varied,
and consisted of household furniture and victuals, of
the value in all of more than £100 ; while the booty
from the different lands consisted of 300 cattle and
1000 sheep, 740 bolls of bear and 1080 bolls of oats. ^
Sir Donald kept possession of the Castle and lands
of Urquhart until he made his peace with the Regent
Albany, in 1515, and although Grant of Freuchy
obtained a decree against him for " Tua Thousand
pund with the mair," it appears the debt was never
recovered.
The rebellion proceeded apace, and raged with
great fury in the Islands. Maclean of Dowart
seized the royal Castle of Cairnburgh in Mull, and
Macleod of Harris seized the Castle of Dunskaich
in Skye, which they held for the new Lord of the
Isles. Alarmed at the formidable appearance which
the insurrection now assumed, the Kegent Albany
took immediate steps to crush it. The Earl of
Argyle was commissioned by the Council to take
proceedings against Lachlan Maclean of Dowart
and others in the South Isles. Munro of Fowlis
and Mackenzie of Kintail were employed to harass
Sir Donald in the North ; while Lochiel and
Mackintosh were appointed guardians of Lochaber.
The Council besides caused letters to be written
to the chiefs whose lands lay along the mainland
coast urging them to resist the landing of the
Islesmen. All these measures seemed to have no
appreciable effect in quelling the rebellion. Maclan
of Ardnamurchan, who had still retained his old
loyalty, was commissioned to treat with the less
rebellious section of the insurgent Islesmen, promis-
^ " Urquhart and Glenmoriston," p. 85.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 321
ing on behalf of the Regent pardon for past
transgressions, and offering favours to such as
should shew themselves willing to submit. It
would appear that Maclan's interposition had the
desired effect on several of the Islesmen. Argyle
also had succeeded in persuading the Macleans and
others in the South Isles to submit to the Regent.
On September 6th, 1515, John, Duke of Albany,
Regent of the Kingdom, granted to Lachlan
Maclean of Dowart and Alexander Macleod of
Dunvegan, their servants, landed men, gentlemen,
and yeomen, a remission for all past crimes, and in
particular for besieging and taking the Castles of
Cairnburgh and Dunskaich, and holding them
against his authority, and for assisting Sir Donald
of Lochalsh and his accomplices, the remission
to last till January, 1516.^ The arch rebel.
Sir Donald of Lochalsh, himself and Albany were
shortly thereafter reconciled. So we have, on the
23rd August, 1515, " Ane Respit maid be avise
of the Governour to Donald of the His of
Lochalsh Kynt and with him uther thre scoir of
persons, his kynnsmen, freindis, or servandis, for
all maner of actionis, and crimes, bigane to cumand
repare to Edinburgh or ony uther place within the
realms to commune with the said governour and do
thair eirrandes and return agane ; for the space of
IX dayis next to cum after the date hereof"^
Disputes between Maclan of Ardnamurchan and
Sir Donald having been submitted to neutral
parties for adjustment, the last spark of rebellion
was extinguished. The aspect of affairs now seemed
to augur well for the peace of the Isles. The
Government had been most lenient with the rebels,
' Orig. Par. Soot., p. 32-3, " Pitcairn's Criminal Trials, vol. I., p. 533.
21
322 THE CLAN DONALD.
and with none more so than with the leader himself,
who, as we shall see presently, least of all deserved
the pardon that had been extended to him.
It is difficult to account for the conduct of Sir
Donald. Evidently he was not satisfied with the
award of the arbiters in the dispute between him
and Maclan of Ardnamurchan, and the old feud
between them was revived. At all events, the
restless chief of Lochalsh again began to show signs
of disaffection, and the quarrel between him and
Maclan was made a pretext for hostilities in the
Northern Highlands. Besides, a favourable oppor-
tunity to strike another blow for the Lordship of
the Isles had now come in the rebellion of Lord
Home, with whom Sir Donald appears to have
been in league for English assistance.^ Any pretext
seemed to serve the Knight of Lochalsh in raising
the standard of revolt, and every fresh opportunity
was taken to gain the object of his ambition, which
seems to have been nothing less or more tlian the
restoration of the Lordship of the Isles in his own
person. He succeeded in gaining the adherence of
some of the Island chiefs by making them believe
that he had been appointed by Government Lieuten-
ant of the Isles. His object, in the first instance,
was to punish Maclan of Ardnamurchan for, among
other things, the murder of Alexander of Lochalsh
at Orinsay. He invaded Maclan's lands accordingly,
took possession of the Castle of Mingarry, which he
razed to the ground, and wasted the district with
fire and sword. His principal supporters, Lachlan
^ " Remission to Alexander Mackloid of Dunvegane, and all his kinsmen,
friends, and servants, &c., for their assistance and supply given to Donald of
the Isles of Lochalsh Knight at the time of his being with Alexander Lord
Hume in his treasonable deeds ; and for all other crimes, offences, and actions
whatsoever without any exception." — Pitcairn, vol. I., p. 534,
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 323
Maclean of Dowart and Alexander Macleod of
Dunvegan, now understood the real motive that
actuated Sir Donald's conduct, which had become
so violent that they resolved to apprehend him and
hand him over to the Government. He, however,
succeeded in making good his escape ; but his two
brothers, who seem to have been art and part with
him in his recent violent proceedings, were captured
by Maclean of Dowart and taken to Edinburgh,
where, after trial before the Council, they paid
the extreme penalty of the law.
Alexander Macleod of Dunvegan, and the Mac-
leans of Dowart and Lochbuy, who had been led by
the pretensions of the Knight of Lochalsh to join in
his rebellion, now hastened to give in their submis-
sion to the Regent and Council, and offered their
services against Sir Donald. They sent separate
petitions to the Council, in which they asked a free
pardon for past offences, and especially for assisting
Sir Donald of Lochalsh in his recent treasonable
doings, which was granted on the 12th of March,
1517.^ The petitioners further demanded grants of
lands in Mull, Tiree, and Skye,^ as the price of the
services to be rendered by them to the Government.
These lands^ with few exceptions, the Council agreed
to give them possession of, and as proof of their
earnest desire to aid the Regent against the rebels,
Macleod and the Macleans demanded the forfeiture
of Sir Donald Gallda as the first step towards the
restoration of peace in the Isles. Lachlan Cattanach
1 Reg. Secret! Sigilli, vol. V., foUo 101.
^ Alexander Macleod was continued as Crown tenant of the extensive
district of Troternish, in Skye. Lachlan Cattanach demanded " the hundreth
merk landis in the lie of Tery and utheris landis in the Mule." "As to the
landis of Mul and utheri.s landis that the said Lauchlane had of befoir of the
Kingis grace now desirit in few ferm be him." — Acta Dom. Con., vol. XXIX.
fol. 130.
324 THE CLAN DONALD.
demanded a remission for himself, " kynnsmen,
servandis, frendis, and partakars, that is, Donald
Makalane, Gillonan Maknele of Barry, Nele Mak-
ynnon of Mesnes, Downsleif Makcura of Ulway, and
Lauchlan MacEwin of Ardgour, for all crimes be
past." After specifying the lands which he desired
the Regent and Council to give him possession of,
and the conditions on which these were to be held,
the petitioner recommends the "justifying (execu-
tion) of Donaldis twa brethir and forfactour aganis
the said Donald ;" but there is no desire expressed
in regard to the " destroying of the wicked blood of
the Isles," with which Gregory credits Lachlan
Cattanach.^ The Earl of Argyle at the same time
petitioned the Council, craving a commission of
lieutenandry over the Isles, " for the honour of the
realm and the common-weal in time to come," which
was granted.^ The Council further gave him full
power to grant remission for past offences, and
restore their lands to such of the Island Chiefs as
should deliver hostages, or find other security for
the payment of Crown dues, " because the men of
the Isles are fickle of mind, and set but little value
upon their oaths and written obligations." From
this immunity, however, " Sir Donald of the His
his brethir and Clan and Clan-donale" were excluded.
The Earl, whose commission was limited to three
years, was instructed by the Council to " persew
Donald of the His and expell him out of the His
and hald him thairout, and sege his hous incontinent
and do at his utter pouer," but no success seems to
have attended his efforts in this direction.
' The petition of Lachlan Cattanach Maclean is given in fuU from the
A.cis of the Lords of Council, vol. XXIX., fol. 130, in Mr J. P. Maclean's
History of the Clan Maclean, pp. 68, 69.
2 Acta Dominorum Concilii, vol. XXIX., fol. 210.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES IV. 325
The Knight of Lochalsh had meanwhile taken
refuge in the Isles, and notwithstanding the deter-
mined opposition of his recent allies, he still seems to
have had a considerable following. He was evidently
not satisfied with the punishment he had already
been able to inflict on his enemy, Maclan of Ardna-
murchan. Maclan had made himself obnoxious not
only to his own clan, but also to all those who still
remained faithful to the Family of the Isles. It
was against him, therefore, that Sir Donald in the
first place directed his energies, and he resolved to
make every effort to crush him. Besides the murder
of his father, Sir Alexander, which he had not
sufficiently avenged on Maclan, that chieftain was
also one of the most powerful among those who
opposed Sir Donald's pretensions to the Lordship of
the Isles. During the interval in his operations
which followed the siege of Mingarry, Sir Donald, it
would appear, had put himself under the protection
of Macleod of Lewis, and assisted by that chief,
Macleod of Raasay, and Alexander of Dunnyveg,
now that a favourable opportunity had come, he
opened his campaign afresh in the district of Ardna-
murchan. After several skirmishes, Sir Donald
and Maclan met in bloody conflict at a place called
Craiganairgid, in Morven. Maclan and his followers
were defeated with great slaughter, while Maclan
himself, and his two sons, Angus and John Suan-
artach, were found among the slain. ^ Sir Donald,
after this victory, was again proclaimed Lord of the
Isles, and many of the Islanders flocked to his
standard. The Regent and Council at once took
measures to put down the rebellion, which seemed
now to have assumed a more formidable appearance
' Hugh Macdouald iii Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 324.
326 TflE CLAN DONALD.
than ever, and proposals were made to have the
rebel of Lochalsh forfeited for his treason. While
these preparations were going on, the restless Sir
Donald of Lochalsh died, according to MacVuirich,
at Cairnburgh, in Mull, and with him the male line
of Celestine became extinct.^ The character of Sir
Donald Gallda stands out before us in the sketch of
his brief career given in this chapter as that of a
bold and resolute clansman, who possessed in an
unenviable degree the restless ambition and self-
assertion characteristic of the chiefs of Clan Oholla.
His residence at the Scottish Court, and the favours
bestowed upon him by the King, only made this
scion of the House of Isla more determined than
ever to restore and maintain the ancient prestige of
his house against the enemies of his race. Now
that through his death the Lochalsh confederacy
was dissolved, the Council did not feel called upon
to take any harsh proceedings against the rebels,
and for some vears to come the Isles are free from
the presence of a claimant to the honours and
dignities of the House of Macdonald.
^ According to Hugh Macdouald, Sir Douald of Lochalsh died on the
Island of Teinlipeil, in Tu'ee.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 327
CHAPTEH XII.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V.— 1519-1545.
Rise of the House of Argyle — Bonds of Manrent to Clan Donald.
— Escape of James V., and change of Policy. — Troubles in
the North and South Isles. — Donald (iruamach. — Alexander
of Dunnyveg. — Feud of Clan Iain Mhoir with Argyle. — The
Clan Maclean unite with Clan Iain Mhoir against Argyle. —
Argyle Invades Maclean Territory. — Cawdor's Proposals for
Pacifying Isles. — Mission of Robert Hart. — Mission of Argyle
and Murray.— The King takes the Isles in hand. — Alexander
of Dunnyveg Submits. — Argyle's Disappointment. — Alexander
of Dunnyveg's Indictment. — Argyle's Disgrace. — Rebellion of
Donald Gorme of Sleat. — Siege of Ellandonan. — Death of
Donald Gorme. — Royal Progress through Isles. — Captivity of
Chiefs. — Death of James V. — Escape of Donald Dubh. —
Scottish Parties. — Liberation of Chiefs. — Donald Dubh
Invades Argyle and Lochaber. — Correspondence with Henry
VIII.— Proclamation against Rebels. — Donald Dubh and
Eai'l of Lennox. — Failure of Rebellion. — Death of Donald
Dubh. — Pretensions of James of Dunnyveg to the Lordship.
— Abdication of Claims.
Sm Donald Gallda of Lochalsh, who died in 1519,
left no son, and this house, so closely allied by kin
to the Lords of the Isles, came to an end in the male
line, although the family claims to the Earldom of
Ross— or at least to the representation of that for-
feited honour — were perpetuated by the marriage of
Sir Donald's daughter with one of the Glengarry
chiefs. Although one source from which aspirants
to the old honours of the Family of the Isles might
arise was forever closed, yet time was to show that
strenuous efforts would not be wanting for the
328 THE CLAN DONALD.
establishment, not only of the Lordship of the Isles,
but of the Earldom of Ross as well.
For a number of years after the death of Sir
Donald Gallda, the most striking feature in the
history of the Western Isles of Scotland is the
rapid and widespread advance of the power and
influence of the House of Campbell. The principal
heads of that House, Colin Campbell, Earl of
Argyle, and his brothers, Sir John Campbell of
Calder and Archibald Campbell of Skipness, were
exercising all the astuteness and political craft so
characteristic of the family, with the view of con-
solidating their influence in those regions, North
and South, in which the Lords of the Isles had once
borne almost sovereign sway. In 1517 Argyle had
received a Royal Commission as Lieutenant of the
Isles, and this office involved the possession of
immense authority in a quarter where the power of
the central Government had been exercised in a
spasmodic and intermittent fashion. Bonds of man-
rent and maintenance were particularly rife at this
period within the Lordship of the Isles, showing
that, with the passing away of the old order, society
in that region being insufficiently protected by the
Crown, souo-ht to save itself during the transition
to greater security and a more settled state of
things. In these bonds of manrent, both in the
North and South Highlands, the Argyle Family was
in a preponderance of instances the superior. The
Earl of Argyle received a bond of manrent from
Alexander Makranald of Glengarry and North
Morar, and his brothers were equally indefatigable
in establishing by similar means the power and
position of their House. ^ In 1521," Donald
' Gregozy, p. 12G. - Tliaues uf Cawdor ad tcnipus.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 329
Gruamach, son of Donald Gailach of Dunskaith, in
Skye, and head of the Clan Uisdean, gave a bond
of manrent to Sir John Campbell of Cawdor. In
1520, Dugall Makranald of Ellantirrim gives a bond
of service to the Knight of Cav^dor,^ while in the same
year his successor in the command of the Clanranald,
Alexander McAllan, with his hand at the pen, signs
a similar instrument, undertaking the same kind of
engagement.^ In the same year Alexander of
Dunnyveg signs a bond of manrent, gossipry, and
service also to Sir John Campbell of Cawdor.^ It is
thus evident that the House of Argyle was using
every means that lay to its hand for assuming the
functions and filling the position left vacant by the
forfeiture of the Island Lordship, while the cadet
families of the fallen House of Isla were in a measure
compelled to cultivate the favour and goodwill of
these politic and ambitious chiefs. It was a time of
triumph for the Clan Campbell, whose star was now
steadily in the ascendant, while the Clan Donald,
with the loss of their ruling family, had fallen upon
evil times and evil tongues, " with danger and with
darkness compassed round."
In order to review with clearness the progress of
events from 1520 to 1528, it may be desirable, in
the meantime, to pass on to the latter year, in the
course of which an incident occurred which exercised
a far-reaching influence upon contemporary events,
and in the light of which the past, as well as the
future, becomes clearer to the historian's gaze.
Previous to 1528, James Y., who was but a child
of two when his father fell at Flodden, had been
virtually a prisoner in the hands of the Earl of
Angus, who acted in the capacity of Hegent. In
^ Thanes of Cawdor ad tempus. ^ ibi,j, 3 Jbjd,
330 THE CLAN DONALD.
that year, however, James, having attained to the
age of seventeen, succeeded in effecting his escape,
and having selected a new set of Councillors, the
policy of the executive underwent a remarkable
change — a change, in some respects, fraught with
injurious effects to the peace and prosperity of the
Isles. During the King's subjection to the power
of Angus, various grants of land had been bestowed
upon different individuals, no doubt for the purpose
of attaching them to the party of the E-egent. The
Government that came into power on the King's
recovery of his freedom reversed the policy of
their predecessors. They took the view that
by the prodigality with which these grants had
been bestowed the revenues of the crown were
dilapidated and the royal estate impoverished.
Hence all gifts of land bestowed during the King's
minority, and while he was unable to give his
consent, were pronounced null and void, and it
was announced that no further grants should be
made without the sanction of the King's Council
and of the Earl of Argyle, the King's Lieutenant
in the Isles. ^ This change of policy, this breach
of national faith, as it may with justice be called,
was the immediate cause of much discontent among
the Hebrideans. If, in some instances, the reversal
was equitable, the general character of the proceed-
ings was such as to discredit the public honour
and impair the confidence of the lieges in the
stability and continuity of the national righteous-
ness. In the Isle of Skye, the transference of the
district of Troternish, part of the patrimony of
the Clan Uisdean, to the Siol Tormoid branch of
the Clan Macleod, was the prolific source of strife
^ CoUectauea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 155.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 331
and bloodshed. In the minority of James V.,.
Macleod had received a lease as crown tenant of
the lands in question, as well as of those of Sleat
and North Uist, all of which, since the charter of
1449, were the undisputed possessions of Hugh,
son of Alexander, Earl of Ross, and his descend-
ants. By this charter — granted by John, Earl of
Ross, and confirmed by the Crown in 1495 — the
Clan Uisdean were rightly determined to abide,
and although John, Hugh's son, had, in 1498,
resigned the patrimony of his family in favour of
the Chief of Castle Tirrim, the latter does not
seem to have taken actual possession, and it is not
strange, although the Sleat Family regarded that
transaction, as well as the Regent Angus' later
grant to Macleod, as a usurpation of their just
and lawful rights. Under the leadership of Donald
Gruamach, and with the aid of Torquil Macleod of
Lewis, half-brother to that chief, the Clan Uisdean
were successful in expelling the Dunvegan Chief
and his clan from Troternish, and by the same
forcible means prevented their taking possession
of the lands of North Uist and Sleat. Donald
Gruamach, on the other hand, rendered powerful
aid to John MacTorquil in seizing the barony of
Lewis, of which his father had been forfeited in
1506, but which, with the assistance of his vassals,
he was able to hold during the remainder of his
life.^
The grant of Troternish, Sleat, and North Uist
to Macleod of Dunvegan was, with other similar
gifts bestowed in the minority of James V. , revoked ;
but as these lands did not revert, at anyrate by
legal process, to their hereditary owners, the Clan
^ Gregory, p. 131.
332 THE CLAN DONALD.
Uisdean, the islands continued to be the scene of
strife and discontent. The Family of Sleat were
evidently regarded by the Government as the lineal
representatives of the House of Isla, and the policy
of repression, so consistently adopted towards them
after the forfeiture of John, probably arose from the
suspicion that, if allowed to flourish and hold terri-
torial possessions, they might perchance at some
future time endeavour to revive the ancient princi-
pality of the Isles. We thus see the evils of the
transition from the ancient order of the Lordship of
the Isles to the control and authority of the Crown
at their worst in the Isle of Skye, and the net result
of the confusions of the period as regards the family
most nearly akin to the House of Isla is found to be,
that the powerful influence of the State is employed
to withhold from them their patrimonial rights, and,
after the manner of their kinsmen of Keppoch, they
are compelled to hold their lands by the most ancient
of all instruments of tenure, their strong arms and
trusty claymores.
The troubles which in the North followed the
disappearance of the ancient government of the Isles
are also paralleled in the South Isles. The Chief of
Clan Iain Mhoir early in the sixteenth century was
Alexander, son of John Cathanach, a man who seems
to have inherited a considerable share of the force of
character and resolute independence characteristic of
his sires, and was destined to play no inconsiderable
part in the Highland politics of the reign of James
V. By far the greater portion of his influence and
possessions lay in the Routes and Glens of Antrim,
where he and others of his line often found a welcome
haven when hard pressed by the Scottish Power,
Yet we may be sure that in his case, as in that of
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 333
other members of his family, the tendrils of affection
clung tenaciously to the island home with which
so many proud memories M^ere associated, and he
strove in the midst of many difficulties, which he
eventually overcame, to retain an interest in its soil.
In 1528, we find Alexander of Dunnyveg in rebellion
against the Crown. That he and his tribe received
grants of Crown lands in Isla and elsewhere during
the minority of James V., in addition to the 60
merklands which were the patrimony of the Family
of Dunnyveg, seems sufficiently well attested. That
portion of Isla and of the other islands, which had
been the immediate and direct property of the
Lords of the Isles, became, after the forfeiture in
1493, the legal property of the Crown, though we
do not find that these were actually appropriated
for many years thereafter. Indeed, at the period in
question, 1528, many of these lands were in the
possession of the Earl of Argyle and his brother, the
Thane of Cawdor, but upon what conditions we
are not able to say. It is clear that the House
of Argyle had the disposal of these lands in 1520,
for in a band of gossipry and manrent between
the Thane of Cawdor and Alexander of Dunnyveg,
the Thane engages that, for certain services he exacts
from the former, he will give him a grant of 45
merklands in Isla, with the 15 merklands of Jura
and the lands of Colonsay, the same to run for a
period of five years. ^ The indenture was made at
Glenan in the Taraf, the 7th May, 1520. It seems
that the bond of gossipry and manrent did not last
to the end of the five years during which it was to
run, and so far as can be judged from contemporary
records, the Thane of Cawdor was to blame for the
' Thanes of Cawdor,
334 THE CLAN DONALD.
breach of peace and amity which caused the pre-
mature dissolution of the agreement, for on the 15th
December, 1524, there is a remission to the Thane of
Cawdor for having wasted the lands of Colonsay,^
and there seems to be no indication that there was
any aggression or violence on the part of the lord of
Dunnyveg to provoke the Thane to such serious
reprisals. This was the beginning of strained rela-
tions between Alexander and the House of Argyle,
and subsequent events would have served to intensify
the hostility. Whether or not the lease of Colonsay
was renewed at the expiry of five years, it seems
that it remained in the Family of Dunnyveg, not-
withstanding the policy of revoking grants which
the new Administration adopted in 1528. When it
is borne in mind that after this date the Earl of
Argyle used all his powerful influence to procure the
revocation of all grants from 1513, the year of the
King's accession, up to the time he took the reins
of Government into his own hands, it is in the
highest degree probable that Alexander's quarrel
with the new order, and his resistance to the policy
of the Government, would have originated in some
attempted breach of public faith involved in the
revocation of a grant of land, probably the island of
Colonsay, as already indicated.
When Alexander of Dunnyveg is found in 1528
in arms against the Crown, or, to put it more
correctly, against the Campbell direction of the
policy of the State, he is receiving the hearty and
powerful support of the Clan Maclean. This Clan,
which had grown in numbers and in property under
the generous sway of the Clan Donald chiefs, had
for a long time been on terms of cordial friendship
^ Thanes of Caw 'or, 1524.
THE CLA.N DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 335
with the Clan Iain Mhoir, and might not unnaturally
be expected to support them in the time of need.
But at this particular juncture the Macleans had a
feud of their own with the Campbells, upon whom,
if a favourable opportunity arose, they were deter-
mined to wreak the most signal vengeance.
Lauchlan Cattanach, the Chief of Maclean, was one
of the darkest and most repulsive characters in the
whole history of the Isles. The great majority of
the Highland Chiefs, though turbulent and restless,
were seldom lacking in a certain chivalrous gener-
osity and honour measured by the canons of their
day. Lauchlan Cattanach was a notable exception
to this rule. He was selfish and treacherous, as
well as lacking in personal courage, and it needed
all the loyalty of the Clan to his position as
hereditary Chief to reconcile them to his rule, or
even to refrain from deposing him from the headship
of his race. There is no one indeed who has drawn
his portrait in darker colours than the partial
historian of his clan,^ Lauchlan had taken to wife
the Lady Elizabeth Campbell, daughter of Archibald,
second Earl of Argyle. We are not astonished to
find that their tempers proved incompatible, and
that, especially when no children blessed their union,
the relations of the ill-matched pair proved unhappy
in the extreme. For the romantic story which forms
the basis of "The Family Legend," as well as of
Thomas Campbell's ballad of " Glenara," we are
indebted to the authority already referred to. It
was alleged, but altogether on insufficient grounds,
that the Lady of Maclean had conspired to take her
husband's life by poison. The real cause for his
desire to do away with his wife was, as future
^ The History of the Clan Macleau, by a Seauuachie, pp. 25-31,
336 THE CLAN DONALD.
events were to prove, that he conceived a violent
passion for the daughter of one of his vassals,
Maclean of Treshnish, Thus it was that the Lady
of Dowart was one evening invited to take an
excursion on the water in a galley manned by some
of the myrmidons of the Chief, who were cog-
nisant of the dark secret. The unsuspecting lady
agreed to the proposal, but on reaching a solitary
rock two miles to the east of Dowart Castle, and in
the direction of Lismore, and which was only
uncovered at half-tide, she was left there to be
drowned by the advancing waters. The scene of
the intended murder is still known as Creag-na-
Baintighearn — the Lady's Rock. Fortunately the
plot was disclosed by a remorseful conspirator, and
before the fatality could occur, a boat was launched
by some of the Chief's bodyguard, who, rowing
rapidly to the scene of the outrage, found the victim
seated on the rock, with the sea already beginning
to break over her, and conveyed her to Lorn, where
she was safely landed, and whence she soon found
her way to Inverary, the residence of her brother
the Earl of Argyle. This incident was supposed to
have on'o-inated the feud between the Macleans and
the Argyle Family, although, undoubtedly, it was
aggravated by the policy of the Government
regarding the Maclean possessions in the Isles.
Vengeance soon overtook the would-be murderer.
Some time in 1523^ Lauchlan Cattanach was staying
over night somewhere in the neighbourhood of Edin-
burgh. John Campbell, Thane of Cawdor, his
brother-in-law, having become cognisant of his
whereabouts, broke into his apartment under cover
of night, accompanied by a number of his followers,
1 Diurnal of Occurrents in Scotland,
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 33/^
and surprised and assassinated him in bed, and what
added ag-gravation to the bloody deed was, that the
Chief of Maclean was at the time travelling under a
safe conduct from the Government, of which the
worthy Thane was regarded as a strenuous supporter.
On the loth December following, we find the Thane
exerting his influence successfully with the Govern-
ment to obtain a remission for the deed, he and his
accomplices undertaking to make such amends to
the friends of the slaughtered Chief, as might prove
satisfactory to the authorities. Though Lauchlan
Cattanach was very far removed from being an ideal
character, or beloved chief, he was still the head of
the Clan Maclean, and the fatal blow was felt as a
deadly insult by every member of the tribe, ^
The foregoing episode in the history of the Do wart
Family has been narrated here for two reasons.
First of all it shows that, notwithstanding the
wariness and political talent of the Family that
had so largely supplanted the House of Tsla, the
feeling against them in the Western Isles, instead
of becoming favourable, was becoming more accent-
uated in its bitterness, acquiring, in fact, a volume
and intensity which might in time prove fatal to
their supremacy. The incident has also been
referred to for the purpose of showing that the
Lord of Dunnyveg was not likely to be isolated
in any stand he might propose to take against the
selfish and aggressive policy of the Argyles.
It was only after several years had elapsed since
the murder of Lauchlan Cattanach, by Campbell of
Cawdor, that a favourable opportunity arose for
vengeance. In 1529 the Clan Donald South and
the Macleans united their forces against the common
^ Thanes of Cawdor ad tempus. Letter from Donald Dubh's Council.
22
338 THE CLAN DONALD.
foe. The combined clans burst with fire and sword
into the regions of Bosneath, Lennox, and Craignish,
the records of the time accusing the invaders of
having plundered and slain many of the inhabitants
of these districts.^ The Clanranald-bane of Largie,
a Kintyre branch of the Clan Donald South, were,
conjointly with the Macdonalds of Dunnyveg,
involved in this invasion. The Chief of the Camp-
bells and his vassals^ were of course resentful of this
attack upon tlieir territories, and we find them with
little delay having their revenge, not on this
occasion upon the Macdonalds, but upon the
Macleans, whose lands they specially selected for
invasion and attack. In the same year — 1529 —
they invaded Morvern and the islands of Tiree and
Coll, burning and slaying and destroying wherever
they went. For this Campbell raid there was a
remission by Government on March I7th, 1532, to
Archibald, Earl of Argyle, and eighty-two others,
the King and his Council having dispensed with the
General Act on condition of the Earl satisfying the
kin of Donald Ballo McAuchin, Donald Crum
McCownane, and Farquhar McSevir, and others
having lawful claims.^ It is evident that on this
occasion the MacCailein Mor did not act in his
public capacity as the King's lieutenant of the Isles,
or punish the rebellious and disloyal lieges in the
name of his royal master. We look in vain for that
lofty national spirit which their modern apologists
claim for the House of Argyle, and find instead
thereof the old-fasliioned method characteristic of
the age and country.
In this same year Sir John Campbell, Thane of
Cawdor, on behalf of his brother Colin, Earl of
1 Reg. Priv. Seal IX., fol. 18. - Ibid.
^ Pitcairu's Criminal Trials, vol. IL, ad tempus.
TBE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 339
Argyle, Lieutenant of the Isles and the adjacent
bounds, made certain j^roposals to the Government
for the suppression of the King's rebels. The
righteous soul of this single-hearted patriot and
supporter of law and order, the assassin of Lauchlan
Cattanach, who had wasted and ravaged the island
of Colonsay, and whose nephew, Archibald, the heir
to the Earldom, had the same year invaded and
pillaged the country of Maclean, is greatly exercised
at the terrible dispeace prevailing in the Scottish
Isles. Though he himself had called up the spirits
of anarchy from the " vasty deep," he stands
astonished and aghast at the result. He is
seized with great searching of heart as to the
best methods of producing social tranquillity, and
yearns to sacrifice himself upon the altar of
Scottish nationality by offering to bring these
disturbed regions in subjection to the Crown.
Inspired by such a patriotic resolve, this scion of
the House of Argyle made certain proposals to
the King, which were undoubtedly of a thorough
and adequate nature. He suggested tliat the
house-holders of Dumbartonshire and Henfrew-
shire, and of the bailiaries of Carrick, Kyle,
and Cunningham, should be ordered to assemble
at Lochranza, in Arran, with victuals for twenty
days, to meet the Earl of Argyle and assist him
in his efforts to reduce the Isles to order. ^ It
soon appeared, however, that whatever confidence
the King and his Council may once have reposed
in the public spirit and disinterestedness of the
Argyle Family, they were now beginning to regard
with suspicion their professions of zeal for the
service of the country. As a matter of fact,
^ Gregory, p. 13^.
340 THE CLAN DONALD.
jealousy of the rapid rise and increasing power of
the Chiefs of Inverary animated the breasts of
many members of the Council, and the tendency
towards self advancement, which sometimes became
visible through the vail of vaunted patriotism,
was gradually being unfolded to the vision of
the young King. It was also felt on all hands
that the lieutenancy of the Western Highlands
and Islands, in itself a position of commanding
influence, was in danger of becoming hereditary
in the Family of Argyle, as public ofiices in these
days had a distinct tendency to become ; and, still
further, that if the Lordship of the Isles had
proved dangerous to the well-being of the State
in the past, this new office of Lieutenant, for the
very reason that in form it was constitutional and
responsible, might be fraught with greater peril
to the commonwealth if its powers were wielded
in the interests of one aggressive and ambitious
House. Hence, when the policy of Sir John
Campbell was, in the first instance, unfavourably
viewed by those in power, there was witnessed the
faint beginning of a rift in the lute, which, by
and bye, might assume larger and more dangerous
proportions, and those who cast the horoscope of
the future might well and safely predict that the
sun of Argyle, which had long been unclouded,
was soon to suffer a temporary eclipse.
The first step resolved on by the King indicated
that a wiser and a more discriminating policy was
now to be adopted towards the Western Isles than
that which had hitherto prevailed. It was decided
that, instead of endeavouring to pacify the Isles by
aggressive military opeiations, a Herald or Puisuiv-
ant should be entrusted with a mission to treat
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 341
with the Western Chiefs, with special reference to
Alexander of Dunn}'veg.^ This Herald, whose
name was Robert Hart, was despatched on 3rd
August, 1529, and the following is the Resolution
of the Lords of Council in accordance with which
he was sent upon his mission :— •
" Anent the articulis and desiris proponit and gevin in be Sir
Johnne of Calder, Knight, in name and behalfF of Colyne Erie of
Ergile for suppleing of him in the resisting and persute of the
Kingis rebellis inhabitantis the Ilis makand insurrectionis aganes
oure Soverane Lord and his auctoritie quhilk may returne to
displeasour of the hale cuntre nixt adjacent to the bordouris of
the Ilis, without provisioun and gude ordoure be put thairin dew
tyme, and for remeid thairof, it is divisit, concludit, and ordanit
as efter followis, —
" Item it is thocht expedient be the saidis Lordis that thar be
ane offic.'ar of armis that is of wisdom and discretioun send to
M'^Kynmont and his complices .... The said officiar of
armis to have this discretioun, in the first to charge the said
Allestar and his complices to desist and ceis fra all convocatioun
or gaddering for the invasioun of our Soverane Lordis leiges, bot
he reddely ansuer and obey to our Soverane Lord and his Lieu-
tenant under the payne of tresone Item the said
ofiBciar sail have commissioun and power of the Kingis Graice to
commone with the said Allestar upoun gud wais and gif the said
Allestar plesis to cum to the Kingis Graice to gif him assuirauce
to pas and repas with ane certane nomer he beand content to gif
plegis of Lawland men for keping of gud reule and till obey the
King and pay him his malis anr) dewiteis of sic landis as his
Graice sail gif to the said Allestar."
In due time Robert Hart returned from his
mission in the Isles ; but whether it was that the
Chiefs were obdurate, or that Argyle was then, as
afterwards, acting a double part, his report upon
the attitude of Alexander of Dunnyveg towards
the Crown was in the highest degree unsatisfactory.
Whatever influences operated against the submission
^ Acts of Lords of Council, XL., fol. 80.
342 THE CLAN DONALD.
of the Islanders, the assertion of the authority of
the King seemed so far productive of Httle good.
The Council thereupon decided upon taking more
stringent action ; but it is evident from surviving
records that they were resolved to exercise due
caution and deliberation. Argyle's oifer for the
reduction of the South Isles to order was accepted,
while similar proposals by the Earl of Murray for the
pacification of the North Isles were likewise ordered
to be carried into effect. The Lieutenant of the
Isles was to direct special attention to Alexander
of Dunnyveg, the most powerful and outstanding of
the Island Chiefs, who apparently took the leading
stand against the proceedings of the Government.
The following is an extract from the Decree of the
Lords of Council upon the failure of Robert Hart's
mission : —
" Anent the articulis send to Alester Canoch with Robert Hart
pursevaut, and the respons of the saidis articulis schawin be the
said Robert to tlae Lordis of Counsale, and thai, beand avisit
thairwith at lenth, has concludit and thocht expedient that the
Erie of Ergile, Lieuetenent of the His and boundis adjacent thairto
sail pas forthwart into the His and to persew the said Alester and
all utheris inobedient liegis to the Kingis Hienes taking of thair
houses and strenthis and for punyssing of trespassoris, ordouring
of the boundis of the His and putting of tha pairtis to pece and
rest, and to subject thame to the Kingis obedience and lawis of
the realme efter the forme and tenour of the commissioun direct
to him thairupoun."
The Decree of the Lords of Council contained full
provision for accomplishing the ends shadowed forth
in the foregoing extract. A roll of the tenants of
the Isles was placed in Argyle's hands, with a
citation that they should all come into the King's
presence in order " to commune with His Majesty
upon good rule in the Isles," All were inhibited
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 343
from rendering any assistance to the rebels, or
calling the King's lieges together for oftensive pur-
poses, under pain of death. The fighting men of
Perth and Forfar, and of the South of Scotland
generally, were summoned to meet the King at Ayr,
with provisions for forty days, to accompany him on
his expedition to the Isles. The men of Carrick,
Kyle, Cunningham, Eenfrew, Dumbartonshire, Bal-
quhidder, Braidalbane, Kannoch, Apuadill, Athole,
Menteith, Bute and Arran were charged to join the
King's Lieutenant at such places as he should
appoint, and to continue with him in the service for
a month. The burghs of Ayr, Irvine, Glasgow,
Renfrew, and Dumbarton were to send boats for
victualling his army, all of which were to be paid for
out of the Royal revenues. Protection was offered
to the Islesmen, in case they should fear to trust
themselves to the tender mercy of the Lowlanders,
and especially of the Campbells, and this protection
was to endure for thirty days, an additional period
being allowed them for returning home.^ Not only
so, but the King promised to take hostages from the
Earl of Argyle for further security of the Island
Chiefs, Duncan Campbell of Glenurchy, Archibald
Campbell of Auchinbreck, Archibald Campbell of
Skipnish, and Duncan Campbell of Llangerig being
proposed as a list out of which any two might be
selected for confinement in Edinburgh Castle until
the Islanders were safely back to their sea-girt
fastnesses.^
While the commission given to Argyle to pass
into the Isles was intended to be put in action
without delay, it does not appear that the materials
for its execution were placed immediately in his
1 Acts of Lords of Council, XLI., fol. 77. - Ibid., fol. 79,
344 THE CLAN DONALD.
hands. The King and his Council seemed still to
entertain some hopes of a peaceful solution of the
Island problem. Orders were given to provide the
Lieutenant of the Isles with a cannon, two falconets,
and three barrels of gunpowder, with other con-
veniences for his expedition ; but it was agreed
to delay the calling out of the levies until it was
seen how Argyle sped in his mission, and " becaus
the harvest occurs now and uther greit imped i-
mentis."^ It is also very certain that suspicions
regarding Argyle's good faith were growing apace.
In addition to all this, an indefinite postponement
of the expedition was caused by the illness of the
Earl of Argyle, and his death in 1530, and although
his son Archibald succeeded him in all his offices
and honours, the circumstances were unfavourable
to immediate and decisive action.
It was not until the early months of 1531 that
Archibald, the new Earl of Argyle, along with the
Earl of Murray, went upon their mission for the
reduction of the Hebrides. The former nobleman,
previous to his departure, gave abundant proof to
the King and Council tliat he possessed the energy
and ambition, with probably no small share of the
unscrupulous character, of his predecessors. He
gave an undertaking that he would carry out his
commission with the most unsparing thoroughness.
He would insist upon the inhabitants taking their
lands in lease from the King, and upon the regular
and punctual payment of the Crown rents into the
royal treasury ; and, if opposition were offered, he
undertook to destroy the recusants root and branch,
and to bring the Isles eventually to a condition of
peace and order. He, at the same time, requested
1 Acts of Lords of Council, XLL, fol. 80.
■AW&VT
dccti>^^t- ^f ^^ A^of^] imcj -dtm^ corW^fe /cUdv^cvj &i/f^u^>,
^c>fH4i ^tM^/'Vc^mtrU- rU\iMfHii^i>) m^H-.v fri\f(\t\ '-orfmu^ <ytcUvmi (('i^ifvHviu
^>fi^H^YOpHHH o^Wfvi /cvm/wf^ '^C^KAJk CAWrt <-o^HyTvmAvn^ /f n-o*; c^
t<^l*vo« ^/wfirf* ^(Mrmtj ^Jioym^ At ^i^wn/^Hi(^r*</i4cn^TmX aTc(fcM-<W^
&>Ww ej(^ .'m^ivrw*) jlrpYimu^ -wincxo^YMi^, cmk^ms Ctf*u <\t^vuiQt^ ybvi- •
I
FAC-SIMILE OF DONALD DUBH'S LETTER TO HENRY VIII , 1545.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 345
that the commission of Lieutenandry which his
father had possessed should be bestowed upon him,
and that he should at all times be consulted by the
Council of State as to any steps that might be
deemed necessary to take in dealing with the
Western Isles. ^ After having submitted these
proposals — not unduly modest in their tone — the
new Earl of Argyle, armed with the royal commis-
sion, proceeded on his way.
The evoDts that followed will be better under-
stood when it is borne in mind that the missions
both of the Earls of Argyle and Murray, the former
in the South. and the latter in the North Isles, were
conducted under the immediate and vigilant super-
vision of the King. It was resolved that James
should proceed in person against the rebels on the
1st June, 1531, and from that moment there
emerges a new and happier relationship between the
Islesmen and the Crown.
The Macdonald Chiefs, like the other vassals of
the Isles, were during the early part of summer of
this year repeatedly cited to the royal presence.
On the 28th April, Parliament met in Edinburgh,
and John Cathanachson, Donald Gruamach, John
Moydartach, Alexander Maclan of Ardnamurchan —
who seems to have grown weary of being an under-
study of Argyle — Alister of Glengarry, Donald
McAllister McRanaldbane of Largie, were all sum-
moned, and not appearing, the citation was renewed
till 26th May.^ We are particularly informed that
the first-named in the foregoing list, Alexander of
Dunnyveg, or John Cathanachson, as he was some-
times called, received a respite under the privy seal
1 Acts of the Lords of CouncU, XLII., fol. 186.
^ Acts of Scottish Parliament, vol. II., p. 333.
346 THE CLAN DONALD.
for himself and his household, men and servants, to
the number of thirty persons, to come to the King's
presence and return again to the Isles in safety.
After the expiry of some weeks, the royal summons
is responded to. On former occasions the pro-
ceedings for the pacification of the Islesmen were
under the immediate direction of those whose
interest, and consequently whose wishes had lain,
not in the tranquillity of the Isles, but in such
chronic disaffection and dispeace as would prove the
ruin of the Western Chiefs, and the consequent
advancement of the House of Argyle. The Lord
of Dunnyveg, recognising that the King was dis-
posed to deal with the Hebridean chiefs on
honourable and generous terms, resolved to make
his submission, On the 7th June he came to
Stirling, and on certain conditions received the
royal pardon. The Act of Council recording the
negotiations is in the following terms : —
" It is the Kingis Graice mynd, with avise of the Lordis of his
Counsale, that Alexander John Canochsoun, becaus he hes cumin
to our said Soverane Lord and ofFerit his service in his maist
liuimle maner like as in certane articulis gevin in be him to the
lordis of Counsale thairupoun is contenit, and refFerit him hale in
the Kingis will. Thairfor it plesis his Hienes to give to the said
Alexander the profFetis of the landis contenit in his privie sele
gevin to him of befoir be his Hienes be the avise of the Duke of
Albany his tutour for the tyme, insofar as pertenis to the Kingis
Grace in propirte Avithin the boundis of Kintyr or ony pairtis of
the His during the Kingis will, and for his gude service to be done
to his Hienes in eschewing of trouble and in quietation of the
Kingis lieges and heirschip of the cuntrie, and for the helping of
our soverane Lordis Chalmerlanys to be maid be his Grace for
inbringing of our said Soverane Lordis malis, profFettis and
dewiteis of the His and Kyntyr as he sal be requirit, and als to
solist and cans at his power all the heidsmen and clannys of the
His and Kintyr and to cum to the Kingis obedience and gude
reule of the cuntre and for sur payment of the malis and profFetjs
TEE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 347
of his landis in the His and Kyutyr intromettit ^Yith be thame ;
provydant that the said Alexander sail put to fredome all
pi'isoneris that he lies pertenand to the Erie of Ergile and utheris
and sail on no wis assist (or) fortifie John McClane of
in assegeing of his hous nor hereing of his landis, but sail stop the
same at his utter power, and sail fortify and kepe the Kirknien in
thair fredome and privilegis, and caus thame to be ausuerrit of
thair landis malis fermis and dewiteis thairof."
In the foregoing conditions of pardon, acknow-
ledgment is made of Alexander's powerful influence
among the Islesmen, which he is called upon to
exercise for the promotion of law and order, and in
proof of this we find that on the same day, not only
the cadets of the House of Isla but other vassals of
the Isles follow the example of the Lord of Dunny-
veg, and on making their submission to the King
are immediately received into royal favour. Thus it
came about that while the Earls of Argyle and
Murray were cruising among the Western Isles,
probably doing more to stir up disaffection than to
create loyalty, the rebellion came to an end through
the direct intervention of the King. By a com-
bination of firmness and generosity, and by personal
intercourse with the Islesmen, James brought about
in a few days a condition which years of Argyle's
lieutenandry had only served to render more remote.
Had James' life been spared for even a few years
longer than the date of his sad demise, and had he
and his successors continued to apply to the problem
of the Isles the same wise and patient policy, the
future history of that region could have been
delineated in brighter and more glowing hues.
The tranquillity of the Isles and the submission
and pardon of the Cliiefs were far from being a
pleasing spectacle to the Earl of Argyle, who found
a very unexpected state of matters awaiting him on
348 THE CLAN DONALD.
his return from his Hebridean tour. The turn of
affairs was so thoroughly satisfactory from a pubhc
point of view that Othello's occupation was mean-
while gone. Finding that the remission granted to
the Islesmen by the King had placed them completely
beyond his power, he did all he could to exasperate
and annoy them and to kindle anew the expiring
flame of disloyalty. The raids of 1529 into the
territories of Argyle are once more raked up against
the Macdonalds and Macleans, although these had
been wiped away by the pardon of 7th June, 1531.
The noble Earl, besides, seems to have forgotten his
own invasion and wasting of the lands of Morvern
and others in that same year, or, if he remembered
these things, he acted as if on the principle that —
" That in the captain's bnt a choleric word
Which in the soldier is flat blasphemy."
The immediate result of the Earl's proceedings in
this matter was, that Alexander of Dunnyveg and
himself both received a remission for the violent
conduct of which they had been guilty in 1529,
although, in the case of the latter, the neces-
sity for such a remission does not in the circum-
stances seem clear.\ The action of the Earl in
these matters, however, proved eventually disastrous
to himself. Alexander of Dunnyveg unhesitatingly
appeared in response to the summons issued to him
at the instigation of his grace of Argyle ; but when
the day appointed arrived, the accuser found it con-
venient to cultivate the privacy of Inverary Castle.
Indeed, the tables were completely turned upon this
magnate, who, with the cadets of his house, had
evidently come to regard the Western Isles as their
'■ Pitcaii'u's Criminal Trials ad iem^us.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 349
own special preserve. His accusations were met by
a statement from the Lord of Dunnyveg, in which
he not only vindicates triumphantly his own position
since his restoration to Royal favour, but puts the
King's Lieutenant completely in the wrong. The
statement has such an important bearing upon the
Clan Donald history of the period that we shall quote
it here in full : —
"Statement by Alexander of Dunnyveg anent certain
Complaints preferred against him by the Earl of
Argyle.
" In presence of the Lords of Council compeared Alexander
John Cathanachson, and gave in the articles underwritten, and
desired the same to be put in the books of Council ; of the which
the tenor follows: — My Lords of Council, unto your Lordships
huimlie menis and schawis I, your servitor Alexander John
Cathanachson, that quhar lately Archd. Earl of x\rgyle of verray
prover malice and envy gave in ane bill of complaint of me to
your Lordships, alLging that 1 had done divers and sundry great
faults to him and his friends, which is not of veritie ; for the
which your Lurdships commanded me by ane maiser to remain in
this town to answer to his complaints. And 1 have remained here
continually tlu'-se 13 days last by past daily to answer to his said
bill ; and because he perfectly knows that his narration is not nor
may not be proved of veritie, he absents himself and bydis away
and wall not come to follow the same. And since so is that that
his narration is all wrong and feynyeit made upon me without any
fault of very malice as said is as manifestly appears, because he
will not come to pursue and verify the same, I answer to the points
of his bill in this wise — In the first, I understand that no person
has jurisdiction of the Lordship of the Isles but my master the
King's grace alanerly. And insafer as his highness gave command
and power to my sympilnes at my first incoming to his grace at
Stirling, I have obeyed and done his highness's commands in all
points and fulfilled the tenor of all his acts made in Stirling in
every point as I was commanded. And gif it please his grace to
command me to give his malis and duties of his lands and Lord-
ship of the Isles to any person, the same shall be done thankfully
after my power. And in sa fer as the said Earl alleged that 1 did
wrong in intromittiug and uptaking of the malis and dewities of
350 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Isles, he failyeit thairin, because I did nothing in that behalf
but as I was commanded by the King's grace, my master.
" Further, my Lords, I at your Lordships' command has
remained in this town thir days last by past ready to answer to
the said Earl in anything he had to lay to my charge to my great
cost and expense. He as I am informed is past in the Isles with
all the folks that he may get and wdth all the men that the Earl
of Murray may cause pass with him for heirschip and destruction
of the King's lands of the Isles and for slaughter of his poor lieges
dwelling therein ; which as I trust is done without his grace's
advice, license, authority or consent. And if so be the whole fault
is made to his highness considering both the land and the men
and the inhabitants thereof are his own ; and Avell it is to be
presumed that his grace woiald give no command to destroy his
own men and lands. And if the King's grace my sovereign Lord
and Master will give power or command to me or any other
gentleman of the Isles to come to his highness to pass in England
in oisting or any other part in the mainland within this realm, I
shall make good we shall bring more good fighting men to do his
grace honour, pleasure, and service than the said Earl shall do.
"And, if the said Earl will contempne the King's grace's
authority his highness giving command to me and his poor lieges
of the Isles, we shall cause compel the said Earl to dwell in any
other part of Scotland nor Argyle, where the King's grace may get
resoun of him.
" And further, there is no person in the Isles that has offended
to the said Earl or any others in the Lowlands but I shall cause
him to come to the King's grace to underly his laws and to please
his highness and the party be ressoun, suchlike as other Lowland
men does, the brokynes and heirschip of the Isles being considered
made by the said Earls father, the Knight of Calder, and Gillespy
Bane his brother.
"And mairattour, what the King's grace and your Lordship
will command me to do for his highness honour and weal of his
realm the same shall be done with all diligence of my power
without my dissimulation.
"And further, my Lords, I have fulfilled your lordships'
command and bidden aye in this town and kept the day that your
Lordships assigned to me to answer to the said Earl's complaint
and that he came not to follow the same, that ye will advertise
the King's grace thereof, and of my answer to his complaint, and
give command to the Clerk of Council to subscribe the copy of my
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 35 1
answer here present to be sent to the King's grace for information
to his highness of the veritie. And your answer humbly I
beseech."
The statement just quoted was certainly not
lacking in boldness and self-confidence, and its
honesty and candour, and the unshrinking desire
it manifests that the whole issue should be strictly
investigated, contrasts most favourably with the
evasive conduct of Argyle. The undertaking to
compel his Grace of Inverary to retire into a more
remote place of residence affords refreshing evidence
of a desire on the part of the Lord of Dunnyveg
to come to close quarters with the enemy of his
House. The King seems to have been deeply struck
by Alexander's indictment, and with characteristic
sense of justice caused a minute enquiry to be made
into its leading allegations, as well as into the whole
question of tlie Argyle policy in the Isles, which the
statement directly impugned. The result was a
repetition of the story of Haman and Mordecai ; a
case of the biter bit. Argyle sank in the pit he
made for others, in the net which he hid was his
own foot taken. Alexander of Dunnyveg was
triumphantly vindicated. It was clearly brought
out that the policy of the Argyle Family in the
Isles had been animated by motives of private
interest rather than by zeal for the peace and
welfare of His Majesty's lieges in that part
of his dominions, and that they were largely to
blame for fomenting much of the turbulence and
disaifection which had arisen within recent years.
Still further it was brought out that Argyle's
intromissions with the Crown rentals were not so
advantageous to the royal revenues as with strictly
honest accounting they should have been. The
352
THE CLAN DONALD.
Earl was thrown into prison, and although his
liberation soon followed, he was discredited and
disgraced, while the public offices he filled were
all taken from him, and some of them bestowed
upon the Lord of Dunnyveg, who continued,
during the reign of James Y,, to receive numerous
marks of royal favour. From the Clan Donald
point of view, the pleasing, but in those days the
unwonted, spectacle is witnessed of the head of
a great branch of the Family of the Isles high in
confidence of the Crown, while the Chief of the
Clan Campbell has to retire into obscurity and
disrepute.
RUINS OF KNOCK CASTLE, SLEAT.
From 1532 down to 1538 the history of the
Western Isles appears to have been quiet and
uneventful ; at anyrate the surviving records of
the age have little to say regarding the history of
the Macdonald Family, a clear vindication of the
methods of governing the Highlands adopted by
James V. and his advisers. The problem of the
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 353
Hebridean dans, especially, proved not hopelessly
insoluble when approached in a spirit of generosity
and firmness ; while, looked at through Argyle
spectacles, and treated in the tortuous methods of
Argyle policy, it was a standing menace to the
peace of Scotland. In 1539, however, the Isle of
Skye and the western border of Koss-shire became
the scene of a fresh attempt to restore the lordship
of the Isles and, to all appearance, also the Earldom
of Ross.
It was the universal belief in the Western Isles,
and there seems little reason to doubt that the
feeling was well founded, that the real heir to
the Lordship of the Isles was the unfortunate
Donald Dubh, who since 1506 pined in solitary
confinement as a State prisoner in Edinburgh
Castle. His claims to the Earldom of Hoss were
by no means so clear. The Charter of 1476, in
which Angus Og and his issue were legitimised,
was granted after the forfeiture of the Earldom of
Ross, and the succession of John's descendants was
legalised only so far as the Lordship of the Isles
was concerned. Hence, although Donald Dubh was,
undoubtedly, the lineal heir to the Lordship of the
Isles, it could not be contended with the same
degree of confidence that he represented any
hereditary right to the Earldom of Ross — all the
more because this dignity had come into the Family
of the Isles not as a Celtic but as a feudal honour.
In any case, seeing that Donald Dubh was
apparently a prisoner for life, there was only one
family akin to the main stem of the House of
Macdonald that could lay just claim to represent
the combined dignities of both Earldom and Lord-
ship. Now^ that the Family of Lochalsh had become
23
354 THE CLAN DONALD.
extinct in the male line, the succession to the who.e
honours of the House of Isla — as regards descent —
appeared to devolve upon the Family of Sleat.
Without prejudging any genealogical questions that
must present themselves hereafter for solution, this
certainly was the view taken by the vassals of the
Isles in 1539, when the Chief of the Clan Uisdean
once more unfurled the ancient banner and deter-
mined to lay claim to and take possession of the
time-honoured heritage of his sires.
There is nothing, we think, more remarkable in
the history of the years between 1493, when the
Lordship of the Isles was forfeited, and the final
effort made for its revival about the middle of the
sixteenth century, than the almost unanimous
support, despite of all opposing forces, that claimants
to the ancient honour received at the hands of the
chiefs and clans of the West. Not only were these
insurrections countenanced by cadet families of the
Isles, but other vassals than those of the Clan
Donald rallied to the support of aspirants to the
Lordship. It was the same tendency which in later
centuries and on a larger scale was displayed by the
Celtic inhabitants of Scotland, in the strenuous
effort to restore the fallen Stuart dynasty to the
British throne. The Highland Clans had not as yet
begun to feel at ease under the yoke of a Govern-
ment becoming more and more out of sympathy
with Celtic culture and sentiment, and with the
conservatism characteristic of the race, they
cherished the hope that the good old times might
be restored when they lived under the sway of
native lords, who kept up the institutions and
language of the Gael as these were nowhere else
maintained. They did not follow the Lordship of
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 355
the Isles as the swallow follows summer, with
chivalrous devotion they clung to it after the
winter of its misfortune had set in. The system
once M^as theirs, and —
" Once though lost
Leaves a faint image of possession still."
Thus do we account for the fact that Donald Gorme
of Sleat, in his plot to lay hold of the Lordship of
the Isles and Earldom of Ross, was supported by a
majority of the Highland Chiefs, and particularly
by the Macleods of Lewis, to whom his family had
long been united in bonds of blood and friendshi[\
It is evident that at this particular stage the
Macleods of Dunvegan had, despite the opposition of
the Clan Uisdean, obtained a footing in the region
of Troternish, for Donald Gorme's first move in the
new campaign was to invade that district and lay it
waste. He then turned his attention to the main-
land of Hoss, and, with fifty galleys and their
complement of fighting men, set sail for the shores
of Kenlochewe. The Barony of Ellandonan was at
that time in the possession of John Mackenzie, 9th
Baron of Kintail, who was at the time away in the
south, but who was well known to be adverse to the
pretensions advanced by the Chief of Sleat, as well
as to have aided Macleod of Dunvegan in his designs
upon the Barony of Troternish.
" M 'Donald has chosen the best of his power ;
On the green plains of Slate were his warriors arrayed ;
Every warrior came before midnight an hour,
With the sword in his hand and the belt on his plaid.
" At the first of the dawn, when the boats reached the shore,
The shai-p ridge of Skooroora with dark mist was crown'd,
And the rays that broke thro' it seemed spotted with gore
As M'Donald's bold currach first struck on the ground.
356 THE CLAjS DONALD.
" Of all the assailants that sprung on the coast,
One of stature and aspect superior was seen ;
Whatever a lord or a chieftain could boast,
Of valour undaunted, appeared in his mien.
" 'Twas the Lord of the Isles whom the Chamberlam saw.
While a trusty long bow on his bosom reclined,
Of stiff yew it was made, which few sinews could draw :
Its arrows flew straight, and as swift as the wind.
" With a just aim he drew — the shaft pierced the bold chief ;
Indignant he started, nor heeding the smart,
While his clan pour'd around him, in clamorous grief.
From the wound tore away the deep rivetted dart.
" The red stream flow'd fast, and his cheek became white ;
His knees, with a tremor unknown to him, shook ;
And his once piercing eyes scarce directed his sight,
As he turned towards Skye his last lingering look.''^
The foregoing lines seem to embody an authentic
tradition regarding the invasion of Hoss and siege of
Ellandonan by the Chief of Clan Uisdean. Here, as
elsewhere, the traditional historian of the Mackenzies
presents to us as sober fact a most luxuriant growth
of legend, expecting us calmly to endorse a narra-
tive of almost miraculous incidents. Only three
men, we are gravely informed, were in occupation of
Ellandonan Castle when it was besieged by the men
of the Isles, and we are asked to credit the astound-
ing statement that these three warriors, the governor,
the watchman, and an individual abounding in
patronymics — Duncan MacGillechriost MacFhionn-
laidh MacKath — successfully opposed fifty boat loads
of chosen warriors of the Clan Donald north. We
can gather this grain of truth from amid the
mountain of chaff, that on arriving at the strong-
hold of Ellandonan, Donald Gorme, at the head of
^ Scott's Border Minstrelsy.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 357
his men, came perilously within bowshot of the walls,
when Duncan, the man of surnames, fired an arrow
with unerring skill, and struck the Chief of Sleat in
the leg. The wound would not have proved fatal
were it not that Macdonald, failing to perceive that
the arrow was barbed, plucked it impatiently out of
the wound, thus causing a severance of the main
artery, and hemorrhage, which his attendants knew
not how to staunch. The dying Chief was removed
to a sand bank on the shore, where a temporary hut
was erected for his protection, and the place is still
pointed out as Larach Tigh Mhacdhomhniiill,
because it was there that the gallant Donald Gorme
lay while the crimson tide of life gradually ebbed
away. Then, when he had breathed his last, tfie
same tradition tells us that his clansmen lovingly
laid his body in its last resting-place, at Ardelve, on
the opposite shore of Loch Loung.
That the followers of the Chief whose career
terminated thus fatally and prematurely did not
retire in dismay before a garrison of three, is
attested by the authentic records of the age.
Under the leadership of Ai^chibald the Clerk, the
death of Donald Gorme was amply avenged by
his clansmen. The Castle of Ellandonan was
burned, as were also Mackenzie's fleet of galleys,
while the country around Kenlochew was harried
and laid waste.
The rebellion of Donald Gorme, which, but for
the death of the leader, might have assumed
formidable proportions, afforded ample proof to the
Government, if such indeed were required, that
there still existed a widespread desire among the
Western clans to bring back the Lordship of the
Isles. For this reason James V., who seems to
358 THE CLAN DONALD.
have understood the Highland character better
than any of his race, resolved to make an imposing
progress through the Western Isles, with the view
of impressing upon the chiefs the power and majesty
of the Crown. For this purpose a fleet of twelve
ships was equipped with artillery and various other
accoutrements of war. Six of these were set apart
for the special use of the King, his retinue, and
soldiers ; while, as evidence of his intention to take
a prolonged cruise, three were loaded with provi-
sions, the remaining three having been appropriated
for Cardinal Beaton, the Earl of Huntly, and the
Earl of Arran respectively. After visiting Orkney
and Caithness, the royal fleet doubled Cape Wrath,
and visited a number of the Hebridean Isles. Among
other regions, the King touched at the district of
Troternish, in Skye, lately the scene of invasion
and attack by the deceased head of the Clan
Uisdean. The fleet dropped anchor at Portree— in
former times known by the name of Loch Challuim
Chille, or Saint Columba's Loch — and there is little
reason to doubt the tradition that it received its
more modern name of Port-an-Righ owing to its
association with this royal visit to the Isle of Skye.
Here James interviewed the famous John Moy-
dartach and Archibald the Clerk, Captain of the
Clan Uisdean (his grand-nephew Donald Gormeson
being but a child), and also Alexander of Glengarry.
The first of these, the redoubtable Captain of the
Clanranald, was, with Macleod of Dunvegan and
others, compelled to accompany the King on his
southward voyage ; but the head of the Family of
Sleat seems to have jn-eserved his freedom, and it is
on record that, in the following year, 1541, he and
the principal men of his clan obtained the royal
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 359
pardon for the excesses and " heirschippes " of
Donald Gorme's campaign in 1539.
From Skye, the King directed his course to the
South Highlands, calling at Kintail in the passing
by, and having among others taken on board his
ship James Macdonald of Dunnyveg, the son of
Alexander John Cathanachson, memorable in the
annals of his race for his triumph over Argyle, he
sailed up the Firth of Clyde and landed at Dum-
barton. According to Bishop Lesly, the King
proceeded homewards by land, while the ships
containing the captive Chiefs, whom he had kept
as hostages for order and good government, were
sent back by the West and North of Scotland,
until they arrived at Edinburgh, in whose Castle
they were immured. History is not definite as to
the personel of these imprisoned potentates, but it
is certain that John Moydartach and Macleod of
Dunvegan were of the number, while it is highly
probable that Macleod of Lewis, Alexander Mac-
donald of Glengarry, and Maclean of Dowart were
likewise their companions in affliction. It is not
likely that James Macdonald of Dunnyveg, who had
been educated at Court under the royal supervision,
and who appears to have been a favourite with the
King, suffered even a short imprisonment. Several
of the Chiefs were liberated after a brief captivity
on their giving hostages for their good behaviour,
while some of the most dangerous to the peace
of the Highlands, including John Moydartach,
were kept in durance. As a consequence of this
summer cruise among the Isles, it is said that peace
and quietness prevailed among the lieges in districts
hitherto perturbed, and that the Crown rents were
promptly and regularly paid.
360 THE CLAN DONALD.
Although the Lord of the Isles had been forfeited
in 1493, the Lordship of the Isles was not then nor
long after, by any formal Act of the Legislature,
attached to the Crown. In 1540, however, certain
measures were enacted by Parliament for increasing
the royal revenues, and among other means it was
resolved to annex the lands and Lordship of the
Isles, North and South, with the two Kintyres, and
the Castles pertaining thereto, and their pertinents.^
In consequence of these enactments, we find a royal
garrison this same year occupying the Castle of
Dunnyveg, with Alexander Stewart as the King's
Captain in charge, as also the Castle of Dunaverty
in Kintyre, both of which were the property of the
Clann Iain Mhoir. This procedure, although it
might be regarded as the natural sequel to the Act
of Forfeiture, was a decisive step so far as the
principality of the Isles was concerned. The for-
feiture of 1493, followed by John's resignation in the
following year, does not stand on record among the
Parliamentary enactments of the time, and their
terms are merely a matter of conjecture. Judging,
however, by this Act of 1540, John's forfeiture did
not extend beyond his own possessions, and the
Lordship of the Isles still continued a separate
superiority, and it does not seem very clear how far
its revenues were levied, or if so, to what purpose
they were applied. Now, however, the Crown
becomes the superior of the lands and Lordship of
the Isles, and it is a question whether this decided
step on the part of James V. was calculated to
promote the peace of that region, especially in
view of the events that darkened the years that
almost immediately followed the appropriation.
^ Acts of Parliament of Scotland, vol. IL, 1540.
THE r!LAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 361
In 1542 events occurred fraught with disastrous
results to Scotland. James V. was at war with
Henry VIII., and in the course of the campaign of
that year incidents took place most discreditable
to the loyalty and patriotism of the Scottish barons.
We are not called upon in such a work as this,
written for readers of all shades of Christian belief,
to discuss the merits of the religious controversy
which was then raging. We can, however, without
offending ecclesiastical susceptibilities, estimate its
political effects at the period at which we have
arrived ; and it is safe to say that the influence of
Henry VIII. with the leaders of the Reformation
movement in Scotland was the main cause of the
disaffection of the barons to the King, who still
continued to support the Church of Rome. In
addition to all this, it had been the policy of James
V. in recent years, as it had been the traditional
policy of the Stewart dynasty for generations, to
lessen the power of the nobles and increase the
perogatives of the Crown. The discontent arising
from these causes came to a height in 1542. First
of all, at Fala Muir, the barons flatly refused to lead
their men to battle, and shortly afterwards, at
Solway Moss, a still more indelible disgrace befell
the Scottish arms. A body of 10,000 men, under
Lord Maxwell and the Earls of Cassilis and Glen-
cairn, entered England, and on being attacked by
1400 English, the whole Scottish army took to
flight, while nearly 1000 rank and file, and 200
lords, esquires, and noblemen fell as prisoners into
the enemy's hands. The leaders were corrupt and
the men mutinous, and for the reasons already
suggested they entered with no heart or energy
into the conflict. Many instances are on record of
362 THE CLA2^ DONALD.
men having been cited to the royal army against this
raid of Solway, and receiving remissions for their
failure to attend. We find on January 21, 1542,
that a remission is granted to Donald MacAlister of
Largie, John, his son and heir apparent, Ranald
Boy, Archibald and John Makranaldvane, with
twenty-four others, and Alexander McAlister of
Loupe and two others, for treasonable abiding from
the raid of Solway. How far, if at all, the other
branches of the Clan Donald were involved in the
same default, we find nothing in contemporary
records to indicate.^ The King felt so keenly the
national disgrace involved in the flight of his army
at Solway, as well as the ominous political compli-
cations by which he was on all hands beset, that he
became a prey to the deepest despondency, and
finally to despair. His proud spirit never rallied
from the humiliation, and the fever of the mind so
consumed his physical frame that in a few weeks he
died from the saddest, the most tragic of all com-
plaints— the pain which no anodyne can soothe and
no physician heal — a broken heart. He was the
victim of a powerful set of political forces which
were beyond the control of any individual, however
gifted, either to oppose or direct ; but he had given
promise of great administrative power, and, humanly
speaking, the wellbeing of the Highlands, and the
interests of the Clan wdiose story we are telling, and
towards which he acted with great wisdom and
consideration, were prejudicially affected by his
death, in the rich summer of his years.
The first notable event in the history of the Clan
Donald after the death of James V. was the escape
of Donald Dubh from Edinburgh Castle in 1543.
^ Pitcairn's Criminal Trials, vol, II., ad tempus.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 363
How his deliverance was effected, whether the men
of Glencoe or other clansmen practised any further
" Fenian exploits" for the liberation of the heir of
the House of Isla, we have no materials for judging.
He himself, in the course of a correspondence with
Henry YIII. two years afterwards, acknowledged his
indebtedness for his freedom more to the good grace
of God than to the Scottish Government.^ It
is obvious that, owing to the political conditions of
the time, the Government's hold upon the Celtic
region had grown lax and feeble ; the Isles parti-
cularly were ripe for insurrection, and we may be
sure that no pains would be spared, no device left
untried, to effect the release of the captive who,
more than any other, had an hereditary right to the
homage of the ancient vassals of the Isles.
It will assist us to understand the influences that
moulded Clan Donald history at this period if we
give a brief glance at the relations between parties
in Scotland. The Reformation was the most
important factor in the political conditions both of
England and Scotland at the time of Donald Dubh's
escape. Among the large masses as well as the
middle classes of the population religious feelings
were deeply moved, and religious motives largely
operated ; but among the nobility the controversy
assumed, in a great degree, a political complexion,
and dominated, to a marked extent, the relations of
political parties. As an inevitable consequence, two
factions arose out of the turmoil of the time ; on the
one hand, the Catholic party, headed by Cardinal
Beaton, wedded to the old order and opposed to the
policy of Henry VIII., the leader of the reformed
movement in England, and, on the other, the Pro-
^ Document in State Paper Office.
364 THE CLAN DONALD.
testant party, under the leadership of the Earl of
Arran, favouring the attitude of the English monarch,
and encouraging his interference in the affairs of the
Scottish State.
Whatever estimate may be formed of the private
character of Cardinal Beaton, a question that we are
not called upon to discuss here, he was undoubtedly
a man of great political talent, and his maintenance
of a national and independent policy for Scotland is,
from a patriotic standpoint, worthy of commendation.
A determined foe of the Reformation, he was a
devoted upholder of the Koman See, as well as of
the alliance with France, all of which implied enmity
to England and hostility to Henry YIII., the political
head and mainspring of the Protestant cause in that
country. Beaton had failed in his design upon the
Regency, but down to the day of his death he
exercised the largest measure of influence in the still
powerful party with which he was so closely allied.
The Earl of Arran, who, on account of his close
relationship to the Throne, was appointed Regent,
had embraced the principles of the Reformation,
but neither his political nor religious convictions
were sufficiently steadfast or profound, to cause him
to take a resolute or consistent attitude, in his
handling of the reins of his exalted office.
The interference of Henry VIII. in the affairs of
Scotland took the form of an attempt to negotiate a
marriage between the Prince of Wales and the
infant Queen of Scots. Facilities for promoting this
match lay to his hand in the return of the Earl of
Angus and the exiled Douglasses, as well as of
numerous prisoners of rank taken at the disgraceful
raid of Solway in 1542, all of whom were strictly
enjoined by Henry to use their endeavours for the
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 365
furtherance of his pet scheme. This scheme, had it
only aimed at a union honourable to both countries,
need not have been regarded with any suspicion,
even on the ground of patriotism ; but when other
designs were entertained subversive of the national
liberties, such as the surrender of the fortresses and
the acknowledgment of Henry's paramount authority,
those Scottish nobles who promised their support
were guilty of the most ignominious treachery.
Cardinal Beaton was, of course, the most prominent
in his opposition to the designs of the English King,
and left no means untried to thwart them. Among
other means, he got Matthew, Earl of Lennox, to
return from abroad, and he being nearly related to
the Royal Family, Beaton proposed him for the
Begency in opposition to Arran, and thus wrought
upon the Begent's fears.
Whatever, in other circumstances, might have
happened, the Scottish factions were soon thrown
into each others' arms by the violent and precijDitate
temper of the English King. The disclosure of his
ulterior designs so alarmed statesmen of all parties,
that something like a rupture of diplomatic rela-
tions ensued, and the treaty for the marriage was
abandoned. The coalition thus entered into by
Cardinal Beaton and the Begent soon produced
its natural results. The Cardinal, who had pre-
vailed upon the Earl of Lennox to come to Scotland
by holding out to him high prospects of political
advancement, now grew cold in his attentions when
he had no further ends for him to serve, and we are
not surprised to find this nobleman taking umbrage
at the treatment, espousing the cause of the party
opposed to the Cardinal, and becoming a strenuous
supporter of English influence in Scottish affaii's.
366 THE CLAN DONALD.
Lennox had gone the length of securing the assist-
ance of the French King for the prosecution of the
war with England, now regarded as inevitable, and
a French fleet actualfy arrived in the Firth of Clyde
laden with military stores and a sum of 10,000
crowns, to be distributed among the Cardinal's
friends. The French Ambassador, not knowing
that the Earl of Lennox had recently changed his
political connection, allowed himself and the Earl
of Glencairn, a staunch upholder of the English
interest, to help themselves to the gold which he
had in his custody, and it was only after the
mistake could no longer be repaired that he
discovered how adroitly the two noblemen had
circumvented him.
It was at this juncture, when tiie Scottish body
politic was rent by conflicting interests, passions,
and intrigues, and English influence was actively
interposing in Scottish affairs, that Donald Dubh
once more made his dehiit upon the stormy theatre
of war. At the time of his escape from Inchconnel,
forty years before, he had been proclaimed Lord of
the Isles with all the traditional rites and cere-
monies ; but now he lays claim to the Earldom of
Ross as well, and, as soon as circumstances permit,
addresses himself to the task of dislodging the Earls
of Argyle and Huntly from the possessions which
belonged to his ancestors, the former in the South
Highlandn, the latter in the region of Lochaber.
Both these noblemen have received praise from
writers of history for their loyalty to the throne
during the confusion and political corruption of
these troublous times. It must, however, be
remembered that the interests of both were intim-
ately bound up with the maintenance of the
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES Y. 367
established order, and that with Argyle especially,
threatened as he was with eviction, bas" and
baggage, from the Lordship of the Isles, antagonism
to England — the ally of his foe — and consequent
support of the Scottish cause, was the only possible
line of action for the preservation of his estates.
When Donald Dubh found himself at large, he
realised the necessity of proceeding with caution
and deliberation. The most powerful of the High-
land chiefs were still prisoners in the Castle of
Edinburgh, from which he had just escaped, and,
consequently, the Western Clans were bereft of
the hereditary leaders, without whose presence the
movement could not possibly gather its full and
legitimate force. In these circumstances a truce
was arranged with the Earl of Argyle to last till
May-day of that year ; but although on the expiry
of the induciae both sides were engaged in hostilities,
these did not, at the outset, assume very formidable
proportions. At last an event occurred which
immediately and powerfully affected the position
and prospects of the new Lord of the Isles. The
Regent Arran, a man of indolent and facile dis-
position, did — on the suggestion of the Earl of
Glencairn — liberate the Highland chiefs, who had
been imprisoned since 1540 as hostages for the
peace of their districts. The object of Glencairn
clearly was to create such discord and civil strife
in Scotland as would absorb the energies of loyal
nobles and weaken the forces available for resisting
the designs of the English King. The conduct of
the Regent, assuming, as we may, that he was
sincere in his maintenance of the national integrity,
was little better than midsummer madness. He
took bonds from the liberated chiefs " that they
368 THE CLAN DONALD.
should not make any stir or breach in their country
but at such time as he should appoint them," and,
no doubt, they were delighted to obtain their
freedom upon terms so easy ; but bonds imposed
under such conditions were soon found to be value-
less. It appears from Donald Dubh's correspondence
with Henry YIII. that the Regent made overtures
to him also to secure his submission and allegiance
upon favourable terms ;^ but in this also he was
unsuccessful, and very shortly after the Chieftains
of the Isles had shaken the dust of Edinburgh from
their feet, Celtic Scotland was once more in the
throes of a revolution.
The liberation of the Chiefs was soon followed by
overt action on the part of the Lord of the Isles. He
took the field with 1800 men, and, invading the terri-
tories of Argyle, he plundered the country and put
many of the vassals to the sword. In this, Donald
had the unanimous support of the vassals of the Isles,
with the single exception of James Macdonald of
Dunnyveg, who withheld his personal co-operation.
If Argyle in the South Highlands was sore beset by
the Western Clans, the Earl of Huntly, as Lieutenant
of the North and owner of extensive territories there,
had similar difficulties to contend with. The follow-
ing extract from the Council records of the Burgh of
Aberdeen illustrates the feeling of insecurity that
existed in the North, and the preparations for
resistance that were being made against the antici-
pated invasion from England, as well as expected
incursions by Donald and his Islesmen : —
"January 26th, 1544. — The sayd day the hayll tooun beying
varnit to this day be thair hand bell passand throcht all the rewis
and stretis of this said toun be the berar therof on the quhilk he
maid fayth in iugment and in speciale be the officiaris of the said
^ Documents in State Paper Office,
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 369
burghe on the qvihilks inlikwyise thai maid fayth in iugmcnt and
comperand for the maist part rcpresentand the haill body of the
townn thar was presentit to thame the quenis grace lettres afor
written ; ane one the sowme of four hundredth hb. xiiij lib. vjs.
viid. of taxt, for furnesing of ane thousand horse to remain with
the Jocumtenant on the bordouris, for resisting of our auld enemies
of Ingland during the space of thre moneths, and als thair was
presentit in iugment two writingis of the Erie of Huntlie locum-
tenant generale of the North of Scotland be the seruandis upoun
the said townn in fear of weir, with all necessaris as efFerit, with
twenty days vitelling to pas with the said locumtenent for resisting
of Donald His quhilk with his complices is cumand, as is allegit
upoun the quenis landis of Koss for inuasion tluiirof and con-
quesing of the same."
In the very midst of Donald Diibh's rebellion the
Northern Highlands were plunged into still greater
disorder by a feud that sprung up between John
Moydartach of Clanranald and the Frasers of Lovat,
and which resulted in the sanguinary battle of
Kinloch Lochy, known in the Highlands as Blar
Leine, and fought on the 15th July, 1545. The
details of this tragic field will fall to be narrated in
a subsequent volume. We refer to it at this stage
to show that John Moydartach, by engaging Huntly
and Lord Lovat, the partisans of the Crown, was
fighting, not only for his own hand, but in the
interests of the Lord of the Isles as well. In the
meantime, the relations between Henry VIII. and
the Scottish Government grew, if possible, more
bitter. The English King sent an expedition, under
the command of the Earl of Lennox, which did much
havoc in the West Highlands. Arran was attacked
and plundered, and the Castle of Brodick reduced to
ashes, while the Island of Bute, with its Castle of
Eothesay, was reduced. After an ineffectual attempt
to take Dunbarton Castle, Lennox returned to Eng-
land. On the 13th of August, 1545, the Scottish
24
370 THE CLAN DONALD.
Lords addressed a letter from Melrose to Henry
VIII., in which they advised an invasion of Scotland
in force, and that an expedition for that purpose
should be organised, under command of the Earl of
Hertford. Preparations v^ere already in progress
for an invasion by land, as well as a naval descent
upon the West Coast, and, in the course of these,
negotiations were opened with Donald Dubh, who
was now at the head of the whole military strength
of the Isles. Alliances with England were nothing
new in the history of the House of Isla, and Donald,
true to his family traditions, and smarting under his
imprisonment of half a century, disclaimed allegiance
to Scotland, and, with the Earl of Lennox as inter-
mediary, entered into a treaty with the English
King. In the month of June, it is evident that the
communications passing between the English interest
and the Lord of the Isles had come under the notice
of the Scottish Government, and a Proclamation was
issued by the Kegent Arran and his Council against
" Donald alleging himself of the Isles and other
Highlandmen his partakers." Donald and his accom-
plices were charged with invasions upon the Queen's
lieges, both in the Isles and in the Mainland,
assisted by the King of England, with whom
thej were leagued, shewing that they purposed
bringing these under obedience to that Sovereign.
The Proclamation called upon them to desist from
such treasonable and rebellious conduct, failing
which they were threatened with serious pains
and penalties. It is thus apparent that before
we have any record of a formal league between
Donald Dubh and Henry VIII., the Scottish
Government regarded the alliance as practically
complete, and Henry's expedition to the West under
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 371
Lennox as in aid of the efforts of the Lord of the
Isles for the recovery of his patrimony. This Pro-
clamation failed, of course, to produce the desired
result, and processes of treason were commenced and
carried through as expeditiously as was compatible
with Parliamentary procedure. So far as we can
ascertain, the first extant record of the league with
England bears the date of 23rd July, 1545, and is
contained in the " Commission from the Lord of the
Isles of Scotland to treat with the King of England,"
the tenour whereof follows : —
" Be it kend till all men be ye pnt wryt We Donald Lord of
ye His and Eiil of Roiss with adviss and consent of our barronis
and counsaill of ye His that is to say Hector Machine Lord of
Doward Jhonn Macallister Capitane of Clanranald Lord MacLeod
of Lewiss Alex^ MacLeod of Dunbeggane Murdoch Maclane of
Lochbouy Angus Maconill brudir german to James Maconill Allan
Maclane of Torloske brudir german to ye Lord Maclane Archibald
Maconill Capitane of Clan Hustein Alex.'^ Mackane of Ardna-
murchan Jhonn Maclain of Coll gilliganan MacNeill of barray
Mackiynnan of Straquhordill Johnn Macquore of Ulwy Jhonn
Maclane of Ardgor Alex"^ rannoldson of Glengarrie Angus ronaldson
of Cnoeddart Donald Maclane of Kengarloch, to have maid
constitud and ordanit and be yir our presentis makis constitutis
and ordanis giffand our full power express bidding and command
to honorable person is and our kynnsmen yat is to say Rore
Makallester elect to ye bishoppe of the Isles in Scotland and deyn
of Moruairin and Mr Patrik Maclain brudir german to yc said
Lord m*^ lain bailze of ycomkill and iustice clerk of ye South His
cointlie and sevralie our aid and indorsetit Comissionaris, We
beand bodely swarne to stand ferme and stable at all and haill ye
saidis Comissionaris promittis or does in our name and bchalve
We neer to own in ye contrar of ye samyn and We admit ye sadis
Comissionaris to bind and to lowss to follow and defend to tyn
and wyn to end and compleit as such awin proper persins war
presentis in all materis as will be commandit yamc be Mathew erll
of Lennox and secund persoun of ye realm of Scotland endowdit
and in speciall testifying our Landis instantlic be maid to ane
most nobill and potent prince Harye ye acht be ye grace of god
372 THE CLAN DONALD.
King of ingland france and Ireland yir forsadis Comissionaris
haifFand our full power to acit and to end in all udir our
afFairis concerning ye Kingis maieste of ingland france and
Ireland and ye said erll of Lennox as ye said erll will comand.
Comanding yir our sadis Comissionaris and for better secuorite of
yis present we ye said Donald has afiixit our proper seill wit our
hand at ye pen becaus we can not writ and has causit ye baronis
aboun writtin becaus thai co<^ not writ to cause ane no tar to
subscribe for yame w* yair hand at ye pen w* yair bodely auttie
neir to cum in ye contrar of ye samyn And als we have gifiin
Commissioun to our saidis Comissiounaris to mak ye selis of yir
our baronis aboun wtin gif neid be or requirit ye qlk ye saidis
baronis has swarne afore ane notar publick to stand and abyd at
ye saidis selis ^ selit be saidis Comissionaris and nere to cum in ye
contrar of ye sam and has selit our proper seill and signet w* ye
saidis Comissionaris for ye completing and ending of all besynes
comandit or requirit be ye said erll of Lennox In witness heirof
we have yir pret Comissioun afoir patrik Colquhoun of pemwul
Walter macfarlan of Ardlys Sr archibald m'^gillivray Vicar of
Killane Mr Jhonn Carswell notaris publick requirit to ye samyn
w*- witness."^
The foregoing document, drawn up in the island
of Eigg — or EUancarne as it is designated in the
conclusion of the deed — contains the names of all
the Island vassals, with the exception already
referred to, and even the Lord of Dunnyveg was
efficiently represented by his brother Angus, who,
no doubt, was accompanied by a contingent of
fighting men from his native Isla. The delibera-
tions which find expression in this remarkable
paper seem to have been conducted with a unity and
cohesiveness of purpose not always characteristic of
the policy of the Western Chiefs. Even Maclan of
Arclnamurchan — who, in former days, was wont to
play into the hands of the House of Argyle, acting
the part of jackal to the lion of Inverary — now falls
^ "Seal" ill this connectiou evideutly means " siguature. "
^ Extracted from Correspondence in State Paper Office.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 373
in line with the rest of the Clan Donald chiefs.
The leading motive of the movement was un-
doubtedly the attachment of the Islesmen to the
historic family which had so long borne sway in
the Western Highlands, and though the attitude
of the Chiefs would not have been weakened by
the vision of English gold held up to them by the
emissaries of Henry, the history of the Highland
people is very far from ju-stifying the suspicion
that mercenary motives played more than a very
subordinate part in the support now accorded to
the last representative of the House of Isla.
From the Isle of Eigg, a favourite rendezvous
with the men of the Isles, the scene changes to
the North of Ireland. There, about a week later,
we find the Island Lord with all his barons, an
army of 4000 men, and 180 galleys. The meeting
place of the Council of the Isles was the chapter
house of the Monastery of Greyfriars at Knock-
fergus, and there were also present Patrick Colquhoun
and Walter Macfarlane, Commissioners of the Earl
of Lennox^ ; also Walter Cluddy Constable, Henry
Wyld Mayor, Patrick Macgelloquhowill and Nicolas
Wild Bailies, of the same town. It is also inter-
esting to note the presence of John Carswell, who
afterwards rose to eminence as the first Protestant
Bishop of the Isles, and whose edition of the prayer-
book in the vernacular is one of the treasures of
Gaelic literature. He signs and indorses, in the
capacity of Notary Public, several of the more
important documents written in the course of this
unique correspondence with the English Govern-
' Agreement of Lord of the Isles and other Chieftauis and Commissioners
of Lennox, in State Paper Office,
374 THE CLAN DONALD.
ment. The Islesmen pledge anew their allegiance
to the English monarch, and promise to do all in
their power to promote the scheme which Henry
still hoped to carry into effect, the marriage of the
Prince of Wales and the infant Princess of Scotland.
This is but a preliminary to other instruments of
agreement and concord which are formulated upon
the same days. In a letter of 6th August, from
Donald to the Privy Council of Henry VHI., we
have for the first time an intimation of the monetary
assistance offered to him for his services, as well as
to aid him in the recovery of his rights. This aid
consisted of a gift of 1000 crowns, sent by the Privy
Council by the hands of Patrick Colquhoun, who, in
the interval since the meeting of Council at Eigg,
has found time to be the bearer of English treasure
to the Island Lord. This is accompanied by the
promise of an annual pension of 2000 crowns for life,
conditioned, of course, by the continuance of his allegi-
ance— ad vitam aut culparii. The Commissioners
from the Lord of the Isles have not yet, however,
gone on their important errand to lay their master's
commands before the King and Council of England.
A series of Articles,^ to be placed in the hands of
the Island Deputies in support of their Commission,
w^as drawn up on the 5th August ; but it would
appear that, on the arrival of the Earl of Lennox
on the scene of Council, other Articles, similar in
number and substance, but containing much addi-
tional matter, were substituted in their room, and
as these shed an interesting light upon the
transactions of the period, we propose to quote
them here as fully and accurately as we can.
^ Documents in State Paper Office,
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 375
" To OUR VERRY GOOD LORDIS OF YE COUNSALL THESE BE
GIFFEN
" Item first, that quhare we desyrit in our artikills to your
Lordshipis bewrtt afore my lord therlle of Lenox coming (second
ppersoun of the realme of Scotland), his Lordship to be send in
Scotland w* ane arme for settin fast of the Kingis enemys of
Scotland. In the nixt artikill quhar our Lord and Maister t' erll
of Ross and lord of the His promittis that his Lordship shall
distroye the tane half of Scotland or than mak theyme to cum to
the Kingis maiesties obedience and to my Lord t' Erlle of Lenox
his hienes subject. The third artikill quhar the said erll of ross
our Maister him becom the Kingis grace subject bodelye
sworne wyt the lord Maclane and the rest of the barronis of the
His . and desyris the Kingis grace w* awise of your Lordships his
good counsall to mak no aggreance with Scotland, and in speciall
w* the erllis huntlie and argyll, wy*out the said erll of ross, the
lord Maclane Captain of Clanranald wy* the rest of the barronis of
the His, the quhilkis ar becom the Kingis grace subjectis be
includit therin the fourt artikill quhar it specifyith of the Kingis
maiesteis most noble gudness and your Lordships his most honor-
able counsall hath written w* patrick colquhoun seruaud to our
good lord t' erlle of Lenox to gif the said erll of ross ane yeirlie
pension of two thousand crownis for service doyne and to be doyne
of the quhilk sum his Lordship hath rasawit be the said patrick
Colquhoun xiiii. hundreth crownis w* uderis presentis send be
t' erlle of Lennox as his discharge at more lenth beareth, of the
qlk yeirlie pension the said erlle of ross desyris sich suirness of
his hienes as sal be requirit rasonable be us his Commissionaris,
and his most noble hienes and your good Lordships thinkis
expedient, w* his grace mainteinyng and defending the said ei-11 of
ross injoeing and bruiking all heretages and possessionis that his
forbearis erlles of ross and Lordis of the His bruikit of befoir.
The fift artikill and last of all beareth that quhar the said erll of
ross promittis to serve the Kingis maiestie and my lord t' erlle of
Lennox w* the number of viii. thousand men, four thousand men
of the same now instanllie is come in the Kingis maiesteis boundis
of Ireland, the uther four thousand is keepand than' awin boundis
agains the erlles huntlie and argyill, the quhilk stayis the saidis
erllis to remane in thair awin boundis, and may not supplie nor
defend the bordoris of Scotland in contrarie the Kingis maiesteis
arme the said cril of ross desyris to have wagis to three thousand
of the said eytht thousand the uther five thousand to serve the
376 THE CLAN DONALD.
Kingis maiestie in favour of my lord t' erlle of Lennox not takand
wagis and this my lordis the said erll of Ross the lord maclane
and the rest of the barronies of the His to becom the Kingis grace
is subjectis as said is, in the fauo^' causing and your afFectioun had
in the said erlle of Lennox and in especialle be suir knowledge of
the gudness that the Kingis most noble maiestie hath doyn and
dalie dois to the said erll of Lennox.
" Item after the comying of the said erll of Lennox we hearand
his Lordship's mynd concernynge the Kingis graces affaires with
presents in o'' Lord and maistiris name the said erlle of ross and
Lord of the His, of my lord of Lennox w*" the Kingis grace is arme
pass uppon Dunbertan or uppon any uther the wcast ptis of
Scotland we sail mak the number of vi. thousand men wyth their
galays and vesshells conforme to the said number to forme the
Kingis graces and my lord errle of Lennox, and yf his Lordship
pass ujjpon the erllis huntlie or Argyill we shall mak the holle
number of viii. thousand, for yf we laif o^' awiu boundis. It most
needis that we laif sum men keepand theym, and those at remains
at hoyme dois the Kingis grace als good service in defending
agains tlie erllis huntlie and Argyill as they do that comynd furt.
" Item secondlie my lordis we exhort your Lordships to
remembr and consider quhat honorable and faithful service we
pinit to do the Kingis maiesties in o^" Liffis and honor and quhath
our maister t' erll of ross hath refusit all oiferis ofierit unto his
Lordship be the guvernor and Lordis of Scotland and in cause of
our good lord t' erlle of Lennox is become the Kingis graces
sultject. And now lastlie hath made slachtir burnying of and
hcrschipps upon the Scottis men takand the pursute of all Scot-
land upon him. This my Lordis because it is the Kingis graces
and your Lordships let not the said erll of ross be dethroynit be
the holle realme of Scotland, for if his boundis be destroyit, he
may not mak the Kingis maiestie so good service as he may quhil
his cuntrie is sawf, and considder quhat the Kingis maiestie
lyekith to spend in his grace and my lord of Lennox afifairis and
that our Maistir and Lord is defended agains the Scottis men, w*
the grace of god It shall redound in much more value to his
maiesties is proffitt honor and obedience, the qlkand his grace
walden have of Scotland If it shal be socht and win be the weast
jDarts and His in suiretie.
" Item thirdly becaus we have hard and considerit quhow that
the Kingis maiestie and my lord t' erlle of Lennox hath beyne
defraudit be the Lordis of Scotland, the quhilk schuld cans the
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 377
Kinge graces and your good Lords of the counsall to be the more
warr with all the nation of Scottis, this for their frauds, and in
spcciall wyt we that is callit the wyld His of Scotland, for tlic
caiis my Lordis we besech your Lordships to have no sich conscit
in us, as we belieff suirlie your Lordships wisdom will not quharfor
your Lardships sail consider we have beyne auld enemies to the
realme of Scotland, and quhen they had peasthe with the Kiugis
hienes, they hanged hedit prisoned and destroied many of our Kyn
friendis and forbears as testefyit be our Maistir terlle of ross now
the Kingis grace subject the quliilk hes lyin in preson afoir he was
borne of his modir, and nocht releissit wit thair will bot now
laitle by the grace of God. In likewise the lord Maclane is fadir
was cruillie murdessit onder ti-aist in his bed in the town of
edinbruighe be Sr John Cambell of Calder brudir to terlle of
Argyill. The Captain of Clanranald the last yeir ago in his
defence slew the Lord Lowett his sone and air, his thre brothir
with xiii. score of men and many uther cruel slachter, burnying
and herschcp that hath betuix us and the sadis Scottis the qlk
was lang to wrythe, for the qlk causis we are not able to agre w*
the sadis Scottismen, and now most of all can thai knaw that we
ar becom the Kingis grace subjectis the hatrand wilbe the grittar
betwixt us and them yan it was afoir, and
" Item fourtlie and last of all your Lordship to considder that
sen we have no uther refuge bot onlic his most noble hienes and
o»' good lord t' erlle of Lennox, tlie q^^ lord and we hath no help
bot of his gracious hienes. And for the tyme is most convenient
now betwix and Christmas to perseue Scotland, and that we are
not best holdin w* wittalis, and most able to do theym grittast
skayth in cornis cattell goodis and biggynis to assay the said erll
of Lennox and o^" maistir t' erll of ross be the Kingis grace is
supple And or his hienes spend anything that may do his Maistir
hurt it shalbe persewit gif our Maistir and Lord performe as we
promist in his name, and It is now convenient to go to warr nor if
continow longer becaus off my Lord terlle of Lennox he is not sett
furtly and our Lord and maistir suppleit now instantlie, our
enemy wilbe the more bawld uppoun us, and mak their vavxnt that
our Maister t' erlle of ross is service Is not acceptil be ye, Kinge
hienes, and in lyke manner the frenchmen will say that they hold
the Kingis grace in sich besynes that his maiestie may not supple
o^" Maistir nor persew his gracis rychtis of Scotland for feir of
theym, and this we pray your Lordship to inform the Kingis
hienes of the sam, that the precious and convenient tyme be no
378 THE CLAN DONALD.
lost ye qi'^ onis lost is unretrevable and on o^' Lyffis your
Lordshippis had neir as good tyme as now.
" Finale my Lordis to concluid we pray your good Lordshepps
to have us excusit of our lang wryttand and barbarous discourse
to consider o'' mynd and not the wryttand that our mind is not to
persuaed your Lordshipps w*^ wordis, or to be desyras of the
Kingis grace is money bot It shalbe onderstand be our good Lord
t' erll of Lennox and theym that gois in his company as pleses the
Kingis maiestie and your good Lord that quhar we desyre one
crowin of his hienes we shall spend thre in his grace is service w*
the grace of God prayand Christ Jesu to have ye Kingis maiestie
in keeping and yo'' Lordshipps, w'^ aught as your Lordshipps
thinkis expedient."
The foregoing lengthy statement exhibits a con-
siderable amount of astuteness both in its conception
and its terms, and the programme laid down, had it
been pushed with vigour and determination, might
have proved disastrous to the freedom of Scotland.
The policy of keeping Argyle and Huntly engaged
in the defence of their own territory, by maintaining
an army in the Isles, and thus preventing their
taking part in the general defence of the kingdom ;
the appeal to Henry's pride not to delay the invasion
of Scotland lest the French should say that the war
against their country absorbed the whole of his
resources ; all this displayed some diplomatic ability,
while the closing paragraphs give vent to feelings of
bitterness engendered by the memory of past oppres-
sion.
The letter of Donald Dubh to Henry VI H.
concludes the more important portion of this corres-
pondence on the part of the Lord of the Isles. It
has never hitherto been published, and a document
so remarkable both as to form and substance well
deserves reproduction in the annals of the Clan.
The tenour of this epistle is as follows : —
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 379
" To your most illustrious highness, most invincible King,
from our inmost heart we offer most humble submission. We
accept truly both the letter and the magnificent gift of your
highness, rejoicing not so much in the gift itself as that j'our
highness has deigned to look upon our low estate, and receive us
into favour ; and this by suggestion of our singular friend, the
Earl of Lennox, the true and vmdoubted Governor of Scotland,
with whom we are ready even to the last day of our life, either in
war or in peace to live, yea, if it should be necessary to meet
death. We have come therefore most potent prince to your
Majesty's country of Ireland attended by 4000 soldiers in that
place (and also wherever your highness shall wish) according to
the wish and desire of the foresaid Earl to offer most diligent
service ; on which account our Commissioners and dear friends the
bearers of these presents we have good to send to your most
magnificent excellency of wliom one is elected to the dignity of
the bishopric of the Isles, the other, a brother of laird MacLane of
Dowart, bailie of Icolumkill and chief Justiciar of the Isles ; to
whom equally as to ourselves we wish faith to be given. And
how great is the joy I feel, reflecting in my mind how your most
Christian Majesty, imitating the example of Christ (who chose not
the great and the rich but the poor and fishers to be disciples and
Apostles), hath not disdained to stoop yourself to our humble con-
dition although from our mother's womb we were bound in the yoke
and servitude of our enemies, and to this very time overwhelmed
with the filth of the prison and with intolerable fetters most cruelly
bound. But lest by excessive and rude talk I cause any weari-
ness to your magnificence, one thing is most certain that we by
our Earl Lennox (who ought to govern Scotland) will as long as
we live be most obedient and submissive to your most Christian
Majesty, whom may Jesus Christ vouchsafe to preserve in pro-
sperity of soul and body. At Knockfergus the fifth day of August
1545.
" To your most invincible highness the most obedient and
humble Donald Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles of Scotland,
etc."
From the correspondence thus quoted at some
length, we learn that certain definite proposals were
made to Henry VIII. by Donald Dubh and his
Council, proposals which had been clearly elicited by
380 THE CLAN DONALD.
previous overtures on the part of the English King.
The main drift of the message borne by the Com-
missioners was to the effect that the territories
claimed by Donald Dubh were to be held of
Henry VIII. as liege Lord, and that Donald was to
assist in the invasion and conquest of Scotland with
8000 men, 3000 of whom were to be in the King's
pay, while the rest were to be maintained at
Donald's own chai'ges. For these services the Lord
of the Isles was to receive an annual pension of
2000 crowns, in addition to a gift of 1000 crowns
already given him as a token of goodwill and as
an earnest of future favoiu^s. The first payment
included, along with 1000 crowds, 300 crowns
additional, which must have been either an instal-
ment of the annual pension voted by the English
Privy Council, or a sum to account for the main-
tenance of the host. Armed with the fullest
instructions, the two plenipotentiaries of the Lord
of the Isles set sail for England.
The scene of diplomacy next shifts to the King's
Manor of Oatlands, where Henry VI 11. receives the
Deputies of Donald Dubh on 4th September of that
year. The primary result of the negotiations con-
ducted there was an aiiTeement arrived at between
the English King and the Commissioners on the
basis of the Island Lord's proposals. The agreement
is in the following terms : —
" To all men to quhome theiss presentis sail cum be It known
that quhair oiu' Lord Donald of the His and erll of ross has
direckit us Lord Macallister elect of the Ills and deyu of Morverin
and Maister patrick Maclane brudir german to Lord Maclane
bailzie of ycomkil and justice clerk of the South Ilis as liis com-
missionaris to the most noble hieast and victorius prence Henry be
the grace of god King of Ingiand France and Ireland supreme head
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 381
of the fayth and of the Churchis of ingland and Ireland supreme
hed not onlie to present a wrytting of en othe maid to his
Maiestie be the said erll of ross as in the letters thereof maid
selit and delyeverit is contenit hot also has gifFen us authorite to
promiss and bynd the said erll and others adhering to him to
observe and keip sich covenants and conditions as sal be be us
aggreit their unto We theirfore the said Commissionaris consider-
ing the grit gudness speciall favour and benignite of the Kingis
said maiestie speciallie that it plesis the same to grant unto the
said erll a yeirlye pension of two thousand crownis as appearis by
his hienes lettres patentis made of the same and that furthermore
his maiestie is content so to accepit the said erll and uther to him
adhering unto his protection as if ony aggrement be maid wythin
the realme of Scotland to comprehend the same Comissionaris doo
promiss for in the behalf of the said erll that they sail trewlie and
faythfullie serve his maiestie to their powaris and to the anoyances
of the governor and his partakers in the realme of Scotland we
shall not entre any practiss of agrement wyth t' erllis of huntlie or
Argyill or any of the realme of Scotland or other in their name or
otherwise to the Kingis maiesti's prejudice, but always persist and
continow the Kinge maiestis trew ffrinds and subject wythout
doing any act to the contrarye And uthers the Kingis maiestie
sendis at this present th' erll of Lennox and his company th' erlle
of Osmond and Osserey of Ireland with a number of men to invade
the realm of Scotland and besides general annoyance to be doon in
burnying herwing and spoiling as they have opportunitie contre
so farre as Stirling iff they may see the enterprise faisable The
said Comissionaris promiss that the said erll an others to him
adhering shall furnishe presentlie in the said enterprise to goo
under the rule and leading of the said erll of Lennox VIII
thousand men so long as the said erll of Lennox shall remayn in
the countrey of the erlle of Argyill and for the tyme the said erll
of Lennox shall be in any other parte of Scotland the said erll of
ross and others shall furnishe only VI thovisand and tother II
thousand to be employed otherwise at home in the noyaunce of
the said erll of Argilis country in the meane season In which
case the kingis maiestie is content uppon such service doon to
allowe unto the said erll and others besides the number furnished
at the kingis maiesti's charge out of Ireland wage for throe
thousand of their said men for the space of two monthis after such
rate as highnes is accustomed to pay to his own.
382
THE CLAN DONALD.
" In witnes hereof we have subscribed these presentis with our
own hande and sette the seal of the said erll our Master delyward
by him unto us for that purpose at the Kingis manor of Otland ye
fourt daye of September ye yeyr of God anno fourtie fyef yeyrs."
«^ ,V-<p.*H^ J^ ^ ^^
cf-^ >h;-u*v- ^W^
d
The Commissioners from the Lord of the Isles, in
addition to the foregoing agreement, bore with them
a letter direct from Henry in answer to that which
Donald had sent to the English King a month pre-
viously. This letter is in the following terms : —
" Right trusty and right well beloved Cousyn we grete you
well and late you wite that we have recyved your letters and Avid
of your submission to our service and allegeaunce made by our
welbeloved the Bishop elect of thyles and the lord Maclane's
brother which we have taken in verrye good and thankfull parte
And we have harde the credence which they had to declaire unto
us on your behaulf and having communed thereupon with our
right trusty and right welbeloved Cousin therlle of Lennox and
the rest of our counsall we have made such an honorable answar
to the same as you shall have good cause in reason to be contented
likeas presently our said cousin of Lennox at his coming hither
and the said bishop and the lord Maclane's brother will signify
unto you shall proyve by such writinge as they bringe with them
Praying you good Cousin to proceed like a noble man to the
revenge of such dishonoures as your enemyes and ours to have
doon both to you and to us and to retrieve the same as moch as
you can and you shall well prove that you have given yourself to
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 383
the servyce of such a Prynce as will consider your welldoing
herein and the good service which you shall minister unto us in
this behalf has the same shall redound to your own benefit and
comeditie Given under our signet at o'" manor of Oteland the
nyth daye of September the xxxvii*^ yere of our Reign."
A letter in precisely similar terms was addressed
by Henry to Hector Maclean of Dowart, whose
name appears at the beginning of the list of Island
barons, and who seems to have taken a leading part
in all the negotiations coiniected with Donald Dubh's
rebellion and his treaty with the English Govern-
ment. He seems to have naturally stepped into his
hereditary position as Seneschall or Steward of the
Isles, and his well-known ability in war and council
qualified him to be Donald's chief adviser during his
brief and troubled rule. The Commissioners of the
Lord of the Isles, Roderick MacAlister, Dean of
Morvern, and Patrick Maclean, Justiciar of the
South Isles, having carried out to the letter the
instructions wherewith they had been charged,
returned to Knockfergus. It was understood that
the Earl of Lennox was to lead an expedition against
the West of Scotland, assisted by the Lord of the
Isles, with eight thousand men. It was stipulated,
in terms of the agreement already quoted, that so
long as Lennox remained in the country of Argyle,
the forces of Donald were to aid him in undiminished
strength, but on his proceeding to any other part of
Scotland, he should be accompanied by six thousand
men. It was also arranged that the Earl of Ormond
should levy two thousand " kerns and gallowglasses"
to assist Lennox in his campaign, while the Irish
Privy Council made all necessary preparations to
equip this force for military duty.
Matters were thus maturing rapidly for an inva-
sion of Scotland in force, and vexed as that country
384 THE CLAN DONALD.
was at the time by civil and religious discord, it is
hard to say what the result might have been had not
circumstances intervened to postpone decisive action.
At this particular moment the Earl of Hertford was
preparing to invade Scotland, and for some reason
which history does not record, Lennox, along with
other Scottish nobles in the English interest, was
summoned to his camp. Lennox, who seems all
along to have displayed a lack of promptitude and
resolution, lingered among his English friends, and
his procrastination proved fatal to the projected
descent upon the West of Scotland. Donald Dubh
and his Council had all along pressed upon their
English allies the necessity of immediate action if
success was to crown their efforts, but now the
golden opportunity was lost, and the Lord of the
Isles, after waiting for Lennox till his own patience
and that of his followers was exhausted, and becom-
ing concerned about his own interests in Scotland,
returned thither with his army. Shortly thereafter
discord and contention, the inevitable percursors of
failure, began to appear among the barons of the
Island Council. The distribution of the gold given
by Henry YIII. for the payment of a section of the
Highland army awakened murmurings and discon-
tent. Hector Maclean, Lord of Dowart, had been
entrusted with the disbursement of the funds, but
whether the distribution was not impartially con-
ducted, or some other unrecorded causes operated, it
is clear that the treasure-laden Argosy, which,
according to M'Vurich,^ came from England to the
Sound of Mull, had a demoralising effect upon the
unity and loyalty of Donald Dubh's following, and
^ Reliquiie CelLicio, vol. II., p. 167.
..■aNV10N3 JO ONIX 3HX HJ-IM J.V3aX OX
ONVIJ-OOS JO S31SI 3HX JO OaOl 3HX WOdd NOISSIWIMOO ,, 3HX OX SNOava QNVnSI 3HX JO SaanXVNOlS 3HX dO 3niWlS-OVd
/I
r^
^
■% I .^ 5-^0 ^^ •?(
^1 i
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 385
his once formidable array became a dissolving scene
of anarchy, and melted away like a snow wreath in
thaw.
When the Earl of Lennox arrived in Ireland he-
found, not only that the armament on which he so
much relied had quitted Knockfergus for the Isles,
but that on arriving at its native shores it had been
dispersed, resolved into its constituent elements.
He, however, determined to avail himself of the
force that was being organised by the Earl of
Ormond, under instructions of the Irish Privy
Council, for the invasion of Scotland, and pending
the completion of the preparations, he despatched
Patrick Colquhoun with a few vessels to the Isles,
with the view of ascertaining whether Douald Dubh
remained loyal to Henry, and if an army could still
be raised to help in the projected invasion. On the
17th November Lennox sailed from Dublin with a
considerable and well-equipped fleet and 2000 Irish
soldiers, with the Earl of Ormond in command.
Meanwhile the Castle of Dunbarton, one of the main
objects of the intended attack, had been delivered
into the hands of the Regent, and the Earls of
Lennox and Ormond, on learning this, as well as
becoming fully aware of the hopeless disorganisation
among the barons of the Isles, seem to have
abandoned aggressive action in the West. The
records^ from which we derive much of our know-
ledge of Scottish history in this age break off
abruptly in October, 1545, and we are left in com-
parative ignorance of many of the events that
followed. According to MacVurich, Donald Dubh
accompanied the Earl of Lennox back to Ireland,
with the view of raising a new force for the pursuit
^ State papers.
25
386 THE CLAN DONALD.
of his cause in the Scottish Isles ; but we gather
from the same authority that on his way to Dubhn
he died at Drogheda of a fever of five nights. Mac-
Yurich says that he left neither son nor daughter,
but according to the documents in the State Paper
Office, already quoted at such length, in his dying
moments he bequeathed his affection to the English
King, to whom also he commended the care of his
natural son.^ Thus died Donald Dubh, after a
gallant though unsuccessful struggle to recover and
maintain the power and possessions of his fathers.
He cannot justly be blamed for disloyalty to Scot-
land and trafiicking with her foes ; for if Scotland
was his mother country, she acted from his infancy
as a cruel and relentless stepmother, to whom he
owed neither gratitude nor affection, but who had
robbed him of his patrimony, cradled him in a prison,
and placed the stigma of illegitimacy on his name.
Loyalty among those of his time who owed more
than he did to their country, was scarce as roses in
December, and it was not to be expected in one who,
like the last of the House of Isla, had been the
victim of half-a-century of wrong. Donald Dubh
must liave inherited much of the intrepidity of his
father when his ardour was not quite crushed by
fifty years of confinement. Instead of suffering his
spirit to be broken, his courage survived the squalor
and th© fetters, the lion though caged was a lion
still, and as soon as he trod his native heather, he
shows the imperial spirit of his race by taking the
place which by rights was his at the head of the
vassals of the Isles. The Earl of Lennox paid every
mark of respect to the memory of the departed
chief, and his obsequies were celebrated with a
^ Gregory's History ad tcmjjus.
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 387
magnificence acceptable to the minds of his Island
vassals.
We have it on the authority of Tytler^ that
Donald Dubh, having left no legitimate heir of his
body, nominated as his successor to the Lordship
of the Isles James Macdonald of Dunnyveg, and
that, notwithstanding the fact that he alone, among
the Highland chiefs, refrained from following his
banner. That his brother Angus, however, appears
among the barons of the Isles who constituted the
court of the late Lord seems to indicate that the
Chief of Clann Iain Mhoir may have been at heart,
if not ostensibly, in sympathy with the movement.
The Chief of Sleat was a minor, and in the unsettled
condition of affairs, if the Lordship of the Isles had
any chance of being maintained upon the old footing
it must be represented by a capable and mature
head. Failing a descendant of Donald of Harlaw
to succeed Donald Dubh, the representation natur-
ally devolved upon the head of the family of John
Mor Tainistear.
The Earl of Lennox, who still contemplated the
conquest of Scotland, sent messengers to the Isles
with intimation of Donald's death, as well as his
nomination of his successor, and shortly thereafter
James Macdonald of Dunnyveg was elected by the
clansmen to assume the vacant honour. We find,
however, that while the cadet families of Macdonald
favoured his pretensions, the majority of the other
vassals — including such powerful chiefs as Maclean,
Macleod of Lewis, Macleod of Harris, along with
the Macneills, Mackinnons, and Macquarries — were
opposed to the election." A reaction had set in
against the English alliance, and the Highland
Chiefs, beginning to anticipate the probable failure
^ Vol. v., p. 406. '^ Gregory ad tempvs.
388 THE CLAN DONALD.
of English designs in Scotland, were endeavouring
to make their peace with the Regent Arran.
Meanwhile the messengers of Lennox returned
to Dublin bearing letters from James Macdonald
of Dunnyveg, " which now declareth himself Lord
of the Isles by the consent of the nobility of the
Lisulans as the bearers affirm," to the Privy Council
of Ireland. On their arrival at the Irish capital
on the 10th February, 1546, a plenipotentiary from
the Lord of Dunnyveg, who accompanied the
messengers to Ireland, was dispatched at the
request of the new Lord to deliver an important
letter to the King of England. This letter was
in due course delivered, and as it represents the
last flickering flame of Celtic sovereignty in the
Isles, its precise terms may here be quoted : —
"Att Ai'iiamurchau, the 24th day of Januar, the yeh' of
God ane thowsand fyef huudyr 46 yeir
" We James McConaill of Dunnewaik and ye glinnis, and
aperand aeyr of ye Yllis grantis us to sene speciall letter deretik
fra your Lordschip to owr knyis men and alyas thchyng the efFecte
and forme of yair promyssis to ye Kyng of Ynlandis Majeste to
fortyfe and suple our noble cusyng Mathew Erie of Lennox.
Quairfoir we exort and prais your Lordschip, my Lord Deput of
Yrland, with ye weill awyissit Consall of Duply n, to schaw in owr
behalf and exprem to ye Kingis Majeste, that we are reddy, eftir
our extrem power, our Kinyesman and alya namely our cusyng
Alan McKlayn of Gyga, Clanronald, Clanechanroun, Clancayn,
and our awin sowrname, bayth north and sowth, to tak ane pairt
with ye said Erll of Lenox, or ony oder qwhat sumever, ye Kingis
Majeste plaissis, to have autyrize or constitut be his grace, in
Scotland ; leilly and trewly the foirsaid Kingis Majeste sendand
pairt of power to us, in company with ye said Erll of Lenox in ane
honest army to ye Yll of Sanday, besyd Kintyer, at Sanct Patrikis
day next to cowm, or yairby, athowe ye said maist excellent Prence
gifFand to us his Majestes raward and sikar, band conformand and
equivalent his Gracis band maid to our cheyf maister Donald Lord
Yllis, whom God asolzeit, ye quhilk deid in his Graceis serwece
THE CLAN DONALD UNDER JAMES V. 389
yis beand acceptibill promist and admittit, we require twa or thre
schyppis to be send to us to ye abowen expromit place, with yeis
berar Hector Donaldsone, beand ane pylayt to ye sammyn, 20
dayes or yo army cowmcs, that we might be foruest and gadderit
agayns ye comyng of ye said army ; to quhawm plais your Lord-
schip geif firm credence in our behalf. And for kepying and
obserwyng of yir presente promittes, desyring siklyke formaly to
be send to us with ye said schippis, we haif affixit our proper seill
to the samyng, with our subscription manuall, the day, zeir, and
place abown expremit.
"James McConil of Dunnewaik and Glennis."
The overtures of the Lord of Dunnyveg did not,
so far as we can gather, meet with any response
from the EngUsh King or his Council. The reasons
for this oversight, so inconsistent with Henry's
policy in the past, are to be found in contemporary
history. For one thing, the Earl of Lennox, who the
previous year had by his delay on the English
borders led to the failure of Donald Dubh's rebellion
now by undue haste rendered abortive the proposals
of the new Lord of the Isles. Without waiting for
the return of his own envoy from the Isles bearing
communications from James Macdonald of Dunny-
veg, he had, with the Earl of Ormond, led an
expedition to the Western Isles, which eventually
succeeded in nothing, because it had attempted
nothing beyond a naval demonstration ; and now
when the messengers from Macdonald arrived at
Dublin, the absence of Lennox, who was the main-
spring of Henry's designs and the chief instrument
of his policy in Scotland, proved disastrous to the
new undertaking. On the other hand, Henry VIII. ,
deeply engrossed in the intrigues with the Scottish
nobles that led to the murder of Cardinal Beaton,
found his hands too fall to permit attention to the
particular detail of his policy which affected the
390 THE CLAN DONALD.
Isles of Scotland. It was not, we suppose, that he
underestimated the importance of this particular
card in the diplomatic game which he was playing,
but he seems to have put oif consideration of it to a
more convenient season. By the time he was
prepared to take it up again, the Lord of Dunnyveg
had abandoned his claim. Having met with no
active co-operation from England in vindicating the
position to which he was elected, he took no overt
action, subsided once more into the attitude of a
loyal subject, and was restored to favour with the
Scottish Regent. This was the final episode in the
eventful history of the Island Lordship, and with it
passed away the last vestige of hope among the
Clan Donald vassals that the ancient principality,
which had withstood the political storms of ages,
might yet be restored.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 391
CHAPTER XIII.
SOCIAL HISTORY.
Structure of Celtic Society. — The Council of St Finlaggan. —
Accounts of Proclamation of Lords of the Isles. — An Inde-
pendent Mortuath. — Tanistry. — The Toshach. — The Judge.
— Officials. — Relation to the Land. — The Tribe-lands. —
Demesne and Church Lands. — Law of Gavel. — The Nobility
and Commonalty. — -Mackintosh Charter. — Herezeld Blodwite.
— Ward and Relief. — Marriage Law. — Hand-fasting. — State
and Wealth of Island Princes.
The Lordship of the Isles, as must appear to our
readers, was the most considerable survival in
Scotland of the old Celtic system which in earlier
ages so widely prevailed. It was on account of the
truly Celtic character and spirit of the heads of the
House of Isla and their maintenance of the traditions
of the Gael, that the distinctively Celtic elements of
society throughout the Western Highlands clung so
tenaciously to the order of things represented in the
institutions of the Island Lordship. We have seen
that the history of this principality was to a large
extent a conflict between the two sets of social
forces represented by the words Celt and Saxon.
In the course of our narrative it was felt to conduce
to clearness if we dealt separately and with greater
minuteness with those characteristics of Gaelic
society embedded in the systems that prevailed
under the Clan Donald chiefs. We therefore
propose in this chapter to glance, not exhaustively
or with great or original research, at the structure
392 THE CLAN DONALD.
of Celtic social polity and at the conditions of social
life, as both these are connected directly or indirectly
with the history of the Lordship of the Isles. It
can hardly be expected that, in a country where
Celticism and Teutonism co-existed so long during
ages of which the social history is very obscure, we
should be able to find the former flourishing in a
condition unaffected by the predominant influence
of the latter. As a matter of fact, much of our
knowledge regarding the ancient Celtic polity of
Scotland is arrived at by inference and deduction,
aided by what is known of other Celtic lands such
as Ireland and Wales, rather than from actually
ascertained facts. The evidence is to a large extent
circumstantial rather than direct. Our enquiries
must be begun, continued, and ended amid circum-
stances largely conditioned by feudal influences, and
in the midst of these we can obtain but occasional
and dim conceptions of Celtic polity in its pristine
integrity.
Feudalism had gained a thorough ascendancy
in Scotland in the twelfth century, when the ('Ian
Cholla emerge out of the obscurity in which the
Norse occupation had placed them, and although
Somerled and his descendants strenuously opposed
its encroachments upon their own domains, that
system was gradually becoming the most powerful
influence in the political life of the country. In
one respect, viz., their relation to the Crown,
Celticism and feudalism produced similar results.
If the great feudal baron, the lord of wide acres,
who through his ownership of the soil wielded
supreme power over his vassals, often acted as an
independent ^Drince, the great Highland chief, who,
as head of his tribe, possessed their undying homage,
SOCIAL HISTORY. 393
was equally disposed to assert his independence ;
and at some critical periods l)oth proved equally
dangerous to the authority, and even the existence,
of the State.
In considering the structure of Celtic society, we
may naturally expect that the growth and develop-
ment of the system should proceed according to the
analogy of all organic progress. In nature we find
organisms adapting themselves to their environment,
and- the functions which their surroundings compel
them to discharge inevitably lead to the development
of special organs. The complex oi-ganism of society
is no exception to the rule, and it will be found that
the peculiarities of Gaelic society owe their special
form and character to the exigencies of its history.
In early times, and before the growth of those great
and manifold industries which have arisen in modern
times, and are not directly connected with pastoral
or agricultural pursuits, society was solely dependant
upon the primary products of the soil. Hence, as
might be expected, the organisation of ancient
society, with its gradation of ranks and differentia-
tion of functions and offices, was conditioned by its
relation to the occupancy of land. As of other
branches of the great Aryan Family, this is true of
the two kindred branches of that family, the Celt
and the Teuton. Much of the philosophy of their
social development is found in their respective
methods of occupying and possessing land. While
there are certain resemblances, as might be expected,
between the land system of the Celt and of the
Teuton, we find also wide and deeply-seated distinc-
tions. There are two leading types of land tenure
to be met with in the ancient history of nations, one
or other of which is characteristic of all European
394 THE CLAN DONALD.
nations — indeed, it may almost be said of ail nations
— one of which may be described as feudal and the
other as tribal. According to the former of these,
the land was the absolute property of the overlord,
who exacted from the occupiers military service, or
such commutation thereof as he might accept,
while, according to the latter, the land was
the property of the community or tribe, whose
patriarchal head or chief exercised superiority over
it in name and on behalf of the tribe. Variations of
each of these types no doubt are observable, owing
to the mingling of races and the consequent modifi-
cation of culture and institutions which now and
then occurred during the progress of so many ages ;
but the systems stand out clear and distinct in their
main character and outlines. It seems fairly well
proved by the learned researches of the best
authorities that the land system of Teutonic nations
was feudal, and that of Celtic nations tribal and
patriarchal. The vassal of the feudal baron owed
allegiance to him, not as the head of his race, but as
the superior of the land he occupied ; while the
Celtic vassals owed allegiance to their chief, not
primarily as the lord from whom they derived the
right to till the soil or pasture their flocks, but as
the head of the race to which they owed their origin.
This tribal tenure, with its various characteristics,
became in historic times subject to many modifica-
tions, through its contact with the feudal system,
but its main features are not difficult to perceive ;
and it is interesting to observe this common pro-
perty in land surviving in the township system which
prevails to some extent in the crofting areas of the
Western Isles. ^ A modern writer, one of the most
^ Skene's Celtic Scotland, vol. III., p. 378, et seq.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 395
learned of our Scottish historians, seeks to minimise
the distinctions between the social polity of the
Teuton and the Celt.^ He does not admit that the
definition of " patriarchal" at all applies to the latter
as distinguished from the former, and he maintains
that the land tenure of the Celt is not based upon the
principles of the community, in which all share alike,
but upon those of the kingdom, with its various
gradations both of property and rank. While it is
possible unduly to accentuate the differences between
the two phases of polity, it is equally so to ignore
those differences. The principles of the kingdom are
no doubt traceable in the structure of Celtic society,
but this does not imply that the relation of the com-
munity to the land was ought else than tribal, and
this we hope, in some measure, to indicate in the
course of the present chapter.
The Lordship of the Isles having survived as a
form of Celtic polity for hundreds of years after the
dissolution of the great tribes or Mortuaths of Scot-
land, affords us at some points an interesting light
upon the social life of the Gael in ancient times.
Hugh Macdonald, the Seanachie of Sleat, has con-
ferred a boon upon the students of Highland history
if for naught else for the record he has left of the
crowning of the Lord of the Isles, as well as of the
Council of Finlaggan, with its gradations of social
rank.^ The proclamation of the Kings of Innse-Gall
was a ceremony of much display and pomp, as well as
affording evidence of the poetic symbolism character-
istic of the people. The Bishops of Argyle and the
Isles, on account of their territorial connection with
these Island magnates, gave the benediction of the
^ Robertson's Scotland under her Early Kings, vol. 11., ji. 197, tt aeq.
- Collect, dc Reb. Alb., p. 29(3-97.
396 THE CLAN DONALD.
Church to the function, while the Chieftains of all
the families and a ruler of the Isles were also present
on the occasion. The newly proclaimed King stood
on a square stone seven or eight feet long, with a
foot-mark cut in it, and this gave symbolic expression
to the duty of walking uprightly and in the footsteps
of his predecessors, while his installation into his
dignities and possessions was also in this fashion set
forth. He was clothed in a white habit as a sign of
innocence and integrity of heart, and that he would
be a light to his people and maintain the true
religion. The white apparel did afterwards belong
to the poet by right, probably, though the seanachie
does not say so, that it might i aspire him to sing of
the heroes of the past. Then he was to receive a
white rod in his hand, the whiteness indicating that
though he had power to rule it was not to be with
tyranny and partiality, but with discretion and
sincerity. Then there was given to him his fore-
fathers' sword, signifying that his duty was to protect
and defend his people from the incursions of their
enemies in peace or war, as the customs and obliga-
tions of their predecessors were. The ceremony
being over, mass was said after the blessing of the
Bishop and seven priests, the whole people pouring
forth their prayers for the success and prosperity of
their newly created Lord. When they were dis-
missed the Lord of the Isles feasted them for a week
thereafter, and gave liberally to the monks, poets,
bards, and musicians.
The foregoing description is in almost all its
details identical with Martin's account of the cere-
monial prevalent early in the eighteenth century in
connection with the entrance of a new chieftain
upon the Government of his clan. The Lordship of
SOCIAL HISTORY. 397
the Isles had fallen about two hundred years previous
to this time, yet the custom of his day is carefully
modelled upon the time-honoured ceremony of the
crowninof of the Lords of the Isles ; and Martin
having been by birth and upbringing a Skyeman
and a native of Troternish, it is highly probable that
he refers to the inauguration of the barons of Sleat
into the Chiefship of Clan Uisdein. The only vari-
ation is that the young chieftain stood upon a
pyramid of stones while his friends and followers
stood round about him in a circle, his elevation
signifying his authority over them, and their
standing below their subjection to him, also that
immediately after the proclamation of the chief, the
chief Druid (or Orator) stood close to the pyramid
and performed a rhetorical panegyric setting forth
the ancient pedigree, valour, and liberality of the
family as incentives to the young chieftain and fit
for his imitation. Hugh Macdonald indicates the
presence of the bard at the older ceremonial, though
he says nothing about the metrical effusion in which
the event must always have been celebrated. The
office of the bard had also been closely associated
with the coronation of the Celtic Kings of Scotland,
and even after the days of David I., when a feudal
monarchy was firmly established on the throne, the
Celtic ceremonial continued in use after the feudal
observances were concluded, and the bard recited
the royal genealogy in Gaelic to show that the
Kings ruled over the realm of Scotland by the right
of long descent, and as the representatives of the
line of Alban's Kings.^ The coronation stone seems
to have been a common feature of these Celtic
celebrations, and in the stone on St Finlaggan Isle
1 Robertson's Scotlaiid uuder the Eaiiy Kings, vol. XL, !>. 54.
398 THE CLAN DONALD.
we liave something similar to the lia fail, or stone
of destiny, still to be seen beneath the coronation
chair at Westminster, a survival of the immemorial
custom among ancient peoples of marking, by monu-
ments of stone, events which they desired to keep in
perpetual remembrance. That the ceremony thus
described by the authorities quoted was based upon
ancient Irish usage seems to be beyond question,
and there is evidence that the custom survived in
Ireland as late as the sixteenth century, and
probably existed there up to a later day. Edmund
Spenser, author of the " Fairy Queen," who spent
many years in that country as secretary to Lord
Grey of Wilton, gives an account of the installation
of a chief among the Irish, which by reason of
its confirmation of the statements of Highland
authorities is deserving of literal quotation : —
" They use to place him that shall be their Captain
upon a stone always reserved to that purpose, and
placed commonly upon a hill. In some of which
I have seen formed and engraven a foot ; whereon
he, standing, receives an oath to preserve all their
ancient former customs inviolate ; and to deliver up
the succession peaceably to his Tanist ; and then
hath a wand delivered to him b}^ some whose proper
office that is, after which, descending from the stone,
he turneth himself round thrice forwards and thrice
backwards."^ Hugh Macdonald does not inform us
where the coronation of the Lords of the Isles
actually took j^lace, but the inference to be drawn
from his description is that Eilean na Coinihairle,
the Island of Council, was the scene of that cere-
monial. There would be no reason to doubt such a
conclusion were it nut that the only other reference
^ View of Ireland, by Edmund Spenser.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 399
to the Proclamation of the Lord of the Isles locates
the crowning of Donald of Harlaw at Kildonan, in
the Island of Eigg. While this was undoubtedly
the case, we think it still the more probable view
that the islet on Loch St Finlaggan, with its table
of stone, and its place of judgment, close by the
larger isle, on which stood the chapel and palace of
the kings, must have been the scene of the historic
rite, and that the proclamation of Donald as Lord
of the Isles at Kildonan must have arisen out of
conditions which at this time of day it is difficult to
estimate. It seems, however, that the Isle of Eigg
must have been regarded as a suitable place of
gathering for the vassals of the Isles, for we find the
Council of Donald Dubh assembled there in 1545,
when they appointed Commissioners to treat with
Henry VIIL It is to be noted that the place of
sepulture for the wives and children of the Lords of
the Isles was on the larger isle on Loch Finlaggan,
while the Island potentates themselves were always
borne in solemn state to the sacred Isle of Hy.
The supplementary passage to that in which the
historian of SI eat records the proclamation of the
Lords of the Isles, and in which he describes the
constitution of the Council of Finlaggan, is also
worthy of consideration in any review of the social
history of the Island Lordship. The constitution
or government of the Isles, he says, was thus : —
" MacDonald had his Council at Island Finlaggan in
Isla to the number of 16, namely, four thanes, four
armins, that is to say, four lords or sub-thanes, four
bastards (i.e.) squires or men of competent estates,
who could not come up with Armins or Thanes, that
is freeholders or men that had the land in factoiy as
Magee of the Kinds of Isla, MacNicoll in Portree in
400 THE CLAN DONALD.
Skye, and MacEachren MacKay and MacGillivray
in Mull. There was a table of stone where this
Council sat in the Isle of Finlaggan ; the whole
table with the stone on which MacDonald sat
were carried away by Argyle with the bells that
were at Icolmkill. Moreover, there was a judge in
every Isle for the discussion of all controversies who
had lands from MacDonald for their trouble and
likewise the 11th part of every action decided. But
there might still be an appeal to the Council of the
Isles. MacFinnon was obliged to see weights and
measures adjusted, and MacDuffie or Macphee of
Colonsay kept the Records of the Isles."
We have here a complete and self-contained
system of Gaelic polity representing in outline the
action of a free and autonomous principality. The
question naturally arises, whence does it come ? and
before entering with any minuteness into the condi-
tion of things adumbrated by the Seanachie, it may
be desirable to point out the historical relation of
the Lordship of the Isles to the rest of Celtic
Scotland. On this point it will be unnecessary to
dwell at length, inasmuch as certain aspects of it
were dealt with in an early chapter. Historians are
agreed that Scotland, during the period of the Picts
or ancient Caledonians, was divided into seven
provinces, all owning the supremacy of one Ardrigli,
or high King, while each of the provinces was under
the government of a king of less dignity and power
than the supreme head, called Oirrigh, but who
within his own dominions exercised something
approaching absolute power. Two of the leading
authorities are somewhat at issue as to one at least
of the leading features of Celtic polity in the great
provinces or Mortuaths. Dr Skene maintains that
SOCIAL HISTORY. 461
these petty kingdoms under their Mormaors endured
as part of the national Celtic system, until it gave
way in the eleventh and twelfth centuries before the
establishment of a feudal monarchy, and that these
Mormaors were their hereditary rulers.^ Dr J.
Stewart, on the other hand, upholds the view that the
seven provinces of Celtic Scotland disappeared with
the Union of Dalriada and Pictavia in the ninth
century ; that this fusion of the two kingdoms
resulted in a large increase of the power and
possessions of the suj)reme King, owing to the
annexation of considerable portions of tlie tribe-
lands to the crown, and that the Mormaors were
not the hereditary kings or provincial orrighs, but
stewards appointed by the crown and answerable
for the crown dues. In most cases the hereditary
rulers stepped into the fiscal office. We are disposed
to adopt the views of Dr Stewart on this matter as
that best borne out by the ascertained facts of
history. It is, on the whole, the more feasible view
that the seven divisions disa23j)eared as hereditary
principalities or kingdoms after the Pictish monarchy
was replaced by the Scoto-Irish dynasty of Kenneth
MacAlpin, and that Southern Scotland became one
state with an undivided rule. It also seems well
established that it is only after this period of national
consolidation that there is any record of the title
Mormaor being used, that being the time ax hypothesi
that these provincial officers came into existence ;
while in Galloway and Lothian, which were not
united with Scotia until after the period of
Mormaors, such a name never appears. On the
whole there seems no sufficient evidence of any
trace either in Gaelic history, poetry, or tradition
^ Skene's Celtic Scotland, vol. III. The Book of Deer, preface, pp. 7S, 70.
26
402 THE CLAN DONALD.
of the term Maor or Mormaor as applied to the
chief or king either of a province or tribe, certainly
not to any of the hereditary rulers of Argyie and
the Isles, which Dr Skene reckons as one of the
seven ancient provinces of Alban. The term Maor,
whether Mor or otherwise, always means an officer
acting under some superior authority for the adminis-
tration of law, or the collection of rates or dues, or
some other civil or ecclesiastical purpose. Dr Skene
emphasises the significance of a passage in the Book
of Deer in whicli the names of the seven Mormaors of
Buchan appear as flourishing during the five centuries
between the foundation of the Celtic monastery in
the time of Columba and the reign of David I., and
this he regards as a confirmation of his view. It
must be borne in mind, however, that the historical
entries in the Book of Deer were written in the
eleventh century, three hundred years after the
Mormaors, according to our view, had superseded
the Orrighs or provincial Kings, and the name had
long become the traditional title of these ancient
reguli, and as a part of the social system were only
passing away. It was very natural, therefore, for
the writer to describe the ancient hereditary rulers
of Buchan in the terms most intelligible in his own
time.
In what relation did the Lords of the Isles and
the community, of which they were the heads, stand
to the general system of Celtic Scotland ? Dr
Skene's theory that the reguli of Argyie, Somerled
and his predecessors, were the representatives of the
Mormaors of Oirthirghael, and that the tribe over
which they reigned formed one of the seven great
communities of ancient Pictdom, would no douljt fit
in symmetrically with his main historical induction.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 403
We have not, however, disputed the general trend
of GaeUc and Irish tradition, that the Hne of Somer-
led was a branch of the Scoto-Irish race, owning
allegiance to the Kings of Dalriada during the
separate existence of that dominion, but after the
ninth century becoming the chief Dalriadic family in
Oirthirghael and Innse-Gall. This question has been
already discussed by us, but we wish, in this con-
nection, to lay stress upon the fact that the branch
of the Clan Cholla, represented by the tribe of
Somerled, rose into eminence after the disappearance
of t]:ie seven provinces that constituted the national
system of Scotland, and that, therefore, their
position was absolutely unique. Hence it was
that the Lordship of the Isles never formed part
of the old system of Caledonia, and that these
kings of the Western Gael were for ages inde-
pendent princes, owning no allegiance to Celtic or
Saxon potentate.
Before proceeding further in our review of the
political elements embraced in the Lordship of the
Isles, it is desirable that we should at this sta.g'e
touch briefly and in a general way upon some of tlie
features of the tribal organisation of the Celt, after
which we shall enquire how far these features are to
be met with in the history of the Island Lordship.
The social unit was the Tuath or Cineol, while
several Tuaths constituted a Mortuath each with its
King, while in Scotland the seven Mortuaths were,
as already stated, subject to the one Ardrigh. The
structure of society in Ireland was very much after
the same type, save that instead of seven provinces
there were but five, each of which was called a
coigcamh or fifth, while these provinces, well known
in Highland legendary lore as Coir/ Clioigeamh na
404 THE CLAN DONALD.
h-Eirinn, were all subject to one Ardrigh, who
swayed the sceptre in Tara. The Kingdom of
Dalriada in Scotland embraced too small a territory
to constitute so large a social organism. It never
attained to more than the dimensions of a mo^'tuath,
consisting of three tribes or Cineol, viz., Cineol
Lorn, Cineol Gabhran, Cineol Eoghainn, though it
always had its independent kings. Again, within
the Tuath there arose the^ne or sept, a miniature
of the larger polity, in which its features were
reproduced ; in fact, throughout the tribal organisa-
tion of the Celt, from the congeries of Cineols which
formed the Kingdom, down to the fine or sept, a
unity of type and idea prevailed. The head of a
tribe, or of the series of tribes constituting a mor-
tuath, occupied that position in virtue of his descent
from the founder of the race, whether mythical or
historical.
While, however, the headship of a race always
remained in one particular family — so long as a male
representative of a race existed capable of succeeding,
the succession did not descend from father to son
in the more primitive stages of Celtic culture.
It proceeded according to the law of Tanistry, a
principle which, in view of the causes that produced
it, was a fundamental element of Celtic society.
In accordance therewith, brothers succeeded prefer-
ably to sons ; and this for two reasons. The root
idea of the system lay in the connection of the tribe
with its founder, and the Chief or King held his
position as head of the race on account of his com-
parative nearness of kin to the founder. But the
brother was a step or generation nearer the founder
than the son, and for this reason his claim to succeed
was considered stronger. There was, however.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 405
another, and for practical purposes a stronger reason
than sentiment for the operation of this law of
succession. As distinguished from feudalism, with
its well-nigh absolute property in land, and its
absolute claim upon the service of the vassals, the
patriarchal system was largely limited by the will
and interests of the tribe. The chief was the father
of his people, but his paternity must be exercised
for the good of the entire family, and whether this
ideal was actually fulfilled or not in individual
instances, it was the principle upon which the Celtic
system was based. He was the superior of the land
for the people, and in all other respects was supposed
to rule in a manner productive of the greatest
happiness of the greatest number. It was, no
doubt, from this fusion of the interests of the Chief
and his clan, and the absence of anything like an
iron despotism ; from this enlargement of the
family idea centred in the head and realised more
or less by all the members, that sprang that devoted
attachment to the person of the Chief which char-
acterised the Highlanders as a race. Now, in this
law of succession by Tanistry, matters were ordered
in the interests of the community. Self-preservation
is an elementary law of nature in society as well as
in the individual, and here we meet with an appli-
cation of the law by which society developes its life
according to the exigencies of its environment. The
welfare of a tribe and its retention of its possessions
largely depended upon its having a chief of mature
years and tried valour, capable of administering its
internal affairs in time of peace and of leading its
hosts to battle when threatened by the foe. Thus
it came to pass that in order to obviate the possi-
bility of having a minor as chief, it became a settled
400 THE CLAN DONALD.
law of Celtic polity that during the lifetime of every
chief, a brother or the nearest male representative
of the family was installed into the position of
Tanist, who, upon the chiefship becoming vacant,
immediately and indisputably stepped into the
vacant place. The feudal law of primogeniture may
have controlled, and of course largely did control,
the later phases of Celtic life in Scotland ; but the
law of Tanistry was undoubtedly the old law of
succession, and amid the din of controversy which
sometimes assails our ears as to the chiefship of
Highland clans, it seems to be often overlooked that
primogeniture cannot be regarded as the sole or
even the main principle to guide the settlement of
the question.
We have ample evidence of the existence of the
law of Tanistry in the succession of the Celtic Kings
of Scotland disclosed in the Albanic Duan, and it is
interesting to notice that in the controversy between
the elder Bruce and Balliol for the Crown, the
former bears testimony to the existence in former
times of this tanistic law. Bruce's third pleading
was, "that the manner of succession to the Kingdom
of Scotland in former times made for his claim, for
that the brother as being nearest in degree [ratione
2Droximitatis in gradu) was wont to be preferred to
the son of the deceased King. Thus when Kenneth
M'Alpin died, his brother Donald was preferred to
his son Constantino ; thus when Constantine died,
his brother Edh was preferred to his son Donald,
and thus the brother of Malcolm III. reigned after
him to the exclusion of the son of Malcolm III."^
As, however, the succession always remained in the
same family, it very generally came back again, by
^ Skene's Higlxlanders of Scotland, vol. I., p. 160,
SOCIAL HISTORY. 407
the operation of the same law, to the surviving son
of the chief wiio had formerly been passed over. Dr
Skene quotes a curious passage from an old chronicle,
which sheds an interesting light upon the same
question. ^ 1 1 informs us that there was an ancient law
by which "in case that the children of the deceissand
suld not have passit the aige of fourteen zeirs, that
he of the blude wha was nerrest beand worthie and
capable suld be elected to reign during his lyffe,
without prejudice of the richteous heretouris whan
they atteinit the parfite age." We learn from this
writer that a considerable modification had taken
place in the law of succession in his time. The
tanist in this case occupied the position of regent,
and only when the son of the chief was a minor did
he assume the reigns of government. It thus
appears that in course of time the sentiment which
confined the succession to the generation next of kin
to the founder was beginning to lose its force, and
that the practical question alone was considered, how
to secure a capable head for the tribe. It is note-
worthy that the early age of fourteen years was not
considered too young for a son to succeed to the
headship of a clan. While the choice of Tanist
usually fell upon the oldest brother of the last chief,
circumstances were always considered, and in the
case of age or physical incapacity or any kind of
unworthiness, the clan or tribe was supposed to
possess a residuum of power, by which, in cases of
emergency, it made its own selection. In virtue of
this ultimate authority, cases have been known, in
comparatively modern times, in which power was
exercised for the deposition of chiefs who proved
unworthy of their position, and whose sway was
1 The Highlanders of Scotland, vol. I., p. 161.
408 THE CLAN DONALD.
intolerable to the vassals. Instances entirely
analogous are to be met with in the history of the
British dynasty, which, although hereditary in its
occupancy of the throne, has yet, in the person of
individual monarchs, been removed from the position
by the common and irresistible sentiment of the
community.
The Tanist was thus a recognised functionary in
the political system of the ancient Celt, and by
reason of his position as the heir apparent of the
chief he was specially provided for out of his estate.
It was the immemorial custom that a third part
of the chief's income should be set apart for him — ■
trian Tiglieamais — the third part of a lordship the
old Highlanders used to call it. Tanistry thus arose
out of the necessity that the tribe should have a
capable man of ma.ture, or, at any rate, of competent
age at its head. As the military head of his race —
that being, of course, the most important aspect
of his position — the chief was denominated the
Toshach, a word obviously corresponding with the
Gaelic word for first, viz., toiseach, which in turn is
derived from tus, signifying beginning.^ In the
course of time the tendency of society is to become
more complex, and for its officials to increase in
number. Hence the function of Toshach came to be
separated from the chief and became the hereditary
position of the oldest cadet family of the tribe.
Under the peculiar system of gavel, which falls to
be considered later on, the family longest separated
from the main stem, and, consequently, whose
property was least subject to division, possessed
its territories in the greatest integrity, and became
the most outstanding in influence and estate next
^ The Welsh equivalent of Toshach is Twj'sog.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 409
to that of the chief himself. Hence it was the
most fitted to produce a leader or lieutenant-general
for the tribe, to go before its fighting men when the
day of danger dawned. The same necessity that
resulted in the appointment of a tanist or successor
to the chief, also when ofl[ices became more widely
differentiated, produced the military captain or
Toshach.
That the designation of Toshach was also inter-
changeable with the Saxon title Thane seems to be
made clear by Dr Skene's researches into the
system of thanages elucidated in his edition of
Fordun's Scotichronicon.^ There seems little or no
reason to doubt that the ancient thanages, of which
numerous traces remained in the South and West of
Scotland in the reigns of Malcolm Canraore's sons,
were the survival, under a Saxon designation, of the
ancient Tuaths or tribe-lands which existed under
the old polity of Celtic Scotland, but which were
attached to the crown. With the reigns of Malcolm
Canmore and his successors Saxon culture was
beginning to impress Scottish institutions, and
while the tribe or Tuath retained many of its Celtic
characteristics, these, until we examine the social
texture, are apt to be concealed from us under
the disguise of Saxon terminology. Thus it was
that the Mormaor, the successor of the Kino- or
R-igh Mortuath, the head of each of the sevenfold
divisions of Scotland, was replaced by the Earl
or Comes, and the High Tuath or King of the
smaller tribe came to be designated Thane or Maor.
An interesting proof of the identity of the old
thanages with the Gaelic Tuaths, and of Thane
with Toshach, is given by Dr Skene in his larger
1 The Hi.storiiins of Scotland, vol. IV., 441-4G0,
410 THE CLAN DONALD.
and later work on Celtic Scotland. When the
Earl of Ross was forfeited in 1475, the lands of
William Thane of Cawdor, who was a vassal of
the Earldom, were erected into a new thanage
with the privileges of a barony ; certain lands in
the parish of Urquhart, in the Black Isle, detached
from the old thanage, were incorporated in the new,
and these lands are to this day designated locally
and by the Gaelic people Fearann na Toiseachd,
i.e., Ferintosh, the land of the thanage, evidence of
the ancient tribal organisation over which the Eigh
Tuath or Toshach or Thane in ancient times held
sway. The title more generally applied within
historical times to a chief or laird, and corresponding
with Thane or Toshach, was Tighearn, which con-
veyed the idea of lordship, and of which the Welsh
equivalent is Teyrn, both evidently cognate with
the Greek Turannos. The word Tighearn must
have been originally applied to the highest royal
dignitary, and this is indicated by the application
universal among the Gael of the same term to the
Supreme Being. Though we find the same designa-
tion used with regard to chiefs in a state of
vassalage, this is only an instance of the retention
of a name after it has ceased to be strictly applicable.
So far, then, we have glanced at the two higher
grades of Celtic society, the Righ Mortuath, who
became the Mormaor, and was still further feudal-
ised into the Comes or Earl, who had his lands
in capite from the King, and the High Tuath, who
was also the Toshach, and became feudalised into
Maor or Thane, responsible for the rents and
revenues of a thanage. The character of a patri-
archal chief has thus been subject to a certain course
SOCIAL HISTORY. 411
of development. He is not only the father of his
tribe, but its military leader, and under feudal
influences becomes an official with fiscal duties
and responsibilities to discharge. The exigencies of
society have also compelled a devolution of functions.
The military leadership devolves upon the oldest
cadet, who becomes the official Toshach, but we find
that the Toshach has civil duties to perform as well,
that to his hands are committed the responsibility
for the fiscal administration of the Crown lands
within the chiefs domains.
Another important function which originally
rested in the chief was that of judge. In this, as in
other respects, the patriarcli of the tribe was tlie
fountain of authority, and was known of old in
Wales and Ireland as the Brennin or Brehon. Here
also, both among the Cymric and Gaelic Celts, there
seems to have been a separation of the judicial from
the military and other functions of the chief, and a
devolution of the same upon functionaries specially
set apart. The AVelsh Cynghellwr, the Manx
Deempster, and the Toshachdeorach of Gaelic Scot-
land, bear testimony to this fact.
Having thus briefly indicated the first degree of
rank in the polity of a Celtic tribe, with some of the
functions and offices connected therewith, we have
arrived at a stage at which we can more conveniently
discuss the relation of the Chief to the occupancy of
the land, as well as the rights pertaining to his tribe.
As already stated, the land belonged to the com-
munity, but the Chief exercised a certain superiority
or lordship over it, not in his individual and private
capacity, but as head and in name of the tribe. In
the earlier stages of Celtic society, private property
in land did not exist, even on the part of the
412 THE CLAN DONALD.
patriarchal head. Individual property was confined
to what in modern parlance is known as personal or
moveable estate, such as cattle, sheep, goods and
chattels. Private property in land was an innova-
tion on primitive Celtic culture — the Chief having
in olden times only the same right of pasturage and
of the allotment of agri cultural land awarded in the
annual division. The land was owned by the Chief
and his kindred in common, and all within the limit
of three generations from the head of the race had a
claim upon the family inheritance. As each genera-
tion passed away, or upon the death of the head of
the house, a fresh division of the Orba, or inherit-
ance, took place, those entitled to a share being
designated Aeloden among the Welsh, and Flaith,
or nobles, among the Gaelic Celts. This division
took place upon the principle of gavel, a law not
confined to Celtic races, but more tenaciously
adhered to by them than by their Saxon neighbours.
The division of land among the nearest kindred of
the Chief had the effect of modifying the practical
operation of a common property in land, and pro-
moted the growth of an aristocracy or privileged
caste, who became in time privileged owners of the
soil. The Orba, or inheritance land, did not exhaust
the property of the tribe ; for, in addition thereto,
there was the tribe-land proper, occupied by the
Ind-jine, the commonalty, who, though of the same
race as the Chief and his immediate kindred, were
yet beyond the degrees of consanguinity that con-
stituted a claim upon the special property of the
kindred. This was the duchas, or immemorial
right of the clan, free from taxation, which, under
the early feudal Kings of Scotland, became attached
to the Crown. This, according to Dr Skene, and he
SOCIAL HISTORY. 413
has excellent grounds for the opinion, constituted
the Saxon thanages. The tribe lands were partly
agricultural and partly pastoral, the latter being-
grazed according to the number of cattle possessed
by each, and the former being subject to periodical
division, when, owing to the death of former occu-
pants and the emergence of new claimants, a
redistribution became necessary.
Along with the Saor-chlann, the free members of
tribe, who held their untaxed duchas land in virtue
of a real or supposed consanguinity with the royal
race, there usually existed the daor-chlaiin, or, as
they have also been termed, the native men, or
Laetic population. These consisted of tribes or
septs who had lost their rights through conquest,
and became subject to the conquering clan, or took
refuge in some neighbouring territory. In the
former case, having lost their freeborn rights,
whether oi Duchas or Orba, owing to the subjuga-
tion of the Chief through whom all their privileges
flowed, they became virtually bondmen, subject to
any servitude or taxation imposed upon them, their
only surviving privilege consisting of the inborn
right to remain upon the land. These usually
obtained land from the Flaith, or nobles, and in
Ireland were termed Fuidhir. They constituted
the bands known in Irish history as Galloglach,^ or
Galloglasses, who followed the chiefs to war. They
were not only subject to compulsory military service,
but also to taxation in kind, particularly the calpe,
a word signifying a horse or cow, the exaction being
usually paid in this special form. Members of the
clan were not supposed to pay this tribute. From
^ Probably meauiiig stranger servants— from (VaW = stranger, and Ofjlacli,
in its secondary sense, a servant man.
414 THE CLAN DONALD.
the relation of these broken clans or stranger septs
to the dominant races arose those peculiar conven-
tions known as bonds of manrent, in which, for
services rendered by the subject parties to the
superiors, the latter undertook their protection
within their jurisdiction.
We have seen how the division of the Orba, or
inheritance lands, upon the succession of a new Chief,
was always kept within the limits of three genera-
tions. Consequently, although in each instance the
fourth in descent was not included in the distribution
of the ancestral property, yet he not improbably
might fare better than had he been so included.
He inherited his father's allotment as a separate and
fixed inheritance, not subject to the periodical sub-
division which rendered the tenure of Celtic nobles
so fluctuating and uncertain. From the ranks of
the nobles, therefore, there sprang, and was con-
tinually recruited, a class of landholders inferior to
the Flaith, but still of gentle birth, called among
the Irish Gaels Saertach or Brugaidh,^ among the
Scottish Gael Ogtiern, signifying primarily a young
lord, but coming secondarily to mean an inferior
grade of lord. This class was the ancient represen-
tative of the modern tacksman, both being kinsmen
of the Chief, and both at times converting their tack
into a chartered freehold when feudal land tenure
came into operation. It is also intelligible that as
the ranks of the Ogtierns were continually swelled
by descendants of the nobility, so members of this
inferior grade of Flaith supplied the ranks of the
commonalty with fresh blood when the periodical
division of the agricultural lands came about.
^ Brugaidh was originally the member of an Irish clan who possessed a
Brwjh, or homestead with a holding.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 415
In addition to the lands already specified — the
inheritance and tribe lands proper — there was a
third class of lands, which may be described as
official. There being little or no money in these
early times, land and its products constituted the
wealth of society, and those for whom the Tuath
found it necessary to provide were endowed with an
interest in the soil. Thus the Chief and Tanist had
to be maintained in a manner suited to their lofty
station, and for this purpose, along with the
residence of the hereditary head of the race, there
was set apart the tribe demesne-lands for the sup-
port of the royal dignity. The same rule applied to
the judges and bards, for whom special provision
was made out of the tribe lands ; and when Christi-
anity obtained a footing in the country, and churches
with their religious establishments were planted here
and there under the protection of the great Celtic
Chiefs, donations out of the inheritance lands were
bestowed for the maintenance of the Christian com-
munity. An interesting quotation from the Brelion
laws indicates the view taken of the institutions of
the Celt in those far off times : — " It is no Tuath
without three noble privileged persons, Eclais or
Church, Flath or Chief, and Jih or poet." The
judge is not mentioned in this quotation, but pos-
sibly the function of judging may still have been
vested in the Ard Flath when the saying was first
uttered. The Church lands possessed many privi-
leges, and, on account of their sacred destination,
were regarded as conferring a right of sanctuary to
all who were fortunate enough to obtain a refuge
within their consecrated borders. On the principle
of the cities of refuge of Old Testament times, even
should the avenger of blood be in pursuit of his foe,
416 THE CLAN DONALi).
once the latter planted his feet within the holy
domain, the hand of violence at once was stayed.
On some notorious occasions sanctuaries have been
outraged, but in those ages of blood and vengeance
the deterrent power of bhe Comraich^ must have
exercised a salutary influence.
Having thus, with as much brevity as is con-
sistent with clearness, endeavoured to point out
some of the leading features of Celtic polity, it
remains for us to shew under this branch of our sub-
ject how far the relations of the Lords of the Isles to
the community over which they ruled, illustrate the
leading phases of that polity. Taking up the various
topics in the order in which they have already been
discussed, we enquire first of all what traces, if any,
of the Celtic law of Tanistry are to be met with in
Clan Donald history up to the middle of the
sixteenth century. To this enquiry we think it may
be confidently answered that, in the first place, in
the succession of Angus Og to his brother Alexander,
the principle of Tanistry entered as a dominating
influence. It may certainly be said with truth that
Alexander's opposition to Bruce was a determining
factor in the case, inasmuch as it shut oat himself
and his posterity from the possession of the terri-
tories which belonged to him by hereditary right,
but could not be enjoyed without the royal favour.
On the other hand, succession to the chiefship of a
clan was quite a different matter from lordship over
lands, and was governed by totally different prin-
ciples. If succession to lands was now affected by
feudalism, succession to a chiefship was still, and
long after, a question upon which the voice of the
clan, which was a potent element in the law of
^ Comraich = protection, vide Macbain's Etymological Dictioiiaiy, p. 284.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 417
tanistry, made itself effectually heard. The suc-
cession of Angus Og to the exclusion of the son of
Alexander could hardly have been accomplished so
quietly, and without any apparent dissent, were it
not that the succession of one brother to another
appealed to the traditional sentiments of the race.
We may be sure that the question was well weighed
by the Council of Finlaggan, and that the assump-
tion of the sceptre of the Clan Cholla by Angus Og,
only took place after due and earnest consideration
on the part of the officials of the Clan.
The operation of the same law is to be seen in
the succession of Donald of Harlaw, preferably to his
brother Reginald, the son of John of Isla by the
first marriage. Here also there were causes deter-
mining the issue, other than the law of tanistry.
The whole train of events was set in motion by the
influence of Robert IL to divert the honours of the
House of Isla to the family of his own daughter. It
is clear that Reginald, the oldest surviving son of
Amis Macruari, was the lawful son, and by the law of
primogeniture the heir of John of Isla. It is equally
clear that Reginald abandoned his position as the
heir of his father, both to the chiefship aiid the
estates, by two acts which are indubitably vouched.
In the first place, he resigned his rights as the heir
of his father's lordship by accepting of a charter for
a portion of the lands of that lordship, and however
princely in extent the domain thus accruing to him
certainly was, the charter in question transferred
him from the position of the prospective Lord of the
Isles to that of a vassal of the Isles. And in the
second place, he deprived himself of the Chiefship of
the Clan, and made himself a vassal Celtically as
well as feudally, by handing over the sceptre of
27
4 J 8 THE CLAN DONALD.
Innse-Gall to Donald at Kildonan. The ceremony
that took place there was a purely Celtic function,
and not in any sense a feudal investiture, and it
seems unquestionably to prove that as, according to
a root idea of tanistry, Celtic succession was hereditary
in the family, while it was elective in the individual,
Donald, on the resignation by his brother Reginald
of his reversion to the Chiefship, became, with the
approval of the Clan, Donald of Isla, Lord of the
Isles, and head of the Family of Macdonald.
John Mor, second son of John of Isla by his
second marriage, was called, as is well known, the
Tainistear of Macdonald. The principle of the title
and the functions exercised by him in that capacity,
must have been in accordance with the restricted
application of the law set forth in the ancient
Chronicle quoted by Dr Skene. It could not have
meant that there was any provision for his succeed-
ing, on the death of his brother Donald, if Donald
left heirs male of his own body, for the feudal law of
primogeniture was now too strong to permit of such
an eventuality. There must, however, have been
some publicly acknowledged position given to John
Mor as the Tainistear, though no specific record of the
fact seems to have survived. Such an appointment
may have been made to meet certain contingencies
that were by no means impossible or improbable.
During the latter days of Donald of Harlaw, his
son Alexander was in reality the only individual
standing between the House of Dunnyveg and the
succession, for Angus, the only other son of Donald,
had entered the Church, and was therefore ineligible
for the position. This fact, coupled with Alexander's
youth, was to all appearance the reason, and a
sutiicient reason it was, why the name of the founder
SOCIAL HISTORY. 419
of the House of Dunny veg should have come down
to us as John Mor Tainistear. Other instances
of the operation of this Celtic law arose, hut these
belonged to a period rather later than that under
consideration. Those already cited are sufficient to
indicate traces of a principle which in early times
must have been a dominant feature in the political
life of the Clan Cholla.
Of the office of Toshach, or military leader, as
distinct from the hereditary Chief, we find traces in
the history of our clan. We have the authority of
Dr Skene in his earliest work for believing that such
an office existed, and was recognised, as vested in
the oldest cadet of the clan ; but although this
would be in entire accordance with the history and
genius of the Celt, we have come across no direct
proof of the fact. Whether this be so or not, we
find that, practically, the military leader was at times
some one else than the Chief. Whether Godfrey
Mac Fergus, Toshach of the Isles, who flourished in
the eighth century, was the chief of his race, or,
according to Dr Skene's view, the military leader
only, and the senior cadet of his tribe, we are unable
to say. We find, however, a practical application
of the principle, if not of the name, in the events of
the time of Alexander, Earl of Koss, and his son
John. Donald Balloch was the son of John Mor,
the Tainistear of the Isles, and although that
title was not applied to Donald, so far as we
are aware, he probably filled the position, as he
certainly exercised the functions of the kindred
office of Toshach, or Captain of the hosts of Clan
Donald, in the time of both these chiefs. From
1431 down to 1463, Donald Balloch was the leader
of the Clan Donald hosts in battle, and remembering
420 THE CLAN DONALD.
that he was the head of the leading cadet family of
the House into which the honours of the line had
passed, his position is so far a confirmation of the
view that has been referred to. In more recent
times the Highlanders seem to have recognised a
distinction between the military and patriarchal
head, though neither bard nor seanachie makes use of
the designation Toshach. The term most closely
akin is " Captain," which the Gaelic people seem
very readily to have appropriated to signify the
same idea. We find it in some instances made use
of when doubt existed as to the individual so named
being actually the chief of the clan. John Moy-
dartach and his father, Alastair Mac Allan, were
each styled Captain of the Clan E,anald, its fighting
as distinguished from its patriarchal head, the latter
being a position which their opponents rightly or
wrongly — we cannot pause to enquire at present
which — were not disjDOsed to allow them. Only
once or twice do we find this title of " Captain"
applied to any individual of the Family of Sleat.
In 1545, Archibald the Clerk, who was head of
the Clan Uisdean during the minority of his grand-
nephew, styled himself, and was described in public
records, as " Captain" of the Clan Uisdean. John
Lorn, the Lochaber bard, in his poem to the first
Sir James Macdonald of Sleat, concludes his first
verse with the words —
" Slaiut do Chaipteiu Clanu Domhauill," &c.
In this latter case, the title of Captain is applied to
the actual Chief, but this evidently in his capacity
of military head of his people. On the whole, we
are disposed to think that as " Captain" was applied
to the leader of the tribe in war, as distinguished
SOCIAL HISTORY. 421
from the hereditary Chief, so its ancient synonym
(Toshach) would have been the title among the Clan
Choha given to the official lieutenant-general, when
he was separate and distinct from the Ceann Chuiidh.
Like all ancient Celtic offices, it was hereditary, and,
according to Dr Skene, vested in the family of
greatest power and influence next to that from
which the Chief was chosen.
We have touched upon the judicial functions
resting in the Chief, or Ceann Cinnidh, and in the
more advanced stages of Gaelic society devolving
upon hereditary officials specially endowed with
lands for their support. Previous to the days of
Somerled, the Norwegians had a Sheriff of the Isles,
but under the House of Isla, as Hugh Macdonald,
the Sleat Seanachie, affirms, there was a judge in
every isle for the discussion of all controversies, who
had lands from Macdonald for their trouble, and
also the eleventh part of every action decided, but
from whose judgment there was an appeal to the
Council of Finlaggan, whose decision was absolutely
final, ^ The judges of the Isles, who might be the
local barons or special officials, often held their
courts on the summit of a rising ground, and were
usually helped in their decisions by local or pro-
vincial councils. A hill in Skye, at Duntulm, an
ancient residence of the Chiefs of Sleat, is called
Cnoc na h-eiric,'^ or the hill of ransom, so called
because the settlement pf causes was determined —
save in instances of capital punishment — by the
administration of fines. Among questions that came
up for settlement, a frequent one was the arrange-
ment of boundaries, and the method sometimes
adopted for preserving a record of these matters
^ Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis, p. 297. - Pennant, vol. II., p. 304.
422 THE CLAN DONALD.
partook of* the quaintness spiced with cruelty
characteristic of a primitive time. When the
marches had been fixed, several boys received a
sound thrashing on the spot, and thus it was pro-
vided that, if no record was kept on sheepskin, there
would be those among the rising generation who
bore the impress of the transaction upon their own
skins, and thus from whose minds the memory of
the day's proceedings would never fade away.
We have already seen that the ancient name
for the judge under a tribe was " Toshachdeora,"
which signifies derivatively " the chief man of
law," the name of his office being Toshachcleorachd.
The existence of the designation in records connected
with particular districts in comparatively modern
times affords an interesting testimony to the
existence of the tribal organisation there in days
long gone by. We find a reference to this office in
regions within the Lordship of the Isles, and once
at least apparently existing side by side with the
feudal office of bailie. In 1455, John, Earl of E-oss,
and Lord of the Isles, confirms to Neill McNeill a
grant made by his father to Torquil McNeill, con-
stable of the Castie of Swyffin, the father of Neill,
of the office called Toshachdeora of the lands of
Knapdale.^ In 1456, the same John, Earl of Ross,
grants to his esquire Somerled, son of John, son of
Somerled, for life, and to his eldest son for five
years after his death, a . davach of his lands of
Gleneves, with the office commonly called Toshach-
deora, of all his lands of Lochaber, and he seems to
have derived from it the name of Toche or Tosach,
as in 1553 or 1554 the same lands of Gleneves are
granted to his grandson, here called Donald Mac-
^ Grig. Par. Scot., vol. II., p. 61,
SOCIAL HISTORY. 423
Allaster Mic Toche. It is somewhat singular that,
notwithstanding the maintenance of this Celtic
office by the Lord of the Isles, a feudal bailiary
co-existed with it, for in 1447, Alexander, Earl of
Ross, granted to the Mackintosh a charter of the
bailiary of the lands of Lochaber, an office which
became hereditary in that family. In what relation
the baihe and the Toshachdeora stood to one another;
whether the former alone exercised an effective
magistracy, and the latter was only an honorary
appointment, a sinecure valuable to the holder
because of the lands connected with it as the sur-
vival of a past order ; or whether the holder of the
office acted as an officer under the bailie, we cannot
exactly say. It is highly probable that, at the time
of which we Imve these scanty notices, the office was
fast decaying, and M'as of service only in providing a
snug provision for favourites of the Island Lords.
We have seen that, originally, succession to
the headship of a tribe or clan, was not according
to the feudal law of primogeniture, but by the
Celtic law of tanistry. We also find that
the transmission of lands was not dominated by
primogeniture, but by the Celtic law of gavel,
by which a father in disposing of his territories
divided them equally among his sons. The
circumstances of these far past times rendered
such proceedings necessary and even desirable.
There did not then exist those manifold outlets for
the industry and energy of sons which render society
now-a-days less dependent than formerly upon the
soil. When sons grew to man's estate, and possessed
families of their own, the only possible provision foi
them was to settle them upon the land, nor was the
necessity so much to be deplored at a time when the
424 THE CLAN DONALD.
population, as a whole, was sparse, and the power
and security of a trihe depended so largely uj)on the
numbers that could be mustered when the day of
battle came. The gavelling of lands was a distinct
feature of the social history of the Lords of the Isles.
Somerled divided the greater part of his immense
territory in equal portions between his sons, Reginald,
Dugall, and Angus, while the other sons seem to
have obtained smaller grants upon the mainland.
Reginald similarly divided his lands among his sons,
Donald, Roderick, and Dugall. Donald divided his
lands between Angus Mor and Alexander, while
Angus Mor acted similarly to his three sons, Alex-
ander, Angus (3g, and John Sprangach. The
tendency towards a gradual attenuation of the
ancestral domains was arrested in the case of the
" Good John," for he, being the only legitimate son
of Angus Og, inherited, not only the lands gavelled
by Angus Mor to his father, but also those forfeited
by his uncle, Alexander, Lord of the Isles, along
with others that accrued through the forfeiture of
the Comyns, Macdougalls, and others. His estates
were still further enlarged by his first wife, Amie
Macruari, bringing over to him the patrimony of the
branch of the House of Somerled of which she was
the sole legitimate surviving heir. No sooner has
this remarkable consolidation of territory taken
place than the law of gavel again steps in, and a
new division of the estates of the House of Isla takes
place. John divides his lands by charter and other-
wise among his seven sons, thus keeping up, amid
feudal forms, the old succession to lands by the law
of gavel.
As already stated, the Chiefs direct possession
oi- occupancy of land seems to have originally
SOCIAL HISTORY. 425
extended little beyond the demesne or manor lands,
which were attached to his principal residence.
Thus we find that, of the immense territories
governed by the Lords of the Isles, a comparatively
small portion was in their actual occupation. The
great bulk of its area was held of them in vassalage
by cadets of their own House and by other Western
clans. Over the lands held of them in vassalage
they seem to have maintained sovereign and undis-
puted sway. Although charters confirming the
ownership of land seem to have been in existence
even in the days of Somerled, not until the days
of Angus Og, one hundred and fifty years later, did
tlie Lords of the Isles give any real acknowledgment
of superiority, either to Norway or Scotland. On
the other hand, they exercised their lordly or kingly
rights by bestowing lands by verbal gift, as well as
by feudal charters. Verbal gifts of land were, of
course, the ancient method of conveyance, and
accompanied, as these always were, by appropriate
symbols of investiture, such as sword, helmet, horn,
or cup of the lord, sometimes spur, bow and arrow,
the act was regarded as solemnly conferring real and
inalienable rights. An interesting verbal grant has
survived, made by Donald, either the progenitor of
the clan or the hero of Harlaw, in which, sitting upon
Dundonald, he grants the lands of Kilmahumaig, in
Kintyre, to Mackay for ever : —
" Mise Domhnull Mac Dhomhnuill
Am shuidh air Dun Domhnuill
Toirt coir do Mhac Aigh air Kilmahumaig
S gu la brath'ch mar sin."
From a very early period, from Reginald, the son
of Somerled, downwards, the Lords of the Isles, if
they did not receive, granted lands by charter to
426 THE CLAN DONALD.
the Church and individuals ; and, at intervals,
as long as the Lordship lasted. The earlier
charters, those of the twelfth and thirteenth
centuries, are couched in mediaeval Latin, and it is
a peculiar feature of these that they are never
dated, neither the year of the Lord nor of the
reigning sovereign given to indicate the period. In
some Scottish records of the age, such an entry as
we find in the Book of Innes Charter, Post con-
cordiam cum Somerledo, helps us to specify a certain
year ; but the dates of the charters granted by the
earlier Lords of the Isles can only be a matter of
conjecture. It is only about the middle of the
fifteenth century that we find a charter of the Lords
of the Isles written in the vernacular Scotch of the
day, showing that the spoken language of the people
was beginning to supersede Latin for documentary
purposes. Judging, however, from the verbal
charter already quoted, as well as from the still
more interesting charter of 1408, by Donald of
Harlaw, many of the Macdonald grants, both verbal
and written, must have been expressed in the
language of the Gael. On a strip of goatskin the
Lord of the Isles conveys certain lands on the
Rhinns of Isla to " Brian Bicare Magaodh," on con-
dition that he would supply his house annually with
seven — probably fat — kine. The Magaodhs seem to
have emigrated to the North of Ireland, having lost
their property after the fall of the House of Isla, and
a few years ago this unique charter was found in
the possession of one Magee, resident in County
Antrim, a descendant of the original grantee.
Magee was persuaded that the Register House in
Edinburgh was, on the whole, more likely to preserve
the terms of this ancient charter than the peat-bank
SOCIAL HISTORY. 427
in which, for safe custody, it was deposited until the
family estates in some good time coming are
restored. In the Register House, therefore, it is
now kept, an interesting testimony to the Gaelic
spirit and sentiment of the great Highland Lord
who braved the might of Scotland.
Hugh Macdonald, the Sleat Seanachie, informs us
that among the functionaries of the Island Lordship
there was a Recorder, or, as we might term him, a
Secretary of State of the Isles, an hereditary office
belonging to the MacDuffies of Colonsay. We do
not suppose that the keeping of the Island records
meant that the MacDuffie of the day was of neces-
sity the actual scribe. The clergy, both of Ross
and the Isles, sometimes performed the part of
notaries public for the lords of these regions. Not
only so, but we find Thomas of Dingwall, sub-deacon
of the Diocese of Ross, acting as Chamberlain for
the Earldom in 1468, a fact that need not surj^rise
us when we remember that the education needed
for the management of revenues, keeping of accounts,
and other estate business was almost confined to the
clergy in those days. The Betons, who were heredi-
tary physicians to the Family of Isla, sometimes
acted as clerks, and it was by one of them that the
Gaelic Charter of 1403 was written. The Records
of the Isles, ever since lona became the centre of
learning and religion, have been subject to an
unhappy fate. The repeated and savage inroads
of the Danes destroyed what must have undoubtedly
been a valuable collection of MSS., and the fall of
the Lordship of the Isles in 1493, with the turmoil
that ensued for upwards of half a century, resulted
in the loss of the Records of that principality,
which would probably, had they survived, have
428 THE CLAN DONALD.
shed a flood of light upon certain problems con-
nected with Highland history which, with our
present information, seem well-nigh insoluble.
The dignity of the Lord of the Isles was
maintained by the mensal lands set apart for him,
and by the tribute paid him by his vassals. But
there were also old forms of Celtic taxation which
the Chief enjoyed, and which, according to certain
interesting evidence, prevailed within the Lord-
ship of the Isles, either appropriated by Macdonald
himself, or conveyed along with lands to his vassals.
The charter by Alexander, Earl of Ross, in which he
grants the Lordship of Lochaber to the Mackintosh
in 1443, sheds an interesting light upon the lights
and privileges of the Lords of the Isles and those
who held lands of them by feudal tenure. Taking
the latter part of the deed in question first, as
bearing more directly upon the rights of the superior,
we find the conditions of grant to be servitium,
Wai'di et Relevii, the service of wardship and relief
on the part of the vassal. The right of wardship
was one of the feudal casualties which usually
belonged either to the King or to the highest rank
of lay and ecclesiastical magnates. It consisted of
the guardianship of a fief during the non-age of the
heir apparent, and this meant nothing less than the
actual possession of the estates by the tutor during
his tenure of ofiice. These wardships appear to have
frequently been sold or granted to the nearest male
relative, and have proved stumbling blocks to
modern antiquarians, who have at times in their
genealogical researches failed to remember the
operations of this feudal principle. In this manner
David of Huntingdon enjoyed the Earldom of
Lennox, Alan Durward that of Athol, and Earl
SOCIAL HISTORY. 42&
Malcolm of Angus that of Caithness, during the
minority of the heirs. ^ It will be remembered that,
in the treaty between England Balliol, and John of
Isla, in 1335, by which various lauds were bestowed
upon the Lord of the Isles, not the fee simple, but
the wardship of Lochaber, " until the attainment
to man's estate of the son and heir of Lord David
of Strathbolgy, the last Earl of Athole," was bestowed
upon the Lord of the Isles. ^ It was not until 1343
that Lochaber, owing to the death of the heir referred
to, was actually conveyed to John of Isla by charter.
Now, a little over 200 years later, the Earl of Ross,
in granting the same lands to the Mackintosh,
retains the reversion of the wardship, his interest in
the lands being precisely that enjoyed by his grand-
father under Edward Balliol. The wardship by
itself, however, might j)i^ove a barren honour if, as
was possible, the heir on all occasions succeeded
when he was of full age ; so there accompanied the
wardship a fine or tax called " Belief," exacted from
every heir on succeeding to his patrimony.
Looking further into the contents of the same
charter, we fiad enumerated among the perquisites
of the vassal for the Lordship of Lochaber three
items which lend some interest to the social history
of the day, namely, Blude-wetis, herezaldis, mulierum
merchetis. Each of these in turn demands some
attention. The word Blude-wetis is a Latinized
form of the ancient hlodivite, also known among the
Saxons as Wergild, and among the Gael as Eirig.^
It signified the compensation payable by any who
had committed homicide to the kindred of the
^ Scotland under her Early Kiugs, vol. II., p. 129.
" Vide p. 106 of this vol.
^ Elriy, supposed to be derived liom fear, a mau, and reic, to sell, thus
meaning a man's value in money or kind.
430 THE CLAN DONALD.
deceased. The custom was very ancient, and seems
to have been known, though divmely disallowed in
the case of wilful homicide, at the time when the
Mosaic code was being formulated,^ It was not
incumbent upon the friends to accept a compensation
for their kinsman's slaughter, as the stern desire for
vengeance could not always be set at rest by any
means save the blood of the offender. When the
fine was accepted, the amount was determined by
the rank of the deceased, and the ancient codes
detailing the Cro or liability of persons according
to the rank of the slain, have been among the chief
sources of our knowledge of social grades among
Teutonic and Celtic nations. The early principle by
which the immediate kindred of the deceased were
regarded as alone interested in the blood feud seems
to have become modified with time. Homicide or
murder was looked at as a crime against the com-
munity or state as well as against the individual, and
part of. the blood money came to be a public due
paid into the coffers of the King, the ofiicial head of
the nation. This reference to the custom in the
Mackintosh charter is the only evidence we have
hitherto come across as to the existence of the
hludivite within the Lordship of the Isles, at anyrate
so late as the middle of the fifteenth century.
We have already referred to the cai^^e, an impost
paid by the " native men" for the benefit of living
under the protection of a conquering Chief This is
doubtless synonymous with the herezeldis of the
Charter, for a tax somewhat similar to the calpe,
entitled " heregild," prevailed in the Saxon districts
of Scotland certainly as late as the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries.'^ It is notable that a curious
^ Numb. XXXV. 31-3'2. ^ Sir David Lindsay's " Three Estates.''
SOCIAL HISTOHY. 431
variation of this tax of calpe existed until last
century in North Uist, said to have been intro-
duced by a son of Godfrey, lord of that Island. On
the death of any of the tenants, the best horse in
the widow's stable was appropriated for the behoof
of the landlord, and this horse, for what reason
it is difficult to say, was called the each ursainn}
Singular to say, while the Celtic law of calpe was
abolished by the Legislature in the seventeenth
century, this tax lingered in North Uist for upwards
of one hundred years thereafter.
Once more reverting to the Mackintosh Charter
of 1443, we find a tax which has given rise to a
good deal of speculation, namely, that designated
Mulierum Mercheta, and which consisted, at any-
rate in later days, of a tax payment by a vassal to
his lord upon the marriage of his daughter. In
connection with this particular point, and arising out
of it, we think it desirable to enter briefly into the
wider question of the marriage laws that existed of
old in Celtic Scotland. Roman writers, from Julius
Csesar downwards, have stated, one after the other,
that a system of community of wives prevailed
among the ancient Caledonians. There are un-
doubtedly indications in what has survived of the
history of pre-Christian ages that the relations
between the sexes were, as might be expected, looser
and less regulated among the ancient Celts of Scot-
land than they have been within the Christian
period. Sons were regarded as belonging to their
mothers' rather than to their fathers' tribes, while it
was through females that the succession to family
honours, and particulaily to the supreme dynasty of
^ By a proLusi quite iutelligible to a Gaelic speaker, ursainn may be a
corruption of " herezild."
432 THE CLAN DONALD.
Pictland, was regulated. The succession of Kenneth
M'Alpin to the throne of united Alban was brought
about through his being the grandson of Ungusia,
wife of a Pictish King. Social laws and customs
long survive the causes that produce them, and this
succession through a female probably indicates the
existence of a state of society at a vastly remoter
time, when the parentage of the mother was the
only certain guarantee as to a particular line of
descent.
Whetlier the custom known in Gaelic histor}'- as
" hand -fasting:" was that which suo-gfested to Caesar
and other Koman writers this somewhat revolting
idea of " polyandria," or whether hand-fasting may
be a modification or development of the social con-
dition described, it is difficult to say. If hand-fasting
did not amount to a community of wives, it certainly
meant that a woman could possibly enter into con-
jugal relations with several living men within the
limits of a few years. The contract sometimes took
place in this wise. An agreement was entered into
between two chiefs, that the heir of the one should
live for twelve months and a day with the daughter
of the other. The contract provided further that, in
the event of the lady, within that period, becoming
a mother, the marriage became good in law, even
without the imprimatur of the Church, but if there
was no appearance of issue, the contract was dis-
solved, and each was allowed to marry or hand-fast
with another. The survival of a custom so abhorrent
to the Church, and inconsistent with feudal law,
long after the introduction of Christianity and Saxon
culture, is only to be accounted for by its being
congenial to the Celtic system. The form of Gaelic
society was of such a nature that the welfare of the
SOCIAL HISTORY. 433
community depended greatly upon the birth of heirs
to carry on the ancestral line, and this fact was
suflScient to perpetuate for ages a system of men
taking wives unto themselves on approbation. The
Highlanders regarded the issue of such marriages as
perfectly legitimate, and absolutely distinct from
bastardy. Instances of the issue of hand-fasted
parents being regarded as legitimate could easily be
quoted. John Maclean, fourth laird of Ardgour,
hand-fasted with a daughter of Macian of Ardna-
murchan, taking this lady, according to the seanachie
of the clan, " upon the prospect of marriage if she
pleased him. At the expiration of two years (the
period of her noviciate), he sent her home to her
father, but his offspring by her were reputed lawful
children, because their mother was taken upon a
prospect of marriage."^ Another case in point was
when the issue of a hand-fast marriage claimed the
Earldom of Sutherland in the sixteenth century " as
one lawfullie descended from his father, Earle John
the third, because, as he alleged, his mother was
hand-fasted and fianced to his father." As shewing
the strength of his claim, Sir Adam Gordon, who
had married Earl John's heiress, bought it oif by the
payment of a sum of money.
The opinion has been advanced that the union
of John of Isla with Amie Macruari was a hand-fast
marriage, and this has been adduced as accounting
for the surrender by Reginald of the sceptre of the
Isles to Donald, the eldest son of the second
marriage at Kildonan. We have already given our
decision, whatever be its worth, against this view.^
Only a word or two need be said in supplement.
The authority of MacVurich and the Dispensation
1 The Clan Maclean, by a Seanachie, p. 265. - Vide pp. 128-9
38
434 THE CLAN DONALD.
of 1337 are the main grounds set forth m proof of
the feudal illegitimacy of Amie's sons. The accu-
racy of the Clanranald Seanachie, when he tells the
story of these years, is by no means unimpeachable,
and his deliverances display an amount of historical
incoherence which is a httle perplexing to the
reader. He propounds an absurd theory as to the
parentage of the Princess Margaret ; he says that
Reginald's abdication in favour of Donald was
ao-ainst the wishes of the men of the Isles, and
almost in the same breath makes the statement,
diametrically opposed, that it was with their consent,
while he seems entirely ignorant of the Papal Dis-
pensation which, for whatever reason it was obtained,
rendered John's marriage absolutely legal, and his
eldest son his feudal heir.^ Neither priest nor altar
could make this surer than the authority of the
Church's earthly head. Clearly MacVurich's views
upon the subject were created by the fact which he
could not account for, except by illegitimacy, that
John's eldest son did not succeed his father. But
why did the " Good John" get this Papal Dispensa-
tion ? In the circumstances of his third cousinship
to his wife, it was absolutely necessary. In the
fourth Council of the Lateran, the question of the
forbidden degrees of consanguinity, which had been
a burning one in the Church for ages, was taken up.
There was a relaxation of the stringency of former
times which forbade marriage between sixth
cousins (!), while now it was restricted to fourth
cousinship.^ Amie Macruari being John's third
cousin, the marriage could not possibly take place
without the high authority of Rome. Then there
was obtained, not a legitimation of offspring as was
'■ Rcliquire Ccltiero, \>. l'^9. - Cone. Lat. IV., Act. .'"jO.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 435
bestowed upon Coinneach a' Bhlair, the Chief of
Kintail, m 1491, but a licence, or Dispensation,
which permitted the celebration of a union which
would otherwise by canon law have been irregular.
We must now j^ass from this subject of hand-
fasting to the special aspect of the ancient marriage
laws suggested by the third item quoted from the
Mackintosh Charter of 1443. It seems necessary
to discriminate between the law of Maritagium,
which meant the right of bestowing the hand of an
heiress in marriage, and the muUerum mercheta, or
maiden fee, which was a tax imposed upon a vassal
on the occasion of his dauixhter's marriaffe.^ This
maritage, like the rights of Ward and Relief, repre-
sented at times a considerable pecuniary interest,
and it was sometimes bestowed in charters by Kings
and great Crown vassals, and sometimes sold. In
the sixteenth century we find James Macdonald of
Dunnyveg and the Earl of Argyle eagerly contend-
ing for the wardship and marriage of Mary Macleod^
the heiress of Dunvegan, which the Queen Regent
had compelled the Earl of Huntly to relinquish.
The mu/ierum mercJieta, or marriage tax, paid by a
vassal to his lord, has been made the basis of purely
fanciful and long-exploded theories. According to
Hector Boece, the law of jus primce noctis was
devised and introduced by a profligate King
Evenus, who reigned in Scotland shortly before
the Christian era, and it was in force until the
time of Malcolm Canmore, who commuted it into
a fine. Modern writers have striven with great
ingenuity to prove that it jDrevailed not only in
Scotland, but also in England, France, and other
continental countries as a recognised right of the
' Scotlaiid under lier Early Kings, vol. II., p. 129.
436 THE CLAN DONALD.
overlord in the dark ages of feudalism. After all,
this theory has been founded upon a mistaken
interpretation of old feudal phraseology, into
which imaginative writers have read a meaning
which it never bore.^ As a matter of fact, it
was from the very earliest times of which we possess
any record nothing else than a marriage tax, though,
of course, there is room for differences of opinion
as to the causes of its origin. According to
one view it arose in this wise. Only freemen
who were possessed of property could enter into the
stipulations necessary for contracting a marriage.
Among the servile classes marriage could not exist ;
they were looked upon as cattle or stock, having
lost their rights of kindred, or duchas, and possessing
no privileges except the pleasure of their masters.
But there were also dependent freemen, such as the
military followers among the Germanic nations, and
the amasach of Gaelic races, who, having surrendered
their birthright of land for knightly service under
their lord or chief, could neither marry nor give in
marriage without his permission, this permission
being granted on payment of a sum of money.
Another view of the origin of this impost is that it
was paid by a tenant or vassal to the Chief as a
recompense for the loss of the bride's services when
she transferred her allegiance to another lord, ser-
vices to which the Chief, jure sanguinis^ was entitled.
Both theories are feasible, and while we do not
presume to decide between them, it is evident that
in either case the mulierum mercheta was a marriage
tax, originating among feudal peoples, but, with
other Teutonic customs, finding its way at an early
period into the social culture of the Celt.
^ Scotland under her Early Kings, vol, II., p. 307.
SOCIAL HISTORY. 437
Before closing this chapter, it will be desirable to
give a short survey of the dignity, sway, and wealth
of the family whose story we have tried to tell. As
we have seen, the chiefs of Clan Cholla became
independent rulers within Dalriada after Kenneth
McAlpin had moved eastward to become King of the
new realm of Scotia, Somerled, after he had vindi-
cated his rights, assumed like his forbears the title
King of the Isles, and was to all intents and
purposes an independent prince. This sense of
independence he transmitted to a long line of
successors, and, although at times compelled by the
force of circumstances to profess allegiance to the
Scottish Kings, no amount either of force or con-
ciliation could make them long adhere to a submissive
attitude. Reginald, son of Somerled, styled himself
Lord of Argyle and King of the Isles, a two-fold
designation which seemed to indicate that the
relation of his dynasty to the Isles was of an
older and more nidependent character than their
relation to Argyle, Beginald was also the first
of the family known as De lie, though the
Isles must have been the home of the race
several centuries before his day. This title of Dc
He was the oldest territorial designation of his
family, and always stood first and foremost in the
order of their honours and dignities. It was con-
fined to the heads of the race, and while cadets of
Macdonald might designate themselves De Insulis,
or assume any other title they chose, they never
presumed to adopt that of De He. It is from this
fact, mainly, that we conclude the seniority of the
Clan Donald line over all other branches descended
from Reginald MacSomerled. Reginald was himself
De He, as were his ancestors probably for many
438 THb; CLAN DONALD.
generations, and while other junior families branched
off, that of De lie, from Donald down to the last
John, were undoubtedly the heads of the Clan
Cholla. While they had this territorial title, they
were also known by others. Both in Ireland and
Scotland they were frequently designated Rigli
Innsegall- — Kings of the Isles — and in the beginning
of the fifteenth century we find McYurich the bard
addressing his " Brosnacha Catha" to Donald of
Isla, King of Innse-gall. Both in Ireland and
Scotland the heads of the Clan Donald were called
Ardjiath Iniise Gall. On the other hand it is
undoubtedly the case that the Celtic or patriarchal
title of the heads of the family, down from the time
of the first Donald De He, was Macdhomhnuill.
There is only one signed charter from any of the
heads of the House of Isla, namely, the Gaelic
Charter by Donald of Harlaw, in 1408, and in this
deed he styles himself without any territorial
addition, simply as Macdonald. The Chiefs of Isla
were all Macdonald, from the time of Angus Mor
down to Donald Gallda, and Donald Dubh, who
were both proclaimed "Macdonald" in their unsuc-
cessful efforts to revive the fallen principality of the
Isles. In the arming of the last Lord of the Isles,
McYurich speaks of John as "Macdonald," the noble
son of Alexander, the heroic King of Fingall, and a
poem by a contemporary bard, quoted by the same
seannachie, begins with the words, " True is my
praise of Macdonald." In Ireland, also, from very
early times, the heads of the race were known by
the same Celtic title. In the Annals of Loch Ce,
1